Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Federal: members of the parliamentary opposition exercise full constitutional guarantees


yota691
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Botzwana said:

Where] the nine points of the agreement are published and victory.....2018/6/23 ......[Ayna-Baghdad]

announced the leader of a coalition going to Moqtada al-Sadr alliance with the head of the block Nasser Haider Abadi; to form the next government.

In a joint press conference with Abadi held in Najaf on Saturday, Al-Sadr read the nine points agreed upon by the two blocs:

1. Calling for a trans-ethnic and ethnic alliance that includes all components of the Iraqi people.

2 - Continue to fight corruption and remove the corrupt from the positions of the state and the government and provide those who prove the files of corruption to the Iraqi judiciary.

3 - forming a government of technocrats of competencies away from narrow quotas.

4 - support system" rel="">support and strengthen the army and police and security forces and the inventory of weapons by the state.

5. Develop a reform program to support system" rel="">support the Iraqi economy in all sectors.

6. Maintain a balanced relationship with all countries to achieve Iraq's interests, sovereignty and independence.

7 - support system" rel="">support the reform of the Iraqi justice system and activate the role of the prosecution.

8 - maintain the unity of Iraq and the land and people.

9. Emphasize the peaceful transfer of power.

 

   10. make sure all dinarians are well compensated for investing in iraq ........

  thanks botz. go cbi

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are we Done NOW ?

 

Can we get on with it ?

 

No calling a Mulligan . . . . No do overs . . . . No, oh just kidding, we're still counting with No " in the coming days " to be resolved horse poop.

 

July 1st quickly approaches - Fingers crossed not too much longer to wait.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, WheresmyRV? said:

Exactly what I am thinking Chuck, that whole county will go into full blown civil war.

I agree and that is not from the Minister of Propaganda speaking. These people will loose all faith in a democracy and it will be an all out free fall. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to Iraqi judiciary announces the transfer of ballot boxes from the areas of fraud to Baghdad
Iraqi judiciary announces the transfer of ballot boxes from the areas of fraud to BaghdadBox - Archive
 

Reuters

 
 
 
Iraq will recount votes in the May parliamentary elections only in areas reported in official reports of allegations of fraud or official complaints, a panel of judges assigned to the Independent High Electoral Commission (IHEC) said on Sunday.

The ballot box from areas where allegations of fraud were reported would be transferred to Baghdad, where the recount will be held in the presence of UN representatives at a date and venue to be determined later, the board of commissioners said in a statement.

 

The Iraqi parliament has demanded a nationwide recount after allegations of fraud and replacement of the Electoral Commission members by the Board of Commissioners. Judges interpreted the decision of the Federal Supreme Court on Thursday that they would manually re-categorize the funds suspected of forgery. 

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leaked documents reveal the refusal of the Federal Court to extend the life of Parliament

mahkma-500x269.jpg

 

BAGHDAD - The documents issued by the Federal Court, the refual to extend the life of parliament, no more than 30 days, to complete the tasks that require this at the request of the Presidency or the Prime Minister or the Presidency of Parliament

 

The Federal Supreme Court was formed on 01/21/2018 under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat Al-Mahmoud and the membership of judges Arwaq Mohammed Al-Saami Ja'far Naser Hussein, Akram Taha Mohammed, Akram Ahmad Baban, Mohammed Saeb al-Naqshbandi, Abboud Saleh al-Tamimi, Michael Shamshon, Krukis, and Hussein Abbas Abu al-Taman, who authorized the judiciary in the name of the people and issued a decision. "

According to the document, the Iraqi Council of Representatives / Office of the First Vice-President, asked the Federal Court

(No. 19/3/1) in 2018/1/17, entitled "Statement of Opinion - Interpretation of Constitutional Articles,

Which reads as follows:

1. Based on the provisions of Article I of Article 56 of the Constitution, the duration of the electoral cycle of the Council of Representatives shall be four

Calendar years beginning with the first session and ending at the end of the fourth year.

2. Based on the provisions of Article II of Article 56 of the Constitution, the new Council of Representatives is to be elected 45 days ago

From the date of the end of the previous electoral cycle.

3. According to the provisions of Article 7 / First, of the Law of Elections of the Council of Representatives No. 45 of 2013 must be conducted

Elections of the House of Representatives 45 days before the date of the end of the previous electoral cycle at least.

4. Based on article 7 / third of the Law of Elections of the Council of Representatives No. 45 of 2013, the date of elections shall be determined by a decision of the Council of Ministers and in coordination with the Independent High Electoral Commission and endorsed by the House of Representatives and issued by a presidential decree and announced by all media before the scheduled date for the duration of not less than About 90 days.

In accordance with the provisions of Article 93 / II of the Constitution, the Electoral Commission, in accordance with the principle of the Constitution and its supremacy over the laws, is obliged to conduct the elections within the time specified in Article 56 of Article II of the Constitution and Article 1 of Article 7 of the Constitution. Of the Law of Elections of the House of Representatives No. 45 of 2013 in the event that the House of Representatives does not approve the date set for elections by the Council of Ministers by the way prescribed in Article 7 / III of the above-mentioned election law.

 

Response of the Court

 

 

The Court's interpretation, according to the documents, was as follows: "The above request, as formulated by the Federal Supreme Court, was subject to scrutiny and deliberation and found its subject matter to be governed by Article 56, paragraph 1, of the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq for 2005, The first session and ends at the end of the fourth year », and the extrapolation of this text was found to be the text of the Constitution set the Constitution to start the duration of the electoral cycle of the House of Representatives and be effective from the first session and extends for four

Calendar years and the end of the fourth year of that session. "

The interpretation of the court that "this period is the duration of the mandate of the electoral cycle to exercise the functions prescribed and the effects of this measure and its results are considered null and void because the voter when he gave his vote to the person chosen by his representative in the Council in the Constitution and its end of the term of the session and become any action taken outside is not supported by the Constitution The deputies, gave him specific authorization in terms of duration and ends this authorization by the end of its term allocated in the Constitution is four calendar years and no one may skip it to skip it means to overcome the will of the people.

He pointed out that "this period can not be exceeded because it is skipped based on any text in a law that is contrary to the provisions of Article 13 of the Constitution, which states, first:« This Constitution is the law of nominal and highest in Iraq and be bound in all the fold without exception », "It is not permissible to enact a law that contradicts this constitution and invalidates every text contained in the constitutions of the territories or any other legal provision that conflicts with it."

The Federal Court, according to the interpretation, that "the only text that authorized the extension under the Constitution is the text of Article 58 / second, which is the possibility of extending the legislative term of the session of the House of Representatives no more than 30 days, to accomplish the tasks that require this at the request of the Presidency The Presidency, the Parliament or 50 members of the Parliament, provided that it does not exceed the duration of the electoral cycle because that is contrary to the provisions of Article 56 / First, the text of which reads ".

The House of Representatives, ended Sunday, June 24, 2018, read and discuss the Fourth Amendment

For the legislative elections, which provided for "extension of the life of parliament" until the ratification of the Federal Court

On the results of the elections and raise its meeting to next Thursday.

MP Talabani and the winning candidate in the elections for the Baghdad Alliance, confirmed that the work of Parliament

The current legislative session which began on 1 July 2014 will end next Saturday and the Constitution

It is never allowed to be extended.

Talabani said in a leaflet on its Facebook page, "MPs

The losers in the elections in vain try to change the will of the voter who has decided and voted, and their attempts to extend

The Parliament has been a constitutional violation and circumventing the legitimacy and the peaceful transfer of power. "

"According to Article (56) of the Constitution, which set the duration of the parliamentary session four years

Calendar begins with the first session and ends at the end of the fourth year, constitutional and legal and may not be extended

The life of this council, and its work ends next Saturday on the thirtieth of June 2018. "

The legal expert Tareq Harb, on Sunday, for his part, that the extension of the life of parliament needs to be amended

In the constitution and approval of the Iraqi people, between the Federal Court will invalidate the extension.

"Prime Minister Haider al-Abbadi has to send an inquiry," the newspaper Al-Sabah reported

To the Federal Court to express its opinion on the extension of the life of Parliament, "calling" the Federal Court to

Speeding up the matter by a single session, and waved a war to file a lawsuit with the judiciary to invalidate any law

Extend the life of the House of Representatives. "

"The extension of the life of parliament for more than the constitutional period, needs to amend the Constitution, which requires the consent of the people even if the extension of one day, because the extension of Parliament is different from the extension of the provincial council," adding that " An interest

General".

"The law is amended by a law by the parliament, but the constitution is not amended by a law as parliamentarians did during Friday's session," he said. "Even if the law reads a second reading, it will be subject to revocation by the Federal Supreme Court."

He pointed out that "the decision of the court is known, and the latest decision issued by the Court regarding the counting and sorting between the extension is during the holiday and not after the end of the life of parliament," noting that "the reference of some members of parliament that they will not receive salaries during the extension period is unacceptable."

"Parliament knows the position of the court and therefore no one has asked for a statement of opinion on extending the life of the parliament," he said.

"The Constitution has fixed the date and age of the House of Representatives four years from the date of the first session to be held, and the first session of the current House of Representatives was on 1 July 2014, that is, the life of parliament ends on 1 July 2018, and can be extended only by amending the Constitution.

He added that "in the event that the House of Representatives on such a step I will be the first to file a lawsuit with the judiciary to invalidate any law to extend the life of the House of Representatives," saying that "the abolition of such a law guaranteed and the Federal Court will cancel within a week or 10 days, You need evidence and proof. "(1)

20180625_033641-720.PNG

 

20180625_033618-112.PNG

 

20180625_033556-993.PNG

https://www.iraqpressagency.com/?p=277385

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to The federal court refuses to extend the life of parliament and considers it null and void of the Constitution.

The federal court refuses to extend the life of parliament and considers it null and void of the Constitution.

Readers

 

 

8
The federal court refuses to extend the life of parliament and considers it null and void of the Constitution.

 

26-06-2018 12:57 PM

 

The Euphrates -

 

Al-Furat news on the documents issued by the Federal Court and found the refusal to extend the life of parliament and considers it null and void the Constitution.

 

image.php?token=359b14e9069450ddaeba0822

 

image.php?token=e7f3c2e704eb68632a67e18a

 

image.php?token=5434f4397ded0d3fceafb78d

 

image.php?token=df0b8275413fa228c5cdc3e9

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Editorial date: 2018/6/26 9:00  751 times read
 
(Baghdad: Al Furat News) The Federal Supreme Court, rejected the extension of the life of the House of Representatives based on the law and the Iraqi constitution and considered it null and void the Constitution.
The court's interpretation that "the first paragraph of Article 56 of the Iraqi Constitution for 2005 and its text {shall be the duration of the electoral cycle of the Council of Representatives four calendar years, beginning with the first session and ends by the end of the fourth year) and the extrapolation of this text found that the text of the governor, The electoral cycle of the House of Representatives and be effective from the first session and extends for four calendar years and the end of the end of the fourth year of that session. 
The decision of the court that "this period is the duration of the mandate of the electoral cycle to exercise the functions provided for in the Constitution and end of the mandate of the session and become any action taken outside of it is not supported by the Constitution and considers the effects of this procedure and its results are null because the voter when he gave his vote to those chosen by his representative in the House of Representatives Give him specific authorization in terms of duration and ends this authorization by the end of his term in the Constitution is four calendar years. "
"It is not permissible for any party to skip this constitutional period because to overcome it means to overcome the will of the people, which proved this period from the beginning and end when he approved the articles of the Constitution through the general referendum, which took place on all articles, including Article (56 / I) and the people is the source and legitimacy of the authorities As provided for in Article 5 of the Constitution and may not violate his constitutional will. " 
The Federal Court said that "Based on the above, the Independent High Electoral Commission and the House of Representatives are required to implement article {56 / II} of the Constitution and the elections are held according to the time specified therein and not exceeding them. Another date for holding the general elections of the House of Representatives because this is an amendment to the provisions of Article { 56 / II] of the Constitution and in a manner contrary to the amendment of the articles mentioned in Article 126 thereof.
The House of Representatives, has finished last Sunday, after the resumption of the special session under the chairmanship of Salim al-Jubouri, Speaker of the House of Representatives, discuss the proposed amendment to the Fourth Law of the elections of the House of Representatives No. 45 of 2013, which provides for the extension of the work of Parliament "until the end of the process of counting and sorting the results of the election." 
The parliament, whose current session ends on June 30, will hold a session on Thursday to vote on the fourth amendment to the law
  • Upvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mr.unlikely said:

That’s good news for the people. You start extending the mandate once, suddenly it’s PM for life. M hats off to the federal supreme court of Iraq for getting that one right.

It seems to me that this is not an attempt by the PM Abadi to extend the current parliament beyond June 30 but rather the Speaker Jubori and  his non-re-elected henchmen (his and  Maliki's) to try and pull off another interminable extension  a la Malikis's back in 2010.  Opposing this extension is right out of the Sadr-Abadi clean-up playbook.

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎6‎/‎23‎/‎2018 at 7:57 PM, 10 YEARS LATER said:

Are we Done NOW ? Fingers crossed, not too much longer to wait.

 

                                                  

Related image
                                          Fingers.
  Related image
                                                Toes.
                             Image result for eyes crossed images
                                         Eyes.
 
 
Related image
                                                        Legs.
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me grounded...but Iran has a ton of pull within their political landscape...and corruption...while all this is great...actual charges being brought against Maliki, et al...would take a ton of doing, I'm not so sure that will actually happen. 

 

Interesting times we live in. Trump's shutting the door on Iran, etc. 

 

:twocents:

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

123......evidence against Maliki has been turned over to the International Courts about 2 years ago. He is on a short leash (IMO) and his day of reckoning is nearly at hand.

 

"The time for honoring yourself will soon be at an end, highness."

    ~ Russell Crowe in Gladiator, as he confronts Commodus ~

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, King Bean said:

123......evidence against Maliki has been turned over to the International Courts about 2 years ago. He is on a short leash (IMO) and his day of reckoning is nearly at hand.

 

"The time for honoring yourself will soon be at an end, highness."

    ~ Russell Crowe in Gladiator, as he confronts Commodus ~

Got your back KB 

 

  • Thanks 3
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, King Bean said:

 

                                                  

Related image
                                          Fingers.
  Related image
                                                Toes.
                             Image result for eyes crossed images
                                         Eyes.
 
 
Related image
                                                        Legs.

.....Gotta go with the legs...Been a leg man my entire life...follow the legs and they end at heaven...

  • Haha 4
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, King Bean said:

 

                                                  

Related image
                                          Fingers.
  Related image
                                                Toes.
                             Image result for eyes crossed images
                                         Eyes.
 
 
Related image
                                                        Legs.

 

:bravo: YIP YIP YAHOOOOOOO 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, King Bean said:

Thanks Wiljor. One of the best movies ever IMO. Best movie summer too. CastAway, Perfect Storm, Gladiator. :twothumbs:

 

Oh yea King Bean, totally agree my friend, one of the, if not the, best movie ever. I have seen it many times and it never gets boring. Sure wish we had a few Gladiators in this Shiite storm  😀

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Iraq and Medhat al-Mahmoud
 
Posted: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 09:38:49 | Views
 
 

 

The words of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful, are revealed to you. 
Among the commands of Imam Ali peace be upon him is much about justice and the importance of judging justice, his message to the owner of the famous Asharqat while his father was against Egypt, where he said, peace be upon him: 
"Choose to judge among the people the best of your community and stop them in suspicions, and take them with arguments, And they are strict when the ruling is clarified, which is not encouraged by praise, and is not supported by dumping). 
In a famous incident of the Umayyad caliph who was crowned by the Fifth Caliph, when one of the governors asked him for money to fortify the city, he replied: "Fortify it with justice and make its way from injustice."
 Salah al-Din al-Ayyubi also has a saying after his victory in the battle of Hittin. He said to his soldiers: "Do not think that I have owned the country with your swords, but by the just judge." 
The British Prime Minister during World War II Winston Churchill is famous when he asked his advisers and associates about the state of justice in his country, After the destruction of Britain's infrastructure and reached the bottom of the economy as a result of the war, they replied that he is fine, he said: As long as justice and justice in the country is fine,
Former French president Charles de Gaulle said: "If the judiciary is fine, France is safe, it is the mainstay of the advancement of the state." This statement was also made after the Second World War, so it is clear to you dear reader that Europe has overcome its ordeal and dark ages. The work of the judiciary work through the realization of the right and justice and equality in the issuance of judgments among people without dependence or fear or corruption. 
As we get closer in modern times and in a period of time not far away, we note the American judiciary, the most powerful and dominant state in the world, and it overturns the decisions of President Trump with all firmness and without fear, but vice versa.
Through these simple lines compare dear Iraqi citizen between these evidence and what is happening now in Iraq and the case of the Federal Court (Almdahtip) and how it became a game of corrupt politicians are driven by whatever they want and according to what requires their interests and all this because of the weakness of its president Medhat Mahmood and corruption, which bled the nose and became visible when Any decision that is in the interest of a particular party shall be driven by it as it wishes. 
I saw today many pictures and writings, although simple against the Mahmoud say you continue to write the thousand mile journey begins with a step, these writings and the simplicity intimidating the corrupt. 
 
 The Iraqi street knows very well that the cause of the destruction of the country is Medhat al-Mahmoud, President of the Federal Court (Almdahtih), in more than a situation and a serious incident affecting the country and his career takes Mahmud corrupt side and victory on the right and destroy the hopes of the Iraqi citizen in the realization of the right and the issuance of a decision taken by the public interest.
 
The Iraqi situation will not improve and will not change its limits if it does not reform the case of the Federal Court and have a strong president. It becomes a sword on the necks of the corrupt and rest in God for a suitable nation. The change will only happen through sacrifices. It is cheap to change the reality. The corrupt and corrupt country will not find any deterrent or force that prevents them from going on with their injustice, injustice and corruption as long as the Federal Court is in such a deteriorating situation. Your situation will not change unless you change the President of the Court (Medhat Al Mahmoud), who destroyed any hope of improving the reality. The country, and a revolution on the Sade on this non-Mahmoud, who applies justice Satan Aaadalh God in the earth, this only you will be in the right direction for change and access to refineries outstandingly countries that respect justice and the judiciary which is al-Faisal and his right and the largest head in the state.

They changed him, and he had a captain

The arrows of the spring

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Federal Court supports the mass count and contravenes the judges' decision

Journal June 30, 2018

 

260815101112_14_1-660x330.jpg

 

BAGHDAD - 
The Federal News reported the President of the Federal Court Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud, Saturday, a number of deputies supported the process of counting and manual hand-counting, indicating that the judges assigned to the Federal Court decisions against partial counting decision. 
MP MP Mishaan al-Jubouri said in a parliamentary session on Thursday that "the President of the Federal Court Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud confirmed the presence of a number of deputies on the violation of the decision of the judges in the Electoral Commission to conduct the process of counting and partial sorting of what was supported by the Federal Court to conduct a comprehensive counting of all stations." 
He added that "the purchase of the receivables of a number of directors of polling stations outside Iraq on the basis of agreements between some political parties for large sums of money for the purpose of manipulating the results."
For his part, MPs Ahmad al-Masari and Ahmad al-Jubouri said during the deliberative session, "We support what MP Mishan al-Jubouri, supported by the President of the Federal Court to conduct the counting and counting of electoral votes instead of enumeration and partial counting approved by the judges assigned."Stressing "the possibility of challenging the process of counting and partial sorting."

http://www.aljournal.com/المحكمة-الاتحادية-تؤيد-العد-الشامل-وت/

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to The Federal Court supports the mass count and contravenes the judges' decision

The federal government issued a constitutional provision on the commitment of the provinces in the general contexts of the Council of Ministers and the mechanism for the appointment of senior positions

Readers

 

 

8
The federal government issued a constitutional provision on the commitment of the provinces in the general contexts of the Council of Ministers and the mechanism for the appointment of senior positions

 

01-07-2018 01:51 PM

 

The Euphrates -


The Federal Supreme Court confirmed that the provincial councils must abide by the general contexts of the Council of Ministers, pointing out that the approval of the competent minister to appoint senior positions in the provinces does not conflict with the Constitution.

The court spokesman Ayas al-Samuk said that the Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all members of the judges and considered the appeal against the unconstitutionality of paragraph (1) of Article (II) of Article (4) The approval of the Minister to appoint or hold senior positions in the province if the conditions for the candidate is not available in it.

He added that 'the Federal Supreme Court found that the text subject to appeal does not conflict with the provisions of the Constitution that the conditions that must be provided in the candidates for senior positions in the province requires coordination with the federal government that set these conditions, and the approval of the Council of Ministers that a context for those who is the degree Director-general, so effective that the text subject to appeal does not conflict with the provisions of the Constitution '.

He pointed out that 'the plaintiff - the President of the Council of the province of Maysan / in addition to his job - also challenged his claim unconstitutional article (11) of the amendment law, which requires the province to maintain public contexts prescribed by the Council of Ministers'.

The official spokesman stated that 'the Federal Supreme Court found the Council of Ministers and based on the provisions of Article (80 / I) of the Constitution is the one who plans and implements the general policy of the state, so the duty contained in the article subject to appeal is based on the article mentioned in the Constitution, The Federal Supreme Court has decided to dismiss the case because it is not based on a constitution. '

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to The Federal Court emphasizes that the provincial councils must abide by the general contexts of the Council of Ministers
01-07-2018 01:45 PM
image.php?token=4d6e47ab149c633b7ec8c86ddfff3229&size=
 


 

 

The Federal Supreme Court confirmed on Sunday that the provincial councils must abide by the general contexts of the Council of Ministers, pointing out that the approval of the competent minister to appoint senior positions in the provinces does not contradict with the Constitution. 

"The Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat Al-Mahmoud and the attendance of all the judges and considered the appeal against the unconstitutionality of paragraph (1) of Article (II) of Article (4) of the Amendment Law Third of the law of the provinces, including the need to approve the minister to appoint senior positions in the province or rejected if the conditions of the candidate is not available in it.

The statement added that "the Federal Supreme Court found that the text subject to appeal does not conflict with the provisions of the Constitution that the conditions that must be provided in the candidates for senior positions in the province requires coordination with the federal government that set these conditions, and the approval of the Council of Ministers that a context for those who Is the rank of director general, so effective that the text subject to appeal does not conflict with the provisions of the Constitution. 

The statement pointed out that "the plaintiff - the President of the Council of Maysan province, in addition to his job - also challenged his claim to the unconstitutionality of Article (11) of the amendment law, which requires the province to maintain public contexts set by the Council of Ministers.

The statement said that "the Federal Supreme Court found the Council of Ministers and based on the provisions of Article (80 / I) of the Constitution is to plan and implement the general policy of the state, so the obligation contained in the article subject to appeal based on the article mentioned in the Constitution, The Federal Supreme Court decided to respond to the case because it is not based on the Constitution. "

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to Federal: members of the parliamentary opposition exercise full constitutional guarantees
  • Adam Montana locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.