Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Iraqi Supreme Court: Article 140 is in force and must be implemented


yota691
 Share

Recommended Posts

NT-231748-636566180018306123.jpeg

The change reveals documents issued by the Federal Court decision of the constitutionality of Article 140

The policy of  March 14, 2018 on change reveal documents Federal Court issued its decision on the constitutionality of article 140 closed 53 visits

 

Baghdad / SNG

 

The head of the Change Bloc MP Amin Bakr said Wednesday that the Federal Court, within its response to a query sent by him, pointed out that Article 140 of the Constitution is a valid and valid and non-expired article, while noting that the Federal Court responded by interpreting trolls with turbid water.

Bakr said in a press conference held in the parliament building and attended by SNG, that "the Federal Court has indicated in response to a query presented to it on the definition of disputed areas in November last year, that the disputed areas are areas that were administered by Kurdistan on March 19 2003 This means that the meaning of the disputed areas are the provinces of Arbil, Dahuk and Sulaymaniyah, which is not true and a clear gap in the interpretation of the Federal Court.

 
Bakr added, "We filed a request last February to the Presidency of the Parliament to address the Federal Court on the interpretation and demand to reconsider the interpretation where the Federal Court replied to our inquiry on atheist ten of this month that the Federal Court believes that the disputed areas are areas that were not managed before Kurdistan Regional Government on March 19, 2003 in the governorates of Dohuk, Erbil, Sulaymaniyah, Kirkuk, Diyala and Nineveh, and that the resolution of this issue be made by the committee formed in accordance with Article 140 of the Constitution.

 

Bakr said: "We can respond to some trolls water turbidity on two important things is that some say that Kirkuk is only a disputed area and the interpretation of the Federal Court binding for all the picture is clear that all of these areas have a disputed status, the other is related to the auctions of some That the Constitutional Article 140 is a finished article, the interpretation of the Court stressed the fate of those areas in accordance with that article and this clearly means that it is a valid article and the basis for resolving the issue of disputed areas in accordance with the mechanisms that have been established to resolve.

Bakr said that "this decision of the Federal Court this means that the rights behind them are not going to die and the delay of recovery, and here is the Federal Supreme Court confirms a binding decision that article 140 of the Constitution is a living substance in force."

Article 140 of the Iraqi Constitution provides for the normalization of the situation in the province of Kirkuk and the disputed areas in other provinces such as Nineveh and Diyala, and set a period of time ended on the thirty-first of December 2007 to implement all the provisions contained in this article, and left the people of those areas freedom Self-determination whether by remaining an independent administrative unit or appended to the Kurdistan region of Iraq through the organization of a referendum, but several obstacles led to the delay of the implementation of some of the basic items in the article for reasons that politicians say the Kurds are political, while Baghdad says that the delay is not deliberate, The competent ministerial application of article that carried out some of its clauses, such as compensation for those affected, have not been implemented in the most important of which is the referendum on the fate of the city.

While the Kurds strongly support the implementation of Article 140 of the Constitution, a section of Arabs and Turkmen in Kirkuk and other areas opposed to their implementation, for fear of the possibility of annexing oil-rich province to the Kurdistan region, after accusing the Kurdish parties to bring hundreds of thousands of Kurdish population of the city to change its demographic identity, Saddam Hussein also brought others hundreds of thousands of Arab population in the seventies and eighties of the last century within the policy of Arabization, which applied in those areas at the time.

636566175770609352-111111111111111122.jp

636566176249994279-22222222222222%D8%B6%

636566176503492654-33333333333333%D8%B6%

  • Thanks 3
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Wednesday, March 14,

 

Search Bigger
 
 
 
 
 
 

Alsumaria News / Baghdad , 
said MP from the Turkmen component architecture Niazi Ihsanoglu, Wednesday, that the Federal Court 's decision on Article 140 is contrary to the Constitution, noting that the Court were not successful time issuing the decision, while the possibility of the success of the committee formed to implement article implementation of its ruled out. 

"The decision of the Federal Court, although it is binding and binding for all, but there is a time limit for Article 140, which ends on 30 December 2007, a clear and explicit constitutional provision, and therefore they are contrary to the decision to enter into Article 140," said Oglu in an interview with Alsumaria News, Noting that "the recent period of the imposition of law and order in the areas of intermittent and exceeded and occupied and different and not disputed, created a need for some to revive the clinical situation of Article 140 ended a decade ago."

 


"The attempt to revive Article 140 at this time and near the elections is a serious mistake and fought against the national project after October 16, 2017, and the Federal Court was not successful to issue its decision," adding that "the Iraqi constitution is fragile and flexible and gives more than one explanation for each Material and subject to the jurisprudence of the Federal Court unfortunately, evidence that there are more than 50 constitutional articles need to enact laws detailed them. 

"The return to Article 140 does not give us a solution because the committee formed to implement Article 140 can not accomplish its work because of the many inconsistencies and differences that hinder the work of the Committee." 

The head of the Change Bloc MP Amin Bakr Revealed on Wednesday that the Federal Court, within its response to a query sent from him, pointed out that Article 140 of the Constitution is a valid and valid and non-expired article, while he pointed out that the Federal Court responded by interpreting trolls with turbid water.

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Wednesday, March 14
-
 
+
 
Search Bigger
 
 
 
 
 
 

Alsumaria News / Baghdad 
announced the head of change parliamentary secretary Bakr, Wednesday that the Federal Court within its response to a query sender of it indicated that Article 140 of the Constitution is a material force and effect and unfinished, while noting that the Federal Court rejected the interpretation phishers water Aker. 

Bakr said in a press conference held in the House of Parliament and attended by Alsumaria News, that "the Federal Court has already indicated in response to a query presented to it on the definition of disputed areas in November last year, that the disputed areas are areas that were administered by Kurdistan on 19 March 2003 and this means that the meaning of the disputed areas are the provinces of Arbil, Dahukand Sulaymaniyah, which is not true and a clear gap interpretation of the Federal Court.

 

 


Bakr added, "We filed a request last February to the Presidency of the Parliament to address the Federal Court on the interpretation and demand to reconsider the interpretation where the Federal Court replied to our inquiry on atheist ten of this month that the Federal Court believes that the disputed areas are areas that were not managed before Kurdistan Regional Government on March 19, 2003 in the governorates of Dohuk, Erbil, Sulaymaniyah, KirkukDiyala and Nineveh, and that the resolution of this issue be made by the committee formed in accordance with Article 140 of the Constitution.

Bakr said: "We can respond to some trolls water turbidity on two important things is that some say that Kirkuk is only a disputed area and the interpretation of the Federal Court binding for all the picture is clear that all of these areas have a disputed status, the other is related to the auctions of some That the Constitutional Article 140 is a finished article, the interpretation of the Court stressed the fate of those areas in accordance with that article and this clearly means that it is a valid article and the basis for resolving the issue of disputed areas in accordance with the mechanisms that have been established to resolve. 

Bakr said that "this decision of the Federal Court this means that the rights behind them are not going to die and the delay of recovery, and here is the Federal Supreme Court confirms a binding decision that article 140 of the Constitution is a living substance in force."

Article 140 of the Iraqi Constitution provides for the normalization of the situation in the province of Kirkuk and the disputed areas in other provinces such as Nineveh and Diyala, and set a period of time ended on the thirty-first of December 2007 to implement all the provisions contained in this article, and left the people of those areas freedom Self-determination whether by remaining an independent administrative unit or appended to the Kurdistan region of Iraq through the organization of a referendum, but several obstacles led to the delay of the implementation of some of the basic items in the article for reasons that politicians say the Kurds are political, while Baghdad says that the delay is not deliberate, The competent ministerial application of article that carried out some of its clauses, such as compensation for those affected, have not been implemented in the most important of which is the referendum on the fate of the city.

While the Kurds strongly support the implementation of Article 140 of the Constitution, a section of Arabs and Turkmen in Kirkuk and other areas opposed to their implementation, for fear of the possibility of annexing oil-rich province to the Kurdistan region, after accusing the Kurdish parties to bring hundreds of thousands of Kurdish population of the city to change its demographic identity, Saddam Hussein also brought others hundreds of thousands of Arab population in the seventies and eighties of the last century within the policy of Arabization, which applied in those areas at the time.


636566175770609352-111111111111111122.jp

636566176249994279-22222222222222%D8%B6%

636566176503492654-33333333333333%D8%B6%

  • Thanks 3
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, mylilpony said:

AWESOMESAUCE ;)

 

I read the above article Twice - I have Brain ache - My Chemo Brain Fog is making things very murky . . . What the hell are they really going on about. Art.140 is constitutional & not implemented ? CrapI hate this haze . . . HELP :unsure:

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

its always about money and no one wants to get the short end of the deal when the deal making is going down , its good to even read them revisiting art.140 , the exchange rate, baghdad and kurdistan trying to work together ect. can't happen fast enough...

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Yota....Somebody's got to hold the small-end of that stick...The Federal Court just basically sided with the constitutionality of Article 140...The (a) decision has been made...now whether this will sets presidence in the integrity of a Federal Court decision is to be observed....

Edited by skeetdog
Brain fart
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, 10 YEARS LATER said:

 

I read the above article Twice - I have Brain ache - My Chemo Brain Fog is making things very murky . . . What the hell are they really going on about. Art.140 is constitutional & not implemented ? CrapI hate this haze . . . HELP :unsure:

 

I second that...

And we all are pulling for you my friend.

 

B/A

Edited by bostonangler
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to The Turkmen Front in Kirkuk demands Kurdish leaders to put Article 140 aside to solve the problems of the province
 
BAGHDAD / 

Kirkuk, Oct. 16 (AKnews) - The Iraqi Turkmen Front in Kirkuk confirmed on Sunday that Kirkuk after October 16, after the federal forces took control of the city, became an Iraqi province for all components of the city.

"After October 16, after the federal forces took control of the city, Kirkuk became an Iraqi province for all the components of the city," Samaan told Al-Ghad Press. 

"In the Turkmen front, we reject what some Arab legislators in the province state that Kirkuk is Arab," he said. 

"These deputies have never been in the defense of the rights of the people of Kirkuk and what they are doing now is just for electoral propaganda." 

"It is necessary to apply Article 23 of the Constitution, which provides for the fair distribution of the components of Kirkuk by 32%," and 

demanded Kurdish leaders to "sit at the negotiating table with the federal government and resolve the outstanding problems among them around the disputed areas and put Article 140 aside and work Article 23 because it is the solution To solve problems in Kirkuk. "
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to The "disputed" areas ... the first crises awaiting the new Iraqi parliament
The "disputed" areas ... the first crises awaiting the new Iraqi parliament
 
 
 
 
 

The deportation of the disputed areas between Baghdad and Erbil  to the next parliament, scheduled for birth a few weeks from now, necessarily means that the first crises awaiting parliament related to Article 140 of the Constitution on the determination of the fate of these areas. Kurdish officials have vowed to open the disputed territories after the formation of parliament and government after the May elections And push for the implementation of Article 140 of the Constitution, while officials in Baghdad want to amend the article and the abolition of the term of disputed areas, on the grounds that the control of these areas and management by the federal government is a matter of settlement, and any of those towns is no less important than Baghdad or Najaf or Falluja. The "disputed" areas form a strip of more than 1,000 kilometers extending from the border with Syria to the Iranian border, with an area of about 48,000 km. This strip passes through the three autonomous governorates of Erbil, Sulaymaniyah and Dohuk, which includes land in Nineveh, Erbil, Salah al-Din and Diyala governorates, as well as the province of Kirkuk, the latter being the richest by containing oil.These areas are particularly important, with about a third of Iraqi oil, as well as large gas fields, other than border areas with Turkey and Iran of a commercial nature.


Kurdish forces want to apply Article 140 of the Constitution on the determination of the fate of these areas 

"

Historically, the majority of these areas have Arab origins, either Christian or Islamic, but have changed over the past century due to Kurdish immigration from Iranian and Turkish border areas. These include Syria, which is also neighboring Iraq, most of them mountainous. A mixture of Iraqi and Iraqi ethnic groups, Arabs, Kurds, Turkmen, Muslims and Christians is currently living in these areas.

The Constitution, adopted in 2005, through Article 140, to determine the formula to resolve the fate of mixed areas, which says Erbil that it is Kurdish or a Kurdish majority, to organize a census of the population and then hold a referendum allows the population there between staying under the authority of the central state or introversion Under the administration of Kurdistan. But the article was not implemented because of political problems and accusations from Baghdad to Erbil to carry out demographic changes in their favor and the expulsion of Arab Muslims and Christians and the resettlement of Kurds from areas within the Kurdistan region in the disputed areas. Baghdad insists that the territory of Kurdistan will remain until 2003, the main or the so-called Green Line, which is the borders of the three governorates of Kurdistan, Erbil, Dohuk and Sulaymaniyah administrative, while the areas that include the Kurdish component outside the borders of the region known under the administration of the federal government including Kirkuk, The administrative borders of the provinces of Nineveh, Diyala and Salahuddin.
 


Although Erbil was included in the referendum it organized to secede from Iraq in 2017, the massive military campaign launched by Baghdad with the participation of tens of thousands of soldiers and air cover led to the expulsion of Kurdish forces (Peshmerga) in mid-October last year Of the majority of those areas and their return to the 2003 borders.


The disputed areas constitute a strip of more than 1,000 kilometers extending from the border with Syria to the Iranian border 

"

Baghdad imposed its authority on these areas four years after the seizure of Erbil after an invasion calling for Iraq, by authorizing the Iraqi parliament to Prime Minister Haider Abadi about this military move, which also included hundreds of oil wells and gas fields in that region.

And experiencing these regions weeks ago significant tension , with the proximity of the parliamentary elections, amid statements by Kurdish politicians about being pressured by the "popular crowd" forces and deny the recent so.

A senior Kurdish official in Erbil, who has held a cabinet post in Nuri al-Maliki's government, says there is a plot already hatched in Baghdad for the next parliament. "Sunni and Shiite Arabs, as well as Christians in the Nineveh Plain, will challenge the Kurds as usual in such cases, and there is agreement on the disputed areas," he said. "We are trying to form a committee from now on to prepare for this file legally and in front of international forums," said the Kurdish official, who declined to be named. "The Sunni and Shiite forces agreed that the criterion for defining the affinity of these areas would be the 1998 census, under the pretext that Erbil carried out major demographic changes in those areas and wanted us to return to Saddam Hussein's borders," he said.

In the context, confirms the leadership in the Kurdistan Democratic Party, led by former provincial president Massoud Barzani, Najiba Najib, that "the Kurdish parties, especially the ruling now in Kurdistan, will work during the next parliamentary phase to apply Article 140 of the Iraqi constitution, and address the file of the joint administration of disputed areas on her". And draws in the interview with the "new Arab", that "the next parliament will go towards the application of the article and its implementation after the long period of freezing the movement of Kurdish forces in the areas adjacent to the region." It warns that "without activating this article, the disputed areas will not enjoy security, political and economic stability."


For his part, says a member of the legal committee in the Iraqi parliament, Sadiq al-Laban, "The government's decision on Article 140, constitutional and flawless If the Kurds open the file of this article in parliament for reading or take new action on areas that the government seeks The law will be the rule, and through it we can satisfy the Kurds or convince them that what they want is illegal. " Al-Labban said in an interview with "The New Arab" that "things are fraught with time, the steps of the Iraqi components in the next stage may change or develop." No one knows the direction of the Kurds in the next stage, but what we know is that the law will apply and will be above all. Baghdad's decision to deploy its military forces in the Iraqi areas belonging to Article 140 is constitutional and not to be wrong. "

In parallel, the representative of the Arab component in the local council in Kirkuk, Borhan al-Asi, refuses to return the Kurdish Peshmerga forces to his city. "The Kurdish forces entered Kirkuk and the disputed areas when the Iraqi state was weak, and the terrorist groups messed with the local security, and came to protect the Kurdistan region and not to protect Iraqi areas," he said. "The social situation in Kirkuk currently does not accept the idea of returning Peshmerga to it, and even the rest of the areas such as Sinjar and another in the province of Salah al-Din." He pointed out that "Kirkuk according to the Iraqi constitution is Iraqi, and no place for the central non-federal authority represented by Baghdad and its decisions, both in terms of security or political."

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the newly elected will already have a reason NOT to show up ?? Priceless. Previous fools left a chunk of laws still needing a vote, as I recall. I think they will start with the important ones...like if you marry your favorite camel, will she be required to wear a burka?? And law to determine if shooting camel spiders is a sport??

  • Haha 3
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're all waiting for the election, the budget, the HCL, the end of violence, the new moon, the... Well, you get the picture we are all waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting... Okay I'm tired of waiting, every year it is the same crap. The new government, the new budget, the new CBI, the new lower denomination, the new moon, the big screens in the square... Whew.... Okay, I feel a little better now!!!

 

B.A

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, ChuckFinley said:

These guys make everything a world crisis. 

Sensationalism at its finest.Almost seems they want to make it sound like they are superior in ways unimagined.. not sure if the article writer or the Iraqi's themselves are bi-polar.illusions of grandeur seem to be in play.Anyone know what their average level of education is compared to others around the globe? 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, ChuckFinley said:

These guys make everything a world crisis. 

 

3 minutes ago, js214 said:

Sensationalism at its finest.Almost seems they want to make it sound like they are superior in ways unimagined.. not sure if the article writer or the Iraqi's themselves are bi-polar.illusions of grandeur seem to be in play.Anyone know what their average level of education is compared to others around the globe? 

 

Too, Too Many Divas in that crowd . . . Snickers Bars should be the go to brand of candy bars for this mob. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, js214 said:

Sensationalism at its finest.Almost seems they want to make it sound like they are superior in ways unimagined.. not sure if the article writer or the Iraqi's themselves are bi-polar.illusions of grandeur seem to be in play.Anyone know what their average level of education is compared to others around the globe? 

These guys have a minimal education but are just crooks or they are educated from some families ties and are crooked. In both cases taking over the family business.  

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ChuckFinley said:

These guys have a minimal education but are just crooks or they are educated from some families ties and are crooked. In both cases taking over the family business.  

With the conditions they endure I imagine many would be.I do hope they are getting some sort of outside council and truly shown a better way for their people , and the process 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, js214 said:

With the conditions they endure I imagine many would be.I do hope they are getting some sort of outside council and truly shown a better way for their people , and the process 

I really hope they are but I feel that people has stepped back and let this country figure it out for themselves.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


the Supreme Iraqi Court: Article 140 is in force and must be implemented

Iraqi Supreme Court: Article 140 is in force and must be implemented
 
 Twilight News    
 
 2 hours ago
 
 

The Supreme Federal Court issued a decision on constitutional article 140, noting that it is one of the important articles of the Constitution and does not die in any way.

The legal expert Khalil Mirani said in an interview with the official website of the Kurdistan Democratic Party that the Federal Supreme Court issued a few days ago its decision on the constitutional article 140, explaining that according to the court's decision, Article 140 of the articles of the Iraqi Constitution is not in any form and must be implemented, he said.

He added that "the decision came in response to the people and the Iraqi forces, which claimed that the 140 has expired, but the Kurds insist on it, because the Iraqi authorities when the implementation of any constitutional article in favor of the Kurds do not implement."

The legal expert pointed out that "the Kurds have been busy during the last period of building Iraq to live all Iraqi people under the state in all their components after 80 years of dictatorship and become a federal democracy," but added that "it appeared that those who ascend the throne of power in Iraq governed by mentality Previous itself ".

He stressed that "the implementation of Article 140 until 2007, but it was not implemented, because of Baghdad," pointing out that "the Kurds will not give up those areas of Kurdistan, which falls within the constitutional Article 140."

He explained that "most of those areas were until last year under the authority of the Kurdistan Region," but added that "because of some traitors, the region lost those territories."

"The people should punish the traitors who caused this great betrayal in the loss of part of the territory of Kurdistan," he said.

 
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Butifldrm said:


the Supreme Iraqi Court: Article 140 is in force and must be implemented

Iraqi Supreme Court: Article 140 is in force and must be implemented
 
 

The legal expert Khalil Mirani said in an interview with the official website of the Kurdistan Democratic Party that the Federal Supreme Court issued a few days ago its decision on the constitutional article 140, explaining that according to the court's decision, Article 140 of the articles of the Iraqi Constitution is not in any form and must be implemented, he said.

 

 

 

Let's get it done!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to Iraqi Supreme Court: Article 140 is in force and must be implemented

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.