Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Trump's New White House Communications Director Believes The Earth Is 5,500 Years Old


Recommended Posts

960x0.jpg?fit=scale

Anthony Scaramucci, the new White House communications director (Credit: Fabrice Coffrini/AFP/Getty Images)

In a flurry of activity last week, Anthony Scaramucci became the White House communications director while President Trump accepted Sean Spicer's resignation. In doing so, President Trump gave one of the biggest microphones in the world to someone who believes the Earth is 5,500 years old.

Scaramucci, one of many Wall Streeters who now influence the Trump Administration, is known for his business acumen as a salesman. Unfortunately, that does not translate into the realm of science, to which Scaramucci unfoundedly disagrees with basic conclusions of science.

In an interview on CNN in 2016 Scaramucci compared the consensus on climate change to the once held belief that the world is flat. First, the ancient Greeks, 2,000 years ago, believed we lived on a sphere. Yes, there were scientists that believed the Earth was flat, yet when presented with solid evidence otherwise the science community eventually changed their stance.

 

This is an example of where data led to a change in belief about our world. In the scenario of climate change, there is overwhelming data that points toward human's influence in rapidly changing the climate. We are in a similar era of accepting the Earth is in fact round, whereby data is presented to alter our mindset of how the Earth operates.

A 2015 Pew Research Center survey found significant differences in what scientists and the public believe on several issues, one of which is climate change. The report found that 94% of scientists say climate change is "very serious" compared to 65% of the public. In addition, 87% of scientists blame human activity on modern climate change, compared to 50% of the public.

 

In the same interview Scaramucci said he believes the Earth is 5,500 years old, saying the scientific community has gotten things wrong in the past; a similar argument used for his belief in climate change.

"You're saying the scientific community knows, and I'm saying people have gotten things wrong throughout the 5,500-year history of our planet," said Scaramucci in the interview.

Scaramucci goes on to say that human history is 5,500 years old. It's unclear whether he believes both or only the latter. However, written history dates back to over 5,500 years while human artifacts date back well over 10,000 years.

Any scientist will openly admit the scientific community has gotten things wrong in the past. However, hard facts and data has eventually prevailed and changed that understanding. Discrediting the vast amount of data that the Earth is 4.54 billion years old because sometimes scientists have gotten it wrong in the past is illogical.

That's like telling a doctor you no longer believe in modern cancer treatment because doctors used mercury to heal ailments in 1,500 BC.

Scaramucci has the right to doubt the science of climate change or the age of the Earth. Skepticism is a key component of furthering our understanding of the world and something most scientists are used to. However, it becomes dangerous when elected officials frame their decisions around a disbelief of science. At the moment, Scaramucci is putting his personal beliefs before the best interests of his constituents.

For instance, imagine a politician in Flint, Michigan saying they don't believe that high concentrations of iron in water is dangerous to human health. He discredits the science surrounding lead poisoning and claims there is no consensus. Then, that politician goes on to make dangerous policy decisions surrounding that disbelief.

President Trump has surrounded himself with science deniers, whether intentionally or not. Thus, we find ourselves in a difficult situation whereby policy will be decided based on a disbelief of science and disregard for the fundamentals of data driven conclusions.

 

Trevor Nace is a geologist, Forbes contributor, founder of Science Trends, and adventurer. Follow his journey

https://www.forbes.com/sites/trevornace/2017/07/27/trumps-new-white-house-communications-director-believes-earth-5500-years-old/#47b0785e35a0

 

Okay now this is just silly...

B/A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure on the exact age of the Earth but I can see the Creationist argument that modern day Geologist have used cyclical reasoning to determine an origin date for the planet. Let me try to explain.

 

The scientific community has defined paleontological periods based upon fossil evidence and pre-conceived influences such as evolution that has mandated geological periods far greater than could ever be proven or validated through some scientific means. For example, carbon dating is the most accurate and only method to accurately put some kind of date on any fossil evidence and this method is only accurate to several thousand years. How is it that geological periods of 100's of Millions or even Billions of years can be determined? 

 

The theory of evolution is based upon the idea that inter-species evolution happens, but if the true age of the Earth is much much less than most in the scientific community believe, than the theory quickly loses validity.

 

Indy 

Edited by Indraman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One theory is that when God created the earth it was created to look old. So the carbon dating would be accurate "if" the Earth was "actually" old.

 

Some scholars go by the 1 day is a 1000 years in the creation account.

Edited by nstoolman1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scaramucci in furious, foul-mouthed attack on White House rivals

 

Scaramucci attacks Bannon and calls Priebus ‘fuxxxng paranoid schizophrenic’

 

Extraordinary tirade raises prospect of all-out civil war at the White House

 

 

David Smith in Washington

Friday 28 July 2017 07.32 BST

 

 

 

Vid in link

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/27/anthony-scaramucci-white-house-reince-priebus-steve-bannon

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.