Injury to a member of the US Congressional shooting

[nstoolman1]

Let me re post this. 

 

 

 

[FlyHi]

This is "incident" is actually more sinister than first glance impression.

In my view this is part of a co-ordinated attack on all current government  members (Trump and Sessions included) who after draining the swamp. Remember at the end of May Scalise came out with a video calling for the end to human trafficking.

This shooting is all about the current government who has the pedophiles and human traffickers in their sight.

Simply because if these sicko's were caught and dealt with, half the government bureaucracy would be put away.

so to protect themselves they will aim at assassination  of the top brass in the government.

 

Prayers up for your true leadership to stand their ground in the face of this evil

[MyLadiesDaddy]

6 hours ago, FlyHi said:

This is "incident" is actually more sinister than first glance impression.

In my view this is part of a co-ordinated attack on all current government  members (Trump and Sessions included) who after draining the swamp. Remember at the end of May Scalise came out with a video calling for the end to human trafficking.

This shooting is all about the current government who has the pedophiles and human traffickers in their sight.

Simply because if these sicko's were caught and dealt with, half the government bureaucracy would be put away.

so to protect themselves they will aim at assassination  of the top brass in the government.

 

Prayers up for your true leadership to stand their ground in the face of this evil

I've been saying this for decades.

[yota691]

Virginia governor says we lose 93 MILLION Americans a day to gun violence

[Indraman]

And the funny thing is, not one reporter knew that his claims were wildly incorrect. Let me analyze how far off he was... 

 

93 million / day = 3.494 days before everyone in America is dead. 

 

Indy 

[Indraman]

1 minute ago, Indraman said:

And the funny thing is, not one reporter knew that his claims were wildly incorrect. Let me analyze how far off he was... 

 

93 million / day = 3.494 days before everyone in America is dead. 

 

Indy 

 

After thinking about this some more, I just think he had sun burn and the sun was on his mind...after all the distance between the Earth and Sun is 93 million miles. 

 

Indy 

[yota691]

The Savage Nation with Michael Savage - June 14 2017 [HOURS 2 & 3] The result of leftist incitement

[Shabibilicious]

1 hour ago, Indraman said:

...after all the distance between the Earth and Sun is 93 million miles. 

 

Indy 

 

I saw what you did there, Indy.  And me being a true believer of ball earth....I like it.  

 

GO RV, then BV

[Shabibilicious]

1 hour ago, Indraman said:

And the funny thing is, not one reporter knew that his claims were wildly incorrect. Let me analyze how far off he was... 

 

93 million / day = 3.494 days before everyone in America is dead. 

 

Indy 

 

People make unsupported idiotic claims all the time....take the POTUS for example..  

 

GO RV, then BV

[SnowGlobe7]

6 hours ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

People make unsupported idiotic claims all the time....take the POTUS for example..  

 

GO RV, then BV

or gurus.....

[bostonangler]

2 minutes ago, SnowGlobe7 said:

or gurus.....

 

Truer words have never been spoken.

 

B/A

[MyLadiesDaddy]

55 minutes ago, SnowGlobe7 said:

or gurus.....

Or dumb azz truckers who believe the word of God literally. Which is what he was truly insinuating 

[adhoc10]

On 6/14/2017 at 10:24 AM, SgtFuryUSCZ said:

The terroristic rhetoric from the left has got to stop. 

 

We pointed out only yesterday, on these very Boards, the magnitude of the calls to hate by the left.

 

ENOUGH.

I have to admit that I am confused as to who is left and who is right and I've wanted to ask for clarification for a while now.  It would appear that the actions of the current administration would put them more in the left zone, things like bans on travel, violation of human rights, stripping of basic health care, etc. Whereas ensuring people have a quality of life, livable wages, creating a world where there doesn't need to be environmental protection, etc, would put them in the right zone. Is that how you look at it? 

 

 

 

[tankdude]

[nstoolman1]

There is no health care mandate in the Constitution,

There is no Dept of Education mandate in the Constitution.

There is no Dept of Energy mandate in the Constitution. 

There is an obligation to protect our boarders and the US citizens here and abroad

Preventing a certain type of person from entering does that. ( Not sure why this is so hard to understand) Other countries practice this and where is the outcry against them?

There is no travel ban for US citizens.  (In fact it might be nice if some of them left. Jmho) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

The Bird We know wouldn't tolerate the leftists who are trying to destroy this Republic by

 

"fundamentally changing" it.

 

 

Calls by the extreme leftists today to trash Our Constitution are appalling.

 

 

Unless you come to terms with the fact that a deep-state enemy is within and destroying US,

 

who insist on the kumbaya rhetoric you are commanded by them to adopt or be labeled hateful, racist, bigoted, etc...

 

you will fail to take a stand for Truth, Justice and The American Way and allow them to accomplish what they want...

 

 

Don't be THAT guy.... that traitorous enabler... who fears being labeled by them, so unwittingly become a party to their EVIL.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

8 minutes ago, nstoolman1 said:

There is no health care mandate in the Constitution,

There is no Dept of Education mandate in the Constitution.

There is no Dept of Energy mandate in the Constitution. 

There is an obligation to protect our boarders and the US citizens here and abroad

Preventing a certain type of person from entering does that. ( Not sure why this is so hard to understand) Other countries practice this and where is the outcry against them?

There is no travel ban for US citizens.  (In fact it might be nice if some of them left. Jmho) 

***///

 

Bravo, NSTOOLMAN !  

[Indraman]

5 hours ago, adhoc10 said:

I have to admit that I am confused as to who is left and who is right and I've wanted to ask for clarification for a while now.  It would appear that the actions of the current administration would put them more in the left zone, things like bans on travel, violation of human rights, stripping of basic health care, etc. Whereas ensuring people have a quality of life, livable wages, creating a world where there doesn't need to be environmental protection, etc, would put them in the right zone. Is that how you look at it? 

 

 

 

 

Main difference between Left and Right: the Left wants the Federal Government to do things that are no where enumerated within Constitution.

 

Now I will be the first to acknowledge that Trump is not a true Constitutional purists, but his policies are much more in alignment than what we would have gotten with HRC.

 

And this whole "travel ban"...it is amazing how people on the Left interpret constitutional rights to non US citizens in foreign countries (especially known foreign states hostile towards America). What level of education do you have to come to this conclusion? 

 

Indy 

[yota691]

If You Need Proof CNN Wants Trump And His Supporters Assassinated — Here It Is

TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP/Getty Images

BY:

 JOHN NOLTE

JUNE 15, 2017

 

The question over whether or not words and images can provoke violence is a stupid one. Of course they can. Why do thousands of companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars on advertising? Why do politicians spend billions of their own? Because words and images have the power to alter human behavior, and not only in small ways, like which toothpaste they will purchase.   

The image of Clark Gable not wearing one in Frank Capra's It Happened One Night (1934) almost put the t-shirt industry out of business. Martin Scorsese's Taxi Driver (1976) inspired a presidential assassin. Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight (2008) inspired a Joker-like movie theater massacre. David Fincher's Fight Club (1999) inspired its own Project Mayhem. Need I go on?

The question is not whether or not words and images inspire violence. We know they do. The question is whether or not living in a free society is worth that cost. Of course it is.

The other question — and this is the only important one — is one of intent.

Did Capra intend to put the t-shirt industry out of business? Did Scorsese intend to inspire an assassination attempt, and so forth?  No, of course not. These men did absolutely nothing wrong.

The same, however, cannot be said for CNN.

In the wake of Wednesday's attempted shooting massacre of dozens of Republican lawmakers, we know for a fact that CNN intends to provoke and inspire this kind violence, and intends to do so specifically against Donald Trump and his supporters (including Rep. Steve Scalise, who was gravely wounded yesterday).

We know this for a fact because throughout the years, CNN has admitted that the very behavior the network now aggressively engages in, provokes and inspires political violence.  

Some examples …

We know for a fact that CNN believes that symbols as innocuous as crosshairs on a political map can result in a political assassination. We know this because for weeks after 2011's horrific Gabby Giffords shooting, CNN blamed Sarah Palin. Palin put usual-usual crosshairs on a political map (a normal practice at the time) and CNN revealed to us again and again that they believed those symbols provoked this assassination attempt.

And so, because we know what CNN believes, without any uncertainty we know that what CNN's intent is when CNN blasts Trump as "unmoored," "unhinged" and "un-American." We know what CNN's intent is when CNN compares Trump and his supporters to the Ku Klux Klan. We know what CNN's intent is when CNN ties Rep. Scalise to the KKK.  

Another example … We know for a fact that CNN believes images inspire political violence. We know this because CNN told us so in the wake of that godawful 2015 church shooting in South Carolina. For weeks CNN told us the image of the Rebel Flag provoked this violence.

And so, because we know what CNN believes, without any uncertainty we know what CNN's intent is when they defend, praise, recommend, and stand by their parent company's decision to sponsor an assassination porn play that depicts the bloody murder of President Trump.

Another example … We know for a fact that CNN believes rhetoric inspires violence. We know this because in the wake of the terrible 2015 Planned Parenthood shooting, CNN told us that abortion rhetoric inspired this violence.

And so, because we know what CNN believes, without any uncertainty we know what CNN's intent is when CNN compares Trump and his supporters to the Ku Klux Klan. We know what CNN's intent is when CNN ties Rep. Scalise to the KKK.  

Another example … We know for a fact that CNN believes unsubstantiated and reckless conspiracy theories provoke violence. We know this because in their coverage of the 2016 "Pizzagate" shooting, CNN told us they believe this.

And so, because we know CNN believes this, without any uncertainty we also know what CNN's intent is when CNN continues to push the false Russian conspiracy, the thoroughly-debunked liethat Trump mocked a reporter's disability, and the even more absurd lie that Trump has admitted to serial-sexual assault. 

Let's boil this down …

CNN firmly believes that certain behavior inspires, provokes, and causes political violence — including assassination attempts.

Therefore, when CNN itself consciously engages in this exact same behavior, we know for a fact that their intent is to inspire, provoke, and cause political violence — including assassination attempts.

You may choose not to blame CNN for Wednesday's near massacre. You may choose not to believe that words and images and rhetoric and conspiracy theories can be blamed for violence. Whatever. That is not my point.

The point is that if CNN believes those things result in violence and then does those things, the network's intent is not in dispute.  

Now will you cut the cord?

[Shabibilicious]

Lest we forget that "Jaws" inspired thousands of sharks to take a bite out of man....or that Donald Trump said he could shoot somebody on the street and not lose his supporters.  

 

GO RV, then BV

[Shabibilicious]

13 hours ago, adhoc10 said:

I have to admit that I am confused as to who is left and who is right and I've wanted to ask for clarification for a while now.  It would appear that the actions of the current administration would put them more in the left zone, things like bans on travel, violation of human rights, stripping of basic health care, etc. Whereas ensuring people have a quality of life, livable wages, creating a world where there doesn't need to be environmental protection, etc, would put them in the right zone. Is that how you look at it? 

 

 

 

 

As you've just witnessed, adhoc, the best you can hope for from the "alt-right" is a back handed compliment....nobody got time for that.  

 

GO RV, then BV

[MyLadiesDaddy]

7 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

As you've just witnessed, adhoc, the best you can hope for from the "alt-right" is a back handed compliment....nobody got time for that.  

 

GO RV, then BV

And  the best you can hope for from the left is some DumbAzz that can't shoot straight.

[Shabibilicious]

9 minutes ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said:

And  the best you can hope for from the left is some DumbAzz that can't shoot straight.

 

Not like you to think "inside" the box....disappointing.  

 

GO RV, then BV

[bostonangler]

13 hours ago, nstoolman1 said:

There is no health care mandate in the Constitution,

There is no Dept of Education mandate in the Constitution.

There is no Dept of Energy mandate in the Constitution. 

There is an obligation to protect our boarders and the US citizens here and abroad

Preventing a certain type of person from entering does that. ( Not sure why this is so hard to understand) Other countries practice this and where is the outcry against them?

There is no travel ban for US citizens.  (In fact it might be nice if some of them left. Jmho) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Great post but you left one out... Individuals are not to pay income tax... But some how we ended up with corporate welfare, and you pay a higher percentage in taxes than most corporations.... Our government is bought and paid for, and we the people are the ones suffering. That suffering is what is causing the separation and hatred. We need to amend the 16th amendment and go back to what our brilliant founding fathers started.

[MyLadiesDaddy]

27 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

Not like you to think "inside" the box....disappointing.  

 

GO RV, then BV

What can I say, ya gave me a ,"cheep shot",  And I took it.