Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Washington confirms its commitment not to use the territory of Iraq to attack neighboring countries


yota691
 Share

Recommended Posts

I suspect this has Nouri al-Maliki written all over it.

 

Cancel the Strategic Framework Agreement with The United States Of America AND truncate the Bicraqi Iraqi’s ability to rocket THEIR standard of living AND, instead, blow up on the launch pad and decend far further into chaos AND a launch pad for the Insanians to further terrorism???!!!

 

I think NOT!!!

 

Hey, The True The United Stated Of America Patriot President Donald J Trump Will have a “SUDDENLY” visit in Iraq. I wonder what will happen “SUDDENLY”???!!!

 

Pretty sure Ole Donald has his “keester kickers” “well conditioned” AND “ready for action” to “drive” this “DEAL” “home”!!!

 

YEAH, BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Go Moola Nova!

:pirateship:

  • Like 3
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Synopsis said:

I suspect this has Nouri al-Maliki written all over it.

 

Cancel the Strategic Framework Agreement with The United States Of America AND truncate the Bicraqi Iraqi’s ability to rocket THEIR standard of living AND, instead, blow up on the launch pad and decend far further into chaos AND a launch pad for the Insanians to further terrorism???!!!

 

I think NOT!!!

 

Hey, The True The United Stated Of America Patriot President Donald J Trump Will have a “SUDDENLY” visit in Iraq. I wonder what will happen “SUDDENLY”???!!!

 

Pretty sure Ole Donald has his “keester kickers” “well conditioned” AND “ready for action” to “drive” this “DEAL” “home”!!!

 

YEAH, BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Go Moola Nova!

:pirateship:

I have a question.. what has Trump done that qualifies him as a patriot?? 

  • Confused 4
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jaygo said:

I have a question.. what has Trump done that qualifies him as a patriot?? 

 

Are YOU blind or have YOU somehow remained uninformed?

 

:facepalm3:       :facepalm3:       :facepalm3:

 

Abiding by AND upholding The Constitution Of The United States Of America TO INCLUDE The Ratified Bill Of Rights while, especially, observing the noted Constitutional Articles regarding the Office Of The President Of The United States Of America has AND will be done by The True The United Stated Of America Patriot President Donald J Trump for one - among a host of other OBVIOUS things!!!

 

A far more pressing question is what have YOU, Jaygo, done that qualifies YOU as a patriot???!!!

 

Asking rhetorical questions about the OBVIOUS???!!!

 

:facepalm3:       :facepalm3:       :facepalm3:

 

In The Mean Time..........................................................

 

Go Moola Nova!

:pirateship:

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking that anyone that does not know why President Trump is a patriot it's because they watch too much of the mainstream Media news. Fake news and anything President Trump has done for us does not make the news. Kind of like the government three letter words like FBI CIA DOJ. They all are one-sided against our President Trump and for continuation of corruption and the money laundering of the American people's money.

Edited by jg1
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Security expert: The government is called upon to suspend the strategic framework agreement
 - 09/12/2018


%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%
 

Information / Baghdad ..
Security expert Kazem al-Hajj said on Sunday that the American side gave itself the legitimacy of targeting the resistance factions at the border with Syria, pointing out that the government is called upon to intervene and end the presence of these forces and stop the work of the strategic framework agreement.
"The American presence in the western bases of Iraq is a threat to the resistance factions, because this presence represents a threat and a blatant interference in the Iraqi affairs," Al-Haj said in a statement to Al-Maaloumah. "America has put some resistance factions on the terrorism list, Justification for targeting the factions, and give itself the legitimacy of that blatant targeting. "
"The government has a lot of question marks about its silence," he said. "We have to take a stand on this, because the forces at the border may be targeted at any moment by American airliners."
Al-Haj pointed out that "the strategic framework agreement must be reminding the American side of it, and work to end that agreement and remove Mamood of foreign troops from Iraq." Ending / 25 n



 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to Deputy: the abolition of the security agreement with America will reflect negatively on Iraq

Deputy: the abolition of the security agreement with America will reflect negatively on Iraq

02:43 - 16/12/2018

 
image
 
 

Special - Mawazine News 
MP in the parliament, Abbas Sarwat, Sunday, the abolition of the Strategic Framework Agreement for the joint defense between Iraq and the United States in 2008, will reflect negatively on the security situation of the country. 
Sarwat told Mawazine News that "the demand of some of the building alliance deputies to cancel the strategic framework agreement for the joint defense between Iraq and the United States in 2008, reflected negatively on the security situation of the country." 
He added that "the presence of cells in some areas and on the Iraqi border requires the continuation of this agreement to maintain the security of the country," stressing "not to hurry and consider this issue." 
There were media reports of a political move within the parliament to cancel the strategic framework agreement for the joint defense between Iraq and the United States in 2008, especially by the deputies of the Construction Coalition.
In November 2008, Iraq and the United States signed the Strategic Framework Agreement for the Common Defense and the Enhancement of Security and Stability in Iraq

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to Coalition of Victory: Maliki's government is the one who summoned the US forces to Iraq
Coalition of Victory: Maliki's government is the one who summoned the US forces to Iraq

Coalition of Victory: Maliki's government is the one who summoned the US forces to Iraq

Written by: mohanadat:January 09, 2019In: 

Light News / Baghdad , 
said a coalition victory, on Wednesday, we would like to inform the Iraqi public opinion that US forces were summoned to Iraq on 06/24/2014 by the government of former Prime Minister Nuri al - Maliki after the entry of the terrorist gang Daesh and bring it down to our provinces dear.

The coalition said in a statement received by "Al-Nour News" that it "is documented in the United Nations documents and documents exchanged between the two countries, based on the strategic framework agreement between Iraq and America."

He continued that "Abadi, when he won the confidence of the House of Representatives on 8/9/2014, the US forces were present in Iraq before taking over the responsibility of the Prime Minister for more than two months, and Abadi is what made them multiple forces and not only US forces."

"We call upon the political forces to commit to credibility and to avoid misleading the public opinion," he said. "Dr. Abbadi was still keen on Iraq's independence and sovereignty, and all the steps he took were in the interest of the unity, independence and sovereignty of Iraq."

"The coalition will not tolerate the attempts of exclusion, distortion and deception practiced by irresponsible elites," the coalition said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

121103.jpg?width=750&&height=375

 
2019/01/09 10:17
  • Number of readings 38
  • Section: Iraq
  •  

Maliki: Entering a call to Iraq because of the abandonment of the United States from the implementation of the Strategic Framework Agreement

 

BAGHDAD - The media office of the head of a coalition of state law Nuri al-Maliki, Wednesday, January 9, 2019, on the statement of the victory coalition headed by Haider al-Abbadi, who accused Maliki of bringing US troops to Iraq in June 2014, and pointed out that the statement contained many fallacies, The coalition is an attempt to break the deadlock in which they live and to avoid the embarrassment that has occurred.

The director of the office, Hisham al-Rikabi said in a press statement followed by the obelisk, that "it is regrettable to issue a position of the victory coalition in this way, which included a lot of fallacies," noting that "Maliki testifies to him that everyone addressed the Americans, and that many US military leaders talked Openly that Maliki is a partner and a difficult ally because he is obsessed with sovereignty. "

Al-Rikabi added that "the entry of Da'ash to Iraq was due to the abandonment of the United States of America to implement the strategic framework agreement and meet the needs of Iraq's military," adding that "the statement of the coalition victory, an attempt to get out of the impasse of the coalition because of the legacy of heavy created by the presence of US forces and the establishment of rules Outside the strategic framework agreement, and this is borne by Abadi because he was the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. "

Al-Rikabi asked: "If Maliki is the one who entered the Americans, who entered the Turks and make their forces take over and wandering?" He pointed out that "this position of the coalition of victory continued from the embarrassment of the government of Abdul-Mahdi so he tries to acquit his boss Haider Abadi of this responsibility and hold it to others."

The coalition of victory announced in a statement on Wednesday that former Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki is the one who summoned US troops to Iraq after the entry of "Daash," stressing the keenness of its president on Iraq's independence and sovereignty.

Follow the obelisk

http://almasalah.com/ar/news/160638/المالكي--دخول-داعش-الى-العراق-بسبب-تخلي-الولايات-المتحدة-عن-تنفيذ-اتفاقية-الاطار-الاستراتيجي

 
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

107715.jpg?width=750&&height=375

 
2019/01/15 16:52
  • Number of readings 122
  • Section: Iraq
  •  

Deputy: The strategic agreement with Washington is in force and we do not need new legislation

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq has no need to legislate a new law to regulate its security relationship with the United States, MP Hassan Khalati said on Tuesday (January 15th, 2019), adding that the previous strategic agreement is still in force.

"The security relations of Iraq with the United States of America is governed by a strategic agreement signed earlier and it determines the nature of the work and the presence of troops within our territory," Khalati said in a press statement that "Iraq does not need to enact a new law on regulating the relationship between Iraq and Washington on the security side" .

"The agreement is valid and clear and should be applied to what is in it, which necessitated the presence of foreign forces for training and advice. It prevented the presence of combat forces, did not allow the construction of foreign military bases, nor allowed the movement of foreign forces inside our territory," Khalati said.

The member of the Committee on Security and Defense parliamentary Adnan Vihan said, Saturday, 12 January 2019, the intention of his committee to host security leaders in the near period to clarify them about the number and places of presence and duties and types of foreign troops stationed on the territory of Iraq.

It is noteworthy that a member of the Committee on Security and Defense parliamentary Karim Alawi said, Tuesday, January 8, 2019, that there is a tendency within the House of Representatives to issue a binding resolution to bring US troops stationed on the ground in Iraq illegally or legitimately.

Follow the obelisk 

http://almasalah.com/ar/news/161239/نائب-الاتفاقية-الستراتيجية-مع-واشنطن-سارية-المفعول-ولسنا-بحاجة-لتشريع-جديدة

 
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to Suron submits a bill to abolish the security pact with America

Suron submits a bill to abolish the security pact with America

01:13 - 25/01/2019

 
image
 
 

 

BAGHDAD (Reuters) 
- A member of the alliance, Sabah al-Saadi, announced Friday that he would present a proposed law to abolish the security pact with the United States and remove foreign forces from Iraq. 
"We submitted to the Speaker of the House of Representatives (with a proposal of law) to terminate the security agreement and to cancel the third part of the strategic framework agreement signed with the United States of America," Saadi said in a statement received by Mawazine News. Referring to the security and defense committees and foreign and legal relations in order to take legal steps to legislate. "
He added: "We have confirmed in the articles of this law proposal to end the presence of US and foreign in Iraq and to prevent the presence of any military bases in Iraq as well as the end of the presence of trainers and advisers American and foreign military in Iraq within one year from the date of adoption of this law, and also gave the right to the Government to submit to the House of Representatives The recruitment of trainers for the Iraqi armed forces in the case of need, but with the consent of the absolute majority of the members of the House of Representatives. " 
He pointed out that "this proposed law put an end to US and foreign military bases in Iraq and speculation that did not give the government a comprehensive answer around them reassuring the Iraqi people about the sovereignty of the state and land and not violate in any form."

10251201919.jpg

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Souron makes a proposal for Halabousi that includes ending the security agreement with Washington

 

 

Photo: 

In the document ..

 

8 hours ago

 

Parliamentary bloc submitted to the Speaker of the House of Representatives Mohamed Halbusi proposed a law to terminate the security agreement with the United States of America .

"We submitted today to the Speaker of the House of Representatives a bill to end the work of the security agreement and the cancellation of the third section of the strategic framework agreement signed with the United States of America, " said head of the Sabah al-Saadi bloc in a  press statement published late last night . 

He pointed out that they and this proposal put the presidency of the Council in front of its legal and constitutional responsibility by referring it to the security and defense committees and foreign and legal relations in order to take legal steps to the law .

"We have confirmed in the articles of this bill to end the US and foreign presence in Iraq and to prevent the presence of any military bases in Iraq, as well as the termination of the presence of US and foreign military trainers and advisers in Iraq within one year from the date of adoption of this law ."

"We also gave the right to the government to submit to the House of Representatives to bring trainers of the Iraqi armed forces in case of need, but with the consent of the absolute majority of the members of the House of Representatives ."

Saadi added that "we proposed this law put an end to US and foreign military bases in Iraq and speculation that the government did not give a comprehensive answer around them reassuring the Iraqi people about the sovereignty of the state and land and not violate in any form."

Earlier, the United States warned of the danger that Iraq would legislate any parliamentary law that would force foreign troops out of the country, asserting that such decisions would cause serious damage to both sides .

"This American warning was conveyed by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to the Iraqi political leadership during his recent visit to Baghdad," an Iraqi politician told foreign media.

According to deputies who spoke with those means, the head of the parliamentary bloc of Asaib Ahl al-Haq, Adnan Fihan, is leading the dialogues with various parliamentary parties to persuade them to support the efforts to pass this law, which will later become a platform for Iran's allies in Baghdad, US troops from the country .

"What the United States expects is for Iran to start its defensive war from Baghdad by establishing a legal base that will shift its soldiers and freedom of movement in Iraq if it does not succeed in passing a law that provides for the illegality of the presence of foreign troops on Iraqi territory, Which could be the subject of disagreement between the government of Adel Abdul Mahdi and the House of Representatives, which tends to the majority of its members to Iran, varying degrees .

The observer notes that "the Iraqi government will be cautious in dealing with this thorny issue, which can not postpone consideration under the pressure exerted by extremist currents in the loyalty to Iran, such as the movement of Asaib Ahl al-Haq, whose leader tries to put it spearhead to defend Iran in the face of the United States After he and a number of members of his movement were classified as terrorists . "

The observer believes that "Iran is expected to start implementing the worst case scenario if the United States decided to complete the economic sanctions by a military strike, which prompted the Minister of Foreign Affairs Mohammed Jawad Zarif to visit Iraq and offer options to block the strike," according to the London-based Arabic newspaper .

The US position came in response to efforts by Iraqi political parties close to Iran to legislate a parliamentary law that requires the government to ask all foreign forces, including the United States, to leave Iraq by 2020 .

636839576669460532-PHOTO-2019-01-24-23-0

636839577034032532-PHOTO-2019-01-24-23-0

636839577273648532-PHOTO-2019-01-24-23-0

636839577885948532-PHOTO-2019-01-24-23-0

636839578240068532-PHOTO-2019-01-24-23-0

636839577626676532-PHOTO-2019-01-24-23-0

636839578632096532-PHOTO-2019-01-24-23-0

 

http://www.nrttv.com/AR/News.aspx?id=8732&MapID=2

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pull our troops, our investments, our support, our military equipment and no US DOLLARS in the auctions. Let's see where they stand then. Short memories of how their forces dropped and ran when 1500 ISIS members managed to take over nearly half the country. What a bunch of fools!

                                    :wacko:

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, King Bean said:

Pull our troops, our investments, our support system" rel="">support, our military equipment and no US DOLLARS in the auctions. Let's see where they stand then. Short memories of how their forces dropped and ran when 1500 ISIS members managed to take over nearly half the country. What a bunch of fools!

                                    :wacko:

💯🤦‍♂️

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, alreis said:

 

I agree and in my opinion Obama should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

 I am not a big fan of Obama.  But it was Hillarious that was calling all the shots over there.  He was stupid enough to go along with her. She is the one that financed the terrorists. She was stupid enough to think that if she gave them money  and guns that they would use them for her agenda. And be loyal to her. NOT

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, King Bean said:

Pull our troops, our investments, our support system" rel="">support, our military equipment and no US DOLLARS in the auctions. Let's see where they stand then. Short memories of how their forces dropped and ran when 1500 ISIS members managed to take over nearly half the country. What a bunch of fools!

                                    :wacko:

King Bean,

Do not forget the ghost army that fled as well.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to Washington confirms its commitment not to use the territory of Iraq to attack neighboring countries

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.