moose 57 Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 h.a.n.d. 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nstoolman1 Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 Yes. That is the truth. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
learning all i can Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 Very true but he sure does look old......I don't think k I do...lol not from my eyes anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karsten Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 I would have to agree....Been there and still going it. I sure would be doing a lot more if this darn RV would just happen already. Karsten 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
umbertino Posted April 15, 2017 Report Share Posted April 15, 2017 True that....Proud '57-born here..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muleslayer Posted April 16, 2017 Report Share Posted April 16, 2017 (edited) I have to argue one point. in high school I had a olds 442. 454 4.11 pop tops bolted to a turbo 350 1200 rpm stall converter and a 4:11 to one Posi trac rear end. that car cost me my drivers license twice, 3 girlfriend's and roughly 12,000 dollars in upgrades and repairs. 1975 dollars! i now drive a 6 cylinder Mazda CX-9 that will do 0 to 60 in 4.5 seconds. no fire breathing no smoke no noise just GO! oh did I mention that the 442 would pass anything but the gas station? CX-9 is respectable 23 mpg. as you get older the big head retains more blood. Edited April 16, 2017 by Muleslayer For the edit snoops! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
umbertino Posted April 16, 2017 Report Share Posted April 16, 2017 23 hours ago, Karsten said: I would have to agree....Been there and still going it. I sure would be doing a lot more if this darn RV would just happen already. Karsten Agreed, Karsten...Happy Easter to you and all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moose 57 Posted April 16, 2017 Author Report Share Posted April 16, 2017 10 hours ago, Muleslayer said: I have to argue one point. in high school I had a olds 442. 454 4.11 pop tops bolted to a turbo 350 1200 rpm stall converter and a 4:11 to one Posi trac rear end. that car cost me my drivers license twice, 3 girlfriend's and roughly 12,000 dollars in upgrades and repairs. 1975 dollars! i now drive a 6 cylinder Mazda CX-9 that will do 0 to 60 in 4.5 seconds. no fire breathing no smoke no noise just GO! oh did I mention that the 442 would pass anything but the gas station? CX-9 is respectable 23 mpg. as you get older the big head retains more blood. I agree with the gas- yet nothing like Your 442!!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Posted April 19, 2017 Report Share Posted April 19, 2017 I agree Moose, the 50's were good in many ways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.