DoD Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 Folks we need to remember one thing about Abadi. He was corrupt like all the rest, maybe not to the extent as most of the rest but still corrupt. He made a statement the other day about America paying for all the chaos an problems it created with the invasion of Iraq. I won't preach a sermon on what I think of Abadi right now but is he good for Iraq, absolutely. Let's just be honest though an say the only real thing he wants from the USA is their money an military support. 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggdog60 Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiljor Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 PM Abadi says Iraq's oil is for Iraqis, and Trump offers to increase the level of assistance to Iraq 25/1/2017 10:32:00 Share Print PM ABADI SAYS IRAQ'S OIL IS FOR IRAQIS Iraq's oil is the property of Iraqis, Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi said on Tuesday, in reaction to U.S. President Donald Trump who argued that the United States should have taken possession of the nation's crude reserves. In a speech to CIA officials on Saturday, Trump suggested the United States should have taken Iraq's oil in reimbursement for the 2003 invasion that put an end to Saddam Hussein's rule. Trump also suggested that taking Iraq's oil would have prevented Islamic State from rising up, by removing a source of the group's funding. "It wasn't clear what he meant," Abadi told a news conference when asked about Trump's comments. "Did he mean in 2003 or to prevent the terrorists from seizing Iraq's oil?" "Iraq's oil is constitutionally the property of the Iraqis," he said. The new U.S. president has also sent messages offering to increase the level of assistance to Iraq, Abadi said, without giving details on the nature of the assistance. "I've got assurances from President Trump that the assistance to Iraqi will continue and that it will also increase," Abadi told a news conference in Baghdad. Trump has made the fight against Islamic State, the hardline group that declared a self-styled "caliphate" over parts of Syria and Iraq in 2014, a priority for his administration. A U.S.-led coalition is already providing critical support to an offensive by Iraqi forces to take back Mosul, the largest city under control of Islamic State. The United States is also providing financial support to Iraq. Source: Reuters PUKmedia 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nannab Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 This definatly would have cut out a lot of bs and nonsense and deaths. Another busy fella for our benefit ! Thank you Wiljor 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiljor Posted January 25, 2017 Report Share Posted January 25, 2017 4 minutes ago, nannab said: This definatly would have cut out a lot of bs and nonsense and deaths. Another busy fella for our benefit ! Thank you Wiljor Always a pleasure nannab, 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted January 26, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 US Ambassador to the infallible: continue to provide support and support for Iraq 1/26/2017 0:00 BAGHDAD / morning President Fuad Masum , confirmed that thevictories achieved on «Daesh» help theinternational community to get rid of the threat ofterrorism, while the new US ambassador to Iraq ,Douglas Silliman his country's keenness to support the military effort in Iraq and to provide the requirements of the displaced and their return. According to a presidential statement, received «morning», that infallible received, upon receiving the US ambassador in Baghdad Douglas Silliman «Acknowledgement US administration on a telegram of congratulations he had sent to the United States President Donald Trump on the occasion of his accession to his duties, and the confirmation of the administration to continue and strengthen the close ties between the two countries especially in the field of combating terrorist Daesh and eliminate it and edit all Iraqi cities and villages of it. » The statement added , «As President received congratulations for the great victories achieved by our armed forces in various formations in combat operations against Daesh in Mosul, as it was stressed that these victories make it easier to completely eliminate Daesh and help to reach the desired stability and the return of all displaced people to their homes». He said the US ambassador, according to the statement, «his country's keenness on providing support and backing for the Iraq military to combat effort and the requirements necessary for the displaced and their return». And through the President of the Republic for «thanked Iraq for receives from the award by the United States and the international coalition and friends in the fight against terrorism», adding that « the victories achieved on Daesh help not only Iraq, but the general international community to get rid of the threat of terrorism and its expansion». The statement noted that « the two sides during the meeting , they reviewed relations between the two friendly countries in various fields and the possibility of enhancing cooperation between them». 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuckFinley Posted January 26, 2017 Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 We can all work this out. It is just a matter of everyone seeing the benefit. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDuesing Posted January 26, 2017 Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 (edited) HAs the Iraqi oil money been going to the people so far? I dont think so lol. JUst hope Abadi knows that Iraq is being watched and dont think for a minate that Trump wont fire all your asses and control the oil putting the money where it belongs. Edited January 26, 2017 by KDuesing 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boozer Posted January 26, 2017 Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 Trump got the plan. Iraq is not first on his list. His people are first as he has proven in the past few days.. Trust me Iraq is on the list and coming up fast..I say March is the Month to look at.. Trump the Man with the Plan ..... 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texstorm Posted January 26, 2017 Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 9 minutes ago, Boozer said: Trump got the plan. Iraq is not first on his list. His people are first as he has proven in the past few days.. Trust me Iraq is on the list and coming up fast..I say March is the Month to look at.. Trump the Man with the Plan ..... Boozer you are spot on ! It's just a matter of time. Tick tock tick tock ! Trumpanado is going to put his foot up their derriere....How far is up to them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.M. Posted January 26, 2017 Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 U can't fix Stupid 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted January 26, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 5 hours ago, DoD said: Folks we need to remember one thing about Abadi. He was corrupt like all the rest Let's just be honest though an say the only real thing he wants from the USA is their money an military support. Sorry but you don't know that...and Yes as he has stated many times he fighting ISIS in Iraq for International community, so I guess Abadi has a point for funding..... 4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinarham Posted January 26, 2017 Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 WE know by now the weird vernacular Iraqis use . They use less words than we do ,many words meaning different things Watermelon ? Abadi may have meant that some profits should go to the Iraqians 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mylilpony Posted January 26, 2017 Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 All i will say is wait till Rex TILLERSON arrives. He knows that country in and out and he knows who they all are. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigergorzow Posted January 26, 2017 Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 30 minutes ago, mylilpony said: All i will say is wait till Rex TILLERSON arrives. He knows that country in and out and he knows who they all are. mylilpony, 100% Agree. I'm also 100% certain he knows how important the "Oil & Gas Law" approved and voted in Parliament. It is a Win Win for Iraq, KRG, Oil Companies, Investors and of course the rest of the "World". Sharing the wealth... 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jg1 Posted January 26, 2017 Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 28 minutes ago, tigergorzow said: mylilpony, 100% Agree. I'm also 100% certain he knows how important the "Oil & Gas Law" approved and voted in Parliament. It is a Win Win for Iraq, KRG, Oil Companies, Investors and of course the rest of the "World". Sharing the wealth... Also, I believe the HCL is required to be aproved as its part of their constitution. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theseus Posted January 26, 2017 Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 12 hours ago, fancy said: Don't get me wrong I really dig DJT, he's going to do great things for us, he's clearly a doer and likes winning, we the American people will benefit from his presidency. But taking resources from another county isn't that a war crime according to the Geneva convention? DJT meant that we should have kept the oil as war reparations for spending out the wazoo for their country. You know like how Germany was supposed to pay everyone money for the war they waged but still haven't. The money used from the oil proceeds could have gone to paying for the wars we fought to liberate their sorry behinds. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted January 26, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 Iraq studying proposal to request compensation from the Americans © Photo / 01/26/2017 11:54(Updated 12:08 26/01/2017) Dr. Adnan al-Sarraj, a former deputy in the Iraqi parliament, said, commenting on US President Donald Trump hint that Washington had to take Iraq's oil reserves to pay off the invasion of Iraq, the costs in 2003, it is clear that Trump's foreign policy lacks a lot of experience and the ability to adapt regional and international and domestic balances. © PHOTO / YOUTUBE / ABC15 ARIZONA Trump: if the United States imposed control over oil there would have been "Daesh" Dr Adnan al-Sarraj head of the Iraqi Center for Media Development, and former MP in the Iraqi parliament, in an exclusive interview with "Sputnik" Commenting on US President Donald Trump hint that Washington had to take Iraq's oil reserves to pay back the invasion of Iraq costs in 2003: It is clear Trump's foreign policy lacks a lot of experience and ability to adapt to regional and international and domestic balances. It also raises a lot of tensions within the global political reality. This is not the first and not the last call, for Trump regarding financial compensation and oil and the like from other countries. He noted Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi clearly worried by the actions of his government Trump, because the US intervention has been under United Nations resolutions, and US pressure and severe under false pretenses. This intervention in the destruction of government official and sovereign institutions in the country and led. Iraqis planning to the principle of demanding material compensation from the United States of the damage brought by the citizens and the Iraqi infrastructure due to its occupation of Iraq during the period of 2003-2011, and today actually Iraqi Council of Representatives this proposal taught well and will take the necessary decisions on the payment of compensation and damages. It should be noted that Trump has hinted, in an interview with officials from the CIA last Saturday, that the United States had to take Iraqi oil to pay off the invasion in 2003, which resulted in the collapse of Saddam Hussein's regime costs. Trump spoke during the meeting, also taking on Iraq's oil was possible to prevent the rise of organizing "Daesh", by depriving him of the source of financing. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted January 26, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2017 US report analyzes how seriously Washington 's control over Iraq 's oil 47 minutes ago Twilight News / American newspapers referred to President Donald Trump 's comments on the seizure of Iraq 's oil, and wondered how serious he pointed to the risk of the move if it has. The Washington Post has reported President Trump 's remarks on Iraq 's oil, and said that no one knows how serious in its intention to control Iraq 's oil and confiscate it , and added that this step Trump in what has if they take the risk and exceptional costs. She explained that the attempt to Trump This means the risk of the US losing its best partner in the face of the organization of the Islamic state on the ground, however , saying that the president told the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) days that perhaps there is another opportunity in this context before. She pointed out that Trump had previously stated that he opposed the invasion of Iraq and oppose the overthrow of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, but Trump candidate said that the invasion of Iraq was an occupation costly and deadly, and he expressed his wishes if the United States were confiscated oil reserves of Iraq, and he repeated the same statement after his inauguration president. The Washington Post added that Trump 's remarks on Iraq ignores American history over hundreds of years, where he heads the country 's former tend to the bestowal of the countries that America has fought in which money and aid, without seize their resources as is the case in Germany and Japan. She noted that the United States can not control Iraq 's oil and confiscate it , it requires the main employers enormous resources and manpower in the country, which has failed Washington despite spending more than two trillion dollars and deployed about 170 thousand troops in the country. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.