Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Militiamen take over federal building in Oregon wildlife refuge after anti-government rally; son of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy among them


Recommended Posts

 
 

A so-called militia with ties to Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy seized a federal building in a southeast Oregon wildlife refuge and have no plans to leave.

Bundy’s son, Ammon Bundy, was among the self-described militiamen occupying the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters and visitor center with eyes on a U.S. Bureau of Land Management fire station near Frenchglen, the Oregonian reported.

“We’re planning on staying here for years, absolutely,” Ammon Bundy told The Oregonian. “This is not a decision we’ve made at the last minute.”

Bundy, who lives in Idaho, called upon fellow militia members to "come prepared" and join protesters rallying for two ranchers, Dwight Hammond Jr. and his son, Steven, who have been ordered to serve a five-year prison sentence for arson.

It’s unclear if the militia members camped out at the Malheur building are armed.

“I just felt like what happened to us is happening to them,” Bundy said in a video shared Friday. 

"This is not a time to stand down, it is time to stand up and come to Harney County," Bundy said in a seperate video on Facebook.

Despite Bundy's claim he and other protesters are in it for the long haul at the wildlife refuge, he told his wife he would only "be gone for a couple days.”

Bundy’s call-to-action garnered an apparent goodbye video from one of his militia followers addressed to his wife and two daughters, ages 3 and 5. The video was recorded at some point before the holidays, tearfully explaining why he wouldn’t be home during Christmas or New Years.

“This is one of the tougher videos I’ve had to make,” said a man identified as Jon Ritzheimer. “I love you, my beautiful wife. I know I never said it enough but I’ve become so proud of the mother you’ve become.”

“We the people need to take a stand,” said Ritzheimer, adding he expects 75-year-old Dwight Hammond to die in prison.

“Dwight, do you want die in prison labeled as a terrorist by these oppressors,” Ritzheimer asked. “Or do you want to die out here with us a free man. I want to die a free man.”

A judge has ordered the Hammonds to report to prison Monday to serve a lengthier sentence after being convicted in 2012 of igniting two fires in 2001 and 2006 on federal land leased for cattle grazing.

The father and son claim the blazes were a precaution against future wildfires and invasive plants.

Bundy’s father, Cliven, made headlines in 2014 as the anti-government rancher who got into an armed confrontation with federal agents over unpaid grazing fines.

In a statement, Cliven Bundy asked the Hammonds to seek protective custody at the Harney County jail instead giving into a tougher prison sentence.

Ammon Bundy and two of his brothers were among hundreds of protesters in Burns rallying in support of the Hammonds outside the Harney County courthouse in Burns Saturday afternoon before a splinter group broke into the remote refuge headquarters about 245 miles southeast of Portland.

A FBI spokeswoman is aware of the militia take-over at the Malheur refuge, but would not comment further.

The refuge encompasses nearly 190,000 acres of wetlands and desert frequented by hunters and fishermen with a visitor center. Because of the militia occupation, the refuge will be closed to the public instead of opening at 8 a.m. Monday.

With News Wire Services 

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/militia-takes-ore-fed-building-protest-article-1.2483723

ranching-standoff-protest.jpg

 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These folks look like upstanding people to me that have grown tired of government tyranny. When I look at the picture I don't seen any young kids, I see men and women over 50 years old who know right from wrong. I really hope government doesn't screw this one up because if they do I am going to side with the civilians. Thanks BW and Yota ! Please keep us up to date. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are the real patriots shabs.

its the only thing this GOVT will listen to and take notice.

Is hundreds of armed citizens that are pi$$ed off.

 

 

I say its about time. . This fire needs to burn brighter . 

 

It just seems odd that the Hammond family spokesperson says they have no connection with the Bundy faction.  So ultimately, Bundy's boys are calling the shots for the Hammonds.....taking away Hammond's right to deal with the matter as they see fit.  Doesn't sound much like freedom for the Hammonds to deal with the government in their own way, when others are calling the shots for them, because they most definitely know what's best.  

 

GO RV, then BV   

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Hammonds are facing prison time.  I dont think they are looking this gift horse in the mouth. If it wasnt for these people`s intervention they would already be starting a 10 year sentence. 

 

Well, whatever.........just as long as the Bundy boys stay off whatever portion of the reserve that belongs to me.....a member of John Q public.   :D 

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HISTORY: (aa) The Harney Basin (were the Hammond ranch is established) was settled in the 1870’s. The valley was settled by multiple ranchers and was known to have run over 300,000 head of cattle. These ranchers developed a state of the art irrigated system to water the meadows, and it soon became a favorite stopping place for migrating birds on their annual trek north.


(ab) In 1908 President Theodor Roosevelt, in a political scheme, create an “Indian reservation” around the Malheur, Mud & Harney Lakes and declared it “as a preserve and breeding ground for native birds”. Later this “Indian reservation” (without Indians) became the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.


(a) In 1964 the Hammonds purchased their ranch in the Harney Basin. The purchase included approximately 6000 acres of private property, 4 grazing rights on public land, a small ranch house and 3 water rights. The ranch is around 53 miles South of Burns, Oregon.



 

 


(a1) By the 1970’s nearly all the ranches adjacent to the Blitzen Valley were purchased by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and added to the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. The refuge covers over 187,000 acres and stretches over 45 miles long and 37 miles wide. The expansion of the refuge grew and surrounds to the Hammond’s ranch. Being approached many times by the FWS, the Hammonds refused to sell. Other ranchers also choose not to sell.


(a2) During the 1970’s the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), in conjunction with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), took a different approach to get the ranchers to sell. Ranchers were told that, “grazing was detrimental to wildlife and must be reduced”. 32 out of 53 permits were revoked and many ranchers were forced to leave. Grazing fees were raised significantly for those who were allowed to remain. Refuge personnel took over the irrigation system claiming it as their own.


(a3) By 1980 a conflict was well on its way over water allocations on the adjacent privately owned Silvies Plain. The FWS wanted to acquire the ranch lands on the Silvies Plain to add to their already vast holdings. Refuge personnel intentional diverted the water to bypassing the vast meadowlands, directing the water into the rising Malheur Lakes. Within a few short years the surface area of the lakes doubled. Thirty-one ranches on the Silvies plains were flooded. Homes, corrals, barns and graze-land were washed a way and destroyed. The ranchers that once fought to keep the FWS from taking their land, now broke and destroyed, begged the FWS to acquire their useless ranches. In 1989 the waters began to recede and now the once thriving privately owned Silvies pains are a proud part of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge claimed by the FWS.


(a4) By the 1990’s the Hammonds were one of the very few ranchers that still owned private property adjacent to the refuge. Susie Hammond in an effort to make sense of what was going on began compiling fact about the refuge. In a hidden public record she found a study that was done by the FWS in 1975. The study showed that the “no use” policies of the FWS on the refuge were causing the wildlife to leave the refuge and move to private property. The study showed that the private property adjacent to the Malheur Wildlife Refuge produced 4 times more ducks and geese than the refuge did. It also showed that the migrating birds were 13 times more likely to land on private property than on the refuge. When Susie brought this to the attention of the FWS and refuge personnel, her and her family became the subjects of a long train of abuses and corruptions.


(B) In the early 1990’s the Hammonds filed on a livestock water source and obtained a deed for the water right from the State of Oregon. When the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) found out that the Hammonds obtained new water rights near the Malhuer Wildlife Refuge, they were agitated and became belligerent and vindictive towards the Hammonds. The US Fish and Wildlife Service challenged the Hammonds right to the water in an Oregon State Circuit Court. The court found that the Hammonds legally obtained rights to the water in accordance to State law and therefore the use of the water belongs to the Hammonds.*


© In August 1994 the BLM & FWS illegally began building a fence around the Hammonds water source. Owning the water rights and knowing that their cattle relied on that water source daily the Hammonds tried to stop the building of the fence. The BLM & FWS called the Harney County Sheriff department and had Dwight Hammond (Father) arrested and charged with “disturbing and interfering with” federal officials or federal contractors (two counts, each a felony). He spent one night in the Deschutes County Jail in Bend, and a second night behind bars in Portland before he was hauled before a federal magistrate and released without bail. A hearing on the charges was postponed and the federal judge never set another date.


(d) The FWS also began restricting access to upper pieces of the Hammond’s private property. In order to get to the upper part of the Hammond’s ranch they had to go on a road that went through the Malhuer Wildlife Refuge. The FWS began barricading the road and threatening the Hammonds if they drove through it. The Hammonds removed the barricades and gates and continued to use their right of access. The road was proven later to be owned by the County of Harney. This further enraged the BLM & FWS.


(e) Shortly after the road & water disputes, the BLM & FWS arbitrarily revoked the Hammond’s upper grazing permit without any given cause, court proceeding or court ruling. As a traditional “fence out state” Oregon requires no obligation on the part of an owner to keep his or her livestock within a fence or to maintain control over the movement of the livestock. The Hammonds intended to still use their private property for grazing. However, they were informed that a federal judge ruled, in a federal court, that the federal government did not have to observe the Oregon fence out law. “Those laws are for the people, not for them”.


(f) The Hammonds were forced to either build and maintain miles of fences or be restricted from the use of their private property. Cutting their ranch in almost half, they could not afford to fence the land, so the cattle were removed.


(g) The Hammonds experienced many years of financial hardship due to the ranch being diminished. The Hammonds had to sale their ranch and home in order to purchase another property that had enough grass to feed their cattle. This property included two grazing rights on public land. Those were also arbitrarily revoked later.


(h) The owner of the Hammond’s original ranch passed away from a heart attack and the Hammonds made a trade for the ranch back.


(i) In the early fall of 2001, Steven Hammond (Son) called the fire department, informing them that he was going to be performing a routine prescribed burn on their ranch. Later that day he started a prescribed fire on their private property. The fire went onto public land and burned 127 acres of grass. The Hammonds put the fire out themselves. There was no communication about the burn from the federal government to the Hammonds at that time. Prescribed fires are a common method that Native Americans and ranchers have used in the area to increase the health & productivity of the land for many centuries.


(j) In 2006 a massive lightning storm started multiple fires that joined together inflaming the countryside. To prevent the fire from destroying their winter range and possibly their home, Steven Hammond (Son) started a backfire on their private property. The backfire was successful in putting out the lightning fires that had covered thousands of acres within a short period of time. The backfire saved much of the range and vegetation needed to feed the cattle through the winter. Steven’s mother, Susan Hammond said: “The backfire worked perfectly, it put out the fire, saved the range and possibly our home”.


(j1) The next day federal agents went to the Harney County Sheriff’s office and filled a police report making accusation against Dwight and Steven Hammond for starting the backfire. A few days after the backfire a Range-Con from the Burns District BLM office asked Steven if he would meet him in town (Frenchglen) for coffee. Steven accepted. When leaving he was arrested by the Harney County Sheriff Dave Glerup and BLM Ranger Orr. Sheriff Glerup then ordered him to go to the ranch and bring back his father. Both Dwight and Steven were booked and on multiple Oregon State charges. The Harney County District Attorney reviewed the accusation, evidence and charges, and determined that the accusations against Dwight & Steven Hammond did not warrant prosecution and dropped all the charges.


(k) In 2011, 5 years after the police report was taken, the U.S. Attorney Office accused Dwight and Steven Hammond of completely different charges, they accused them of being “Terrorist” under the Federal Antiterrorism Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. This act carries a minimum sentence of five years in prison and a maximum sentence of death. Dwight & Steven’s mug shots were all over the news the next week posing them as “Arsonists”. Susan Hammond (Wife & Mother) said: “I would walk down the street or go in a store, people I had known for years would take extreme measures to avoid me”.


(l) Shortly after the sentencing, Capital Press ran a story about the Hammonds. A person who identified as Greg Allum posted three comments on the article, calling the ranchers “clowns” who endangered firefighters and other people in the area while burning valuable rangeland. Greg Allum, a retired BLM heavy equipment operator, soon called Capital Press to complain that he had not made those comments and request that they be taken down from the website. Capital Press removed the comments. A search of the Internet Protocol address associated with the comments revealed it is owned by the BLM’s office in Denver, Colorado. Allum said, he is friends with the Hammonds and was alerted to the comments by neighbors who knew he wouldn’t have written them. “I feel bad for them. They lost a lot and they’re going to lose more,” Allum said of the ranchers. “They’re not terrorists. There’s this hatred in the BLM for them, and I don’t get it,” The retired BLM employee said. Jody Weil, deputy state director for communications at BLM’s Oregon office, indicated to reporters that if one of their agents falsified the comments, they would keep it private and not inform the public.


(m) In September 2006, Dwight & Susan Hammond’s home was raided. The agents informed the Hammonds that they were looking for evidence that would connect them to the fires. The Hammonds later found out that a boot print and a tire tracks were found near one of the many fires. No matching boots or tires were found in the Hammonds home or on their property. Susan Hammond (Wife) later said; ” I have never felt so violated in my life. We are ranchers not criminals”. Steven Hammond openly maintains his testimony that he started the backfire to save the winter grass from being destroyed and that the backfire ended up working so well it put out the fire entirely altogether.


(n) During the trial proceedings, Federal Court Judge Michael Hogan did not allow time for certain testimonies and evidence into the trail that would exonerate the Hammonds. Federal prosecuting attorney, Frank Papagni, was given full access for 6 days. He had ample time to use any evidence or testimony that strengthened the demonization of the Hammonds. The Hammonds attorney was only allowed 1 day. Much of the facts about the fires, land and why the Hammonds acted the way they did was not allowed into the proceedings and was not heard by the jury. For example, Judge Hogan did not allow time for the jury to hear or review certified scientific findings that the fires improved the health and productivity of the land. Or, that the Hammonds had been subject to vindictive behavior by multiple federal agencies for years.


(o) Federal attorneys, Frank Papagni, hunted down a witness that was not mentally capable to be a credible witness. Dusty Hammond (grandson and nephew) testified that Steven told him to start a fire. He was 13 at the time and 24 when he testified (11 years later). At 24 Dusty had been suffering with mental problems for many years. He had estranged his family including his mother. Judge Hogan noted that Dusty’s memories as a 13-year-old boy were not clear or credible. He allowed the prosecution to continually use Dusty’s testimony anyway. When speaking to the Hammonds about this testimony, they understood that Dusty was manipulated and expressed nothing but love for their troubled grandson.


(p) Judge Michael Hogan & Frank Papagni tampered with the jury many times throughout the proceedings, including during the selection process. Hogan & Papagni only allowed people on the jury who did not understand the customs and culture of the ranchers or how the land is used and cared for in the Diamond Valley. All of the jurors had to drive back and forth to Pendleton everyday. Some drove more than two hours each way. By day 8 they were exhausted and expressed desires to be home.


On the final day, Judge Hogan kept pushing them to make a verdict. Several times during deliberation, Judge Hogan pushed them to make a decision. Judge Hogan also would not allow the jury to hear what punishment could be imposed upon an individual that has convicted as a terrorist under the 1996 act. The jury, not understanding the customs and cultures of the area, influenced by the prosecutors for 6 straight days, very exhausted, pushed for a verdict by the judge, unaware of the ramification of convicting someone as a terrorist, made a verdict and went home.


(q) June 22, 2012, Dwight and Steven were found guilty of starting both the 2001 and the 2006 fires by the jury. However, the federal courts convicted them both as “Terrorist” under the 1996 Antiterrorism Act. Judge Hogan sentenced Dwight (Father) to 3 months in prison and Steven (son) to 12 months in federal prison. They were also stipulated to pay $400,000 to the BLM. Hogan overruling the minimum terrorist sentence, commenting that if the full five years were required it would be a violation of the 8th amendment (cruel and unusual punishment). The day of the sentencing Judge Hogan retired as a federal judge. In his honor the staff served chocolate cake in the courtroom.


® On January 4,, 2013, Dwight and Steven reported to prison. They fulfilled their sentences, (Dwight 3 months, Steven 12 months). Dwight was released in March 2013 and Steven, January 2014.


(s) Sometime in June 2014, Rhonda Karges, Field Manager for the BLM, and her husband Chad Karges, Refuge Manager for the Malheur Wildlife Refuge (which surrounds the Hammond ranch), along with attorney Frank Papagni exemplifying further vindictive behavior by filing an appeal with the 9th District Federal Court seeking Dwight’s and Steven’s return to federal prison for the entire 5 years.*


(t) In October 2015, the 9th District Court “resentenced” Dwight and Steven, requiring them to return to prison for several more years. Steven (46) has a wife and 3 children. Dwight (74) will leave Susan (74) to be alone after 55 years of marriage. If he survives, he will be 79 when he is released.


(u) During the court preceding the Hammonds were forced to grant the BLM first right of refusal. If the Hammonds ever sold their ranch they would have to sell it to the BLM.


(v) Dwight and Steven are ordered to report to federal prison again on January 4th, 2016 to begin their re-sentencing. Both their wives will have to manage the ranch for several years without them.


To date they have paid $200,000 to the BLM, and the remainder $200,000 must be paid before the end of this year (2015). If the Hammonds cannot pay the fines to the BLM, they will be forced to sell the ranch to the BLM or face further prosecution. (more citations here)


  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe you should ask yourself why you think these are bad people.

 

I never said they are bad people.  I'm simply using their line of thinking to achieve the same goal.  They believe that federal property belongs to the people and I'm part of the people, therefore part of that land by their logic belongs to me and I don't want them on my property, same as the neighbor punks next door to my actual home.....stay off my lawn.  Very simple really.  Come on now, did you really think I believed I was going to get into this hot topic conversation and be the popular guy in the room.  I, unlike so many here, don't believe the sky is falling.  I, unlike so many here, don't believe "the man" is going to show up and take my guns.  I, unlike so many here, believe there is always two sides to a story.  I, unlike so many here, believe politics is a two way street requiring debate and compromise.  And I, unlike so many here, don't live day to day with fear and anger in my heart.  The view from the fence is rather comical to tell you the truth.  On the left, I see millions of unarmed hipsters screaming guns are no good.  On the right, I see millions of people locked and loaded waiting for the unarmed lefty hipsters to invade.  Our country's not failing, it's just divided.....thanks to Obama and his refusal of compromise, a completely inept congress and it's refusal of compromise....and now Trump and his fear mongering.  Rant complete.   :D 

 

GO RV, then BV 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said they are bad people.  I'm simply using their line of thinking to achieve the same goal.  They believe that federal property belongs to the people and I'm part of the people, therefore part of that land by their logic belongs to me and I don't want them on my property, same as the neighbor punks next door to my actual home.....stay off my lawn.  Very simple really.  Come on now, did you really think I believed I was going to get into this hot topic conversation and be the popular guy in the room.  I, unlike so many here, don't believe the sky is falling.  I, unlike so many here, don't believe "the man" is going to show up and take my guns.  I, unlike so many here, believe there is always two sides to a story.  I, unlike so many here, believe politics is a two way street requiring debate and compromise.  And I, unlike so many here, don't live day to day with fear and anger in my heart.  The view from the fence is rather comical to tell you the truth.  On the left, I see millions of unarmed hipsters screaming guns are no good.  On the right, I see millions of people locked and loaded waiting for the unarmed lefty hipsters to invade.  Our country's not failing, it's just divided.....thanks to Obama and his refusal of compromise, a completely inept congress and it's refusal of compromise....and now Trump and his fear mongering.  Rant complete.   :D 

 

GO RV, then BV 

 

 

 

Nice rant man.

 

But the only problem with your on the fence theory is

that by the time you finally do see the threat and try to climb down off the fence its to late. 

 

 

But as kermit the frog would say as he`s sipping sweet tea .

 

Hey    Thats none of my concern.    :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said they are bad people.  I'm simply using their line of thinking to achieve the same goal.  They believe that federal property belongs to the people and I'm part of the people, therefore part of that land by their logic belongs to me and I don't want them on my property, same as the neighbor punks next door to my actual home.....stay off my lawn.  Very simple really.  Come on now, did you really think I believed I was going to get into this hot topic conversation and be the popular guy in the room.  I, unlike so many here, don't believe the sky is falling.  I, unlike so many here, don't believe "the man" is going to show up and take my guns.  I, unlike so many here, believe there is always two sides to a story.  I, unlike so many here, believe politics is a two way street requiring debate and compromise.  And I, unlike so many here, don't live day to day with fear and anger in my heart.  The view from the fence is rather comical to tell you the truth.  On the left, I see millions of unarmed hipsters screaming guns are no good.  On the right, I see millions of people locked and loaded waiting for the unarmed lefty hipsters to invade.  Our country's not failing, it's just divided.....thanks to Obama and his refusal of compromise, a completely inept congress and it's refusal of compromise....and now Trump and his fear mongering.  Rant complete.   :D 

 

GO RV, then BV 

Fence sitters are gamblers with no skin in the game.  They gamble their trust with both "sides" and then watch the results, and simply accept their personal "gain" or their "loss"... as well as the gain or loss of others. Like so many here, I refuse to be subject to that mindset.  Like so many here, I prefer to defend my perspective... with assertiveness and conviction.  Like so many here, I prefer to take my own gamble in such regards... with faith that I will win.  Like so many here, I want to be responsible for my own fate... not a consequence of others' gambling habits.  Like so many here... I could go on...  It's called vigilance, liberty, freedom... with daily attention, not just at election time.  I trust ME, over the government.  I trust in the Constitution of the land... not the people that run the government.  The Constitution trumps the human element of the government.

 

Frankly, I don't really know any overt fence sitters in "real life"... but of those I'm aware of overall, you're my favorite Shabs!!!

Edited by Jaxinjersey
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fence sitters are gamblers with no skin in the game.  They gamble their trust with both "sides" and then watch the results, and simply accept their personal "gain" or their "loss"... as well as the gain or loss of others. Like so many here, I refuse to be subject to that mindset.  Like so many here, I prefer to defend my perspective... with assertiveness and conviction.  Like so many here, I prefer to take my own gamble in such regards... with faith that I will win.  Like so many here, I want to be responsible for my own fate... not a consequence of others' gambling habits.  Like so many here... I could go on...  It's called vigilance, liberty, freedom... with daily attention, not just at election time.  I trust ME, over the government.  I trust in the Constitution of the land... not the people that run the government.  The Constitution trumps the human element of the government.

 

It literally comes down to right and wrong, Jax.  Just because I don't have some convoluted misconception that all things "right" occupy one particular side of the singular proverbial fence, does not mean I have no skin in the game.  

 

GO RV, then BV 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It literally comes down to right and wrong, Jax.  Just because I don't have some convoluted misconception that all things "right" occupy one particular side of the singular proverbial fence, does not mean I have no skin in the game.  

 

GO RV, then BV 

But understand Shabs... many many people have strong rooted beliefs in right and wrong... not just the belief of the day.  Many many people are comforted by their position, with a firm conviction of right and wrong that validates such.  In other words, they default to that position first... and then determine if they will budge.  However, the positions are very much defined for a reason... budging is most times unnecessary when analyzed and reasoned out.  Comfort is then validated... but often needs defending.  It's simply a matter of preferred position, mostly through experience and wisdom.  I value that which has provided my reasoned clarity... and I will always preserve that quality... that value, foremost. 

 

Most people are uncomfortable sitting on a fence, or constantly climbing from one side to the other and resting in between.  It's too consuming and exhausting... and takes a toll on clarity.  You are not one of them... and that is your choice.  

 

As I've said before Shabs... your perspective serves a purpose!  And those of us who use it to clarify our resolve, appreciate it.  Carry on my friend!

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most people are uncomfortable sitting on a fence, or constantly climbing from one side to the other and resting in between.  It's too consuming and exhausting... and takes a toll on clarity.  You are not one of them... and that is your choice.  

 

As I've said before Shabs... your perspective serves a purpose!  And those of us who use it to clarify our resolve, appreciate it.  Carry on my friend!

 

Always my pleasure to be a tool for clarity, my friend.    :peace: 

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

***///

 

Every American Patriot has "skin in the game".

 

If you allow the FED to walk all over your Constitutional Rights,  

 

and over-take Liberty & Justice for All, you are not just ignorant ,weak, and / or lazy...

 

you're a traitor personally handing over this Republic to dictators.

 

Not sure if your using the term "you" as a generalization of "anybody".....or if your using "you" as in me, Shabs.  If it's the first, you're spot on.  If it's the second........you know what you can do with your opinion.   :eyebrows: 

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

***///

 

So, thoughtful, SHABS....

 

If we broke a hip,

we'd yank out the bone and rap you on the head with it to try n' knock some sense into ya !  :lol:  :P

 

I can't decide which is more disconcerting.....the osteoporosis in that severed hip bone.....or your brand of "sense".    :eyebrows: 

 

GO RV, then BV

Edited by Shabibilicious
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.