Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

State law shows surprise at the government failed to include the oil agreement within the 2016 budget


yota691
 Share

Recommended Posts

 State law shows surprise at the government failed to include the oil agreement within the 2016 budget

19508.jpg
 
 BAGHDAD - Iraq Barre - November 7: showed a coalition of state law, on Saturday, was surprised at the government include the failed agreement with the KRG oil agreement within the 2016 budget, and wondered about the "fate of expenditure sent by the center to the region without receiving oil against which that is out of proportion of the 17 percent. "

he MP for the coalition of law, high-Nassif, in a statement quoted its press office and received / Iraq Press / copy of which was "surprised by the Iraqi government to include the oil agreement within the 2016 budget, despite the failure of the agreement after a short period of concluded due to non-fulfillment of the territory of any of its obligations Despite the large losses suffered by the state treasury as a result of this agreement failed. "

 

She explained: "The central government has already paid large sums of Peshmerga and 100 billion to support the electricity and 3 trillion to support the Government of Halabja, also paid the development of regions and expenses allocations province of Kirkuk in full (sovereign expenditure and the ruling), as well as it paid 17 percent of the region's share of the budget, If we assume that 17 percent receive government center in place of oil, what is the fate of the rest of the expenses paid to the province and that Ayatonna oil money? ".

 

It continued: "It's also not unreasonable to increase the amount of oil exported by Basra and the southern provinces, while still the province issued the same 550 thousand barrels of oil without an increase, we also pay to the province of Kirkuk amounts of operational and investment projects while the oil is not us, Vajeeb started Today we austerity measures to reform Iraqi money we waste on the other hand. "

 

And showed "that the House of Representatives bear legal and moral responsibility by not approve the inclusion of the oil agreement in the 2016 budget, with the need for the amendment of this budget the right way by hosting a representative government to be amended his presence to ensure that the appeal budget adjusted" .anthy a h. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

J p

Twilight News / expressed high Nassif MP on Saturday astonishment from the federal government to include the oil agreement "failed" agreement with the Kurdistan Regional Government in the 2016 budget.

Nassif said in a statement responded to Twilight News, it was "surprised by the Iraqi government to include the oil agreement within the 2016 budget, despite the failure of the agreement after a short period of concluded due to non-fulfillment of the territory of any of its obligations and despite the large losses suffered by the treasury State due to the failed agreement "according to its expression.

She explained that "the central government has already paid large sums of Peshmerga and 100 billion to support the electricity and 3 trillion to support the Government of Halabja, also paid the development of regions and expenses allocations province of Kirkuk in full (sovereign expenditure and the ruling), in addition to all that pay 17 percent of the region's share of the budget, If we assume that the 17 percent received by the central government instead of oil, what is the fate of the rest of the expenditures made for the region, which does not give us oil against which "?, as in the statement.

Nassif She "as it is unreasonable to increase the amount of oil exported by Basra and the southern provinces, while still the province issued the same 550 thousand barrels of oil without an increase, we also pay to the province of Kirkuk amounts of operational and investment projects while the oil is not us, Vajeeb we started Today we austerity measures to reform Iraqi money we waste on the other. "

It showed that "the House of Representatives bear legal and moral responsibility by not approve the inclusion of the oil agreement in the 2016 budget, with the need for the amendment of this budget the right way by hosting a representative government to be amended his presence to ensure that the appeal budget as modified."

The Baghdad and Erbil have signed last year stipulated that the second export an average of 550 000 barrels of crude oil through the Turkish pipeline Kurdish to the port of Ceyhan agreement 0.300 thousand barrels of them from the Kirkuk oilfields and the rest of the fields of the region compared to the first commitment to send Kurdistan's share of the Iraqi budget General, amounting to 17 percent of them, but the two sides often accused each other of acting Balaltvaq or not to abide by it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 
 

07/11/2015 10:28 GMT

  High Nassif express surprise at the government's inclusion of the oil agreement within the 2016 budget

 

158003.jpg
 

 

Follow-up - and babysit -.. showed high MP Nassif surprise of the government include the oil agreement, which it called "failed" agreement with the Kurdistan Regional Government in the 2016 budget, wondering about the fate of expenditure sent by the center to the region without receiving oil against which that is out of proportion 17 percent.

 

 

She said: "We are surprised by the Iraqi government to include the oil agreement within the 2016 budget, despite the failure of the agreement after a short period of concluded because of the region not to meet any of its obligations and despite the large losses suffered by the state treasury as a result of this agreement failed."

 

She explained: "The central government has already paid large sums of Peshmerga and 100 billion to support the electricity and 3 trillion to support the Government of Halabja, also paid the development of regions and expenses allocations province of Kirkuk in full (sovereign expenditure and the ruling), and in addition to all that pay 17 percent of the region's share of the budget and, if we assume that the 17 percent receive government oil center instead, what the fate of the rest of the expenses paid to the province and that Ayatonna oil money? ".

 

It continued: "It's also not unreasonable to increase the amount of oil exported by Basra and the southern provinces, while still the province issued the same 550 thousand barrels of oil without an increase, we also pay to the province of Kirkuk amounts of operational and investment projects while the oil is not us, Vajeeb started Today we austerity measures to reform Iraqi money we waste on the other. "

 

And showed "that the House of Representatives bear legal and moral responsibility by not approve the inclusion of the oil agreement in the 2016 budget, with the need for the amendment of this budget the right way by hosting a representative government to be amended his presence to ensure that the appeal budget as modified."

 

http://www.alrayy.com/158003.htm

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much appreciated Yota and K98, I can't help but wonder, if she is Maliki's, Monica Lewinsky.

 Here I am all happy and reading all the posts, and you had to put that image in my mind *shudders uncontrollably* speaking of troll(s), she is scary looking!

Unlike, I may add, Monica. I thought Bill should have dumped hilda beast for Monica a long time ago.

stop harshing my buzz Sibes! ;)

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I find so comical is all these State of Law politicians and ex-finance minister don't have a clue how a democracy is supposed to operate because most of them were on Maliki's corrupt under the table payroll.

I read an article yesterday where M's old finance minister was trying to tell the CBI how to roll out the new currency reform.

Also, the parliament members are pissed because Abadi cut their salaries because the IMF required it to move ahead with the dinar reforms.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.