Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Amanda Knox ruling by Italy's highest court could lead to new legal battle


Recommended Posts

If Knox and Raffaele Sollecito’s 2014 guilty verdicts for the murder of Meredith Kercher are upheld this week, a battle to extradite Knox to Italy could be next



Stephanie Kirchgaessner in Rome and Nicky Woolf in Seattle


Friday 20 March 2015 18.32 GMT




Amanda Knox was en route to Seattle from Rome – a free woman whose conviction for murder had just been overturned – when David Thorne, the US ambassador to Italy, sent a cable to the State Department declaring that the case was officially over.


Thorne’s relief seemed palpable. Knox’s arrest, trial and imprisonment for the brutal slaying of her British housemate, Meredith Kercher, had dominated headlines all over the world, and was closely followed by American officials in Rome, diplomatic cables would later reveal. “Post considers this case closed,” he wrote in October 2011.


It turned out to be premature, but the depth of the ambassador’s miscalculation will only fully be known next week, when a highly-anticipated ruling in the ongoing case by Italy’s highest court could open the door to a whole new legal battle over Knox’s potential extradition from the US, a decision that would have significant diplomatic and political consequences from Rome to Washington DC.


Knox – who has been portrayed both as a maligned and naive innocent and as a sex-crazed psychopath – has already said she would have to be dragged “kicking and screaming” back to Italy. Many factors could influence the outcome of a potential extradition request. Even the decision of whether or not Knox wishes to have a child – she plans to marry a schoolfriend called Colin Sutherland – could become a factor in her forced return to the bel paese because American officials might delay the extradition of the mother of a small child. But the final decision – Italy’s to seek the extradition and the US’s to grant such a request – could ultimately hinge on politics, legal experts say.


The case has been long and complicated so far, with a series of drawn out decisions, appeals and reversals that are common in the notoriously slow and backlogged Italian justice system. Knox and her former boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, were convicted of Kercher’s murder in 2009, then freed on appeal two years later because of doubts about the veracity of physical evidence, including the alleged murder weapon found at Sollecito’s apartment. Both Knox and Sollecito have always maintained their innocence.


That acquittal was then thrown out of court in 2013 because the appeals court was ruled to have been inconsistent in its judgment of the evidence. A year later, after a retrial, the pair were found guilty – again – of murder, with Knox sentenced to 28 and a half years in prison, and Sollecito to 25 years.


Under Italian law, that decision will not be considered final unless and until it is upheld by the court of cassation in its ruling this week, which could come as soon as Wednesday. That is why Knox has been able to live freely in the US, even though she is currently considered guilty of murder in Italy. Sollecito is also free in Italy right now, but would be arrested immediately if the conviction were upheld.


If it does not uphold the conviction, the court could also decide to send one or both defendants back to trial, but it does not have the power to acquit Knox or Sollecito outright.


The pair knew one another for seven days prior to the murder. Their public canoodling shortly after Kercher’s body was discovered aroused suspicion at the time and fueled the perception – among those who believe they are guilty – that Knox, in particular, was a psychopath.


Though they are no longer a couple, the pair have faced justice together since their first interrogations by police in Perugia. That, too, could change this week. Sollecito’s attorney hinted last year that she would seek to exploit differences in their cases. “They’re not Siamese twins,” Giulia Bongiorno told reporters last year.


The court’s latest conviction relied on a written confession Knox made – and then later retracted – after being questioned by police, in which she said she had been in the house when the murder occurred but not participated in the crime, and that her boyfriend was not there. A third man, an Ivorian named Rudy Guede, was also convicted of murdering Kercher in 2008 after a fast-track trial. He has almost served half of his 16-year sentence. Although Sollecito has long maintained that both he and his former lover are innocent, his defence will now rely on the truthfulness of a confession that Knox has said was made under duress.


“If you believe in the confession, Sollecito is extraneous to the facts,” Bongiorno told the Guardian. “The words of Amanda Knox … exonerate Sollecito.”


Even if their convictions are upheld, the wheels of justice will continue to move slowly. After the court releases its legal rationale for the decision – which could take up to 90 days – the Italian minister of justice would then have up to six months to determine whether to demand Knox’s return from the US.


Michael Scadron, a former lawyer for the US Department of Justice and a keen observer of the Knox case, predicts the Italians would not seek extradition under pressure from the US. “They will use back channel diplomacy to prevent a request,” he says.


If such a request was nevertheless made, the US would technically have to abide by it under the strict terms of an extradition treaty between the countries.


“If the Italian supreme court sustains the conviction, it will be nearly impossible for the US – despite the political uproar that will occur among those who believe she is innocent – not to extradite her to Italy,” says Steve Clemons, a senior fellow at the New America Foundation and foreign policy expert. “Emotions may run high, but in the end the relations between Italy and the US are deep, strategic, complex, and are designed to respect each other’s laws, even in controversial cases,” he added.


Relations have not always been rosy, however. In 2001, diplomats from both sides had to duke out an agreement over a woman called Silvia Baraldini, an icon of the Italian left who had been convicted of bank robbery and kidnapping in the US but was released to Italy under the condition that she serve nine more years of her prison sentence. Baraldini was released early to be treated for cancer following tense negotiations in an episode that insiders say created mistrust between the parties.


Under US law, if an extradition request is made, it would be scrutinised by the State Department and then the Justice Department, and would then have to be approved by a US court, where Knox could appeal the extradition. If the courts approve of the request, the final decision rests with the US secretary of state, John Kerry.


It is far from clear on what grounds the US government could ultimately challenge a legal request. Some lawyers have said the fact that Knox was once acquitted of the crime, and then convicted, smacked of “double jeopardy”, the concept that a person cannot legally be tried twice for the same crime. Double jeopardy is specifically outlined as an exemption in the US-Italy extradition treaty, though it has never been tested in court.


Italian legal experts flatly reject that argument. They say Knox has not been charged in separate legal cases. She has gone through a single process that has not been particularly unusual in the multi-tiered Italian justice system, which the US agreed to respect.


Back in her home town of Seattle, Knox has begun tentatively to try to return to some semblance of a normal life. In the face of immense attention from journalists and paparazzi, she has kept a low profile. Last year, she started working for a local newspaper, the West Seattle Herald, writing features and theatre reviews. Her editor, Patrick Robinson, told the Daily Beast that he had approached her “to give her the opportunity of a normal life”.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems to be the nightmare she just can't wake up from.    When will this ever end?    :shakehead:  :facepalm:

I hope  it will end soon.. Unfortunately our legal system is  "slightly" screwed up....I know....I live here....


While perfection doesn't exist practically in any country.... Things could be  greatly improved,  granted the good will to do it...Which I can't see so far

Edited by umbertino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By umbertino
      by: Scott Marshall June 12 2015
      CHICAGO - The Illinois Alliance of Retired Americans, SEIU Healthcare Illinois, and several other community and labor retiree organizations held a rally on June 10 to protest Illinois Governor Bruce Rauner's state budget proposals.
      The rally took place in the plaza outside of Rauner's Chicago state office. Rauner would not meet with the rally organizers. Instead he sent two staff members to receive petitions against the cuts to social services and programs.
      The staffers refused to come outside and said only a few could come into the building. (The Thompson Center is a large public building with shops and a huge public mezzanine. There are separate security check-points to get on the elevators to the state office floors above.) The staffers also said that only five people could come in to see them and that cameras and media would not be allowed. However, several dozen demonstrators entered.
      Some media and folks with cameras were threatened; told that they were violating the Homeland Security Act. Really.
      Photo: Video snapshot.
    • By umbertino
      Lender says its negotiating team are going home to Washington due to a lack of progress in narrowing key differences with Athens
      Phillip Inman and Graeme Wearden in London, and Helena Smith in Athens
      Thursday 11 June 2015 17.58 BST  Last modified on Thursday 11 June 2015 18.48 BST
    • By umbertino
      Video posted on YouTube ‘raised concerns’ after it shows the police officer breaking up party in an overly aggressive manner
      Martin Pengelly in New York
      @MartinPengelly  Sunday 7 June 2015 21.50 BST
      A Texas police officer has been suspended after
      showed him breaking up a pool party in an extremely aggressive manner, including drawing his gun. 
      On Friday, units from the McKinney police department were called to the party, at Craig Ranch North Community Pool in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, over reports of a fight. Police said the incident involved “multiple juveniles at the location, who do not live in the area or have permission to be there, refusing to leave”.
      On Sunday, McKinney police chief Greg Conley spoke to reporters about what followed.
      “Several concerns about the conduct of one of the officers at the scene have been raised,” local ABC affiliate WFAA8 reported him as saying. “The McKinney police department is committed to treating all persons fairly under the law. We are committed to preserving the peace and safety of our community for all our citizens.”
        Conley did not name the officer in question, who was not named when his suspension was announced.
      According to WFAA8, Conley added: “A 14-year-old female was temporarily detained by one of the officers. She was ultimately released to her parents.”
      Video posted to YouTube on Saturday shows one officer sprinting past the camera, falling and losing his flashlight, then running again.
      Teenagers are seen returning the flashlight to another officer, who responds politely, before the first officer returns and shouts: “On the ground! I told you to stay! Get your asses on the ground. I told you to stay!”
      The officer, who was not named when his suspension was announced, is then seen forcing a number of teenagers to lie on a grass verge and a sidewalk and telling others to “get your ass out of here”. Some teenagers are handcuffed.
      One teenager can be heard saying: “Sir, we just came from a birthday party, please.”
      Another says: “Officer, I can’t find my bag.”
      The officer replies: “I don’t care, sit down.”
      The officer is then shown talking to teenagers on the ground.
      “Don’t make me run round here with 30 kinds of ******* gear on in the sun,” he says, “because you want to screw around out here.”
      He then forces a group of bystanders to leave. One, a girl, does not comply and the officer wrestles her to the ground. When other teenagers surround him to remonstrate, he draws his gun. Two other officers move to restrain him, and the officer re-holsters the weapon. He then slams the girl back to the ground, shouting: “On your face!”
        As the officer appears to sit on the girl to keep her subdued, hectoring her all the while, a voice, possibly that of the person filming the incident, says the officer pulled a gun on the girl.
      “No I didn’t,” he says, pointing at the camera. “Now get your butts outta here.”
      The officer is later shown in close-up, lecturing two boys who are sitting on the ground.
      “You just did what everybody else did,” he says, “and what everybody else did was illegal. You did it and you got caught. Now you’re sitting here paying for it.
      “I asked y’all to sit,” he adds, “you didn’t and you became a part of the mob. You could’ve been the guys that were doing right and you weren’t, so now you’re sitting here in trouble.”
      The officer in question is white; most of the teenagers on the video are African American. A number of white men in civilian clothes are also shown.
      The poster of the YouTube video, named on the site as Brandon Brooks, wrote: “A fight between a mom and a girl broke out and when the cops showed up everyone ran, including the people who didn’t do anything. So the cops just started putting everyone on the ground and in handcuffs for no reason. This kind of force is uncalled for especially on children and innocent bystanders.”
    • By umbertino
      For the first time in his 13-year rule, the president must enter coalition talks or call new elections as Kurdish party scores a stunning success
      Constanze Letsch in Istanbul and agencies
       Monday 8 June 2015 07.05 BST
      Coalition talks will dominate the coming weeks in Turkey after voters snubbed President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s plans to change the constitution and extend his grip on power, delivering the biggest blow to his Justice and Development party (AKP) since it swept to power in 2002.
      The election result appears to have wrecked Erdogan’s ambition of rewriting the constitution to establish himself as an all-powerful executive president, while the country’s large Kurdish minority has been granted its biggest voice ever in national politics.
      The election breakthrough for the leftist HDP, a new party largely representing the Kurds but also encompassing liberals nationally, was greeted with wild celebrations in the Kurdish-majority city of Diyarbakir in south-eastern Turkey. Cars paraded through the city with drivers honking and people hanging out from windows making ‘V’ signs as occasional gunshots were fired into the air.
        The results will give the Kurds – who, with 20% of Turkey’s population, are the country’s biggest minority – true representation in parliament. The HDP surpassed the steep 10% threshold for entering parliament to take more than 12% of the vote and around 80 seats in the 550-strong chamber. The party’s result also denied Erdoğan’s AKP its majority.
      The 10% hurdle, dating from the military-authored constitution of 1980, had been intended in part to diminish Kurdish representation in the parliament.
      Erdoğan is yet to speak following the vote, which was the first time in four general elections to see a fall in his support. While the AKP comfortably managed to secure the biggest portion of the vote, its 41% share of seats represents a sharp drop from its performance the 2011 elections, when it won nearly half the national vote. For the first time since 2002, the AKP will need to form a coalition government or call new elections.
      It remains unclear who will be a likely partner for the AKP after the most likely candidate, the rightwing Nationalist Movement party (MHP) ruled out the possibility of a coalition.
      According to the state-run Anadolu agency, the party leader, Devlet Bahceli, said the party was “ready to be a main opposition party” against an AKP-led coalition or minority government during a speech from party headquarters in Ankara early on Monday.
      “Nobody has a right to drag Turkey into [AKP] minority and some circles’ scenarios,” said Bahceli. “A snap election will happen whenever it will happen.” He welcomed the election results, with his party gaining 31 seats in parliament.
      Selahattin Demirtas, co-chair of the leftist HDP, and surprise star of this election, also dismissed any possibility of a coalition with the AKP.
      “We will not form a coalition with the AKP. We stand behind our words. We will be in parliament as a strong opposition,” Demirtas said in a press conference in Istanbul on Sunday night. He added that the election results had clearly put an end to all plans of an executive presidency.
        “As of this moment, the debate on the presidency, the debate about dictatorship, has come to an end in Turkey. Turkey has returned from the edge of a cliff,” he said.
      Pro-government newspapers on Monday morning were already calling for early elections. “The ballot box revealed the ballot box”, read the headline of the conservative daily Yeni Safak.
      Burhan Kuzu, the AK party deputy and head of the parliamentary constitution commission, said snap elections were inevitable. “No government will emerge from this scenario. Not even a coalition,” he told BBC Türkçe. “Early elections look inevitable.” He added that the election results reflected the weakness of the parliamentary system.
      “The parliamentary system is a curse for the whole world. In Turkey only majority governments ever worked, coalitions always destroyed it.” He said that the only solution would be an executive presidency.
      According to the AFP news agency, new elections could be called any time in the next 45 days.
      Official results based on 99.9% of votes counted put the AKP in the lead, followed by the Republican People’s party (CHP) on 25%, the MHP on 16.5% and the HDP in fourth place with 13%. Turnout was 86%. According to official projections, the AKP will have 258 seats in the 550-seat parliament, CHP 132, MHP 81 and HDP 79.
      The AKP has dominated Turkish politics since it first came to power in 2002, but has suffered from a dip in economic growth and controversy over Erdoğan’s perceived authoritarian tendencies.
      The results wreck Erdoğan’s dream of agreeing a new constitution to switch Turkey from a parliamentary to a presidential system that he had made a fundamental issue in the campaign. Such a change would have required a two-thirds majority in the parliament.
      Speaking from the balcony of AKP headquarters in Ankara – the traditional venue for the party’s victory speeches – the prime minister and party leader, Ahmet Davutoglu, sought to put a brave face on the results. “The winner of the election is again the AKP, there’s no doubt,” he said, pledging to ensure Turkey’s stability. But he added: “Our people’s decision is final. It’s above everything and we will act in line with it.”
      But the atmosphere outside the AKP’s headquarters was muted. Several hundred supporters chanted for Erdoğan, the party’s founder, but there was little sign of the huge crowds that gathered after past election victories.
      Erdogan’s divide-and-rule strategy of rallying his religious-conservative base has led to increasing polarisation in Turkey, and in some cases to violence. Erdoğan had repeatedly lashed out at the HDP and its charismatic leader Demirtaş before the elections.
      The HDP ran on a platform defending the rights of ethnic minorities, women, and lesbian, ***, bisexual and transgender people - forming an electoral coalition between the Kurdish minority in Turkey’s south-east and liberals in Istanbul and elsewhere.
      “This result shows that this country has had enough. Enough of Erdoğan and his anger,” said Seyran Demir, a 47-year-old who was among the thousands who gathered in the streets around the HDP’s provincial headquarters in Diyarbakir. “I am so full of joy that I can’t speak properly.”
      “It is a carnival night,” said 47-year-old Huseyin Durmaz, a Kurd. “We no longer trust the AKP,” he said.
      Another record was set by the number of women MPs set to take a seat in parliament after an unofficial tally estimated a total of 96 female parliamentarians securing a place in the Turkish grand national assembly – a record high and up from 79 in 2011.
    • By umbertino
      Greek prime minister accuses his country’s creditors of making ‘absurd’ demands and insists debt restructuring offer must stay in place
      Heather Stewart and Helena Smith in Athens
       Friday 5 June 2015 20.03 BST
      The Greek prime minister, Alexis Tsipras, has warned that time is running out to rescue the country from the brink of bankruptcy an and exit from the eurozone, ensuring that Greece’s plight will be a pressing concern for G7 leaders as they gather in Bavaria.
      With the end of June now regarded as the last possible moment for striking a deal to release the €7.2bn (£5.2bn...$8B) in bailout funds that Greece needs to stay afloat, Tsipras struck a defiant tone in a statement before the country’s parliament, accusing Greece’s creditors of making “absurd” demands on his recession-hit country and insisting, “they won’t humiliate us”.
      Tsipras also appealed to the Greek opposition parties – and his own Syriza MPs – to give their backing to his negotiating stance and reject the latest proposals from the country’s paymasters.
        “Time is not only running out for us, it is running out for everyone,” he warned, adding, “Greek people should be proud because the government is not going to give into absurd proposals.”
      He also insisted that a debt restructuring – writing off some of the €320bn that Greece owes – must remain on the table.
      US officials, including the Treasury secretary, Jack Lew, have repeatedly warned their European counterparts not to be complacent about the economic risks of a so-called Grexit, and President Obama is likely to reiterate that argument this weekend. The US president is likely to be particularly concerned that Greece could turn to Russia for aid. Tsipras underlined that risk on Friday by letting it be known he was holding a phone conversation with Russian president Vladimir Putin.
      In the Greek parliament, Antonis Samaras, leader of the opposition New Democracy party, accused Tsipras of mishandling the negotiations and tipping Greece back into recession. “You have totally destroyed the country and isolated us,” he said.
      Analysts said Tsipras’s firm public rejection of the creditors’ latest proposal made it hard to envisage a deal emerging. Nick Spiro, of Spiro Sovereign Strategy, said it was, “difficult to see a basis for further negotiation”, given that Greece and its paymasters were already “at daggers drawn”.
      The German chancellor, Angela Merkel, is thought to favour a compromise in the talks between Greece’s radical leftist government and its lenders, but the International Monetary Fund has argued for a tougher stance.
      Tsipras went to the Greek parliament to explain his stance last night, after Athens took the risky decision to delay a €300m ($333.3M) payment to the IMF.
        In a highly charged parliamentary session, Tsipras condemned the proposals tabled at a late-night meeting in Brussels on Wednesday.
      A leaked draft of those proposals called on Athens to make pensions cuts, raise VAT and cancel the planned repeal of controversial labour market reforms imposed as part of its original bailout deal.
      All of these demands are unacceptable to Tsipras and to many in his party. He had hoped to return to Brussels to continue negotiations on Friday but a furious response from his Syriza colleagues forced him to remain in Greece and make the case for continuing to engage in the negotiations.
      Greek share prices were sold off sharply as investors absorbed the news that Athens had refused to make the IMF payment, a decision that emerged after markets closed on Thursday night. The Athens general composite index fell by almost 5%, with banks hit particularly hard.
      Athens exploited a little-known loophole in IMF rules and announced that it would bundle up four debt repayments into one lump sum at the end of the month.
      The ratings agency Fitch confirmed on Friday that Greece’s decision to postpone the payment would not jeopardise its credit rating, which has already been cut to CCC over the course of the crisis.
      Fitch warned: “The risk that Greece misses its larger IMF payment at the end of June cannot be discounted,” adding that Athens’ decision “illustrates the pressure that a lack of market or official funding and tight liquidity conditions for Greek banks are putting on Greece’s sovereign liquidity”.
      A group of high-profile economists, including the Nobel prizewinner Joseph Stiglitz and John Maynard Keynes’ biographer Robert Skidelsky, also wrote a letter to the Financial Times calling for Greece to be granted debt forgiveness, starting with an immediate moratorium on repayments in return for economic reforms. “We think that the whole of Europe will benefit from Greece being given the chance of a fresh start,” they said.
  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.