Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

America the Battlefield - A New Order of Nations


waterman13
 Share

Recommended Posts

"An oligarchy of wealthy individuals who want to bring the world under socialism in order to enslave the common man"???

 

That makes no sense. The common man is already enslaved, under capitalism.

 

Then there is the racial component that is missing from this analysis. 1.3 billion Chinese are going to put up with being ruled by "wealthy individuals"....meaning what? Rich white guys from Europe or America? I don't think so. That's an idiotic suggestion. The Chinese see us as barbarian. Anyone who could suggest such a thing is culturally illiterate and has never travelled anywhere or understood other countries and cultures. Laughably idiotic.

 

Then there is the invasion of Iraq. The greatest Superpower in history blew 3 Trillion Dollars trying to defeat an insurgency in a mid-sized middle eastern country. There are hundreds of countries around the world were order would have to be imposed, by force. How much will it cost to impose order on the rest of the world? 3 million X 1Trillion dollars?.....

 

This can't be done. Afghanistan alone swallows up whole armies, as the British and Alexander the Great and now the Americans are figuring out.

 

Or conversely, a billion White people are going to agree to be ruled by rich Chinese? Not gonna happen.

 

Caveat: This can't be done......Not yet anyhow...... However, in 50-75 years, when robots become intelligent, can make other robot warriors, and the whole world relies on the internet, then the technological levers of power could be centralized to control the world....then it would be at least more practical.

 

Still, even then, very very difficult.

 

The Chinese and Indians are at least as clever as Americans, and by then they will control technology just as powerful as the stuff in Europe or America.

 

Then there is the whole bogeyman of "socialism" running through this paranoid right-wing rant. It is never really defined, in the article. Good thing they didn't define it. Because it would offend many people who read this stuff and would agree with it. Because it would bring out the silliness of the entire point of view. But right-wing people should not think too hard about the vague boogey man of "socialism" that is brought up, anyhow.  Here's why: Because Medicare and Medicaid are socialist. So is the Social Security check many of you cash. So are many of the highways many of you drive on. Hell so are the schools you send  your children or grandchildren to.....conservatives tend to be older voters and are the biggest takers of socialist benefits. Just the very people to buy into this nonsense.

 

My financial advisor told me 25 years ago: "Only about 5% of people will have enough money to retire on"

 

I asked him where the rest would get their money to live on in their old age?

 

"The government", he said.

 

In other words, socialism.

 

Because wealth tends to accumulate in a few hands, which is simply the way capitalism works, a few people have all the money. And the rest of us are hard-working socialists.  

 

I had to laugh one time. I saw a Tea Party Rally. There was a picture of a woman holding up a placard. It read: "Keep your dirty socialist hands off my Social Security!"

 

So ironically unaware of her own hypocrisy and self-evident silliness, and lack of perception on her own fitting into the socialist benefits of society and why they were necessary in a capitalist society where wealth tends to concentrate in a few hands, as economist Thomas Picketty has figured out. 

 

Then they throw in a bit of the Bible, of course, to make it sound holy and get Christians to buy into this worldview. Which is fine. Here, let me throw a little Bible in, myself: The first Christians lived together. They shared all their common wealth. No one owned things and was richer than the others. What do I call this? Socialism at minimum.

 

However I do agree with right-wingers on the right to bear arms.

 

And anyone who believes the stuff in this article really should get involved in politics.

 

They got some things right, however. War is a racket of the business elites, to make more money.

 

Just like with the Iraqi Dinar. That's why I got into this investment. I saw that the Iraq War was a racket to make money, and the crook in me wanted a slice of the pie, quite frankly.

 

Here's the real kicker, though: technology is developing at a breakneck speed. We humans already have the technology so that everyone in the world can have a middle class way of life. That will come in time. It used to take one farmer to feed a couple of people. Now one good farmer, like my brother in law, can feed a hundred, thanks to using technology. Several decades ago, about 30% of the American labor force was employed in factories, making things. Now, thanks to increases in technology, that figure is down to around 10%. It is expected to go down to around 3% in time.

 

Do you see a trend here? I do. We humans very soon will have the means to produce a very good life for everyone if we just organize our technology properly. We will need fewer and fewer humans to achieve that goal. The rest of us will demand a decent life, since we too are humans. The 1% can't and should not run away with everything. Now what happens when your labor is no longer required, because a machine took your job?

 

Sound impractical? There are google cars driving on the streets of Los Angeles, as the technology is worked out, for driverless cars. Bill Gates has said that within 30 years, robots will advance enough to do 50% of American jobs.... and that is barely the beginning. Robots are winning Jeopardy tournaments, understanding human language, and are replacing doctors and lawyers.

 

So what will the rest of us do when our labor, our brains are no longer required, to produce wealth for us and our children?

 

Turn to socialism, I guess.

 

....oh well, there's that boogeyman again...lol

 

...oh well, interesting read. Helped me understand the right wing, a bit better. Thanks.

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would also agree with the right-wingers that American troops should never submit to the authority of the United Nations. I can't ever see that happening, and should be fought. I think  from reading the link I understand a little better, the paranoia at the heart of the right-wing military. They see a lot of bad s*it in their lives. Far, far more than almost anyone. And this gives people in the military a very paranoid streak in them. I have known several ex-military people personally, including 2 brothers, and that  paranoid streak has always been there. I think it naturally arises out of the nature of the work these people are expected to do. I have tremendous respect for military people, but like all groups, they really have their limits. Remember all those failed banana republics in Central America and South America and many other places around the  world over the past century? For me one of the central lessons of the past century is that military people generally make very shi**y civilian political leaders. It's an entirely different skill-set and mentality. There are exceptions like Dwight Eisenhower, but as a general rule I think it's true. For instance I would not want to have John McCain as President. The man is clearly a nutjob. And who wouldn't be, having gone through what he did? The man was tortured for 5 years. That permanently twists and warps a human being. There is no chance of recovery from something like that. John appears to function as a normal human being but he does not fool me. He would start a nuclear war if in charge. He has been too scarred and twisted by war, to lead. That is why civilian leaders are as a rule, better. They have not had their psychology twisted by awful debilitating life experiences nearly as often as people in the military have. Again, I have tremendous respect for the military, but I can see in this article how the necessary paranoia required to fight in war can get twisted into a very strange world view, based on paranoia and twisted versions of reality, that arise from that paranoia. It's frightening to see  someone's mind up close in this article. Someone obviously very intelligent, yet completely out of tune with psychological well being and health. Reminds me of Adolph Hitler, a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rochester, That's a good analysis. But, it really comes down to the BANKSTERS and their agenda. They have used the US military to set up puppet governments and start wars for years. In some twisted way bringing down the US and the USD (because they have already bought a lot of gold and silver using their fiat currency - printed out of thin air) is good for them so they can then set up a one world currency. They can't do that with the Dollar being strong, it has to be brought down in their eyes. That's why they are trying to shrink the military, removing top officers with long dedicated careers. Making it an environment for foreign troops (UN) to come in to control the public. That's why they are trying to take away guns, less resistance. Besides War is Money to them, big business.

JMO

Wm13

Edited by waterman13
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for posting my blog, waterman13. As for Rochester, I have traveled all over the world to 18 countries, which gave me a wealth of exposure to world culture and helped to make me more culturally literate. This particular article was not about the racial and cultural divisions, but about the military's documented involvement in bringing about a new world order. If I added every single angle and argument, my blogs would be painfully longer than they are already. ;) - Tim

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This oligarchy plan is called agenda 21. Look it up it goes into detail on how bad it going to get here in America and everywhere else in the world. People need to read and pass it along to friends and family. The more people that know about what these insane people plan for the rest of us for the 21 century, we will be able to stop them for good. They are losing their grip on the sheeple more and more every day. We have or vote but we have more might because we out number them and we have guns. It is always good the have knowledge of what the enemy is doing. I have noticed something with the way the elite do things because of rothdad. They have to tell us what they are gonna do before they actually do it. But we also can stop them by knowing. Its our choice. That's my rant don't mean to come off as being paranoid, its the truth.

Edited by jobug38
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"An oligarchy of wealthy individuals who want to bring the world under socialism in order to enslave the common man"???

 

That makes no sense. The common man is already enslaved, under capitalism.

 

Then there is the racial component that is missing from this analysis. 1.3 billion Chinese are going to put up with being ruled by "wealthy individuals"....meaning what? Rich white guys from Europe or America? I don't think so. That's an idiotic suggestion. The Chinese see us as barbarian. Anyone who could suggest such a thing is culturally illiterate and has never travelled anywhere or understood other countries and cultures. Laughably idiotic.

 

Then there is the invasion of Iraq. The greatest Superpower in history blew 3 Trillion Dollars trying to defeat an insurgency in a mid-sized middle eastern country. There are hundreds of countries around the world were order would have to be imposed, by force. How much will it cost to impose order on the rest of the world? 3 million X 1Trillion dollars?.....

 

This can't be done. Afghanistan alone swallows up whole armies, as the British and Alexander the Great and now the Americans are figuring out.

 

Or conversely, a billion White people are going to agree to be ruled by rich Chinese? Not gonna happen.

 

Caveat: This can't be done......Not yet anyhow...... However, in 50-75 years, when robots become intelligent, can make other robot warriors, and the whole world relies on the internet, then the technological levers of power could be centralized to control the world....then it would be at least more practical.

 

Still, even then, very very difficult.

 

The Chinese and Indians are at least as clever as Americans, and by then they will control technology just as powerful as the stuff in Europe or America.

 

Then there is the whole bogeyman of "socialism" running through this paranoid right-wing rant. It is never really defined, in the article. Good thing they didn't define it. Because it would offend many people who read this stuff and would agree with it. Because it would bring out the silliness of the entire point of view. But right-wing people should not think too hard about the vague boogey man of "socialism" that is brought up, anyhow.  Here's why: Because Medicare and Medicaid are socialist. So is the Social Security check many of you cash. So are many of the highways many of you drive on. Hell so are the schools you send  your children or grandchildren to.....conservatives tend to be older voters and are the biggest takers of socialist benefits. Just the very people to buy into this nonsense.

 

My financial advisor told me 25 years ago: "Only about 5% of people will have enough money to retire on"

 

I asked him where the rest would get their money to live on in their old age?

 

"The government", he said.

 

In other words, socialism.

 

Because wealth tends to accumulate in a few hands, which is simply the way capitalism works, a few people have all the money. And the rest of us are hard-working socialists.  

 

I had to laugh one time. I saw a Tea Party Rally. There was a picture of a woman holding up a placard. It read: "Keep your dirty socialist hands off my Social Security!"

 

So ironically unaware of her own hypocrisy and self-evident silliness, and lack of perception on her own fitting into the socialist benefits of society and why they were necessary in a capitalist society where wealth tends to concentrate in a few hands, as economist Thomas Picketty has figured out. 

 

Then they throw in a bit of the Bible, of course, to make it sound holy and get Christians to buy into this worldview. Which is fine. Here, let me throw a little Bible in, myself: The first Christians lived together. They shared all their common wealth. No one owned things and was richer than the others. What do I call this? Socialism at minimum.

 

However I do agree with right-wingers on the right to bear arms.

 

And anyone who believes the stuff in this article really should get involved in politics.

 

They got some things right, however. War is a racket of the business elites, to make more money.

 

Just like with the Iraqi Dinar. That's why I got into this investment. I saw that the Iraq War was a racket to make money, and the crook in me wanted a slice of the pie, quite frankly.

 

Here's the real kicker, though: technology is developing at a breakneck speed. We humans already have the technology so that everyone in the world can have a middle class way of life. That will come in time. It used to take one farmer to feed a couple of people. Now one good farmer, like my brother in law, can feed a hundred, thanks to using technology. Several decades ago, about 30% of the American labor force was employed in factories, making things. Now, thanks to increases in technology, that figure is down to around 10%. It is expected to go down to around 3% in time.

 

Do you see a trend here? I do. We humans very soon will have the means to produce a very good life for everyone if we just organize our technology properly. We will need fewer and fewer humans to achieve that goal. The rest of us will demand a decent life, since we too are humans. The 1% can't and should not run away with everything. Now what happens when your labor is no longer required, because a machine took your job?

 

Sound impractical? There are google cars driving on the streets of Los Angeles, as the technology is worked out, for driverless cars. Bill Gates has said that within 30 years, robots will advance enough to do 50% of American jobs.... and that is barely the beginning. Robots are winning Jeopardy tournaments, understanding human language, and are replacing doctors and lawyers.

 

So what will the rest of us do when our labor, our brains are no longer required, to produce wealth for us and our children?

 

Turn to socialism, I guess.

 

....oh well, there's that boogeyman again...lol

 

...oh well, interesting read. Helped me understand the right wing, a bit better. Thanks.

I agree with much you are saying  

EXCEPT "We humans very soon will have the means to produce a very good life for everyone"

That will sadly never be allowed!

Much like the tech needed to build a car that will go 50 miles per gallon! It was built decades ago but the auto makers/oil companies brought off the ideas before they ever saw the light!

The rich WILL find a way to keep the masses in their place! :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@gymrat, hope you are wrong. Also, the rich don't control the Chinese. The Chinese have almost no oil. They are looking for alternatives to oil. If one came along, they would tell America and the oil producers to jump into a shallow pool, face first, and then build them to their hearts content. Oil does not control politics in China the way it does in America. However I agree with your general distrust of the wealthy, and their need to control people.

 

@waterman13, thanks! And yes, banksters are evil.

 

@jobug38, paranoia is not always a bad thing! Republicans and conservatives should get more involved in sustainability movements and ecology movement in general. They tend to be dominated by left-wing people like myself. That is unhealthy. If you opposed to Agenda 21 but care about the future of the planet, get involved somehow and come up with your own ideas, if you don't like theirs.

 

@America the Battlefield, thanks. I'll keep an open mind about your ideas. I am committed to the idea that I could be wrong, about anything, and reserve the right to change my mind, if I get convinced to change my mind about something. thx

 

I appreciate everyone's comments! thx!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rochester,

I'm glad that you will keep an open mind, that's important in these times. I have found you have to dig really deep to find out what the elite of this country (US) and many others have planned, things like the Georgia Guide Stones, kinda lines up with this the plans from the War College. Things that make you wonder what's going on.

 

I have been studying for years things like the layout of Washington DC, Isis worship (top of the Capitol bldg. the Statue of Liberty for examples) Then Sun god worship with all the obelisks around the world (many directly from Egypt) such as the Washington Monument, The Vatican and many others in Rome, Central Park in NYC, the "Crown" obelisk in the City of London, and many more.

 

There is a power behind all this, the power of deception of ancient times. The same power that deceived Eve in the garden, lies and deceit is it's main tool. I find that when I present what has been shown to me to most people, they don't want to hear it, or don't want to even consider it because of their programing, education from diluted and twisted history, and the MSM lies.

 

Thanks for keeping an open mind.

Wm13

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.