al-Maliki ready to give up «the third term»

[Butifldrm]

 

 al-Maliki ready to give up «the third term»

Fri quarter past twelve a.m. May 23 2014 | (Voice of Iraq) - Al «life» of the sources familiar with the program of the visit of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki Tehran tomorrow, he would tell Iranian officials to his commitment not to run for a third term «in order to preserve the unity of the National Alliance» fractious Shi'ite himself in this matter. Has begun deliberating the names of personalities alternative to him, including his deputy, Hussein al-Shahristani, and the leader of the «Badr» Hadi al-Ameri (more). sources said that al-Maliki will meet with senior Iranian leaders, and in the forefront guide of the Islamic Republic Ali Khamenei and President Hassan Rohani, and will discuss with them at some point after the election «and put them in the framework of consultations conducted by the political blocs to form a new government», after he refused to «Supreme Council», headed by Ammar al-Hakim, and the Sadrist movement his candidacy for a third term. and Iraqi sources keep pace with the visit, that al-Maliki will reach officials in Tehran not to insist on the third term, the Despite the progress of his coalition in the elections to all rivals, «the sake of unity« Alliance », who failed to agree on a mechanism to choose a candidate for prime minister. Began trading names Shahristani and Ameri, and MP in Maliki's coalition Hanan al, which got the most votes in the province of Babylon. As applied to the interface scenarios after al-Maliki, to ensure its survival within the scene, Washington withdrew its objections prior to the nomination of the leader «National Conference» Ahmed Chalabi. said a U.S. official in Iraq's «life» yesterday, said that «Washington would not interfere in the details of the formation of the government, but offers tips to ensure political consensus and unity of the country», and stressed that it rejects the «vast political». He added that his country «does not have a veto on the name of any candidate for the presidency of the government», stressing that «includes Chalabi» which soured his relationship with the U.S. administration after 2003, and classified as closer to Iran. says among Shiite political Chalabi Matrouh as a compromise candidate by blocs «citizen» and «chest», and despite winning on the list of mass-Hakim, but the latter is the actual candidate, Adel Abdul Mahdi. These indicators are the first of its kind to look seriously at alternative options for «the third term». However, this task very difficult. On the other hand, there is another scenario that includes the survival of Maliki in office, with stripped of much of his powers, through a shadow government led virtually the leader of the «National Alliance», which is a block-wise, across the internal system strictly for the government, and for «National Alliance» and a series of pledges and guarantees the authority of the Prime Minister. Some sources say that Tehran at this stage does not adhere to the state-Maliki Third, although a trend Iranian strongly believes that change in Iraq will bring comfort to the political environment in the region, but they do not want to besiege the authority of the head of the government, regardless of the person. Although not express the Shiite cleric Ali al-Sistani any position to form a government, but those close to him say that with the settlement included not give al-Maliki as prime minister, on condition that his removal from the political scene.

Read more: http://www.sotaliraq.com/mobile2014.php?id=150159#ixzz32UbHO6uR

 

[one2one]

so, why is he hanging around with IRAN ?

 

i can not stand that country--muslim fanatics

[Laid Back]

See it, to believe it.!

[Boozer]

Malik give up a third term, when He$$ freezes over. He will never I've up power, only Death will take him away. RV and I'll go away

Edited May 23, 2014 by Boozer

[valu]

_{they have already refused to meet with him.}

[sandfly]

LET'S SEE SOON THANKS

[calkid11]

Thank you

[uncirculd]

Now he is trying to get support to go into exile.   If he can no longer be dictator, he's gonna run.

[yota691]

"Maliki is ready to abandon the third term"

09:48:23 / 05/2014

 

Khandan - reported (life) of London, on Friday, it was learned from sources familiar with the "program of the visit of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to Tehran tomorrow," he would tell the Iranian officials "lack of adherence to run for a third term in order to preserve the unity of the National Alliance" divided against itself in this issue.newspaper quoted sources as saying, "The al-Maliki will meet with senior Iranian leaders, and in the forefront guide of the Islamic Republic Ali Khamenei and President Hassan Rohani, and will discuss with them at some point after the election and puts them in the framework of consultations conducted by the political blocs to form a new government, after he refused to Supreme Council headed by Ammar al-Hakim, and the Sadrist movement his candidacy for a third term. " the newspaper said Iraqi sources keep pace with the visit confirmed that "al-Maliki will reach officials in Tehran not to insist on the third term, despite the progress of his coalition in the elections to all competitors," the sake of the unity coalition , who failed to agree on a mechanism to choose a candidate for prime minister. "

[yota691]

Maliki will be Iran that he was ready to give up «the third term»

 

   

Posted       23/05/2014 11:44 AM

 

Tehran - Mohammed Saleh Sedkian, Baghdad - «life»

Al «life» of the sources familiar with the program of the visit of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki Tehran tomorrow, he would tell Iranian officials to his commitment not to run for a third term «in order to preserve the unity of the National Alliance» Shi'ite divided against itself in this matter. Has begun deliberating the names of his alternate personalities, including his deputy, Hussein al-Shahristani, and the leader of the «Badr» Hadi al-Amiri.

The sources said that al-Maliki will meet with senior Iranian leaders, and in the forefront guide of the Islamic Republic Ali Khamenei and President Hassan Rohani, and will discuss with them at some point after the election «and put them in the framework of consultations conducted by the political blocs to form a new government», after he refused to «Supreme Council», headed by Ammar Hakim, and the Sadrist movement his candidacy for a third term.

The Iraqi sources keep pace with the visit, that al-Maliki will be officials in Tehran not to insist on the third term, despite the progress of his coalition in the elections to all rivals, «the sake of unity« Alliance », who failed to agree on a mechanism to choose a candidate for prime minister. Began trading names and Ameri-Shahristani, the deputy of the coalition of Hanan al-Maliki, which got the most votes in the province of Babylon.

The scenarios presented to the forefront after al-Maliki, to ensure its survival within the scene, Washington withdrew its objections to the nomination of a former leader of the «National Conference» Ahmad Chalabi.

A U.S. official in Iraq's «life» yesterday, said that «Washington would not interfere in the details of the formation of the government, but offers tips to ensure political consensus and unity of the country», and stressed that it rejects the «vast political». He added that his country «does not have a veto on the name of any candidate for the presidency of the government», stressing that «includes Chalabi» which soured his relationship with the U.S. administration after 2003, and classified as closer to Iran.

It says that among Shiite political Chalabi Matrouh as a compromise candidate by blocs «citizen» and «chest», and despite winning on the list of mass-Hakim, however, the latter is the actual candidate, Adel Abdul Mahdi.

These indicators are the first of its kind to look seriously at alternative options for «the third term». However, this task very difficult.

On the other hand, there is another scenario that includes the survival of Maliki in office, with stripped of much of his powers, through a shadow government led virtually the leader of the «National Alliance», which is a block-wise, across the internal system strictly for the government, and for «National Alliance» and a series of pledges and guarantees shrinking the authority of the Prime Minister.

Some sources say that Tehran at this stage does not adhere to the state-Maliki Third, although a strong trend Iranian believes that change in Iraq will bring comfort to the political environment in the region, but they do not want to besiege the authority of the prime minister, regardless of the person.

Despite the lack of express Shiite cleric Ali al-Sistani any position to form a government, but those close to him say that with the settlement included not give al-Maliki as prime minister, on condition that his removal from the political scene.

* For "life"

Hayat: "Maliki will arrive in Tehran, declaring his willingness to abandon the third term"

 

According to Al-Hayat, she has learned from sources familiar with the program for the visit of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to Tehran, he would tell Iranian officials to his commitment not to run for a third term in order to preserve the unity of the National Alliance divided against itself in this matter.

The newspaper quoted sources as saying, that al-Maliki will meet with senior Iranian leaders, and in the forefront guide of the Islamic Republic Ali Khamenei and President Hassan Rohani.

And discuss with them at some point after the election and puts them in the framework of consultations conducted by the political blocs to form a new government, after he refused to Supreme Council headed by Ammar al-Hakim, and the Sadrist movement his candidacy for a third term.

[Ms.Bean]

The posturing and the body language in these pics scream who's really in charge.

[yota691]

Moussawi: Maliki is currently in Baghdad and not in any schedule a visit at the present time

 

Media adviser to Prime Minister Ali al-Moussawi

 

 

Author: Editor: br Reporter:

Number of readings: 48

 

05/23/2014 15:08

 

Tomorrow's Press / Baghdad confirmed media adviser to the prime minister, on Friday, that the latter is currently in Baghdad and not in the schedule any visit at the moment, again lie to the news that talked about a secret visit to the owners to Tehran. said Ali al-Moussawi said in a statement received "tomorrow Press , "" It is unfortunate that the some of the media promoting the news was not related to reality, quite a few days before promoted by some media that the prime minister is a secret visit to the Islamic Republic of Iran and lied news at the time and said that he does not have any secret visit to any country in the world throughout the two states first and second, which is his visits both to Tehran or other countries of the world are announcing Needless to Sriat. " and "Let us then on the media to investigate the accuracy and not to be deceived with inaccurate information just that they are consistent with the desires and specific policies and today we are forced to lie to the same news from the same sources, almost claimed that the President is on a visit to Tehran on Friday in secret. " and stressed that "this is not true and the Prime Minister is in the Baghdad exercise its activity and its regular meetings, not schedule a visit at the present time." The media picked up news reports that Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki had traveled to Iran in secret.

[AmericaInc]

so, why is he hanging around with IRAN ?

 

i can not stand that country--muslim fanatics

Do you mean the one that decided to take back its own oil fields in the 50's and then Washington overthrew their democratic government and installed the murderous Shah of Iran?

 

Do you mean that one?

[umbertino]

Do you mean the one that decided to take back its own oil fields in the 50's and then Washington overthrew their democratic government and installed the murderous Shah of Iran?

 

Do you mean that one?

Yep... Mossadeq was overthrown....

[dontlop]

Bunch of turd burglars

[ididitfirst]

iraq going to iran to discuss the makeup of their government is like the usa going to england to discuss what to do next. iraq will never be a country unto itself until iran is no longer welcome as their instructor. 

[ronscarpa]

Good News if this is actually the case.....Thanks Butifldrm (+1) and YOTA691 (+2).....Five (5) Stars IMHO...!

[Dinarian64]

Do you mean the one that decided to take back its own oil fields in the 50's and then Washington overthrew their democratic government and installed the murderous Shah of Iran?

Do you mean that one?

Nice rally to racism

[George Hayduke]

Do you mean the one that decided to take back its own oil fields in the 50's and then Washington overthrew their democratic government and installed the murderous Shah of Iran?

 

Do you mean that one?

There is just a little bit more to the history than what you are implying.  Democratic Iran in 1951 was much like Venezuela when Chavez was elected; kinda half democratic and half dictatorship.

 

And... it was the British MI-6 who initiated the coup on behalf the Shah when Mosaddegh continued to consolidate power that demographically revealed family, friends, and cronies.

 

Additionally, it was the British that virtually built all of the oil fields in the middle east and provided the technicians to operate them by way of legally structured profit sharing deals where the host country was paid handsomely for not doing anything.  Mosaddegh wanted 50% of oil revenues.  When Briton said no way, Mosaddegh seized the British petroleum infrastructure in violation of international law.  That 'little' theft plus Mossadegh's growing friendship and support of the pro-Soviet Communist Tudeh party opened the door for other possible political considerations, thus, the MI-6 and CIA developed operation AJAX which led to the political demise of the wonderful George Washington of Iran... 

Edited May 23, 2014 by George Hayduke

[TrinityeXchange]

don't leave the banksters out of your history tour.  at some point, some countries wake up and realize that the banksters are swooping in to take up all the resources from the people.  for some reason they seem to remain in the shadows of peoples' recollection of history.  i don't know why we american's act as blind as we do to these same criminals since they have conspired against us from the onset of the republic.  they have had their hand in just about every war and even today did much to foreclose on many of our homes and our american dream.  

 

but nope, we continue to tell the story without ever including them when it is their actions that have shaped much of history.  iran was a friend to the united states until the banksters got ousted and then, just like that, they became enemy number one.  you decide for yourself what that means.  heck, they did the same thing to YOU.  before 1913 there was no tax on a man's God given right to exchange his labor for pursuit of prosperity.  then came the banksters, subjugated the power of congress, and implemented the "graduated income tax" whereby your God given right to the pursuit of happiness would succumb to their tax structure.  they went to war against america and won the power (against the constitution) to print the republic's currency and loan it to us at interest even though they never print the interest for us to repay the loan (eternal indebtedness).  but we, unlike other more courageous peoples, just take it like docile little sheep.  

 

so we all really need to wake up to the real war that has waged on this planet.  

Edited May 23, 2014 by TrinityeXchange

[Maggie123]

don't leave the banksters out of your history tour.  at some point, some countries wake up and realize that the banksters are swooping in to take up all the resources from the people.  for some reason they seem to remain in the shadows of peoples' recollection of history.  i don't know why we american's act as blind as we do to these same criminals since they have conspired against us from the onset of the republic.  they have had their hand in just about every war and even today did much to foreclose on many of our homes and our american dream.  

 

but nope, we continue to tell the story without ever including them when it is their actions that have shaped much of history.  iran was a friend to the united states until the banksters got ousted and then, just like that, they became enemy number one.  you decide for yourself what that means.  heck, they did the same thing to YOU.  before 1913 there was no tax on a man's God given right to exchange his labor for pursuit of prosperity.  then came the banksters, subjugated the power of congress, and implemented the "graduated income tax" whereby your God given right to the pursuit of happiness would succumb to their tax structure.  they went to war against america and won the power (against the constitution) to print the republic's currency and loan it to us at interest even though they never print the interest for us to repay the loan (eternal indebtedness).  but we, unlike other more courageous peoples, just take it like docile little sheep.  

 

so we all really need to wake up to the real war that has waged on this planet.  

 

BRAVO TRINITY!!!

[AustinMom]

Plus one to you Trinity.  Excellent post.

[ezrapound]

:bravo:

[TBomb]

Love it! Love it! Love it! Great teamwork!