Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Maliki offers to facilitate nuke talks between US and Iran


magawatt
 Share

Recommended Posts

Iran Is Said to Want Direct Talks With U.S. on Nuclear Program

 
diplo-articleLarge.jpg
Secretary of State John Kerry meeting with Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki of Iraq, center, in Baghdad in March.
Pool photo by Jason Reed
 
By MICHAEL R. GORDON
July 26, 2013

WASHINGTON — Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki of Iraq told the Obama administration this month that Iran was interested in direct talks with the United States on Iran’s nuclear program, and said that Iraq was prepared to facilitate the negotiations, Western officials said Thursday.

In a meeting in early July with the American ambassador in Baghdad, Mr. Maliki suggested that he was relaying a message from Iranian officials and asserted that Hassan Rouhani, Iran’s incoming president, would be serious about any discussions with the United States, according to accounts of the meeting.

Although Mr. Maliki indicated that he had been in touch with confidants of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, he did not disclose precisely whom he was dealing with on the Iranian side. Some Western officials remain uncertain whether Iran’s leaders have sought to use Iraq as a conduit or whether the idea is mainly Mr. Maliki’s initiative.

State Department officials declined to comment on Mr. Maliki’s move or what steps the United States might have taken in response. American officials have said since the beginning of the Obama administration that they would be open to direct talks with Iran.

“Iraq is a partner of the United States and we are in regular conversations with Iraqi officials about a full range of issues of mutual interest, including Iran,” said Patrick Ventrell, a State Department spokesman. “As we have repeatedly said, we are open to direct talks with Iran in order to resolve the international community’s concerns about Iran’s nuclear program.”

Gary Samore, who served as the senior aide on nonproliferation issues at the National Security Council during President Obama’s first term in office, said that it was plausible that Iran would use Iraq to send a message about its willingness to discuss nuclear issues.

“The Iranians see Maliki as somebody they have some trust in,” said Mr. Samore, who is the director of the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard. “From Maliki’s standpoint, it would serve a number of different purposes. He does not want to be squeezed between Washington and Tehran.”

In a separate move on Thursday, the State and Treasury Departments announced that the United States was expanding the list of medical devices, like dialysis machines, that could be sold to Iran without a license.

In a conference call with reporters, David Cohen, the under secretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, said that the move was intended to “accelerate trade” and address humanitarian needs in Iran. The announcement was also seen by many observers as a good-will gesture before Mr. Rouhani prepares to take office in Tehran on Aug. 4.

Direct talks have the potential to ratchet down some of the pressure on President Obama over one of his greatest foreign policy challenges, the buildup of Iran’s nuclear program.

Mr. Obama has said that he will not permit Iran to have a nuclear weapon and has asserted that the use of military force is an option. Israeli officials have staked out a far tougher position, asserting that Iran should not be allowed to have the ability to build a weapon — and that the United States should do more to convince the Iranians that its threat to use force is credible. Israel has not ruled out military action of its own.

International sanctions have taken a serious toll on the Iranian economy and have helped bring Iran to the negotiating table, but have not yet extracted significant concessions from Iran on its nuclear program. For years, the United States and its partners — Britain, France, Germany, Russia and China — have met on and off with Iranian officials in a dialogue that has become known as the “P5 plus 1” talks.

Nonproliferation experts continue to argue that it is difficult to make major headway in such a committeelike forum, and that if progress is to be made, it will have to happen in private one-on-one discussions between Iranian officials and the Obama administration.

Whether Iran is genuinely interested in such talks, however, has been a subject of debate. In 2009, William J. Burns, then the under secretary of state for political affairs, met with Saeed Jalili, the Iranian nuclear negotiator, on the margins of the “P5 plus 1” talks. They agreed in principle that a portion of Iran’s enriched uranium could be used to make fuel for Tehran’s research center, which would preclude that material from being further enriched to make nuclear weapons.

But that deal fell through after Ayatollah Khamenei objected, and there have been no direct talks since. In a meeting this month with Iran’s departing president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Ayatollah Khamenei was sharply critical of the American stance.

“The Americans are unreliable and illogical, and are not honest in their approach,” Ayatollah Khamenei said. But he also said that he did not oppose talks “on certain issues.”

Even if direct talks are agreed to they are almost certain to be tough.

“The establishment of a bilateral channel is a necessary but not sufficient condition for coming to an agreement,” Mr. Samore said. “They want a nuclear weapons capability, and we want to deny them a nuclear weapons capability. Finding a compromise between those two objectives is going to be very difficult.”

Mr. Maliki, Western officials said, is not the only Iraqi politician who has encouraged a dialogue between the United States and Iran. Ammar al-Hakim, the leader of a major Shiite party in Iraq, is also said to have made that point.

During the war in Iraq, Iraqi officials also urged direct dealings between the United States and Iran.

Talks were held in Baghdad, but they were focused on the conflict in Iraq and Iran’s support for Shiite militias there — not the nuclear question — and got nowhere.

Mr. Maliki’s government appears to have been aligned with Iran on some issues, like its support for President Bashar al-Assad of Syria. Iranian aircraft have ferried huge quantities of arms through Iraqi airspace. Iraqi officials have asserted that they do not have the means to stop the flights, but Mr. Maliki has also been concerned that Mr. Assad’s fall will lead to an escalation of Sunni challenges to his government in Iraq.

American officials have repeatedly said that Mr. Maliki is not a pawn of Iran and that the United States should try to expand its influence in Iraq, including by selling arms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More like domination to me, if I grab your arm, am I in charge? Or at least trying to dominate you?

WM13

In an aggressive situation that could be the case but the relaxed and friendly smiles on everyone tells a tale of relaxed unity.

 

When reading body language you must observe the whole body...facial expression and eyes.

 

If anything it looks like small talk and jokes at that moment. 

 

Notice the smiles of all behind and at the sides...

Edited by coolbeans
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is probably some ploy that was hatched by Maliki in his recent meeting with Ahmadinejad. He's desperate to find some way to keep his head...and, of course, the billions he's pilfered from the Iraqi people.

No...these talks will be with the newly elected president of Iran who wants peace with the US and Israel.

 

Ahmeadinejad leaves office next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No...these talks will be with the newly elected president of Iran who wants peace with the US and Israel.

 

Ahmeadinejad leaves office next week.

:lol:  :lol:  :lol: 

Iran wants peace with Israel and the US? Won't happen, it's a ruse if something does come of it. Those two are the little and big Satans to them.

WM13

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iran Is Said to to Want Direct Talks With US on Nuclear Program

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/iran-us-nuclear-talks/2013/07/26/id/517257#ixzz2aAhXEhEk 
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

 

Tags: iran | us | nuclear | talks

·                                

 

Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki has told the Obama administration Iran is interested in having direct talks about its nuclear program with the United States, a move thought to be orchestrated by Iran's incoming president Hassan Rouhani, The New York Times reports.

The Obama administration has long indicated it would be open to direct talks with Iran. But as Rouhani prepares to take office on August 4, the move may be seen as the best opportunity yet to make progress on the issue. 

As a possible sign that America wants to forge a positive relationship with Rouhani for the sake of progressing talks, the State and Treasury Departments announced Thursday that the United States is easing restrictions on medical supplies, agricultural products, and humanitarian aid entering the heavily sanctioned country. Administration officials, however, have not said the action is specifically intended as a peace offering to Rouhani, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have been pushing for tougher sanctions to be imposed against Iran in the coming weeks, a position that could complicate the administration's strategy efforts to move toward talks.

Until now, President Barack Obama has been forced to take a hard line with Iran. He has pledged that he will not permit the rogue nation to have a nuclear weapons and has said that the use of military force is an option to prevent that possibility. 

International sanctions have taken a toll on the Iranian economy and have helped bring Iran to the negotiating table. But according to the Journal, even as Iran's oil exports have fallen by as much as 50 percent and the country continues to lose up to $15 billion in oil sales every quarter. Little progress has been made in achieving concessions from Tehran on its nuclear program.

It is still uncertain whether direct talks will go ahead, and the State Department has refused to comment on reports of Maliki's offer to help facilitate talks. Even if the talks proceed, experts say the possibility of reaching a breakthrough is slim.

"The establishment of a bilateral channel is a necessary but not sufficient condition for coming to an agreement," Gary Samore, who served as the senior aide on nonproliferation issues at the National Security Council during Obama's first term, told the Times.

"They want a nuclear weapons capability, and we want to deny them a nuclear weapons capability. Finding a compromise between those two objectives is going to be very difficult."

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/iran-us-nuclear-talks/2013/07/26/id/517257

 

Edited by Butifldrm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ZIGGGGGGG, you so right.  Kerry lost his mind????  There ain't no way maliki would host any peaceful talks, especially nuke programs that he is funding.  what the heck????  

 

Ok, I am calm now.  I get it.  Unlike the nut case maliki, I already know without saying that Kerry is up to something.  he could give a rats but about maliki, cause maliki is a puppet and he don't know it.  all we want is to get to iran.  auk ma nut is out, and drones are in, i mean, he could have an accident now that he is out of office.  on a serious note, I need to quit being so bad and saying awful things.  but i can't help my mind sometimes when evil gets away with the atrocities it bestows on mankind.  

 

Kerry will use the puppet and become expendable, then disposable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More like domination to me, if I grab your arm, am I in charge? Or at least trying to dominate you?WM13

That was also the first thing I noticed... and it looks like Maliki has a look of submission on his face. But yes, I definitely agree that by Kerry grabbing his arm, he is showing dominance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Although Mr. Maliki indicated that he had been in touch with confidants of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, he did not disclose precisely whom he was dealing with on the Iranian side. Some Western officials remain uncertain whether Iran’s leaders have sought to use Iraq as a conduit or whether the idea is mainly Mr. Maliki’s initiative.

 

Think about it...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Although Mr. Maliki indicated that he had been in touch with confidants of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, he did not disclose precisely whom he was dealing with on the Iranian side. Some Western officials remain uncertain whether Iran’s leaders have sought to use Iraq as a conduit or whether the idea is mainly Mr. Maliki’s initiative.

 

Think about it...

But its Friday.....bank story day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think some of us have to begin to evolve our thinking when it comes to government and politics.  we cannot see things from the perspective of "citizens" but must look at what they do from the perspective of positioning and commerce.  terms like "up to no good" and "who is dominating whom from a picture snap shot" really don't apply here.  every government is in an effort to put themselves in optimal position in accordance to their short, medium and long term goals.  and the "good of the people" really have nothing to do with it.  it has more to do with the "good of business".  in fact the entire reason kerry is in a picture with the heads of the iraqi state corroborates what i am saying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.