Dinar .. Rising .. NAZELLES

[yota691]

Dinar .. Rising .. NAZELLES

Topic has been read 65 times

 

Author:

 

 

Zia Rahim Mohsen

 

Since the duration and we see the Iraqi dinar exchange rate, which declined after that it maintains a stable exchange rate somewhat, which comes with a big question, what is the reason for the decline in the value of the dinar? Is that the reason for this is due to the weakness of the economic policies pursued by the central bank? Or are there other reasons?!! 
distal and proximal know the composition of the Iraqi economy, it is the economy yield is working on two contradictory; first axis: that the state's economy is dominated by 80% of GDP, or the so-called generation of national income; addition to his responsibility directly responsible providing 99% of the cash inflows of foreign exchange; and subsequent direct correlation version of the central bank monetary movement of those flows. The second axis: the market economy, which has the largest in the effectiveness of indirect management of the results of the state's economy, which is reflected in the general budget in government expenditures, which represent 60% of total government spending. What يؤشره of freed for this market flows emerging from the country's foreign exchange, and the desire of the market in the possession of foreign currency and the accumulated reserves of the Central Bank, which represents a cover for those rights. 
When dominates the free market on the course of events in the economy, and the launch of liberty in the process of foreign exchange in addition to the use of open-door policy in foreign trade to the private sector, and with the lack of vision for the strategic growth and development and the advancement of economic reality, the economy is turning into a bilateral severe rentier in the supply of foreign currency to foreign trade and financing import trade nature consumer, which makes Iraq an incubator for consumption and export to economies of other countries. 
work CBI to grab the stick from the middle to achieve a balance between Tnaqdan namely: the state's economy and keep pace with the economy rent, and the other to keep up with the free market; serving the marketing activity of procedure and the movement of funds towards the outside regardless of the results envisaged to build an economic model generates traffic flows inside and outside foreign currency away from these bilateral or polarimeter intense between the two economies different (economy of the state and the market economy), and the inflows in foreign currency provided by the state economy, and the other out of the foreign currency gasping behind the private sector.  
about all this, what was the reaction of the monetary authority Central Bank of Iraq? I March CBI policy intervention in the exchange market to reach a stable level of the exchange rate, "which noted the citizen throughout the period in which Mr. Shabibi Governor of the Central Bank," so that managed the monetary authority to maintain a stable level of prices, fell inflation levels are ranked ten-to ranked decimal per Add to that the rise in central bank reserves of foreign exchange to the ranked ten-dollar terms, "the highest in the history of the country," However, the central bank could not resolve the battle between the market economy and looked forward to a profit, and between the state's economy and the fact that uniqueness in an attempt to search for profit social; They look lacking economic vision for the movement of Iraqi economic system.Which made ​​the Iraqi economy lost in an attempt to find effective solutions, which resulted in a deterioration in the exchange rate of the Iraqi dinar, the trend towards economic freedom, and swap foreign currency rights maintained Dinars for the purpose of achieving economic stability, the imposition of a burden on the monetary policy of the Central Bank to interfere with daily to sell the dollar in an attempt to maintain the stability of the exchange rate of the Iraqi dinar against the rest of foreign currency, which needs to be bold decision illustrates the general lines of the economy; As for moving to an open door policy with bear all the consequences as a result of attrition happening in oil revenues to ensure the well-being of the individual and stability "in the absence of a clear development policy in the rest of the productive sectors," which is determined by the political leadership in the country and entered the Central Bank which due to incomplete landmarks economic system of the country after a lot of talk about the transfer of $ 180 billion between 2003 and 2012, generated by the economy of the state after spending for the same period via Almoisant public the amount of $ 450 billion, remained there for Development Economics absent for lack of a climate attractive for investment and unresolved economic vision for this contradiction, and release mechanisms of the free market as you want it to emerging economic powers after the year 2003, the results of economic stability will continue vague and will make the country to live with the parallel exchange markets turmoil to an unknown term in the results, and perhaps will be consequences in the stability of prices and the standard of living and a painful daily concerns in the economic life of the Iraqi families and the general economic activity.

Thursday 07/18/2013 03:13 pm

 

[sandfly]

THEN DO THE RIGHT THING LIKE RV

[Nelg]

Man, that was painful to read.  Does anyone have a better translation?

[PD46]

........the results of economic stability will continue vague and will make the country to live with the parallel exchange markets turmoil to an unknown term in the results, and perhaps will be consequences in the stability of prices and the standard of living and a painful daily concerns in the economic life of the Iraqi families and the general economic activity.

 

The article is a difficult article to read, but it is a good read. 
Either the CBI changes its monetary policy to strengthen the dinar, or what I just highlighted above will be the new reality for the next decade in Iraq.  An adjustment in value, based on the basket method similar to what China uses, would fix some of the problems. 

I believe the M0 monetary number of their currency is only in the high billions at this point, meaning their real currency is a lot less than 30+trillion.  A straight up RV, at a low value on par with other countries in the region, coupled with managed basket float of the currency value would solve the bulk of their economic problems, bring in large groups of investors, and strengthen economic infrastructure. 

An artificially rated currency, which is for all practical purposes worthless toilet paper; and a very small hand full of foreign investors simply isn't going to pull Iraq out of this. Parliament needs to grow a set of balls, take full responsibility, and hold Malaki and Turki accountable for this mess ad order them to move forward immediately; including serious threats to have their sorry a$$es removed by force if necessary.   
 

[Psych]

This is what I could get out of the Bing Translator...really no better.

 

Zia Rahim Mohsen

 

For we see Iraqi dinar exchange rate, it regresses to maintain stable exchange rate somewhat, which comes with a big question, what is the reason for the decline of the value of the dinar? Is that the reason for this is due to the poor economic policies pursued by the Central Bank? Or are there other reasons?!

 

Far and wide know the composition of the Iraqi economy, rentier economy is working on two contradictory; the first axis: the State's economy is dominated by over 80% of GDP, or so-called national income; in addition to his direct responsibility to provide 99% of the cash inflows of foreign exchange, and its direct link to the critical edition of the Central Bank of the movement.

 

Theme II: the market economy that has the greatest efficiency in the management of the results of the State's economy, which is reflected in the budget in the Government expenditures, which represent 60% of all government spending. And yo'sharh from private to this market by outflows from the country's foreign exchange market and the desire to acquire foreign currency, accrued from Central Bank reserves, which represent a cover for those rights.

 

When the free market is dominated by the workings of the economy, and freedom in external conversion process in addition to using an open-door policy in foreign trade to the private sector, and with the absence of vision and development strategy for the development and advancement of economic reality, the economy turns into severe bilateral rent in foreign currency supply to foreign trade and import trade financing consumer character, which makes Iraq an incubator for consumption and export to other countries.

 

The CBI's work on keeping the stick of Center of balance between two contradictions: the economy of the State and the economy, and keep up with the rental market, which serves the marketing activity internal and outward movement of funds regardless of the results to build an economic model generates movement and outside the inflows in foreign currency away from these bilateral or highly polarized between different economies (the economy of the State and the market economy), and the inflows of foreign currency provided by the State economy, and other emerging from foreign currency gasping behind the private sector.

 

Zia Rahim mhasnazaa, what was the reaction of the monetary authority of the Iraqi Central Bank? The CBI have exercised a policy of intervention in the foreign exchange market, reaching a stable level of the exchange rate "and is noted by citizens throughout the period Mr. Alshabibi Governor of the Central Bank so that the Monetary Authority has been able to maintain a stable price level, inflation dropped from secondary ten-year levels to one decimal place, add to that the rising Central Bank reserves of foreign exchange to a distant alasharitIn terms of dollar value "and is the highest in the history of the country" and with this, the Central Bank could not resolve the battle between market economy and the profit, between the State economy and predisposition to uniqueness in an attempt to find profit; a lack of vision for the movement of Iraqi economic system. Making the Iraqi economy lost trying to find viable solutions, resulting in the deterioration in the exchange rate of the Iraqi dinar, the trend towards economic freedom, and foreign currency swap rights maintained in dinar for the purpose of achieving economic stability, imposing a burden on monetary policy for the Central Bank to intervene to sell the dollar in a bid to maintain the stability of the exchange rate of the Iraqi dinar against other currencies.

 

Foreign, which needs a bold decision shows the outlines of the economy; either move to an open-door policy with all consequences resulting from attrition in oil revenues to ensure well-being and stability "with the apparent absence of development policy in the rest of the productive sectors" to be decided by the political leadership in the country and to the Central Bank because of incomplete economic system around the country after manyTalk about the transfer of $ 180 billion between 2003 and 2012, generated by the economy of the State after spending for the same period by the General almwazant $ 450 billion dollars, which remained absent development economy for lack of an attractive investment climate and the unresolved economic vision to this contradiction, and launches a free market mechanisms as emerging economic powers interested after 2003, the results of the economic stability of the country will continue to be vague and will coexist with parallel exchange market turmoil to unknown long-term consequences and possibly disastrous In price stability and the standard of living and a painful daily concerns in the economic life of Iraqi families and the general economic activity.

 

 

[Boozer]

Push the Button already !

[calkid11]

COME ON IRAQ DO SOMETHING FOR YOUR PEOPLE ALREADY...GO RV,  THANKS FOR THE POST YOTA......

[stealthwarrior]

Something has to be stopping them from pulling the trigger.they are being pushed hard by the united states to do this.where is the resistance coming from?

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///

 

Who owns the Central Banks of the world, STEALTH...?

 

The illuminati - Bilderburg Group, et al... make the most money when they can incite some

region of the planet into a WAR.

 

Think about this, if The FED is doomed - they lose control... with disastrous consequences for them.

 

If The Global Re-Set is real, and ever actually occurs - they lose control - bad for them, too.

 

If they can keep/hold IRAQ back long enough, they can get the war they want up & running in

the M.E. and be happy as pigs -in-a-poke.

 

So by all means CANNOT allow anyone to have wealth that can get them out from under their control.

 

THEY NEED WAR:

They know the US is going to pull out of the Afghan situation... and they are saddened by this.

They MUST keep the U.S. engaged ... so they USE THEIR TOOL- obummer - to remain in bed with

the Islamic brotherhood --

because they need a bad guys -vs- good guys scenario in order to foster the great war they want to

blow up in the Middle East.

 

So watch carefully as they continue to pit Nations against one-another... 

how they are positioning and aligning Russia with Putin and Nuclear Iran in Syria....

 

obummer (against the will of the US people) with the radical islamist brotherhood in Egypt....

 

Look at the numbers on some of these arms deals...

 

who's getting rich..? THEY ARE.

 

 

THEY CANNOT ALLOW THE PEOPLE TO EVER GET RICH, OR THEY LOSE CONTROL.

 

Edited July 19, 2013 by SgtFuryUSCZ

[10 YEARS LATER]

Man, that was painful to read.  Does anyone have a better translation?

Rising . . . NAZELLES . . .  is either Growing Nipples OR Flaring Nostrils. Hope that helps.    

[staunch]

***///

 

Who owns the Central Banks of the world, STEALTH...?

 

The illuminati - Bilderburg Group, et al... make the most money when they can incite some

region of the planet into a WAR.

 

Think about this, if The FED is doomed - they lose control... with disastrous consequences for them.

 

If The Global Re-Set is real, and ever actually occurs - they lose control - bad for them, too.

 

If they can keep/hold IRAQ back long enough, they can get the war they want up & running in

the M.E. and be happy as pigs -in-a-poke.

 

So by all means CANNOT allow anyone to have wealth that can get them out from under their control.

 

THEY NEED WAR:

They know the US is going to pull out of the Afghan situation... and they are saddened by this.

They MUST keep the U.S. engaged ... so they USE THEIR TOOL- obummer - to remain in bed with

the Islamic brotherhood --

because they need a bad guys -vs- good guys scenario in order to foster the great war they want to

blow up in the Middle East.

 

So watch carefully as they continue to pit Nations against one-another... 

how they are positioning and aligning Russia with Putin and Nuclear Iran in Syria....

 

obummer (against the will of the US people) with the radical islamist brotherhood in Egypt....

 

Look at the numbers on some of these arms deals...

 

who's getting rich..? THEY ARE.

 

 

THEY CANNOT ALLOW THE PEOPLE TO EVER GET RICH, OR THEY LOSE CONTROL.

 

SGT I have always believed this. Maybe not for the exact same reasons you mentioned here, but the US will always be in some kind of conflict. The last time we were not in a conflict (Bush era), they cut our military by almost half. Quick lesson learned there, so conflict is necessary, whether intentionally or not.

[10 YEARS LATER]

Something has to be stopping them from pulling the trigger.they are being pushed hard by the united states to do this.where is the resistance coming from?

" Where is the resistance coming from? "  THAT'S the Million $ Question. Don't know, but whoever he is we oughta shoot him and push the button ! ENUFF IS ENUFF !

[staunch]

SGT I have always believed this. Maybe not for the exact same reasons you mentioned here, but the US will always be in some kind of conflict. The last time we were not in a conflict (Bush era), they cut our military by almost half. Quick lesson learned there, so conflict is necessary, whether intentionally or not.

Edit: just read this again and wanted to clarify I don't approve, my post COULD lead you to believe that I do.

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

SGT I have always believed this. Maybe not for the exact same reasons you mentioned here, but the US will always be in some kind of conflict. The last time we were not in a conflict (Bush era), they cut our military by almost half. Quick lesson learned there, so conflict is necessary, whether intentionally or not.

***///

 

At our age, we've seen a lot of sh*t....

 

we recognize the evil handiwork of those who OWN & CONTROL the World's Central Banks.

 

It's their classic M.O.

 

Right now we think they'll win and get their massive outbreak of war in the M.E. and we'll never

see the RV.

 

Oh, they need to keep the hopium flowing to give off the smell of all things being status quo....

 

But they are firmly perched on the edge of getting their way....

remember how they orchestrated WWII..?

 

They even had England on the side of the Nazi movement across Europe for a long while!

 

Then they kept out of it, allowing Hitler to get a good strong foothold across Europe and slaughter

millions of people in order to get what they wanted -

ENGAGE THE United States - the country with the money- in the conflict.... and cause the

United States to collapse under the weight of the COST OF THAT WAR and

put US "back in our place"....

 

Depressing - but true. This just smacks of their classic CONTROL.

Edit: just read this again and wanted to clarify I don't approve, my post COULD lead you to believe that I do.

***///

 

Didn't think that at all, STAUNCHIE, 'Ol Boy... we liked your post.

" Where is the resistance coming from? "  THAT'S the Million $ Question. Don't know, but whoever he is we oughta shoot him and push the button ! ENUFF IS ENUFF !

***///

See our answer above ....

[zigmeister]

Let's move away from paranoia and cynical scenario's.  The question is what is holding them up?  I would surmise it's Iraq.  

[hoosier1470]

I don't believe that the government will allow civil war to break out in Iraq..which is very likely to happen if something is not done pretty quick. The citizens are tired of being lied to...they want better living conditions for their families! They see the members of government living "high on the hog" with electricity, and every other luxury that they are having to do without. If this is indeed M doing this..then he will be taken out! We see this same scenario taking place here in the States..and we moan and groan about it..but ultimately, most are afraid to buck up against the system. This isn't the case in the ME..these folks have a different mindset than other cultures in the world. They have nothing to lose, and everything to gain! They simply want what has been promised to them...they have been told..and have seen their country is very rich..and they want their piece of the pie!! When push comes to shove..I don't see the government as a whole allowing a the progress that has been made to simply be thrown down the drain!! They are going to get what they want..with or without M or anyone else that tries to hold things up for that matter. We will.see an end of this stalling very quickly...too many countries..and people in high places who are betting on Iraq to flourish economically. They have a lot riding on this..and we know how things work over there. If you have someone who doesn't want to play along, take them out!! Put someone else in their place that will go along with the plan! Bottom line ...everyone involved wants to get rich...and they will! No matter what the cost!! Its coming quickly..don't be deceived!! This is a power hungry, money hungry group...and when someone tries to hold the money up!! People loose their lives!! I believe we are much closer (if not already there) to seeing Iraq come out full force into the global economic scene!! What we read in these news articles is nothing more than a cover to what is truly taking place! Knowing this..we can expect to see the total opposite of what we read!! JMHO...God Bless!!

[jordan23]

Something has to be stopping them from pulling the trigger.they are being pushed hard by the united states to do this.where is the resistance coming from?

Considering how long it took them to take care of Chapter VII, I don't think they are concerned about being pushed into anything.  Obviously there are things that have not been completed and when they are, I'm sure we will see some sort of change in the value.

[10 YEARS LATER]

Let's move away from paranoia and cynical scenario's.  The question is what is holding them up?  I would surmise it's Iraq.  

Whether it be a nation or an individual; they can be their own worst enemy

[TBomb]

The resistance is Maliki's weak dinar policy..can't you see he's stopping the passing or implementation of laws? Like the tariff..check articles posted today.  These guys giving the interviews are either M mouth pieces or are frustrated.  We need the federation council enacted so M cannot continue to veto laws, nor control the judges (bribe, etc).  This is MO.

Dang..he's still helping Iran and will continue this. He does not want the country to prosper.

 

History could prove my opinion wrong, but I'm just looking at the evidence through the articles  "the government will not enact" whenever we see statement akin to this, "the government" is Maliki veto, veto, veto..or pretending he's going to do it, and then ignores the laws and gets judges to not enact them.  It's not going to stop, again, jmo.

Edited July 19, 2013 by TBomb

[TBomb]

Want to add something...do ya'll think it's coincidental that we're seeing the articles on the federation council amped up in the press, after Ch 7 release and little change with passing laws or increase in rate?  I knew when we saw Ch 7 release that Maliki wouldn't change anything (I was hopeful but alas no), or prevent it.  They need Maliki intervention and I believe they're working on it. Again, my thoughts could be grasping at straws, but honestly, I just can't see that this is attributed to anything other than Maliki's policies.

[Priscilla]

Wish I could press that button myself!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!