kobhe911 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 It appears to me that he was the "spearhead" or "go to" guy during the Kuwait RV? I'm not sure Citi group misses him though ...new sec of ust. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
easyrider Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 (edited) just in time eh? the timing couldnt be more coincidental. Jack lew is the man to handle this he has experience. Edited February 28, 2013 by easyrider Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jobug38 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 (edited) Jack Lew is also the man who helped create the housing bubble too! Potus is putting him in the treasury to maybe create some more financial problems for the country will see if his better or worse for the economy . Edited February 28, 2013 by jobug38 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 ***/// (Hey, Peanut! 'S'up..?! ...good to see you... y'know, 'OlSarge looked like yer Walter...) Yes, KOBHE911.... why would they pick a guy of his skill-set if the fed is dead....? What possible other reason(s) could there be...? We, too, are connecting dots over here.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one2one Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 just today's rumor---from another site try that name at wikipedia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 ****//// JOBUG --- they need enough money to clean up that mess.... now where, oh, where might they get their theiving, grubby hands on that kind of money...... yup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
easyrider Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 (edited) Clinton administration From February 1993 to 1994, Lew served as Special Assistant to the President under President Clinton.[13] Lew was responsible for policy development and the drafting of the national service initiative (AmeriCorps) and health care reform legislation.[14] Lew left the White House in October 1994 to work as OMB's Executive Associate Director and Associate Director for Legislative Affairs.[15] From August 1995 until July 1998, Lew served as Deputy Director of OMB.[16] There, Lew was chief operating officer responsible for day-to-day management of a staff of 500. He had crosscutting responsibilities to coordinate Clinton administration efforts on budget and appropriations matters. He frequently served as a member of the Administration negotiating team, including regarding the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. President Clinton nominated Lew to be Director of the OMB[17], and the United States Senate confirmed him for that job on July 31, 1998.[18] He served in that capacity until the end of the Clinton administration in January 2001. As OMB Director, Lew had the lead responsibility for the Clinton Administration’s policies on budget, management, and appropriations issues. As a member of the Cabinet and senior member of the economic team, he advised the President on a broad range of domestic and international policies. He represented the Administration in budget negotiations with Congress and served as a member of the National Security Council. Note: Lets balance that budget Jack just like you did in the clinton days. Dinar RV come on jackie Edited February 28, 2013 by easyrider Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 ***/// ONE2ONE -- this guy is a PTB, ILLUMINATI, BILDERBURG GROUP, ROTHSCHILD agent of doom... One of their infamous puppet tools, just like obummer. The job assignment / mission was slated to be his for quite some time. It's another 'appointment' straight from the devils in hell. If he gets it (the RV) - his next assignment is to seperate US from it... and if we fail to 'co-operate', well, there's always those FEMA camp 'detention'/ holding 'facilites' until our loved ones hand it over to them. Because there is no longer Law giving us right to Fair Trial, Speedy Trial, Legal Counsel, even a phone call. obummer slashed that conveniently away with an EO pen very specifically for an event such as this. The IRS is in serious planning to stragically guarantee pin-pointing exactly who we are. Exchange (cash in/out) and get the hell so far under the radar as you can... fast. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobhe911 Posted February 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 Sorry, I didnt know Rueters was a non-reputable site....http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/28/us-usa-treasury-lew-idUSBRE91R15H20130228 just today's rumor---from another site try that name at wikipedia 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jobug38 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 (edited) ****//// JOBUG --- they need enough money to clean up that mess.... now where, oh, where might they get their theiving, grubby hands on that kind of money...... yup. My point exactly grubby thieving ba$tards!!! Edited February 28, 2013 by jobug38 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fib1618 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 kuwait Rv'd eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silas Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 kuwait Rv'd eh? Every time I see this I have to chuckle a bit. Kuwait NEVER r/d"d folks! It has been proven and shown over and over and over, so to use that as an example of ANYTHING is ludicrous! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobhe911 Posted February 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 Actually I was waiting on somebody to bust my peanuts on that one fib1618.... kuwait Rv'd eh? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fib1618 Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 Sorry Kob... I'm just a stupid currency and commodities trader.. What the heck would I know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontlop Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 (edited) positive impacts of the government shutdown included the balanced-budget deal in 1997 clintons team was against a balanced budget Edited February 28, 2013 by dontlop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 Sorry, I didnt know Rueters was a non-reputable site....http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/28/us-usa-treasury-lew-idUSBRE91R15H20130228 ***/// REUTERS is the tool owned / used by theTPTB, illuminati, Bilderburg, Rothschilds to start wars, send eachother messages, influence nations, get the word out there that THEY want spread around, control situations, manage dis-information campaigns, etc. They have long been one of the most powerful and influential international tools of these bastards... and who owns and manipulates the world's central banks, we ask you...? Anything they put out there MUST be read with a discretionary eye .... read between their lines - always! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobhe911 Posted February 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 Thanks SgtFury, much respect held for you here. To everyone, simply my point was that he/Jack was named Sec of Treasury today, nothing more. I'm sure there is a PR somewhere else, just grabbed Reuters at the time. ***/// REUTERS is the tool owned / used by theTPTB, illuminati, Bilderburg, Rothschilds to start wars, send eachother messages, influence nations, get the word out there that THEY want spread around, control situations, manage dis-information campaigns, etc. They have long been one of the most powerful and influential international tools of these bastards... and who owns and manipulates the world's central banks, we ask you...? Anything they put out there MUST be read with a discretionary eye .... read between their lines - always! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontlop Posted February 28, 2013 Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 (edited) The Contract's actual text included a list of eight reforms the Republicans promised to enact, and ten bills they promised to bring to floor debate and votes, if they were made the majority following the election.[citation needed] During the crafting of the Contract, proposals were limited to "60% issues", i.e. legislation that polling showed garnered 60% support of the American people, intending for the Contract to avoid promises on controversial and divisive matters like abortion and school prayer.[1]Reagan biographer Lou Cannon would characterize the Contract as having taken more than half of its text from Ronald Reagan's 1985 State of the Union Address.[citation needed] [edit] Government and Operational Reforms On the first day of their majority in the House, the Republicans promised to bring up for vote, eight major reforms: require all laws that apply to the rest of the country also apply to Congress; select a major, independent auditing firm to conduct a comprehensive audit of Congress for waste, fraud or abuse; cut the number of House committees, and cut committee staff by one-third; limit the terms of all committee chairs; ban the casting of proxy votes in committee; require committee meetings to be open to the public; require a three-fifths majority vote to pass a tax increase; guarantee an honest accounting of the Federal Budget by implementing zero base-line budgeting. [edit] Major Policy Changes During the first one hundred days of the 104th Congress, the Republicans pledged "to bring to the floor the following [ten] bills, each to be given a full and open debate, each to be given a clear and fair vote, and each to be immediately available for public inspection." The text of the proposed bills was included in the Contract, which was released prior to the election. These bills were not governmental operational reforms, as the previous promises were; rather, they represented significant changes to policy. They mainly included a balanced budget requirement, tax cuts for small businesses, families and seniors, term limits for legislators, social security reform, tort reform, and welfare reform. Whatever the role of the Contract, Republicans were elected to a majority of both houses of Congress for the first time since 1953, and several parts of the Contract were enacted. Some elements did not pass in Congress, while others were vetoed by, or substantially altered in negotiations with President Bill Clinton, who would later sarcastically refer to it as the "Contract on America."[ not one balanced budget for 40 years under democrat control of congress http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_with_America Edited February 28, 2013 by dontlop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobhe911 Posted February 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted February 28, 2013 dontlop, dont misunderstand me, I havent said he was good for OUR country, just possibly good timing for our "investment" if you will, dirty hands get alot of things done unfortunately, IMO. The Contract's actual text included a list of eight reforms the Republicans promised to enact, and ten bills they promised to bring to floor debate and votes, if they were made the majority following the election.[citation needed] During the crafting of the Contract, proposals were limited to "60% issues", i.e. legislation that polling showed garnered 60% support of the American people, intending for the Contract to avoid promises on controversial and divisive matters like abortion and school prayer.[1]Reagan biographer Lou Cannon would characterize the Contract as having taken more than half of its text from Ronald Reagan's 1985 State of the Union Address.[citation needed] [edit] Government and Operational Reforms On the first day of their majority in the House, the Republicans promised to bring up for vote, eight major reforms: require all laws that apply to the rest of the country also apply to Congress; select a major, independent auditing firm to conduct a comprehensive audit of Congress for waste, fraud or abuse; cut the number of House committees, and cut committee staff by one-third; limit the terms of all committee chairs; ban the casting of proxy votes in committee; require committee meetings to be open to the public; require a three-fifths majority vote to pass a tax increase; guarantee an honest accounting of the Federal Budget by implementing zero base-line budgeting. [edit] Major Policy Changes During the first one hundred days of the 104th Congress, the Republicans pledged "to bring to the floor the following [ten] bills, each to be given a full and open debate, each to be given a clear and fair vote, and each to be immediately available for public inspection." The text of the proposed bills was included in the Contract, which was released prior to the election. These bills were not governmental operational reforms, as the previous promises were; rather, they represented significant changes to policy. They mainly included a balanced budget requirement, tax cuts for small businesses, families and seniors, term limits for legislators, social security reform, tort reform, and welfare reform. Whatever the role of the Contract, Republicans were elected to a majority of both houses of Congress for the first time since 1953, and several parts of the Contract were enacted. Some elements did not pass in Congress, while others were vetoed by, or substantially altered in negotiations with President Bill Clinton, who would later sarcastically refer to it as the "Contract on America."[ not one balanced budget for 40 years under democrat control of congress http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract_with_America 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontlop Posted March 1, 2013 Report Share Posted March 1, 2013 (edited) i was referring some info to someone who may think he balanced our budget .. the dems were and still are against a ballanced budget . they had to shut our govt down twice to get clinton to go along with the contract with america.. i think iraq will figure out how they wish to pay their debts to the world community .. whether it be a 10 dollar dinar or a one dollar dinar .. if they were smart they would stick to a pegged one to one exchange .. it would simplify their life . i dont know this guy lew .. but from what i hear .. hes exactly the type of person obama referrs to as a wall street fat cat that all the dems are against ..its kinda hypacritical of obama to nominate him .. kinda like timothy geitner ,, both crooks .. just stealing for the obama team .. he doesnt seem like some bipartisian accountant thats good for america .. if any crooked under handed schemes went on about the dinar .. i believe it was geitner and this guy is here to cover his tracks . geitner has to get out of the picture before anything comes to light .. this guy will be clueless as expected .. wont have any answers to any questions .. this is why they change personal so often ,, they hit and run ... Edited March 1, 2013 by dontlop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontlop Posted March 1, 2013 Report Share Posted March 1, 2013 (edited) what would keep them inline in dc would be a mandatory nomination of the opposing political party for certain cabnet positions especially treasury secratary ,, to hold them accountable .. could you see paul ryan as obamas treasury secratary Edited March 1, 2013 by dontlop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobhe911 Posted March 1, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2013 dontlop, sounds about right to me, personally, I'm hoping he is NOT familiar with where Lehman Bro is going, I have many preferred series in my "escrowed" coffers Geitner certainly did me no favors with them or wamu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncirculd Posted March 1, 2013 Report Share Posted March 1, 2013 ***/// ONE2ONE -- this guy is a PTB, ILLUMINATI, BILDERBURG GROUP, ROTHSCHILD agent of doom... One of their infamous puppet tools, just like obummer. The job assignment / mission was slated to be his for quite some time. It's another 'appointment' straight from the devils in hell. If he gets it (the RV) - his next assignment is to seperate US from it... and if we fail to 'co-operate', well, there's always those FEMA camp 'detention'/ holding 'facilites' until our loved ones hand it over to them. Because there is no longer Law giving us right to Fair Trial, Speedy Trial, Legal Counsel, even a phone call. obummer slashed that conveniently away with an EO pen very specifically for an event such as this. The IRS is in serious planning to stragically guarantee pin-pointing exactly who we are. Exchange (cash in/out) and get the hell so far under the radar as you can... fast. Wow got that right. IRS= illegal entity that someone who thinks they are somebody gave abusive powers to steal income tax money from working Americans. Where is the law? Where are the Constitutional lawyers? So sick of it. Your right, get your funds and get as far under the radar as possible. Amen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandstorm Posted March 1, 2013 Report Share Posted March 1, 2013 just in time eh? the timing couldnt be more coincidental. Jack lew is the man to handle this he has experience. experience for the U.S or are you saying something about a rv? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts