Members of the U.S. Congress threaten to classify al-Maliki as a "state sponsor of terrorism"

[yota691]

Members of the U.S. Congress threaten to classify al-Maliki as a "state sponsor of terrorism"

[14:43] 13/Feb/18

Erbil February 18 (PNA) - threatened members of the U.S. Congress to pass a resolution classifies the Iraqi government and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki as "Raian of terrorism" if exposure Camp Liberty, which includes elements of the PMOI in the capital Baghdad to a new attack, and they confirmed that it "reversed its promises" to protect Headquarters, which houses elements PMOI opposition.

A member of Congress Dana Rohrabakhar who chaired the congressional delegation met with members of the Secretariat of Resistance of Iran Bmqarham in the French capital Paris on Sunday in remarks reported network (france 24) "We will work on the classification of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki sponsor of terrorism in the U.S. Congress if exposure Camp Liberty, which includes elements of the PMOI in Baghdad to attack again. "

It is noteworthy that Camp Liberty was on Saturday (02/09/2013) to attack rocket-propelled grenades, killing six members of the PMOI and wounded nearly a hundred others were injured, and adopted a practical point of belonging to the militia (army chosen), which is believed to be close to Maliki .

The Rohrabakhar that "Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki will feel Balldgh if sought for the implementation of another attack on the refugee isolation in Camp Liberty," asserting that "any attack on this camp and killed refugees insulation which would mean that the Iraqi government has done and we are preparing sponsor of terrorism."

The Rohrabakhar accused a representative of the State of California in the U.S. Congress by the Iraqi government to "set aside the promises given by the Congress to ensure the safety and protection of unarmed refugees in Camp Liberty", and called for "re-transfer of Iranian refugees immediately to Camp Ashraf" in Diyala province.

And longer Aaddour Congress leaders Dana Rohrabakhar of the administration of former U.S. President Ronald Reagan and was primarily responsible for drafting letters Reagan for the period from 1981 until 1988.

For its part, said organization Mujahedeen in a statement received (range Press) copy of "The congressional delegation U.S., which includes four members, and expressed strong support for the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran," and stressed that "the meeting leaders with members of Congress agreed on the need to take immediate action to move residents Bertie camp to Camp Ashraf to keep them away from the source of harm. "

[KiaKaha]

Oh, dear. Thanks, Yota. At first I thought "Yay!!!", but then I realized, "Uh oh!" Time will out, I suppose.

KK

MADD for Heather

[hammer911]

This aint good.... if there are marked as terrorists, there will be sanctions. And we all no what that means!!!!! GO RV!!!~~~

[C.H.]

Interesting note, a lot of these news stories or posts are very inconsistent for example, one Iraq on the verge of chapter VII being lifted the next week Iraq is being mentioned as terrorist's. Inconsistency is instability which in turn tells me more time is required to resolve the pending issues at hand before we witness an RV.

[Shelley]

Thanks Yota... Just don't know what to believe anymore !!!!

[unirod]

I say these threats are nothing less than B/S!! there is too much $$$ invested by the West for Maliki and his Gov't to be labeled a terrorist organization.

Thx Yota

[tedro]

If Maliki is named a "sponsor-of-terrorism" wouldn't there be a bounty out on him??

[staunch]

A lot of the pressure and corrupt influence is coming from the neighboring countries. Iran, Saudi.....they all have a vested interest to see Iraq fail. Unless something drastic happens to quell all the BS, this is just business as usual.

On a side note to that: whenever there is progress made, you see all this BS pop up........so my point is, progress is being made. They just don't like it

[cooked]

I say these threats are nothing less than B/S!! there is too much $$ invested by the West for Maliki and his Gov't to be labeled a terrorist organization.

Thx Yota

I agree completely. They won't cut their nose off to spite their face. They want money more than peace.

[leanonme]

We must be aware of the propoganda going on. Take it with a grain of salt. And, stay thirsty my freinds.

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///***///***///

yuh... like the US would go after maliki before snapping up

the wandering criminial ahmadininut!

It's always been a "we put you in - we can take you out" situation with this 'tard maliki.

we just need to keep things stable enough for an RV then they can all go straight to hell.

[Doctor Smith]

It's always been a "we put you in - we can take you out" situation with this 'tard maliki.

Read more: http://dinarvets.com/forums/index.php?/topic/141643-members-of-the-us-congress-threaten-to-classify-al-maliki-as-a-state-sponsor-of-terrorism/#ixzz2LHKYwlqS

This may be the first step in getting rid of creeptard maliki.

[dontlop]

maliki knows thats grounds for impeachment .. its against the iraqi constitution to be sponcering terrorism .

so if he is labled a state sponcerer of terrorism . he will be tried . maybe be hung .. he doesnt want that . :lol:/>

but progress in iraq will continue despite him being hung

Edited February 18, 2013 by dontlop

[TrinityeXchange]

its against the iraqi constitution to be sponcering terrorism

BINGO! this is more pressure added on maliki to come to concede his dictatorship. he is experiencing pressure from protestors, kurds, iraqiya, and now the west. this is america's warning shot over the bow, "play ball or else." the strategic framework agreement signed by maliki explicitly states that the united states & iraq will defend iraq from enemies of its democracy both foreign and domestic. i repeat, maliki signed off on this.

all things now are pointing to maliki cutting a deal to implement erbil. the tale-tale sign of this is the article 140 money about to be delivered. article 140 must be completed before kurdistan and iraq unification can be completed. and now we see the united states & european union delegations entering iraq for meetings. there is much going on in iraq. i think we stand to see some major happenings before february closes out. plus they are talking about the national meeting again. if the national meeting is held, it is just about a nail in the coffin at the erbil agreement being executed.

these are very exciting times.

[C.H.]

Members of the U.S. Congress threaten to classify al-Maliki as a "state sponsor of terrorism"

[14:43] 13/Feb/18

Erbil February 18 (PNA) - threatened members of the U.S. Congress to pass a resolution classifies the Iraqi government and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki as "Raian of terrorism" if exposure Camp Liberty, which includes elements of the PMOI in the capital Baghdad to a new attack, and they confirmed that it "reversed its promises" to protect Headquarters, which houses elements PMOI opposition.

A member of Congress Dana Rohrabakhar who chaired the congressional delegation met with members of the Secretariat of Resistance of Iran Bmqarham in the French capital Paris on Sunday in remarks reported network (france 24) "We will work on the classification of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki sponsor of terrorism in the U.S. Congress if exposure Camp Liberty, which includes elements of the PMOI in Baghdad to attack again. "

It is noteworthy that Camp Liberty was on Saturday (02/09/2013) to attack rocket-propelled grenades, killing six members of the PMOI and wounded nearly a hundred others were injured, and adopted a practical point of belonging to the militia (army chosen), which is believed to be close to Maliki .

The Rohrabakhar that "Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki will feel Balldgh if sought for the implementation of another attack on the refugee isolation in Camp Liberty," asserting that "any attack on this camp and killed refugees insulation which would mean that the Iraqi government has done and we are preparing sponsor of terrorism."

The Rohrabakhar accused a representative of the State of California in the U.S. Congress by the Iraqi government to "set aside the promises given by the Congress to ensure the safety and protection of unarmed refugees in Camp Liberty", and called for "re-transfer of Iranian refugees immediately to Camp Ashraf" in Diyala province.

And longer Aaddour Congress leaders Dana Rohrabakhar of the administration of former U.S. President Ronald Reagan and was primarily responsible for drafting letters Reagan for the period from 1981 until 1988.

For its part, said organization Mujahedeen in a statement received (range Press) copy of "The congressional delegation U.S., which includes four members, and expressed strong support for the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran," and stressed that "the meeting leaders with members of Congress agreed on the need to take immediate action to move residents Bertie camp to Camp Ashraf to keep them away from the source of harm. "

[/quote

Not quite sure where this came from dated today 2/18, as today is a U.S. Government holiday. Beginning to wonder what is fact and what is fiction being posted here.

[endeavor1]

This has been hangin' over his head from the gitgo, remember Hashemi's bodyguards? He's in for it one way or another. The ptb want democracy in Iraq, they'll have it, sooner or later. So, we wait, go RV!!!

[tommy17]

Interesting note, a lot of these news stories or posts are very inconsistent for example, one Iraq on the verge of chapter VII being lifted the next week Iraq is being mentioned as terrorist's. Inconsistency is instability which in turn tells me more time is required to resolve the pending issues at hand before we witness an RV.

You think like a westerner ,iraq will always have political problems just like libya, syria , eqypt on and on..They've done it for thousands of years.

[yota691]

Not quite sure where this came from dated today 2/18, as today is a U.S. Government holiday. Beginning to wonder what is fact and what is fiction being posted here.

Well I didn't write the article but I sure did Post it...I've not change any thing or altered..Not my Style in fact when I post and I see that the article is from another News Agency..I like to get if from the referring (original) News Agency if possible... Fact is... We all should realize by now that Mr. M has to go...I've assume this since Oct of 2011...The question I've ask myself and a few other here and there is...since then..How will this man leave the scene for the Better of Iraq and its People..Regardless how you feel about them they deserve a Better Life...and I like the Comments from dontlop and TrinityeXchange (up above and as always)...if you want some more understanding of the Facts...+ 100 to both of you...TY...back to the question to soon be Facts...how is Mr. M going to Exit and what will the consequence be like..who dies.. how many...what Political party is going to get blame..is it still gonna be ignore..(the article is US talking) is the whole region gonna explode..just so many ways this can go down.. this is BIG NEWS somewhat being ignored by our media.. lets just hope that is as Peace full as it can be...JMT&O

[uncirculd]

wow what an article. As long as they get rid of maliki, the US can label maliki as a terrorist as he is. But, he must be non affiliated with Iraqi government. I can't help but laugh, I don't know how many time you can create havoc and still come up with something new. If it didn't involve so many people lives you would say this soap opera is comical. But so many folks ride on his dag gum evil to turn a new leaf. Now the US is losing patience. Oh my, I could hear the gurus now.

[yota691]

here another dated 2/18 Austin's comments stir controversy .. Politicians: America is trying to restore its army to Iraq

Author: the future of Iraq

02/18/2013 12:00 am

BAGHDAD / future Iraqi

effects assessment commander senior U.S. situation in Iraq wonder again about the wisdom of the timing of the withdrawal of U.S. troops from the end of 2011, and their repercussions on the political and security situation in Iraq.

has said Gen. Lloyd Austin, the last commander of U.S. forces before their withdrawal from Iraq , that Iraq remained stable, but the stability is fragile. quoted by Agence France Presse Austin told a Senate Armed Services Committee in the Senate that "some of the things that we see in Iraq worrying, with tensions now, and demonstrations Sunni", acknowledging that the U.S. military presence he could help the country.

Moreover, spokesman of the Ministry of Interior Brigadier Saad Maan assess U.S. Gen. Lloyd Austin, the security situation in Iraq as fragile, and pointed to the development of the capacity of the Iraqi armed forces to carry out the quality and improve the cooperative relationship between those forces and citizens during the period followed the U.S. withdrawal.

ended the United States formally presence in Iraq after nine years of invasion of its military in 2003, and topple the regime of former President Saddam Hussein, a decision of the former U.S. president George W. Bush.

his part, said a member of the security and defense committee in the House of Representatives of quitting The statements of Austin indicate that "the U.S. government's desire to return to Iraq," and stressed that "not allow the Iraqi government so" calling on them to "impose security control better to miss an opportunity to both calls to return influence the U.S. military in the country." Iraq has signed and the United States, in 2008, the Framework Agreement strategy to support the ministries and agencies of the Iraqi transition from the strategic partnership with the Republic of Iraq to the areas of economic, diplomatic, cultural and security, based on the strategic framework agreement and reduce the number of reconstruction teams in the provinces, as well as providing important sustainable for the rule law, including police development program and completion of the coordination, supervision and report to the Fund of Iraq relief and reconstruction. either Iraqi List has been charged the United States for what is happening in a number of provinces, and accused al-Alwani United States to "hand over Iraq to Iran on a golden platter," while carrying a number of specialists in the Iraqi issue the government and politicians responsible for the current political crisis as a result of suspension of work the executive and legislative in the country.

Ahead of the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq Interior Ministry confirmed the Iraqi readiness to take over security after it said its reports confirm their ability to take it after the U.S. withdrawal. It is believed Prime Iraqi group for Strategic Studies and confident Hashemi said demonstrations broke out as a result of the inability of the political parties to recruit U.S. withdrawal to build the country, turn the pages past, stressing that the withdrawal negative impact on the situation in the country.

noted that General Austin response to questions about Iraq and other hotspots before the Armed Services Committee in the Senate in the confirmation hearing at the head of the leadership of U.S. forces in the Central Region, which oversees U.S. forces deployed in the Middle East.

turn, supported former Rep. Prime Iraqi Nation Party Alusi assessment General Austin to put the fragile security in Iraq, noting that the U.S. withdrawal allowed the currents and terrorist elements and regional powers to intervene openly in the lives of Iraqis.

indicated that the administration of U.S. President Obama has sought to negotiate with Iraq on keeping force is limited in Iraq that enjoys legal immunity but the Iraqi government refused to do so, and this Shan wished Mithal al-Alusi, the U.S. aid to Iraq for averting intervention parties and different powers in its affairs, as well as the activation of the strategic agreement with Iraq in various fields.

[C.H.]

Well I didn't write the article but I sure did Post it...I've not change any thing or altered..Not my Style in fact when I post and I see that the article is from another News Agency..I like to get if from the referring (original) News Agency if possible... Fact is... We all should realize by now that Mr. M has to go...I've assume this since Oct of 2011...The question I've ask myself and a few other here and there is...since then..How will this man leave the scene for the Better of Iraq and its People..Regardless how you feel about them they deserve a Better Life...and I like the Comments from dontlop and TrinityeXchange (up above and as always)...if you want some more understanding of the Facts...+ 100 to both of you...TY...back to the question to soon be Facts...how is Mr. M going to Exit and what will the consequence be like..who dies.. how many...what Political party is going to get blame..is it still gonna be ignore..(the article is US talking) is the whole region gonna explode..just so many ways this can go down.. this is BIG NEWS somewhat being ignored by our media.. lets just hope that is as Peace full as it can be...JMT&O

I Agree 100% with what you are saying here, many intangibles here at the moment we can only pray and hope this is done in a way that does not spill anymore blood into the streets.

[capt.cliff]

poetical problems always yea man but the difference is one man starting them for his own benefit--these people keep trying to work things out--but a wrench is always thrown into the mix --who throws the wrench , not the blocks doing the talking it is the one who doesn't want them to form a consensus--and plays every trick he can --to to piss off any part of it---I have seen more deals cuts then in our own congress and senate only to fall apart by that one MAN--every time it is from a different angle , every time a different block but only caused by one MAN, who doesn't want to loss power or to try to get more powerful! not hard to see , not hard to know where the real problem starts with--

food for real thought!