Obama Must Have a Cramp in His Stomach Now!

[bigwave]

The following is a great read unless you love O

President Harrison J. Bounel

February 15, 2013 by Bob Livingston

Who is Harrison J. Bounel? According to the 2009 tax return submitted by President Barack Obama, he’s the President of the United States. All nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to discuss this anomaly today.

The case in question is Edward Noonan, et al v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State, and the Justices are finally looking at it thanks to the dogged determination of Orly Taitz.

The case calls into question many of the documents Obama (Bounel, Soetoro, Soebarkah, etc.) has used and/or released as authentic since he came on the national scene.

The case contends that the documents — birth certificate, Social Security number, Selective Service registration, etc. — are fakes or forgeries. If that’s the case, Obama should not have been on the California ballot in 2008 and, therefore, should not have received the State’s electoral votes.

Four of the nine Justices must vote to move the case forward. We’ll see.

Meantime, on Feb. 4, Kathleen O’Leary, presiding judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal, reinstated the appeal of Taitz v. Obama et al filed by Taitz when she ran for Senate. That case involves evidence of 1.5 million invalid voter registrations in the State of California. The appeal also involves Obama’s lack of legitimacy to hold the office of President based on: his forged IDs, stolen Connecticut Social Security number, the fact the last name he’s using is not legally his and his fraudulent claim to be the U.S. citizen.

Evidence in the case includes:

A certified copy of the passport records of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, showing her son’s legal last name to be Soebarkah, not Obama.

Obama’s school records from Indonesia, showing his citizenship to be Indonesian.

Sworn affidavits of top law enforcement experts and investigators, showing Obama’s birth certificate and Selective Service certificate are forgeries and that the Social Security number used by Obama on his 2009 tax returns as posted on WhiteHouse.gov was fraudulent.

The SSN failed when checked through both E-Verify and the Social Security Number Verification Service.

On another legal front,Obama defaulted in the case of Grinols et al v. Obama et al on Jan. 30 when he failed to file a response within 21 days of being served notice of the suit. This case also involves Obama’s phony SSN.

This next part is great:

The suit states:

nvestigator Albert Hendershot found in the database ofhttp://www.acxiom.com/identity-solutions/acxiom-identity-batch-solutions/ the name of the individual whose Social Security Obama is using. Acxciom-batch-solutions showed (Exhibit 1) that Harry J Bounel with the same Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 at 5046 S Greenwood Ave in Chicago, home address of Barack Obama, Database shows Bounel with the same address and Social Security number as Barack Obama himself. According to the databases last changes to the information on Harrison (Harry) J Bounel were made in and around November 2009 by Michelle Obama, who is listed as Bounel’s relative.

Database changes can involve entering the information or deletion of information. It appears that changes made by relative Michelle Obama included deletion of information, which was done at a time when Taitz brought to Federal court in the Central District of California before Judge David O. Carter a case of election challenge by her client, former U.S. ambassador Dr. Alan Keyes and 40 state Representatives and high ranked members of the U.S. Military.

Recently obtained results of the 1940 census, Exhibit 2, provided the last missing link, link (sic) between Harry J. Bounel and the date of birth of 1890. Exhibit 2 shows the printout of the U.S. census, showing Harry J Bounel, immigrant from Russia, residing at 915 Daly Ave, Bronx, NY, age 50 during the 1940 census, meaning he was born in 1890, as shown in the affidavit of Investigators Daniels and Sankey.

There is a pattern of Obstruction of Justice and tampering with the official records and falsification/forgery of the official records related to Obama. This happens in particular when George W. Bush employees leave their positions and are replaced by Obama appointees.

Taitz has asked for expedited default judgment and post judgment discovery in this case out of fear that any records on hand at the Social Security office will be destroyed when George W. Bush-appointed Commissioner Michael Astrue leaves office in February. Records that might have proven Obama’s Selective Service registration was a forgery were destroyed in 2009 after Bush-appointed Selective Service Director William Chatfield resigned, Noonan, et al alleges.

Some more good news for O is that the 9th circuit VACATED an order by judge Guilford, when Guilford denied Taitz's motion to dismiss Berg and Liberi’s case in AntiSLAPP. That is great.

ALSO.....

Law offices of Orly Taitz also announced that Kathleen O’Leary, Presiding Judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal reinstated the Appeal Taitz v Obama et al filed by the candidate for the U.S. Senate, Attorney Orly Taitz

Appeal at hand involves Senator Diane Feinstein and Barack Obama as a candidate for the U.S. Presidency.

The case at hand was filed in July 2012. It involves evidence of one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California. Additionally appeal involves lack of legitimacy of Barack Obama to the U.S. Presidency due to his of forged IDs, stolen CT Social Security number, last name not legally his and fraudulent claim to be the U.S. citizen. Evidence in the case involves a certified copy of the passport records of Obama’s mother, S. Ann Dunham, which shows her son’s legal last name to be Soebarkah, not Obama, it involves Obama’sschool records from Indonesia showing his citizenship to be Indonesian, sworn affidavits of top law enforcement experts and investigators showing Obama’s birth certificate and Selective service certificate to be forged and Social Security number used by Barack Obama in his 2009 tax returns and posted on WhiteHouse.gov to be fraudulently used and failing both E-Verify and SSNVS

I guess I could have "bolded" the entire page.

The following is a link that provides a real military drum roll:

The next is a M16 sound effect:

Take your pick. I would have brought them both over if I knew how.

Both are cool for us and gut wrenching for O!

PEACE

[reveldog]

i pray obummer goes down for the fraud he is

[bigwave]

If he is guilty - me too reveldog.

[reveldog]

there is no doubt he is guilty of all he is accused of

[Deltori]

AN IMPOSTER IS AN IMPOSTER REGARDLESS OF PARTY AFFILIATION...LETS RID OURSELVES OF IMPOSTERS

[TPSprayduster]

The following is a great read unless you love O :blink:/>

President Harrison J. Bounel

February 15, 2013 by Bob Livingston

Who is Harrison J. Bounel? According to the 2009 tax return submitted by President Barack Obama, he’s the President of the United States. All nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to discuss this anomaly today.

The case in question is Edward Noonan, et al v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State, and the Justices are finally looking at it thanks to the dogged determination of Orly Taitz.

The case calls into question many of the documents Obama (Bounel, Soetoro, Soebarkah, etc.) has used and/or released as authentic since he came on the national scene.

The case contends that the documents — birth certificate, Social Security number, Selective Service registration, etc. — are fakes or forgeries. If that’s the case, Obama should not have been on the California ballot in 2008 and, therefore, should not have received the State’s electoral votes.

Four of the nine Justices must vote to move the case forward. We’ll see.

Meantime, on Feb. 4, Kathleen O’Leary, presiding judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal, reinstated the appeal of Taitz v. Obama et al filed by Taitz when she ran for Senate. That case involves evidence of 1.5 million invalid voter registrations in the State of California. The appeal also involves Obama’s lack of legitimacy to hold the office of President based on: his forged IDs, stolen Connecticut Social Security number, the fact the last name he’s using is not legally his and his fraudulent claim to be the U.S. citizen.

Evidence in the case includes:

A certified copy of the passport records of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, showing her son’s legal last name to be Soebarkah, not Obama.

Obama’s school records from Indonesia, showing his citizenship to be Indonesian.

Sworn affidavits of top law enforcement experts and investigators, showing Obama’s birth certificate and Selective Service certificate are forgeries and that the Social Security number used by Obama on his 2009 tax returns as posted on WhiteHouse.gov was fraudulent.

The SSN failed when checked through both E-Verify and the Social Security Number Verification Service.

On another legal front,Obama defaulted in the case of Grinols et al v. Obama et al on Jan. 30 when he failed to file a response within 21 days of being served notice of the suit. This case also involves Obama’s phony SSN.

This next part is great:

The suit states:

nvestigator Albert Hendershot found in the database ofhttp://www.acxiom.com/identity-solutions/acxiom-identity-batch-solutions/ the name of the individual whose Social Security Obama is using. Acxciom-batch-solutions showed (Exhibit 1) that Harry J Bounel with the same Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 at 5046 S Greenwood Ave in Chicago, home address of Barack Obama, Database shows Bounel with the same address and Social Security number as Barack Obama himself. According to the databases last changes to the information on Harrison (Harry) J Bounel were made in and around November 2009 by Michelle Obama, who is listed as Bounel’s relative.

Database changes can involve entering the information or deletion of information. It appears that changes made by relative Michelle Obama included deletion of information, which was done at a time when Taitz brought to Federal court in the Central District of California before Judge David O. Carter a case of election challenge by her client, former U.S. ambassador Dr. Alan Keyes and 40 state Representatives and high ranked members of the U.S. Military.

Recently obtained results of the 1940 census, Exhibit 2, provided the last missing link, link (sic) between Harry J. Bounel and the date of birth of 1890. Exhibit 2 shows the printout of the U.S. census, showing Harry J Bounel, immigrant from Russia, residing at 915 Daly Ave, Bronx, NY, age 50 during the 1940 census, meaning he was born in 1890, as shown in the affidavit of Investigators Daniels and Sankey.

There is a pattern of Obstruction of Justice and tampering with the official records and falsification/forgery of the official records related to Obama. This happens in particular when George W. Bush employees leave their positions and are replaced by Obama appointees.

Taitz has asked for expedited default judgment and post judgment discovery in this case out of fear that any records on hand at the Social Security office will be destroyed when George W. Bush-appointed Commissioner Michael Astrue leaves office in February. Records that might have proven Obama’s Selective Service registration was a forgery were destroyed in 2009 after Bush-appointed Selective Service Director William Chatfield resigned, Noonan, et al alleges.

Some more good news for O is that the 9th circuit VACATED an order by judge Guilford, when Guilford denied Taitz's motion to dismiss Berg and Liberi’s case in AntiSLAPP. That is great.

ALSO.....

Law offices of Orly Taitz also announced that Kathleen O’Leary, Presiding Judge of the 4th District Court of Appeal reinstated the Appeal Taitz v Obama et al filed by the candidate for the U.S. Senate, Attorney Orly Taitz

Appeal at hand involves Senator Diane Feinstein and Barack Obama as a candidate for the U.S. Presidency.

The case at hand was filed in July 2012. It involves evidence of one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California. Additionally appeal involves lack of legitimacy of Barack Obama to the U.S. Presidency due to his of forged IDs, stolen CT Social Security number, last name not legally his and fraudulent claim to be the U.S. citizen. Evidence in the case involves a certified copy of the passport records of Obama’s mother, S. Ann Dunham, which shows her son’s legal last name to be Soebarkah, not Obama, it involves Obama’sschool records from Indonesia showing his citizenship to be Indonesian, sworn affidavits of top law enforcement experts and investigators showing Obama’s birth certificate and Selective service certificate to be forged and Social Security number used by Barack Obama in his 2009 tax returns and posted on WhiteHouse.gov to be fraudulently used and failing both E-Verify and SSNVS

I guess I could have "bolded" the entire page.

The following is a link that provides a real military drum roll:

The next is a M16 sound effect:

Take your pick. I would have brought them both over if I knew how.

Both are cool for us and gut wrenching for O!

PEACE

Cramp from laughing so hard he strained his stomach. This deal is going now where and all of you who are hoping and praying are wasting your time. NO worries i am sure she will come up with some other wild story that HAS no merit tossed out again..

[bigwave]

Hey TP

If he is guilty how would you feel about it all. Just asking not wanting to fight.

[yota691]

Hey TP

If he is guilty how would you feel about it all. Just asking not wanting to fight.

Here How the Obama Phone Lady: Reply..... Obama Lied some folks... well it doesn't matter the King is always right...

[sxsess]

Nothing would be better than seeing that slim SOB go down in flames and watch the liberal retards squealing like little girls!

[Tripphood]

I hope he is exposed for the imposter that he is. It will be a fitting end for him.

[Redwizard]

The justices are nominated by the President of the United States. So people really think that they are going to find anything wrong with the Pres/King. Barry has set himself up where no one can touch him. If he is found invalid, then everything he has done is void, and the justice which was picked by Barry wont have their job....... never going to happen hate to say it.

[DinarMillionaire]

The justices are nominated by the President of the United States. So people really think that they are going to find anything wrong with the Pres/King. Barry has set himself up where no one can touch him. If he is found invalid, then everything he has done is void, and the justice which was picked by Barry wont have their job....... never going to happen hate to say it.

You have a point, but the two justices he appointed should have to recuse themselves in this matter. In fact we should demand that they do.

[TPSprayduster]

Hey TP

If he is guilty how would you feel about it all. Just asking not wanting to fight.

If he was the lawsuits would have been over along time ago wave it is has not been proven in 4 years it won't be proven otherwise. Another tossed suit without merit. I don't have any feeling otherwise. It is a certain group of folks who have chosen to believe this and won't believe nothing else. Just like a group who thinks he is a muslim that still hasn't been proven.

[Captjohn]

If he was the lawsuits would have been over along time ago wave it is has not been proven in 4 years it won't be proven otherwise. Another tossed suit without merit. I don't have any feeling otherwise. It is a certain group of folks who have chosen to believe this and won't believe nothing else. Just like a group who thinks he is a muslim that still hasn't been proven.

I don't doubt that most all of the allegations against O are true, however IMO, they will never touch him as he is viciously defended and supported - at all costs- by the mainstream media. If not, he wouldn't be president today. Who else could hold the office of president for four years shirking leadership, never governing, taking accountability for big decisions, and cruising through his term pitting sides against each other while de facto voting "present" and essentially being MIA on critical issues. The fact that this could happen is a national disgrace.

[Redwizard]

You have a point, but the two justices he appointed should have to recuse themselves in this matter. In fact we should demand that they do.

Right! But that wont happen because he wont let it happen. Barry is untouchable and he knows it. He will just make another executive order and say "dont ever bother me again"

[jonjon]

Right! But that wont happen because he wont let it happen. Barry is untouchable and he knows it. He will just make another executive order and say "dont ever bother me again"

This is a case of extreme fraud.

Classifiable as “Extremist”

We should send out a “DRONE”

[ocdude]

The following is a great read unless you love O :blink:/>

PEACE

Chuckle.

[dinar_stud]

Supreme court published orders for 2/15/2013, note no Orly case big surprise WOW

http://adf.ly/1137106/http://www.multiupload.nl/2GGSXXNRU8

[ocdude]

Supreme court published orders for 2/15/2013, note no Orly case big surprise WOW

http://adf.ly/1137106/http://www.multiupload.nl/2GGSXXNRU8

I am SHOCKED!!!

LOL.

[jonjon]

Supreme court published orders for 2/15/2013, note no Orly case big surprise WOW

http://adf.ly/1137106/http://www.multiupload.nl/2GGSXXNRU8

No. 12A606 Title:

Edward Noonan, et al., Applicantsv.Deborah Bowen,

California Secretary of StateDocketed:

December 13, 2012Lower Ct:

Supreme Court of California

Case Nos.: (S207078)

[ocdude]

That was last year.

It went no where.

Chuckle.

They heard what Taitz had to say and did not grant certiorari.......just like ALL of her other cases before this.

They heard the argument and did not grant certiorari.

During the Justices' regular conference, the Justices discuss the petitions, and grant certiorari in less than five percent of the cases filed. (During the 1980s and 1990s, the number of cases accepted and decided each term approached 150 per year; more recently, the number of cases granted has averaged well under 100 annually). Before each conference, the Chief Justice prepares a list of those petitions he believes have sufficient merit to warrant discussion. Any other Justice may also add a case to the "discuss list"; cases not designated for discussion by any Justice are automatically denied review. The Court or a Justice may also decide that a case be "re-listed" for discussion at a later conference; this occurs, for example, where the Court decides to request input from the Solicitor General of the United States on whether a petition should be granted.[8]

The votes of four Justices at Conference (see Rule of four) will suffice to grant certiorari and place the case on the court's calendar. If the Supreme Court grants certiorari (or the certified question or other extraordinary writ), then a briefing schedule is arranged for the parties to submit their briefs in favor of or against a particular form of relief. During this time, an individual or group having an interest in a case but is not a party to the case may submit a motion to appear before the court as amicus curiae ("friend of the court"). Except for certain specific categories (such as lawyers for state and local governments) or where all parties to the case consent, it is in the Court's discretion whether such motions are granted.

The grant or denial of certiorari petitions by the Court are usually issued as one-sentence orders without explanation.

[bigwave]

Hey TP and ocdude - again simple question: If it turns out that O has gotten his way in through fraud and deceit then what should we do?

If found guilty the Federal guidelines are pretty serious. The details of Federal punishment for identity theft and the Identity Theft Penalty Enhancement Act as posted on the government site is as follows:

Increase penalties by two years for anyone who commits A "aggravated identity theft" in order to commit another serious Federal offense (including immigration violations, false citizenship crimes, firearms offenses, Social Security fraud, government theft, and other serious crimes);

Someone convicted of a federal fraud crime faces serving time in a federal prison. The potential prison sentences associated with any fraud conviction differs significantly, and can range from 0 to 6 months up to 20 to 30 years per violation. The amount of time sentenced will depend upon a person's criminal history, as well as the particular law violated. Alternatives, such as home confinement, are also possible in some situations.

Maybe he can have “Home Confinement” at the White House.

There are more accusations and a number of venues happening simultaneously too.

We also have to remember this is not about Orly Taitz it is about the people that she represents –“We the People” brought to you by among other cases Noonan et al.

Also ocdude this is an amended complaint which you can see by going to: that was posted February 9th 2013 in case you forgot.

O may prove to be pretty slippery and he may get away with it all but I am pretty sure he has to have a gut wrench about now.

We will see…. PEACE

Oh yea – Come on RV.

[dontlop]

yep the libs act like this guy is just some kid with a personal computer making up charges .. he has spent his life in law enforcement.. hes using us laws in his investigation . hes using legitimate investigators .. hes using legitimate forensics to diasect this entire thing .. and now hes made a conclusion as a law enforcement officer of THE LAW ,, that this guy obama has broken the law .. its no wonder he keeps digging .. its because he keeps finding evidence that obama has broken the law

[TPSprayduster]

Has to be proven first and just like last year it wasn't. Talk about beating a dead horse over and over. When it is proven Wave then we will talk until then i am going to enjoying the NASCAR practice session. Not going to belly ache and cry about the so call imposter in the white house as others tend to believe. I have mine and you guys have yours. I will respect that part.

[jonjon]

That was last year.

It went no where.

Chuckle.

No. 12A606 Title: Edward Noonan, et al.,

Applicantsv.Deborah Bowen,

California Secretary of StateDocketed: December 13, 2012Lower Ct:

Supreme Court of California Case Nos.: (S207078)

Read more:

Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.

Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.

This was yesterday the Supreme Court reviewed this in conference