Federal Court Indicts President Obama Will not see end of his second term

[dontlop]

Article 25

"The Members of the United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council in accordance with the present Charter. "

heres article 25 .. and that proves your tard .. thats the entire article 25 . dum bo.. and "your" whole basis obama is the only person in the world that bombed libya ... because hes supposed to obey the un .. and the un told obama to go bomb libya .. you presented your case .. you posted paragraph after paragrah to go read article 25 ... fought about it for days .. when its one sentence .. one freaking sentence ..instead of posting the senrtence you prove your tard ... now go read all volumes of encylclopedia britanica it says your dad was wrong , and it proves your tard .

impeach THE BUM right now

.

Overall, nearly 5.6 million people received unemployment benefits in the week ended Jan. 19, the latest data available. That's about 325,000 fewer than the previous week.

That's also less than half the number of unemployed, which stood at 12.3 million last month. Many of the unemployed aren't eligible for benefits, while others have used up all the benefits available to them.

Many of the unemployed aren't eligible for benefits, while others have used up all the benefits available to them.

Many of the unemployed aren't eligible for benefits, while others have used up all the benefits available to them.

Many of the unemployed aren't eligible for benefits, while others have used up all the benefits available to them.

impeach the bum for sending troops into libya with out congress approval

.

War Powers Act" redirects here. For other uses, see War Powers Act of 1941.

War Powers Resolution Joint resolution concerning the war powers of Congress and the President. Enacted by the 93rd United States Congress Citations

Public Law Pub.L. 93–148 Stat. 87 Stat. 555

Legislative history

Introduced in the House as H.J.Res. 542 by Clement J. Zablocki (D-WI) on May 3, 1973

Committee consideration by: House Foreign Affairs

Passed the House on July 18, 1973 (244–170)

Passed the Senate on July 20, 1973 ()

Reported by the joint conference committee on October 4, 1973; agreed to by the Senate on October 10, 1973 (75–20) and by the House on October 12, 1973 (238–123)

Vetoed by President Richard Nixon on October 24, 1973

Overridden by the House on November 7, 1973 (284–135)

Overridden by the Senate and became law on November 7, 1973 (75–18) <<< democrat controlled house and senate

U.S. Congressional opposition

to American involvement in

wars and intervention

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541-1548)[1] is a federal law intended to check the President's power to commit the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of Congress. The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States Congress joint resolution; this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."

forget the war powers act ..of 1941 .. the resolution was passed in 1973

.

Here’s a history flashback to April 15, 1986, when President Ronald Reagan ordered the bombing of Libyan Dictator Moammar Gadhafi in response to Gadhafi’s direct order to carry out a terrorist bombing in Germany that killed two U.S. Soldiers, and wounded 50 others at a nightclub. Reagan ordered the bombing of Tripoli, and was roundly criticized for it by Democrats and those on the Left. Reagan ordered the attack without seeking Congressional approval in advance.

Under the WPR, the President may commit U.S. forces into armed hostilities, but must advise Congress within 48 hours that he has done so. This report must explain the circumstances necessitating the deployment, the legal authority he is relying on, and the estimated scope and duration of hostilities. A 60-day clock then begins ticking, at the end of which the president must terminate his military action unless (1) Congress has specifically authorized it, (2) Congress has extended the 60 days, or (3) Congress is physically unable to meet due to an attack on the U.S. But the President may extend the 60 days by another 30 days if he certifies to Congress that he cannot safely remove U.S. forces from combat without that additional time.

Thus, an American president operating under the WPR, basically has 92 days total to get his military business done abroad without specific Congressional authorization

I GUESS THERE ARE TIMELINES INVOLVED

I CAN SEE OBAMAS POINT NOW . HE CAN DO THIS IF HES OUT WITHIN 60 DAYS . BUT IT MUST MEET THE CRITERIA OF THE WAR POWERS RESOLUTION >>>> The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States Congress joint resolution; this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces." ... DID IT ?

YA IM FIXIATED ON IT ..

.

.. obama is hurting america not helping

.

.

Edited February 9, 2013 by dontlop

[DinarMillionaire]

So the UN is now a foreign nation ?. Reid vs Covert has nothing to do with the UN, nothing at all. As I said the UN treaty is clear on it's Charter and Article 25 in the Charter is Clear. Since the UN treaty, the US has gone where ever the UN says to go starting with Korea in 1950 and on from there. :)/>/>/>

You're right, my response wasn't about the U.N. slinky. Well, maybe not directly. It was about the U.S. Constitution. You may want to read it and the Declaration of Independence.

Since treaties are compacts between/among " the powers of the earth" of "separate and equal station" as stipulated in the Declaration of Independence, treaties may not be consummated with other than sovereign nations.

Consequently, for at least these two reasons --- 1) because the U.S. Senate in 1945 ratified the United Nations (UN) Charter as a treaty and the UN is not a sovereign nation, and 2) because membership in the UN makes the U.S. inferior to the UN --- U.S. "membership" in the United Nations is unconstitutional, FORBIDDEN, and thus should be declared null and void.

Edited February 9, 2013 by DinarMillionaire

[umbertino]

Hi :)/> No problem, Thx and i'm glad that your on board, I was showed these evils by my dad, so I try to share and pass to anybody willing to listen. My dad would always tell me these things, and when I was little I used to always drill the Constitution in our heads. I thought why is my dad worried so much, now I know, I was :angry:/> at first but my dad said the Constitution is a freedom charter that's why the UN attacks it so much, I tell people you no longer have rights, they call me crazy,I simply reply, if the Constitution is 2nd to the UN treaty, you have no rights period. I invite ANY on this great site to prove me wrong. Crazy thing is Maggie 123, I want them to prove me wrong, BUT they can't.. :(/> . I would even settle (Temporarily though) for the US to be an observatory member only like the vatican (that in itself is another story). If you get a chance, look at the incident of Katanga Province in the Congo 1961 as just 1 of many incidents that the UN involves themselves in and how when someone wants out, how the UN reacts. ( Note the UN at anytime can do this here in the USA as well, prove me please wrong.I Will post a little more later but I leave you with this Maggie 123, Someone once said (excuse caps but it's worth the caps) "WORSE THAN TRAITORS IN ARMS ARE THE MEN (WOMEN) WHO, PRETENDING, LOYALTY TO THE FLAG, FEAST AND FATTEN ON THE MISFORTUNES OF THE NATION" -ABE LINCOLN. :)/>

To understand the spirit in the UN just look at the VETO Power of those few Nations holding it... There goes their idea of democracy. Nuff said.

[joekooltrips]

You're right, my response wasn't about the U.N. slinky. Well, maybe not directly. It was about the U.S. Constitution. You may want to read it and the Declaration of Independence.

Since treaties are compacts between/among " the powers of the earth" of "separate and equal station" as stipulated in the Declaration of Independence, treaties may not be consummated with other than sovereign nations.

Consequently, for at least these two reasons --- 1) because the U.S. Senate in 1945 ratified the United Nations (UN) Charter as a treaty and the UN is not a sovereign nation, and 2) because membership in the UN makes the U.S. inferior to the UN --- U.S. "membership" in the United Nations is unconstitutional, FORBIDDEN, and thus should be declared null and void.

Yes DM You are right (Thank you and Bravo someone is on the right track), the UN treaty should never have been signed for that reason, that's why we need to get out, it tries to circumvent and usurp our Constitution So when the Security Council has a resolution it is voted on, and Russia and China DOMINATE the votes (One man, One vote,) Cause each Member Nation (15 who have votes) counts as only 1 vote despite the Fact that there are 192 current member Nations, this is why I told Dontlop, the UN calls the shots. That's why we need out, those a.s.s.holes in the UN are passing resolutions and turning this GREAT NATION into freakin" Russia/China . It's NOT a coincidence that all this SOCIALISM is here and it has our Countrymen confused as to WTF is happening. That's why I posted earlier as well as other post, we need OUT of the UN. TRUMAN who (illegally) signed the treaty (See your null and Void comment which is true) Is open to a charge of Treason, Article 3 Section 2 of the Constitution (But so is EVERY President that follows and puts the UN Treaty ABOVE the Constitution). FDR started this Whole mess with his behind the scenes deal with Stalin, (LOOK UP Alger Hiss and Leo Pasvolsky as well as the "Special Committee" appointed by Roosevelt they are Sumner Wells, Isaiah Bowman,Hamilton Fish Armstrong, Benjamin Cohen, and Clark Eichelberger.) Conspiracy folks called this group the Jason Society (I don't know so I've been researching them ) . 1 of our fellow members put up a chart during a debate on O passing i believe 144 Executive Orders, if you can find that list scroll down to FDR and those who were in office around that time and how many Executive orders they filed, about 4000 give or take a few just between him and TDR alone NOT a coincidence.Yahshu'a told us you can't serve 2 masters, you can't swear oath and affirmation to 2 documents. DM when you get a chance look at Article 25 of UN charter and note the word "present" which means there could/might be other charters. Take a look also DM at Article 55 and 56 of the UN Treaty as well. Thx and with respect.

Article 25

"The Members of the United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council in accordance with the present Charter. "

heres article 25 .. and that proves your tard .. thats the entire article 25 . dum bo.. and "your" whole basis obama is the only person in the world that bombed libya ... because hes supposed to obey the un .. and the un told obama to go bomb libya .. you presented your case .. you posted paragraph after paragrah to go read article 25 ... fought about it for days .. when its one sentence .. one freaking sentence ..instead of posting the senrtence you prove your tard ... now go read all volumes of encylclopedia britanica it says your dad was wrong , and it proves your tard .

O can take his issue, Libiya, before the UN, the UN Security council votes on said issue if O gets 2/3 if 15 votes, he can go in W/O congress approval per Article 25 and 47

.

.

.

.

.

To understand the spirit in the UN just look at the VETO Power of those few Nations holding it... There goes their idea of democracy. Nuff said.

That's why I pointed out the ALL of Article 25. All the power of the said VETO is in the Security Council.

[dontlop]

if obama violates a federal law and sends troops into another country because the un said its ok .. obama will be impeached . by our congress .

the war powers resolution is a federal law

and since congress didnt do their job ,, others have taken up the issue .. congress can all be impeached for not doing their jobs and defending the constitution by impeaching obama

first things first . you got to prove obama committed an impeachable offense . which he did do

then they can move on congress

Edited February 9, 2013 by dontlop

[joekooltrips]

if obama violates a federal law and sends troops into another country because the un said its ok .. obama will be impeached . by our congress .

the war powers resolution is a federal law

and since congress didnt do their job ,, others have taken up the issue .. congress can all be impeached for not doing their jobs and defending the constitution by impeaching obama

first things first . you got to prove obama committed an impeachable offense . which he did do

then they can move on congress

I overstand what your saying Dontlop, i'm telling you that O is going around congress by taking the issue to the U.N., similar to how O went around Congress when he went to the U.N. for gun resolutions and came back with 23 executive orders, per Article 26 of the U.N. Charter concerning armaments. You see Dontlop, your speaking on How it should be (Constitution base, I overstand that and agree) I'm telling you How it currently is (U.N. Treaty Base 1945). O is the UN secret weapon vs The USA to help pass the key points/agenda needed by the U.N. in its persecution of OUR Constitution, cause he neutralizes the people ?. How, he's Black, if the blacks browns etc don't like what O does the elites can say hey it's a Black/Colored guy calling the shots, if the whites/ caucasions don't like what O does, your racist. The ol' divide and conquer. I don't want this great country in the U.N., We have OUR charter and it is the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND and it's a freedom charter for you, me and ALL who belong to this the Greatest Nation on Yah green Earth. We need to put the WORLD on notice one more time and leave the UN (218 votes from the House would do it) and Declare are Independence as a sovereign nation who operates with YAH given rights. The Constitution is the only thing left standing in the way of 1 world govt and the false anti-christ man-made world peace. If you feel the U.N. is a good thing then we'll have to agree to dis-agree because I do not, again with respect

[joekooltrips]

Dontlop, I would even settle for the USA (temporary fix) to just be an observatory member like the Vatican, I just wanna know your thoughts on that thx and with respect

[Maggie123]

Thank You Joe for your post's Very informative and I have also been admiring your patience. Much Appreciated!

[joekooltrips]

Thank You Joe for your post's Very informative and I have also been admiring your patience. Much Appreciated!

Hi and Thx.

[joekooltrips]

if obama violates a federal law and sends troops into another country because the un said its ok .. obama will be impeached . by our congress .

the war powers resolution is a federal law

and since congress didnt do their job ,, others have taken up the issue .. congress can all be impeached for not doing their jobs and defending the constitution by impeaching obama

first things first . you got to prove obama committed an impeachable offense . which he did do

then they can move on congress

I'm not arguing/debating that, i'm just explaining what O is doing, which has been the precedent that was set forth by Truman, (Korean War) all the way to O and in between, despite the fact that the War Powers resolution of 73 was enacted to prevent such measures. With respect.

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///

...and congress ain't movin' fast enough.....

maybe if we start cleaning house and throw the lot of them out, they'll get the idea.

but it seems no matter who we send,

they end up becoming victimized by the administration's dirty pool and

then are rendered useless to do the right thing on Our behalf....

We have plenty of Law Enforcement-background DVers, let's ask them....

"how do you stop a criminal...?"

[joekooltrips]

***///

...and congress ain't movin' fast enough.....

maybe if we start cleaning house and throw the lot of them out, they'll get the idea.

but it seems no matter who we send,

they end up becoming victimized by the administration's dirty pool and

then are rendered useless to do the right thing on Our behalf....

We have plenty of Law Enforcement-background DVers, let's ask them....

"how do you stop a criminal...?"

Tough thing is Sgt, those who are voting vs the U.N.( 74 votes last attempt, need 218 votes) ,to rescind or get out of the U.N., and how many of them are there as a Govt tool to pacify We the people and who really wants out, I even think Dog or Heavy asked how could we tell, we really can't, also to Sgt, how many of our fellow Americans still are in the Dark about the U.N., so it's hard because we have to convince our fellow citizens to "Shed" the political affiliations for the greater good of "We the People" !. With Respect.

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///

We need somebodies (all Patriots, natch) w/ some big bucks to run a media campaign on tv to out the UN,

tell the public what they are really all about....

then put it to a vote by the people, not those in the gov....

It would sure be something to see them trip all over their d***s trying to defend themselves.

They are a RUSE!

How come they went after the World Trade Center Towers and not the UN building(s)...

things that make you go "hmmmnnn..."

especially considering the UN troops have killed more (potential) terrorists than the US.

right...? <_</>

UN Peacekeepers our eye.... more like UN war-mongers! They are useless!

The french foreign legion has a better record!

***///***///***///

Edited February 11, 2013 by SgtFuryUSCZ

[bigwave]

I just hope and pray that Dr Orly Taitz has everything in order for Friday.

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///***///***///

Amen, Brother BIGWAVE.... Amen.