Is Haarp involved in 9-11?Here's a totally new take

[Ana]

Here's a totally new take on what happened!!!!!

http://feeds.feedbur...sionsmedia/xPBQ

Posted on Yesterday, 05:59 PM by Ana

Read more: http://dinarvets.com...7#ixzz2EBLlrzr9

[Ana]

Sorry the link is has been updated to current news feed & I still can't find the article, but did find these,

I haven't read them fully, just putting out possibilities I never knew about

http://www.gaiamtv.c...truth-about-911

http://911scholars.n...-on-911-and-the

[dog53]

Is Haarp involved in 9-11?

No

[Ana]

Actually the link is still there just scroll down to Dec 4

Directed energy weapons turned World Trade Center into nanoparticles on 9/11

Posted: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:15:43 +0000

Dr. Judy Wood, a former assistant professor at Clemson University, has developed compelling evidence that a directed energy weapon turned the physical matter of the World Trade Center towers into nanoparticles through the process of molecular dissociation. Dr. Wood demonstrates clear evidence that cannot be accounted for by the official 9/11 Commission explanation or alternative theory of military planes, cruise missiles, or other projectiles hitting the World Trade Center buildings, or a controlled demolition caused solely by “advanced explosive nano-thermiticcomposite material found in the World Trade Center dust,” or solely by 4th generation mini-nukes.

In a February 22, 2010 Washington Times article, Richard Gage, a San Francisco architect and founder of the nonprofit Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, states, “’Government officials will be notified that ‘Misprision of Treason,’ U.S. Code 18 (Sec. 2382), is a serious federal offense, which requires those with evidence of treason to act,’ Mr. Gage says. ‘The implications are enormous and may have profound impact on the forthcoming Khalid Shaikh Mohammed trial.’”

The trial of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed may soon begin (subject to reported political negotiations with Republicans), as U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder testified before a U.S. House appropriations subcommittee on March 16, 2010 that “a decision will be made in a matter of weeks on where to try the alleged mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks,” indicating that the Obama administration has a pre-determined position on the evidence that the events of September 11, 2001 were a false flag operation.

United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al. ”is the upcoming trial of five alleged Al-Qaeda members for aiding the September 11, 2001 attacks. Charges were announced by Brigadier General Thomas W. Hartmann on February 11, 2008 at a press conference at the Pentagon. The men charged are Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Mohammed al Qahtani, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ammar al-Baluchi, and Mustafa al-Hawsawi. In an 88-page complaint, the group was charged with attacking civilians, attacking civilian objects, intentionally causing serious bodily injury, murder in violation of the law of war, destruction of property in violation of the law of war, hijacking or hazarding a vessel or aircraft, terrorism, and providing material support for terrorism. If convicted, the five will face the death penalty.”

Regardless of whether U.S. President Barack H. Obama chooses to have these defendants tried in a U.S. Military Commission or in a U.S. Federal court, the evidence amassed by such researchers as Dr. Judy Wood and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth satisfies the burden of proof that the events of September 11, 2001 were, beyond a reasonable doubt, a false flag operation. Consequently, one can characterize the forthcoming trial in United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al as a political show trial, no different in effect – the wrongful execution of the defendants and the attempted hoodwinking of the U.S. and world population – from other political show trials in recent history.

This Examiner.com article in the continuing 9/11 series examines the evidence for the use of secret advanced directed energy weapons in the molecular dissociation of the World Trade Center buildings into nanoparticles on September 11, 2001. The article discusses the implications of this evidence, in light of Andrew D. Basiago’s eyewitness evidence that a secret DARPA time travel program, whose defense liaison was then Nixon Cabinet Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, was in physical possession images of the World Trade Center 9/11 events in 1971, 30 years before the actual events occurred on September 11, 2001. Mr. Rumsfeld, of course, was U.S. Secretary of Defense on 9/11.

The World Trade Center and directed energy weapons on 9/11

Dr. Judy Wood has developed multiple lines of evidence that demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that the molecular dissociation of the physical matter of the World Trade Center towers into nanoparticles on September 11, 2001 was the product of a directed energy weapon. Readers are urged to review this evidence here.

there is more in the article, photos, seizmic charts & data, photos not shown on the news, meltdown of metal vehicles but paper not burned.....lots of questions here

[dog53]

Actually the link is still there just scroll down to Dec 4

Directed energy weapons turned World Trade Center into nanoparticles on 9/11

Posted: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 16:15:43 +0000

Dr. Judy Wood, a former assistant professor at Clemson University, has developed compelling evidence that a directed energy weapon turned the physical matter of the World Trade Center towers into nanoparticles through the process of molecular dissociation. Dr. Wood demonstrates clear evidence that cannot be accounted for by the official 9/11 Commission explanation or alternative theory of military planes, cruise missiles, or other projectiles hitting the World Trade Center buildings, or a controlled demolition caused solely by “advanced explosive nano-thermiticcomposite material found in the World Trade Center dust,” or solely by 4th generation mini-nukes.

In a February 22, 2010 Washington Times article, Richard Gage, a San Francisco architect and founder of the nonprofit Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, states, “’Government officials will be notified that ‘Misprision of Treason,’ U.S. Code 18 (Sec. 2382), is a serious federal offense, which requires those with evidence of treason to act,’ Mr. Gage says. ‘The implications are enormous and may have profound impact on the forthcoming Khalid Shaikh Mohammed trial.’”

The trial of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed may soon begin (subject to reported political negotiations with Republicans), as U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder testified before a U.S. House appropriations subcommittee on March 16, 2010 that “a decision will be made in a matter of weeks on where to try the alleged mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks,” indicating that the Obama administration has a pre-determined position on the evidence that the events of September 11, 2001 were a false flag operation.

United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al. ”is the upcoming trial of five alleged Al-Qaeda members for aiding the September 11, 2001 attacks. Charges were announced by Brigadier General Thomas W. Hartmann on February 11, 2008 at a press conference at the Pentagon. The men charged are Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Mohammed al Qahtani, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ammar al-Baluchi, and Mustafa al-Hawsawi. In an 88-page complaint, the group was charged with attacking civilians, attacking civilian objects, intentionally causing serious bodily injury, murder in violation of the law of war, destruction of property in violation of the law of war, hijacking or hazarding a vessel or aircraft, terrorism, and providing material support for terrorism. If convicted, the five will face the death penalty.”

Regardless of whether U.S. President Barack H. Obama chooses to have these defendants tried in a U.S. Military Commission or in a U.S. Federal court, the evidence amassed by such researchers as Dr. Judy Wood and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth satisfies the burden of proof that the events of September 11, 2001 were, beyond a reasonable doubt, a false flag operation. Consequently, one can characterize the forthcoming trial in United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al as a political show trial, no different in effect – the wrongful execution of the defendants and the attempted hoodwinking of the U.S. and world population – from other political show trials in recent history.

This Examiner.com article in the continuing 9/11 series examines the evidence for the use of secret advanced directed energy weapons in the molecular dissociation of the World Trade Center buildings into nanoparticles on September 11, 2001. The article discusses the implications of this evidence, in light of Andrew D. Basiago’s eyewitness evidence that a secret DARPA time travel program, whose defense liaison was then Nixon Cabinet Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, was in physical possession images of the World Trade Center 9/11 events in 1971, 30 years before the actual events occurred on September 11, 2001. Mr. Rumsfeld, of course, was U.S. Secretary of Defense on 9/11.

The World Trade Center and directed energy weapons on 9/11

Dr. Judy Wood has developed multiple lines of evidence that demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that the molecular dissociation of the physical matter of the World Trade Center towers into nanoparticles on September 11, 2001 was the product of a directed energy weapon. Readers are urged to review this evidence here.

there is more in the article, photos, seizmic charts & data, photos not shown on the news, meltdown of metal vehicles but paper not burned.....lots of questions here

Hmmmm So Doc Judy didnt see those airplanes smash into those buildings HuH ?

Sound like Doc Judy on the crack.

[flatdawg]

Hmmmm So Doc Judy didnt see those airplanes smash into those buildings HuH ?

Sound like Doc Judy on the crack.

Dog, more the 50% of Americans don't believe the official story.

While I don't believe HAARP had anything to do with that day, it was something more than the planes that brought down those buildings, being that the WTC was built to withstand a direct hit from a 707 loaded with fuel.

[dog53]

Dog, more the 50% of Americans don't believe the official story.

While I don't believe HAARP had anything to do with that day, it was something more than the planes that brought down those buildings, being that the WTC was built to withstand a direct hit from a 707 loaded with fuel.

I don't necessarily believe the official story either Dawg. But like you I don't believe the harrp thing. I guess you could say

we agree.

[Ana]

video taken on the street @ 8:45 it shows fire on the ground floor maybe parking lot? If there were no explosives where did this come from?

[Ana]

huge crater shows blast, melted rock....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDgyhIfTbkU

watch what the kids are being asked to read after 'kite'

[Ana]

CIA insider tells what was happening before 9/11

[umbertino]

I don't believe the official story either... But I'm sure it will be another 30 to 50 years (if not longer) until the actual truth is disclosed for good.... We ( at least most of us here belonging to my same generation... born 1957) won't get to know it.

Not in this lifetime.

Edited December 5, 2012 by umbertino

[Ana]

Hmmmm So Doc Judy didnt see those airplanes smash into those buildings HuH ?

Sound like Doc Judy on the crack.

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=tSnkRol5ghQ

another explanation

Edited December 5, 2012 by Ana

[dog53]

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=tSnkRol5ghQ

another explanation

So are you saying there was no planes. or that they had no effect on the buildings whatsoever ?

Sorry aint buying it