rico1 Posted November 18, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2012 "Yes, I understand you can't afford to pay me $30 an hour anymore, so I'll gladly accept that $8 you are offering me. Thank you Mr. Employer!" Martha C. White , NBC News contributor Relax, Twinkies likely to live on As shortages go, it pales in comparison to the gasoline woes the Northeast suffered after Hurricane Sandy. Nonetheless, panic-buying set in among fans of Hostess Twinkies and other baked goods after the company Friday announced plans to shut down. In reality, the snack foods don’t last indefinitely, but even if Hostess liquidates like the filling in a deep-fried Twinkie, the golden cakes still have a shot at outliving the company that makes them. An acrimonious standoff between management and the 5,000-plus members of its bakers’ union prompted Hostess Brands CEO Gregory Rayburn to announce that the troubled company would close the doors on its 83-year history, triggering an outpouring of grief and childhood nostalgia on Hostess’s Facebook page. Beyond Twinkies: Why more workers are striking “Already-baked Twinkies will continue to be shipped and sold, but when they run out... no more Twinkies,” said Marcia Mogelonsky, director of insight for Mintel Food & Drink. Only hours after the news broke, stories and photos began surfacing of cleaned-out grocery shelves across the country as fans made a run on Twinkies and other Hostess products. Spokespeople from Wal-Mart and Kroger had no comment as to whether the retailers were prepared for a potential onslaught of would-be stockpilers. NBC News correspondent Mara Schiavocampo purchased a “lifetime supply” of Twinkies, saying, “they are my single favorite junk food indulgence.” If this is Twinkie the Kid’s final ride into the sunset, it would also be the end of an era at the State Fair of Texas, which popularized an improbable hit: the deep-fried Twinkie. “Although there may never be a shortage of foods to fry, the Twinkie would be missed at fairs and in lunch boxes across the country if it didn’t survive,” said fair spokeswoman Sue Gooding. Related: Make them at home: Here’s a Twinkies recipe Rayburn said the shutdown will be nearly immediate. “Essentially, people are going to be sent home today,” he said. The entire wind-down, which includes selling plants, stores and other assets, will take more than a year. In an interview with CNBC, the CEO laid the lion’s share of the blame at the feet of the striking union. However, he acknowledged that management missteps, particularly ones that saddled the company with debt when it last emerged from bankruptcy after more than four years of restructuring in 2009, also contributed to the company’s current situation. Despite the company’s tough talk, though, Hostess still needs to get permission to liquidate from Judge Robert Drain, who is overseeing its Chapter 11 restructuring. An interim hearing is scheduled for Monday afternoon and a final hearing is scheduled for Nov. 29. Hostess has broached the prospect — or threat, from its unions’ perspective — of liquidation before without following through. But today, Rayburn said that even if the union relented and agreed to accept the 8 percent percent pay cut and nearly 20 percent hike in benefit costs, “[it’s] too late. We’re done.” The CEO did offer a ray of hope for Twinkie fans. “I'm hopeful that we can sell the brands,” he said. “I think that obviously competitors will be looking at those and then they have to make a judgment.” “I imagine they’ll definitely be able to find buyers,” said bankruptcy attorney Jeff J. Friedman, a partner at Katten Muchin Rosenman. “There could be a gap, but I’d be surprised if that gap was measured in anything more than weeks or months.” Mogelonsky said possible competitors who might want to buy Twinkies or other Hostess Brands intellectual property include Entenmann’s owner Bimbo Bakeries, Tastykake manufacturer Flower Foods or Little Debbie baker McKee Foods. “Other possible buyers are private label and food service suppliers including J&J Snack Foods, which supplies a number of food service outlets and convenience stores or one of the big orphan brand adopters’ [like] Pinnacle or ConAgra,” she said. Research company Packaged Facts estimates that snackers buy $125 million of Twinkies a year. Buyers would have to weigh those figures and the nostalgia value against the reality that — in spite of vocal protests from fans on Facebook — fewer Americans are eating Twinkies today. Although 12 percent, or 25 million households, currently buy Twinkies, that number slipped from 15 percent in 2004. Friedman said it’s in Hostess’s interest to sell its big name brands quickly, since customers could switch to a competitor’s products, or use the absence to choose healthier snacks. “These are going to start to lose value as time goes on,” he said. Unlike the Twinkie of urban legend, the brand won’t stay fresh forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
countryroads Posted November 19, 2012 Report Share Posted November 19, 2012 Ho no, Twinkie the Kid on the unemployment line. :(/> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desimo Posted November 19, 2012 Report Share Posted November 19, 2012 I remember Twinkie the Kid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rendog Posted November 19, 2012 Report Share Posted November 19, 2012 Out of a job? Hellooo! They just don't have to go to work. Unemployment for 99 weeks. Do they care that Hostess went away? Nah ... they may not get as much, and what they get will be more than some of us who continue to punch the clock, pay the taxes ... to pay for them. Dontcha just love this new country of ours, under Barama? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanga Posted November 19, 2012 Report Share Posted November 19, 2012 I ate a Suzie Q last night.......... my favorite! It would be poetic justice if they would open their doors again, a few years later, in a right to work state. Texas, I fairly sure is a right to work state, employers can fire at will! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snotrocket Posted November 20, 2012 Report Share Posted November 20, 2012 Here's a blast from the past..... ;)/> 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasGranny Posted November 20, 2012 Report Share Posted November 20, 2012 Texas, I fairly sure is a right to work state, employers can fire at will! Texas is a right-to-work state but that does not mean employers can fire "at will". There are NLRB laws and regulations that prohibit any employer from terminating an employee for anything other than "just cause". Most large companies have something like a three strikes your out policy unless the employee is caught blatantly breaking company rules, like drinking on the job, sleeping on the job, clocking in for pay but not being at the job, being high on dope, physically fighting on the job, etc. BTW, all terminations have to be backed up with documentation. Any employee that feels they have been terminated unfairly, can sue for their job back and any lost wages. One more thing, just because we are a right-to-work state, it doesn't mean we don't have unions in some of our industries. What it does mean is that any employee that does not wish to be a member of the union cannot be forced to join and pay dues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontlop Posted November 20, 2012 Report Share Posted November 20, 2012 (edited) this is only one of the thousands of companys that unions drove out of business or over seas .its either regulated out of the country by democrats . or union democrats running them out .. then they cry they dont have a job .. its about time democrats just open their own businesses instead of telliing other people how to run theirs for starters why dont the democrats just open a health care business and charge low rates .. and cover everybody with existing conditions and cover all the law suits . and compete .. ill tell you why they hate success .. look at democrats .. they have sex and if successful and the girl gets pregnant they want to kill it ..they hate success .. clinton tried to break up microsoft .. it was to successful .. im surprised thhey dont break up hollywodd .. or auto workers union .. they seem to have a monoply onn auto workers jobs .. hollywood wants govt regulations for everyone except themselves in hollywood .. oh ya they tell the govt to stay out of their business ..i think the democrats should be screaming for more hollywood regulations .. regulate the govt too .. it needs regulated more than anyone else . the govt has a monoply on governing and laws .. i just think the democrats are just plain ignorant and two faced .. Edited November 20, 2012 by dontlop 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sentinel7 Posted November 20, 2012 Report Share Posted November 20, 2012 18,500 jobs lost but everything in the universe is hunky dory because we have the other guy to blame Logic never really had a chance. No Surrender No Retreat and No Compromise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts