Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Ahmed Chalabi letter to the Federal Court reveal the illegal practices of the government and disappearance of billions


KamelKeeper
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have no news link for this article, so it is in Rumors:

Ahmed Chalabi, in a letter to the Federal Court reveal the illegal practices of the government and the disappearance of billions of dollars of budget + documents

Ahmed Saadi / Shatt al-Arab - 30/05/2012 AD

I got news agency on the Shatt al-Arab and a three-page document includes a detailed report by Dr. Ahmed Abdel Hadi Chalabi, and addressed to the Federal Court, which reveals the existence of irregularities and serious financial the government, accusing it of wasting billions of dollars from the state budget.

Document issued by the Presidency of the fact-finding parliamentary and shows where Chalabi's corruption claims the government of the Iraqi parliament to pass the paragraphs of the "deferred payment" within the state budget, considering this claim third party legal and positive to open the doors of corruption and waste of public money and harming the Iraqi economy, expressed in policy economic system failed to Saddam's former regime.

Document of great importance and supply the full text, add images to documents, to demonstrate weak excuses Maliki demanded that parliament pass a law postpaid service projects to start and stop the law by Parliament to undermine his government.

As Dr. Ahmed Chalabi explains exactly evil consequences of this claim and shows the numbers and documents lie al-Maliki and his government of corruption that has wasted billions without any legal justification.

Text of the document:

"His Excellency the President of the Federal Court Esquire

M / is the list of the Prime Minister dated 20/3/2012

Greetings, and yet ...

We have examined the list of the Prime Minister presented to the esteemed your court on the law of the federal budget number

(22) for the year 2012, and ratified by His Excellency the President of the Republic.

First - we refer in particular to paragraph (B) (6), according to which] the House of Representatives delete Article (25) of the project

Government, which was authorized ministers of finance and planning to add allocations for the purpose of extinguishing the predecessor of the installed

1/1/2011 until 31/12/2011, which has not been put out [. It is useful to note the following things about this

Thread: -

1 - The debt Audit recommended that the Finance Committee in the House of Representatives delete this article from the budget law, and perhaps for reasons of request of Supreme Audit to delete this article is to authorize the government to extinguish all the advances suspended in the accounts of the state, according to the report of the Office of Financial Supervision in the account Final Act of the Republic of Iraq, said that the predecessor of (7.148) billion dinars, and that the report shows that most of them any more than for the (5) trillion dinars granted without an allocation contrary to the Law of the annual general budget and the Financial Administration Act No. 95 of 2004, in addition to the principles of financial planning in State. Note that the topic for the year 2009 and there are large sums of money belonging to the years before 2009.

Text of paragraph (7) of the report of financial control over the final account of the Republic of Iraq in 2009] the continuation of the Department of Accounting in 2009 disbursing advances to certain circles without corresponding allocation in the budget to cover its legitimacy, and the total amount recorded at the expense of the advances during this year the amount of (7148) billion dinars (seven trillion, one hundred and forty-eight billion dinars), while the balance of these advances have not been settled as on 31/12/2009 the amount of (5104) billion dinars (five trillion, one hundred and four billion dinars), note We were not able to check all the priorities of those advances and make sure there is legal basis for granting so as not to provide us disclose detailed Bembalgha and priorities of approval granted in spite of our request under our note numbered (f / 6/97) at 31/10/2010 addressed to the Department of Accounting and stress in our note numbered (f / 6/19) on 17.03.2011, and adopted in the inventory of the amounts contained in our report on the accounts department records showed cash and to provide what our priorities of [(Antahed text).

2 - According to the Financial Administration Act and the public debt is not permitted to pay from the public treasury of the state, but at the expense of allocations in the budget, and according to Article (61) / II of the Constitution which states] The Council of Representatives (b Monitoring the performance of the executive branch), it is the duty of the House of Representatives have access to the government spending and whether based on the laws of the state budget or is it that there are excesses.

3 - When authorizing the House of Representatives fire advances without investigating the cause of the access and the lack of possibility to document the disbursement, that would be a breach of the duty of the House of Representatives in its responsibilities according to the constitutional article above, and delete the above-mentioned article of the budget law requires the government to clarify the reasons and efficient disbursement of advances before it considers the Council of MPs expense driven by an enhanced final documents fundamentalist.

4 - and according to the Book of Supreme Audit No. (4/2/1/1939) directed to our Committee on 01.26.2012 (copy attached), which is explained in paragraph © that he] had previously numbered among his book (4 / 2/1/3786) on 17/3/2011, and directed to the House of Representatives - Finance Committee, said of the reasons for the emergence of the deficit in the trade ministry is the ministry to purchase quantities of the two materials (steel, oil and fat) in the year 2008 totaled $ (1,286,178) tons, while the need for the annual Under the plan, the company's annual general food trade (473 000) tons, in addition to over-price contract for each of the substances listed below with price comparison composition [.

Is clear from the Book of Supreme Audit referred to above that the Ministry of Commerce has to spend more than (3) billion dollars in 2008, the price of oil, while the material it was possible to meet the needs of the Iraqi people, according to the report for not more than $ 700 million.

5 - if the adoption of Article (25) was the subject of research for the government could extinguish the amount in paragraph (4) without being accountable. If it was re-Article (25) into law the budget, it means that the equipment of the Iraqi state mention on the disposition of public money without reference to the legal basis resulting in the financial system of the Iraqi state to major damage and can not afford and maintain the management of public money from the risks prevailing for the time being.

6 - We request your court esteemed take this matter into consideration when ruling issued on the list, Mr. Prime Minister.

Secondly - paragraph (a) of Article (6), which came with it] to cancel the formula of payment term in the article of the government project, which was vested the Council of Ministers the powers of the development of infrastructure projects and this exceeded clearly the powers of government and contrary to the provisions of the Constitution], we explain the following: -

1 - The cancellation of this article was to avoid giving the power of the government to cover complete without details of the infrastructure projects, payment term, the reason why the House of Representatives after a long debate to the cancellation of this article stems from the duty of the government in taking the House of Representatives approved the contracts for foreign loans and each loan unit and full details of the terms of interest and the repayment period and the consequent of the expenses of a future borne by the budgets of the coming years, we do not discuss here the right of the government in contract foreign loans, but we stick to the attention of the House of Representatives for their information separately for approval or rejection, and that this does not hinder work of the government. We note here that the financial crises in Iraq under the former regime came in the first place pay-term contracts.

2 - The method of disposal of the government contract payment term for the year 2011 was in violation of public law was not successful and enclose herewith a proof that, where it was approved by the cabinet to approve the contract payment term and authorize the minister on the signing of the amount of (6.348) billion dollars (six billion, three hundred and eight Forty million dollars), but they have not been implemented and there was no document that shows what the value of these materials is intended to buy and what are the benefits of it and the difference between the purchase price on credit, the purchase price to pay cash, did not show the Ministry of Finance that it is able to execute these contracts in a manner Cash, which is evident from the budgets of the Iraqi state it made ​​a difference between planned expenditure and revenue of (126) trillion dinars for the years 2004 to 2010.

3 - According to the paragraph that talked about the fact that the government is authorized by the Minister of Electricity contracts with Russian companies for processing material Alcazawal amount of 6 million tons in a payment term of 10 years, and no implementation of this resolution, and that these decisions when Anchert in the global market was damaging the reputation of Iraq, as has been borne by the Iraqi government fines as a result of the cancellation of these contracts unilaterally.

Thirdly - in paragraph © of Article (6), which states] Delete the House of Representatives sub-section (First) of Article (35) of the project, the government and that would have exempted goods and commodities imported by government departments and the public sector in its name and its uses to complete the work assigned to it from customs duties, and this means that government departments will not be obliged to pay customs duties on all goods and goods imported from outside the project implementation and to function daily and this additional financial burdens on the shoulders of government departments and adversely affect their ability to work and the budget of all ministries and departments not related to the Ministry [.

1 - The state does not bear the extra expense because the revenue that customs duties will return to it and the reason that led the House to delete the paragraph is to achieve equal opportunities between the public and the private sector when applying for state enterprises and to create opportunities for competition between the public and the private sector and a grant equal opportunities with the private year.

2 - Adoption of the article is contrary to Article 25 of the Iraqi Constitution, which provides for private sector development.

Note that our committee to follow up the accounts of the Development Fund for Iraq, DFI and ensure the safety of government spending, and the duty to verify that the withdrawals Government from this account, which compose the bulk of the balance of the Iraqi state financial identical to the terms of budgets that were approved in the House of Representatives, and the Commission is serious about its work in this area.

Attachments: -

- Book of Supreme Audit No. (4/2/1/1939) on 26/1/2012.

- Copy of the Council of Ministers Decision No. 93 of 2011.

With appreciation,

Ahmed Abdel Hadi Alچlbe

Chairman of the commission of inquiry

The facts

09/04/2012

A copy of it to:

Mr. Speaker esteemed .. For your kind information .. With appreciation

--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This guy is Bad News, it really funny how he establish himself, in the last month or so!! To think he would think of himself as a replacement for Prime Minster is a Joke or another step backwards!! (not gonna happen) IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.