Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Georgia Judge Malihi Denies Obama's Motion to Not Appear At Georgia Ballot Challenge Hearing


trooper
 Share

Recommended Posts

Georgia Judge Malihi Denies Obama's Motion to

Not Appear At Georgia Ballot Challenge Hearing

Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama, Order on Motion to Appear, Georgia Ballot Access Challenge - 1/20/2012

ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS

Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.

In support of his motion, Defendant argues that "if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States" to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is "unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony... [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party's preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced." Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5).

Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court's rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party's counsel of record. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit.

Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash is denied.

SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2012.

http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Georgia Judge Malihi Denies Obama's Motion to

Not Appear At Georgia Ballot Challenge Hearing

Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama, Order on Motion to Appear, Georgia Ballot Access Challenge - 1/20/2012

ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS

Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.

In support of his motion, Defendant argues that "if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States" to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is "unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony... [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party's preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced." Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5).

Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court's rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party's counsel of record. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit.

Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash is denied.

SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2012.

http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html

No way, He doesn't want to show... Wonder why? Get ready to hear the truth Ladies and Gents!! It's going to be explosive!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Georgia Judge Malihi Denies Obama's Motion to

Not Appear At Georgia Ballot Challenge Hearing

Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama, Order on Motion to Appear, Georgia Ballot Access Challenge - 1/20/2012

ORDER ON MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS

Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.

In support of his motion, Defendant argues that "if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States" to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is "unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony... [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party's preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced." Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5).

Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court's rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party's counsel of record. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit.

Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash is denied.

SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2012.

http://www.art2superpac.com/georgiaballot.html

Thanks for the post TROOPER, I am looking forward to how this story continues to unfold!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defendant argues that "if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States" to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia.

WHAT? Court appearances interrupt duties of President but vacations, numerous rounds of golf, beer summits and campaign fund raisers don't? Good for the judge not to give in to such a lame excuse. This Judge could be the greatest American hero. If Obama doesn't show up, hopefully the judgement will be for the plaintiffs by default and he will not be placed on the ballot. And hopefully other states will follow and the dominoes start falling and the house of cards crashes down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHAT? Court appearances interrupt duties of President but vacations, numerous rounds of golf, beer summits and campaign fund raisers don't? Good for the judge not to give in to such a lame excuse. This Judge could be the greatest American hero. If Obama doesn't show up, hopefully the judgement will be for the plaintiffs by default and he will not be placed on the ballot. And hopefully other states will follow and the dominoes start falling and the house of cards crashes down.

Losing Georgia would be significant. It's not Idaho or Nevada - he'd need those electoral votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHAT? Court appearances interrupt duties of President but vacations, numerous rounds of golf, beer summits and campaign fund raisers don't? Good for the judge not to give in to such a lame excuse. This Judge could be the greatest American hero. If Obama doesn't show up, hopefully the judgement will be for the plaintiffs by default and he will not be placed on the ballot. And hopefully other states will follow and the dominoes start falling and the house of cards crashes down.

Maybe he'll get thrown in jail for contempt of court...

-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.