Whatshername

I like the way cousin Joe Dan Gorman puts it... "As Christians, we don't wish for the TIMELY death of a political foe... we wish for them to have a 'come to Jesus' moment"! And that is my wish for John McCain... he should retire immediately, concentrate on healing and search his soul (if he hasn't already sold it).

LMAO! Reminds me of Ted Cruz! Once I saw it... I can't not see it.

I ❤️ a twist! After catching up with the Mega Millions conversation and my Powerball confession yesterday, I think it's time to change things up! I'm in! Mega Millions for 7/21 01/21/29/47/49 MB 12 🗣 good luck to us all! 🍀 PowerBall for 7/22 11/20/25/39/49 PB 22 🎱 8Ball says we'll win "without a doubt"! 🍀 See the Mega Millions convo here... TERMS for Weekly Powerball Entries 1) Pool(s) is (are) open to identifiable/registered DV MEMBERS ONLY (Sorry, no extended family or friends... or Lopsters, as they are not allowed in the regular forums, and therefore cannot comply with the rules). 2) One SET of numbers per ENTRANT per POST per FAMILY (Multiple members in a family may participate under ONE ENTRANT ONLY). (Please select CASH OPTION when purchasing numbers/ticket). Annuity tickets will not be disqualified and will be factored accordingly if determined a winner, but our preferred intent is for the lump sum payout. 3) A DV Member may purchase and post up to ONE ticket for ANOTHER DV Member (except Lopsters), with that member's acknowledgement and consent. 4) ONE SHARE per entrant of any winnings of the JACKPOT (CASH OPTION!!!) only (Approx. $100 million minimum drawing) 5) Winning ticket/entrant agrees to share EQUALLY with ALL qualified entrants in this thread. 6) Qualified entrants must have numbers/entry posted prior to drawing date/time. 7) Qualified entrants must have a physical ticket to present upon winning, to prove their pledged participation. HOLD onto your "LOSING" ticket. Take a picture of your "LOSING" ticket as a possible backup verification. 8) Winning entrant is responsible for ALL communication with, and coordination of, winning shareholders immediately after the drawing. 9) ALL winning participants/shareholders agree to respect and abide to the PRIVACY terms of the WINNER. Disclosure of identity of winning entrant is sole discretion of winner. This is for the security and safety of all. 10) Winning shares will be dispersed upon final consensus and WRITTEN AGREEMENT, guaranteeing individual preferences, privacy and security. 11) By posting your pledged ticket/numbers in the thread(s), YOU AGREE TO THE TERMS POSTED ABOVE. The following has been added to the rules as of 9/17/2016 to clarify a question about participation: NEW RULE! Ticket/numbers entered into THIS DV POOL are for this pool exclusively. It may not be entered into other pools. Its entry into the DV POOL is time-stamped as verified by the post, and acknowledged by the entrant that it is exclusive to DV. Should it be found that the WINNING TICKET is entered into multiple pools, WE will claim that ticket as the WINNER for the DV POOL EXCLUSIVELY, irrespective of the time-stamp of other pools. Should another pool have a similar rule, or no rule to this regard, the time-stamp may be an effective qualifier if necessary to determine the participant's intent, as well as order of participation.

Its the most complicated lazy thing I do Jax... holding my ticket to the end so my numbers will be close to the posted winning numbers!!!

03/06/11/30/34 PB 16 🍀

Hi Tex! It will not happen here because there has been a shift... for the first time in a long time, the government (swamp) is beginning to fear the people. President Trump is winning for us. The swamp in Europe (EU) is much worse and they have no champion. Maybe as they see things improve here, they will take a stand and fight for their children, their women, their culture and their lives. Its an invasion...

Oh LORD, I hope this catches on... GTFO!

FIGHT, DAMMIT! It's not too late to rally! Unable To Confront The Migrant Crisis, Europe Is Committing Suicide As Europe’s migrant crisis enters a new phase, it’s clear that European leaders have neither the will nor desire to preserve their own civilization. John Daniel Davidson On Sunday, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said she would not limit the number of refugees coming into the country. “On the issue of an upper limit, my position is clear,” Merkel said. “I won’t accept one.” Setting aside the electoral implications of Merkel’s statement, which defied her party’s long-term coalition partner just two months before federal elections, it perfectly captured the refusal of European leaders to face the migrant crisis head-on—a refusal that in turn epitomizes the slow suicide of European civilization. President Trump’s Warsaw speech earlier this month provoked predictable cries of racism and xenophobia from a mainstream media worried that even the term “western civilization” was a dog whistle for alt-right nationalists. Implicit in such criticism is the dubious notion that western values are not really western, that people of all cultures and religions desire more or less the same thing. His critics say Trump was playing on white Europeans’ fears that Muslim migrants won’t adopt western values and won’t assimilate into European society, and therefore pose a direct threat to western civilization. But there’s another group that Trump no doubt had in mind, a group that also rejects western civilization and has little interest in defending or preserving it: European elites. European Elites Refuse to Defend Women Without splitting hairs over what we mean by “western civilization,” let’s stipulate that, at minimum, it encompasses things like freedom of speech and religion, equal rights for both sexes, and democratic rule of law. One could argue that these are elements of western civilization most people in Muslim-majority countries don’t share with the denizens of Europe. But let’s set that aside and ask an equally pressing question: do European political leaders believe in them? Do their policies reflect a desire to defend and preserve these principles? Increasingly, the answer is no. Take women’s rights, for example. In Europe as in America, the equality of the sexes has for decades been held as an immutable fact. But Europe is even more militant about its feminism than America. For Europeans, the very idea of a housewife is backwards and oppressive; mothers are expected to work and send their children to state-subsidized child care, not opt out of the workforce to raise a family. This is the official policy of the EU, which has entire commissions dedicated to ensuring more women enter the workforce. For Muslim immigrants to Europe, who come from societies in which women are generally subordinate to men, this comes as a shock. Yet for a long time Europe insisted that newcomers adopt western attitudes regarding women’s rights and sexual freedom. As Christopher Caldwell has noted, this was the only non-negotiable demand Europe made of its immigrants. The European ruling class might have been willing to look the other way on free speech and denounce as fascist anyone who worries about Islam and terrorism, but on feminism there was no room for negotiation: “It is the litmus test according to which assimilation—and even membership in the national community—is judged. It is the one area where Europeans retain both a deep suspicion of Muslim ways and a confidence in their own institutions that is free of self-doubt.” At least, that’s how it used to be. Caldwell wrote those lines in 2009, long before the migrant crisis coincided with a spike in sexual assaults perpetrated mostly by Muslim men. The mass sexual assault in Cologne and other German cities on New Year’s Eve last year made headlines—not just because of the brazen nature of the attacks but also because German authorities tried to suppress information about them. It was only after rumors and eyewitness accounts began cropping up on social media that authorities acknowledged what had happened. The most infamous case of this kind is perhaps the Rotherham child sex exploitation ring, which first came to light in 2010. An independent inquiry found in 2014 that British men of Pakistani origin had groomed at least 1,400 underage girls for sexual exploitation over the previous 16 years. The girls, some as young as 12, were variously abducted, raped, tortured, and forced into prostitution. Even more shocking than the details of the sex ring is why it persisted for so long: police and city officials knew what was happening but didn’t take action for fear of being accused of racism. You would think this would be enough for the government to take action and protect the women and girls being preyed upon by these men, but you’d be wrong. Two years after the inquiry, an investigation by the Daily Express found that nothing had changed; the exploitation was still happening “on an industrial scale.” The Rotherham case predated the migrant crisis, but there are signs that the ongoing influx of Middle Easterners and North Africans—more migrants have already arrived in Europe this year than in all of 2016—is making the problem much worse. Last week, Cheryl Benard, who spent years working with refugees all over the world, wrote about the growing incidence of sexual assault committed by refugees against local women. The vast majority of such assaults are reportedly being committed by young Afghan men, sometimes in broad daylight. In some cases, passersby have intervened to prevent women from being raped by multiple assailants. As in the Rotherham and Cologne cases, the fact of the assaults was disturbing, but equally disturbing was the reaction of the media and government officials. Writes Benard: It took a while for the pattern to be recognized because, until recently, western European media deliberately refrained from identifying an assailant’s refugee or asylum status, or his country of origin. Only when the correlation became so dramatic that it was itself newsworthy did this policy change. At that point, it became clear that the authorities had known about, and for political reasons had deliberately covered up, large-scale incidences of sexual assault by migrants. The Migrant Crisis Exposes a Morally Exhausted Europe The inability or unwillingness of Muslim migrant men to conform to the sexual mores of Europe is of course just one of the problems the migrant crisis has brought to the continent. But the knee-jerk reaction of European elites to either ignore or deny these sorts of problems speaks volumes about their commitment to western civilization. In his new book, “The Strange Death of Europe,” British journalist Douglas Murray documents his travels across Europe reporting on the migrant crisis, and concludes that Europe is so morally exhausted that it rejects its own right to exist. “Europe today has little desire to reproduce itself, fight for itself or even take its own side in an argument,” writes Murray. “Those in power seem persuaded that it would not matter if the people and culture of Europe were lost to the world.” According to Murray, the migrant crisis perfectly encapsulates this exhaustion. In some ways, it’s a case of competing virtues: the desire to be virtuous to the rest of the world is competing against justice for the people of Europe. Increasingly, virtue is winning out over justice because a misguided commitment to shallow notions of “respect,” “tolerance,” and “diversity” have supplanted the deep roots of European civilization. The problem, argues Murray, is that European values have “become so wide as to become meaninglessly shallow.” As the crisis deepens, it’s become obvious that Europe’s leaders are now so ambivalent about the survival of their own civilization they’re unable to speak of the bad things that have come, and will keep coming, with mass migration.

Well George, I've spent all week far from my Happy Place... immersed in Hayseed and Hick-Billy culture! I do love me some Redneck masculinity (not to mention, ingenuity;)

If cats had SuperPowers...

Mystery Site – Medusa. Real or Fake? July 15, 2017 BFH There’s a “feminist” site that is being linked by right-wing sites in order to shine a spotlight on their ridiculous progressivism. Granted, it is pretty hard to separate earnest left-wing nutballism and parody. But I do believe this site is a hoax. Here are a few examples- Make Masturbation Illegal for Men Without porn to look at, more men will just masturbate to fantasies they create in their mind of women they know in real life. This is even worse than just jacking it to porn. Sex workers are aware that their image will be sexualized and accept that but when a man masturbates to a woman he know in real life without her consent, that is telepathic rape. It’s sick. It even affects the victim although she may be unaware but it lowers her energy. Don’t Gender your Pets They cannot tell you that they are being misgendered. It’s important not to make assumptions about what gender your animal is based off of its sex. Try to give them a gender-neutral name instead and calling them gender neutral pronouns like they and them. You may be thinking “why is this important? This is just an animal?” Well it is important because typically pets are more important to their owners than just “animals.” Also, it’s an important way to practice getting rid of gender norms all together. 4 Ways To Reduce Your CIS Footprint On Society Give your children non-gender names River, Xander, Gray, Sky, Blanket, Apple and Table are just some of your options, but the rule of thumb is to keep it neutral. And if you’re unfortunate enough to be pregnant with a white male (It’s not too late to terminate!), the battle is only just beginning against his natural rape urges. I wish you the best of luck as neutral names only get you so far… Are Canker Sores Sexist? I will admit I was not woke enough to know this was a problem until it was introduced to me by a friend of mine, Mager. He showed me an article saying that canker sores were more prevalent in females than males. While this itself does not seem to be a problem, upon further research, I realized that this is literally oppression. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ As much as I enjoy satire, I don’t think it’s cool to carry the joke so far that you insist on keeping up the appearance of being an actual site. Why? Because we don’t need any help pointing and laughing at actual feminists. Thanks for the effort, Medusa, but it’s time to reveal yourselves as hoaxers. Why do we need you when we have people like this —> http://iotwreport.com/the-face-of-feminist-mental-derangement/ ?

02/07/09/63/67 PB 21 🍀

Citizen Science Projects https://eclipse.aas.org/resources/citizen-science

10 - 4 Good Buddy! And More Lunacy 💩 One of the problems with leftist utopias is that there tends to be a lot of human excrement on the streets and sidewalks. I don’t know why progressives love poop so much, they just do. The leftist city of Denver has moved to decriminalize public defecation because it was unfair to illegal immigrants to expect them to use a damn toilet. The problem is so bad in leftist San Francisco that there are apps to help people avoid stepping in the excrement that city’s leftist Government has encouraged. In Seattle, all they wanted to do was clean the human excrement off the sidewalks around a city courthouse. This offended a Seattle city councilman because… I am not making this up … the use of pressure washers to clean human excrement from the sidewalk reminded him of fire hoses being turned on civil rights protesters in the 1950’s. Seattle councilmember Larry Gossett isn’t a fan of one solution to power wash the feces from the sidewalks to tamp down on the smell. Power washing the sidewalks is too reminiscent of civil rights activists being hosed down, he said. If that’s true why doesn’t he shut down the fire department? I’m sure fires can be put out with holistic healing, chanting, and hugging. The area is also known for rampant crime, assaults, and drug abuse… right next to a courthouse. Leftist utopia. A city that can’t keep sh-t off the public sidewalks, can’t stop assaults and robberies next to a courthouse, but has plenty of time and money to spend on rainbow crosswalks to feed the egos of one of the left’s targeted political demographics. http://www.gaypatriot.net/2017/07/13/and-more-lunacy/