simple

And billions spent on an election. $1M Grant was for job creation or just what it says, promoting healthy eating? Do you make fun for the sake of it or is it reps narrow-minded comedy? Oh Mitt will save the day 1 kid at a time! Hilarious!

No, not spot on as accurate but you may regard his thoughts as spot on of yours.

Thanks for your reply!

So that's the problem!

Snotrocket, we really can agree on quite a lot. Do you have a thought of where the fault lies? There's hardly a place to truly place a fault. We can play Monday morning quarterback for years to come. History easily allows us to apply fault. Not very much in the world depreciates; so yes, just about everything goes up year after year. Where or how would it stop --- I have no idea but a president will not change it.

cris, it's plenty you're just too much I can't hold it in... :lol: BTW: Romney coming on strong!!! He agrees with all of us; everyone of us, just not at the same time. I'm being seriously!!!

Government will never be out of the way. You can bank on that!

What an xxxx.

Don't you think it was the republicans that camped out? Not stagnate, had to make a U turn.

Rules of engagement is one thing that endangers the lives of military personnel and others. Fabricated stories of waking up locals is another. That article did NOT state any commands from a higher military source regarding locals. It is about rules of engagement and personal or sarcastic reflections from soldiers. Yota, you have no idea of education; I tend to believe Obama will be the last man standing. Romney is making himself dizzy spinning the roulett of BS. You have to know he's making this shxt up each week. It'll catch up in daily Democratic ads, news reporters and on the stump.

No man, it's a general perception that the right wingers are deceptive and exclaim dishonesty toward everyone not onboard with the reps. So I think we should get in the habit of just calling you guys uneducated liars; we've been too nice buddy. Yota, I have no respect for your deranged comments. There's no rationalities.

When I say right wing I mean it's a great possibility of being all lies. Search shows only blog types, nothing credible!

You guys get so hyped up without knowing whether true or not. You don't even ask who would have requested. You just assume someone from the U.S. This is right wing until proven otherwise!

Spike the ball buddy! I understand; I just decided to add Bush statement. Skitealwedrop made the statement about congress working together. Isn't that what the country needed over the past 3+ years?

Exactly what do you think will turn around? Willard and Paul are saying anything on any day. Who knows what they will do. +1 Maggie, only thing Bush had was a sincere patriotic look with a rejected smile. He appeared believable and overwhelmingly religious. Actions were different.

It was almost impossible to read your comments.... MY GOD! It's certainly okay to respect a president... we should! You're awarding Bush for the Dinar HOPE/DREAM, you probably shouldn't but it is a HOPE/DREAM. Thank God for hope and dreaming! Thank Bush/Cheney for hell and the 2008 CRASH OF THE UNITED STATES, JOBS LOSSES ETC... WHAT DID BUSH DO FOR THE IRAQI DINAR BEFORE, DURING OR AFTER THE WAR. The name Willard offends you? I'm offended of our freaking congress partisan and selfish attitudes. Exercise the high I.Q. Get a grip Francie, MOST offended by the imbalance of human concern, taxes and country development. Why would Obama allow Willard the largest stage he's ever seen to smooth over his 47% comments? He obviously didn't want to to talk to Willard. What's highly disrespectful is the disrespect of the highest office by congress followed by militia types, don't you think?

Thanks Elixir.... even though most will not read, it's a good resource oppose to the wild a$$ remarks from people the usual. Factcheck.org

Mythical illusions didn't stop him '08.

Better ask why!

Imagine the things he wanted to reply with but could not in an effort to stay focus. There had to be a reason to side-step all of the blunders of Willard. No one could have been that disengaged and Obama had to look away to keep his cool. To launch this strategy is gutsy!!! Guys, don't let the smooth taste fool ya! Did the debate win or lose any voters is the question. Too much time left.

Folks, Obama may have gotten what he was looking for out of the debate.

Technically, Romney routed Obama with a very aggressive attempt to storm the airwaves with his ideology as if he knew Obama wouldn't challenge. It didn't matter that Romney have bounced around on the topics. Obama looked totally disinterested and did not step up to the debate. Boring and unchallenged debate that could have easily set Romney on defense with all of his flip-flopping. Obama didn't do it! Whether taking a high road or just f..ing asleep. Romney took the battle to Obama and was not challenge in any matter. I don't know why! Obama act as if it (the debate) didn't matter. That was an empty chair but Reagan and W experienced the same debate funk. Chalk one up for Willard.

You haven't proved me right! Haha - neither did you validate me. Now that's sounds like a stupid dog. Is that what you thought you were doing - proving D_Stud and I were correct? I'm trying to help you wake up from all the BS you guys step in --- DAILY!

you guys are something. its been debunked several times in this post and others. unbelievable!

As TrippHood stated, and I paraphrase, he will believe anything negative on Obama administration.