sandstorm

spot on! because its impossible. thusly why its called a scam. calling deleting three zeroes a 1:1, 100,000% increase, is a scam. its can be totally eliminated as any chance of possibility, all by economic principles. the dinar can obviously gain value. but there will never be some massive rv of the dinar. it started at 1500:1 its at 1166, and the market/ street rate cant meet the pegged 1166.

he thinks hes smart, by playing distractive defense. hes talking about a 20 year old rd, to scatter people of the topic of the thread

Instant Classic

its like everyone in the class has figured it out except one student. your holding us up. get to it. this is ch 1.

no you didnt.demonitized swiss dinar backing the IQD! now im really worried

0.000%

very clear and precise. excellent wording

your re-inventing the event. your calling it something its not, off some technicality, that resulted in no increased purchasing power or rv. no one made a penny. your theory concludes people walked around and got everything for free, cuz they had swiss dinar, then the next day the had to pay for items. your premise of a 00.0000 exchange rate is invalid

thank you, thats as close a concession as could be expected.

source. seriously? any history book you can find on economics at the library. any economists or currency expert on the planet. i think the sources are endless.

hes here! i just checked! lolol

since when??

exactly. spot on.there was a CONVERSION not a CHANGE in the official rate.

dont go into defensive default mode. you clearly have to understand what happened. tell me this is just you trying to get fib on the one time 20% rv thing. if you want to argue that until the end of time, so be it. but do you clearly understand exactly the way, f everyone has explained it?

relax, think about it before you post. maybe your fingers typing are distracting you and slowing your thought process. take your time, one at a time.

every economists on the planet would testify it was a neutral rd. why do you continue this insanity?

oh boy, the swiss dinar redenomination. dontlop talks more about a redenomination than any lopster in the tank. lol

its in the lop tank. a rd opinion in the rd section, which isnt even my post. but you get mad at me all you want. thatll do ya good

lol

what trouble? i posted someone discrediting guru lies. people post okie material, and its great and gravy. i post someone discrediting the gurus, and im here for trouble. the only trouble is for those pushing guru lies and fake rvs. thats called running a scam. hey dv, ask dinarbeliever about all those bank rumors from the past. i guess for someone posting made up stuff, my post would be troubling to them. cool. read it or not. best to youthis is an analytical , data driven venture. theres more to it than wanting it to rv. engage if you want or ignore it

swiss dinar was a beutral redenomination. it happened, its apart of history. you claiming it was a trillion percent rv, is a lie. when you push that lie for weeks and months thats being a liar. when you give an opinion it rv"d, your being honest. instead you push false rvs around this forum, and your wrong.

and you dont know, but he does this to keepm, fib, fs4e, boomer, any anybody who discredits gurus. take notice this article is not my opinion. i gave no opinions. instead, i get talk of digging graves and being banned, all the while im being as kind as possible.

he wants to see me banned because i bring evidence discrediting all the lies gurus have told you. instead he wants refocus your rv vision til 2016. debunking gurus is garbage. qnd he wants me banned from showing the followers evidence of opinions that discredits multiple gurus. see it for what it is.

see dinarvets, dontlop shows up to see me banned. he calls debunking gurus garbage!! claims he was told about a rv in 2016, but wont say. surely dv has enough vision to see thru his intent!

garbage? they debunked 100 hours of conference calls in a few paragraphs. truly remarkable, you can always keep form your own opinion.why do you want to laugh about me getting banned? because i talk about a rd in the rd section? ive formed my opinions, and dont jam anthing down others throats. they can read it or debate in a pleasant manner. or they can ignore it if they so choose. thats sad you want to be like that.