nstoolman1

They will spend millions(of our money) flying over cow pastures, monitoring the air quality. Or the vegans will get their way and have all the cows slaughtered. Except the ones that the comrad's in charge are using for meat. Next they they will slap a fart monitor on all humans to start taxing flatulent output.

Then people would go to the barter system and bypass that altogether. IRS won't like that because they have no way to monitor that.

I think they will do exactly as you posted earlier. They will leave the country for a more lucrative environment and then sell their products back to us here in the U.S. You are right. Their management does not care. If those companies folded tomorrow the upper management would take their multi millions and go live a good life.

What is foolish is you ignored my first sentence based on a sentence of yours. No corporations to provide jobs and the workers sit home and starve.

And if we drive them out the mule will have nothing to do. A lot of people will starve before some get their feet back under them and learn to survive. Then you will have the people desperate enough to rob, steal and kill for what they want. Then their will be a lot of dead folks who run into people that don't want their families to starve or be murdered. I guess that is one way to thin the herd.

I see no reason to neg Umb for the articles. He is doing no more than some of the pro conservatives on this site. I know it is frustrating to see the articles that don't fit the conservative view but we all have the option to hit the "ignore" button. I wish there was a option to neg the article but not the poster.

That is going to leave a mark.

Comparison Chart BASIS FOR COMPARISON COMMUNISM SOCIALISM Meaning Social organization system, that focuses on communal ownership and eliminating class distinction. Theory of social organization where there is public or cooperative ownership of the means of production. Ideology Political and economic Economic Proposed by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels Robert Owen Main idea To achieve equality among members of society and promoting classless society. To achieve equality and fairness among the society members. Basis of wealth distribution According to the needs. According to the efforts or contribution. Means of production Equally owned by the members of the state. Owned by the citizens. Management of resources Lies on few people belonging to a particular authoritarian party. Done by the people Ownership of property Private Property cannot be owned, but personal property can be owned. Yes Capitalism It removes capitalism. Can exist in socialism. They both take away the incentive to achieve beyond what is expected. Why work hard to have it taken away. No guarantee that greed among the people who administrate the program will not occur. You are turning over your God given right to freedom to someone else to run your life.

So, she goes there to join and then after she is radicalized she wants to come back and do what/ Blow up Americans and cause havoc here? Let her rot in the camp.

Now, everyone that does not claim POTUS as your president, no day off for you, get back to work.

Hmmm....Maybe Christine Blasey Ford should be contacted and ask what she thinks of a law that makes you responsible for a false claim.

That is your opinion and you are entitled to it. Thanks for participating. I gave you a purple cup.

I don't believe they can get much lower. 10,000,000 % https://fee.org/articles/venezuelas-inflation-rate-projected-to-hit-10-000-000-in-2019/?gclid=CjwKCAiAhp_jBRAxEiwAXbniXc91or3iev_jUSMuW9y8iUbV_nFmDq9maZ6swifMku6mPTmxil9LpxoCrocQAvD_BwE

He did get the " I declared my intention to run for President, won the nomination, won the election " trophy. That should be worth some respect.

If we can make that country great like it was, the people would not want to come up here. There already is a mass exodus going on from Venezuela. If we actually took the oil then I would say we send in the military, take over the country, name it The United State of South America and move some of our people that want to go down there. Great climate and great food growing. If we are going to be aggressive then lets get aggressive. Your "doofus" comment may sound funny to you but for me it is disrespectful. He is the legally and duly elected sitting POTUS whether you like it or not and he does deserve some respect for that.

We are all liars to some degree. We have all lied about something. I expect a lot better from a lot of people and I get disappointed all the time. I don't control or have any influence over POTUS but I do vote. I also believe that God is in control of the matter and He has a better grip on this than I. I have enough trouble keeping my herd of cats in a bag to get wound up about POTUS.

Have you?

Not true. In states where pot is legal high school age use has increased a lot. And I still don't understand how a third party is going to be any different than the two parties we have already.

Not outnumbered. Just not fully awakened yet.

33 U.S. Code § 2293 - Reprogramming during national emergencies (a)Termination or deferment of civil works projects; application of resources to national defense projects In the event of a declaration of war or a declaration by the President of a national emergency in accordance with the National Emergencies Act [50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.] that requires or may require use of the Armed Forces, the Secretary, without regard to any other provision of law, may (1) terminate or defer the construction, operation, maintenance, or repair of any Department of the Army civil works project that he deems not essential to the national defense, and (2) apply the resources of the Department of the Army’s civil works program, including funds, personnel, and equipment, to construct or assist in the construction,operation, maintenance, and repair of authorized civil works, military construction, and civil defense projects that are essential to the national defense.

People, no negs is the rule. If you absolutely can not stand what is written in a post, or poster, then simply ignore the post or poster and move on.

PC should be frowned upon(it is a restriction on the 1st A. and the ability to speak without regard should be permitted. What you left out is that when a person speaks their mind they should suffer or accept what consequences come back to them. The very basis of the 1st A protects that right. Thinking of the consequences (good or bad) should come first before opening the mouth.

And without coffee yet this morning.

Hate comes from the hater, not the hated. Where is my purple cup? 🙂

I will buy most of what you are saying with the exception to the part of hurting someone else. I would buy the complete premise if after killing someone while under the influence you would get a swift and speedy trial and if found guilty a swift and speedy execution. I would even go as far as putting all drugs and alcohol in the same pot.