Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content

SPRAYERDUDE

Platinum VIP
  • Posts

    247
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SPRAYERDUDE

  1. thats all blue sceen technology dont be fool..now was obama if he is against beheading then why is all these Guillotine at all fema camps across usa and their purpose because they are all spanking new pal.
  2. something is stage and about to happen..they have other people wearing these isis clothing pay them and have them walk around so people can see..just like the STAGE missouri cop shooting of a black man that cause outrage and looting.many was shuttle and paid to demonstrate,loot,hold up signs include the fake kkk. so stop believe what they are telling you there is a mission and in reality and agenda.
  3. now if you guys think daah,isis is there enemy think again...you really think if thats the case he would have go over their to tour whe these guys would do what ever to take him out..basically its well done isis/daah great job for the genocide and cleansing and force the suni,shite,kurds to come to a final agreement with this GOI...they know our admninstration very well..now what you think is going to happen in november when O grant amnesty to over 5 millions illegal immigrants in the USA..they will have every right as you and more because the also have convert to muslims...open your eyes
  4. pay attention to key words... tell obama to stop bombing or else.. see that's part of their strategy actually he not bombing no ISIS group just a way to tell the american people.. you see i dont want to send troops over there they will beheaded such and such (no names).. how would you send a army to fight against the mens who is creating havoc to propel agenda... silly people wake your butt up.. CAN'T YOU SEE WHAT IS GOING ON HERE... THEY HAVE NO PROBLEM SHOWING ON TV SOMEONE GETTING BEHEADED RIGHT? BUT WITH THE CONNECTICUT SANDY HOOK SUPPOSE OF SHOOTING THEY WOULD NOT SHOW NO BODIES OR FUNERALS,SAME WITH THE AURORA MASS SHOOTING THE PUBLIC WAS NOT INVITED TO SEE THE SUPPOSE OF DEAD BODIES... SURE!!! BUT ITS OK TO SHOW WHAT YOU WANT THE WORLD TO SEE SOMEONE GETTING THEIR HEAD CHOP OFF TO PUT PEOPLE IN FEAR WHILE YOU LAUGH BEHIND THE CURTAINS,GREAT JOB!! YOU SHOUTED!! FOR THE PLANNERS AND STAGERS..MMMMMMMMMMMM
  5. Really? Obama can not control what happens in his own country! Why would you think he can control what terrorist do? CAN'T CONTROL WHAT HAPPEN IN HIS OWN COUNTRY??? WHERE IS IT? IF YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT USA WHY WOULD HE? HE IS AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION,SPEAK AGAINST OUR FOREFATHERS, ATTACK AMERICAN RIGHTS AND BELIEFS... COME ON NOW THERE IS ALOT OFCHRISTIANS THAT LIVES IN THE MIDDLE EAST THAN YOU ARE TOLD. ATLEAST WHEN SADDAM WAS IN POWER THE CHRISTIANS WASNT BEEN ATTACK.
  6. http://www.****************.com/t97201-us-and-islamic-state-we-did-see-this-coming#135158 YOU KNOW WHAT.. THEY TRY TO HAMMER IN OUR BRAINS THAT MALIKI IS THE REAL PROBLEM BUT AFTER YOU READ YOU WILL SEE WHO IS BEHIND ALL THIS ISIS, JIHAD,TERRORIST CRAP AND MALIKI WAS TRYING TO STOP THEM WASHINGTON IGNORE ALL HIS PLY.. I REMEMBER EVEN WHEN MALIKI TRAVELS TO WASHINGTON TO MEET TO TALK ABOUT THE SITUATION...MMMM MALIKI WON THE ELECTION DIDN'T HE? WELL IF WASHINGTON BEHIND IT PUSHING HIM OUT THAT MUST MEANS HE IS NOT DOING THE DIRTY DEEDS THEY WANTED... WASHINGTON — Like the rest of the world, the U.S. government appeared to have been taken aback last month when Mosul, Iraq’s second largest city, fell to an offensive by jihadis of the Islamic State that triggered the collapse of five Iraqi army divisions and carried the extremists to the threshold of Baghdad. A review of the record shows, however, that the Obama administration wasn’t surprised at all. In congressional testimony as far back as November, U.S. diplomats and intelligence officials made clear that the United States had been closely tracking the al Qaida spinoff since 2012, when it enlarged its operations from Iraq to civil war-torn Syria, seized an oil-rich province there and signed up thousands of foreign fighters who’d infiltrated Syria through NATO ally Turkey. The testimony, which received little news media attention at the time, also showed that Obama administration officials were well aware of the group’s declared intention to turn its Syrian sanctuary into a springboard from which it would send men and materiel back into Iraq and unleash waves of suicide bombings there. And they knew that the Iraqi security forces couldn’t handle it. The group’s operations “are calculated, coordinated and part of a strategic campaign led by its Syria-based leader, Abu Bakr al Baghadi,” Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Brett McGurk told a House committee on Feb. 5, four months before fighting broke out in Mosul. “The campaign has a stated objective to cause the collapse of the Iraqi state and carve out a zone of governing control in western regions of Iraq and Syria.” The testimony raises an obvious question: If the Obama administration had such early warning of the Islamic State’s ambitions, why, nearly two months after the fall of Mosul, is it still assessing what steps, if any, to take to halt the advance of Islamist extremists who threaten U.S. allies in the region and have vowed to attack Americans? In fresh testimony before Congress this week, McGurkrevealed that the administration knew three days in advance that the attack on Mosul was coming. He acknowledged that the Islamic State is no longer just a regional terrorist organization but a “full-blown” army that now controls nearly 50 percent of Iraq and more than one-third of Syria. Its fighters have turned back some of the best-trained Iraqi units trying to retake key cities, while in Syria, it’s seized nearly all that country’s oil and natural gas fields and is pushing the Syrian military from its last outposts in the country’s east. “What started as a crisis in Syria has become a regional disaster with serious global implications,” Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said Wednesday. Yet Defense Department officials say they might not complete work on proposed options for U.S. actions until the middle of August, a lifetime in a region where every day brings word of another town or village falling to the Islamic State. Some lawmakers and experts say the delay borders on diplomatic malpractice. “We did see this coming,” said Royce, adding that Iraqi officials and some diplomats at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad began urging the administration in August 2013 to launch U.S. drone strikes against Islamic State bases near Iraq’s border with Syria. “This was a very clear case in which the U.S. knew what was going on but followed a policy of deliberate neglect,” said Vali Nasr, the dean of Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies and a former State Department adviser on the Middle East. “This miscalculation essentially has helped realize the worst nightmare for this administration, an administration that prided itself on its counterterrorism strategy,” said Nasr. “It is now presiding over the resurgence of a nightmare of extremism and terrorism.” Administration officials deny the charges of inaction. U.S. policy, they contend, was aimed at helping the Iraqi government deal with the growing threat. “That was also the desire of the Iraqi government. The Iraqi government wanted to act on its own with our assistance,” McGurk told Congress this week. He insisted that Baghdad didn’t formally request U.S. airstrikes until May. The situation, however, was far beyond the Iraqi government’s ability to cope. One complicating factor was the administration’s approach to Syria and the uprising there to topple President Bashar Assad, a goal President Barack Obama adopted as America’s own in an August 2011 statement that said Assad had lost all legitimacy to rule and must go. Some experts argue that Obama committed a key error in 2012 by rejecting calls from top national security aides, lawmakers and others to train and arm a moderate rebel force to fight Assad. Obama administration officials say that rejection was based on a variety of concerns, including that weapons passed to moderate rebels might end up in the hands of more radical elements such as the Nusra Front, an al Qaida affiliate that by mid-2012 had taken the lead in many of the anti-Assad movement’s major victories. But without a well-armed moderate force, the battlefield was left open to increasing jihadi influence, others respond. “This crisis was allowed to fester and get worse in many ways due to inaction against Assad and ISIS,” said Phillip Smyth, a Middle East researcher at the University of Maryland. A review of the record shows, however, that support for the anti-Assad movement also hampered U.S. action to quash the Islamic State, which until earlier this year rebels considered an ally in the push to topple Assad. In testimony in November, McGurk said that one of the reasons the United States had not granted Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki’s request for assistance against the Islamic State was Maliki’s refusal to close Iraqi airspace to Iranian planes flying arms to Assad’s military. While Maliki’s fears about the Islamic State “are legitimate,” McGurk said then, “it’s equally legitimate to question Iraq’s independence given Iran’s ongoing use of Iraqi airspace to resupply the Assad regime.” In another misstep, some experts said, the Obama administration appears to have turned a blind eye as U.S. allies Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and others provided arms and money that allowed Islamist groups to hijack the Assad opposition and ultimately provide Baghdadi with a secure patch in Syria from which he eventually would send men and weapons back into Iraq. Smyth disputed that idea in part, noting that the Islamic State was largely self-sufficient financially, although the influx of foreign fighters provided a crucial boost to its manpower. What is indisputable, Smyth said, is that the White House became immobilized by the complexity of the crisis: Having declared that Assad had to go, it found that there was no opposition group that didn’t have some ties to jihadists, and actively backing the rebels would put the United States on the same side as al Qaida. “When you have a policy that was paralyzed by a number of different things, the result is a confused policy,” he said. On Iraq, meanwhile, the public testimony shows that the administration moved slowly to respond to the rising Islamic State threat. One complication: Doing so would have put the United States effectively on the same side as Iran, the main regional ally of Baghdad and Damascus. Maliki, whose Shiite Muslim majority dominated Iraq’s government, formally sought stepped-up U.S. military and counterterrorism assistance in October 2013. But he had been asking privately for help much earlier. One such appeal came after a March 4, 2013, attack inside Iraq by Islamic State forces on Iraqi army troops who were escorting back to the border dozens of Syrian soldiers who’d fled into Iraq to escape an attack on their post by anti-Assad rebels. While still inside Iraq, their buses drove into bombs and gunfire. At least 49 Syrians and 14 Iraqis died. It was one of the first documented instances of the Islamic State coordinating attacks on both sides of the border. Ali al Mousawi, Maliki’s spokesman, called then for the United States to immediately give priority to arming Iraq with weapons that the country already had requested so that it could fend off any future incidents. “We need equipment as fast as it was delivered to Turkey,” Mousawi said, referring to the deployment of Patriot anti-missile batteries by the United States and several NATO allies after Syrian missiles landed in Turkish territory. “They managed to install the Patriot systems within two weeks. We need something like that,” he told McClatchy the day after the incident. Instead, the White House stuck with a policy that tried to make use of the crisis to pressure Maliki into replicating the U.S. success late in the 2003-2011 occupation of enlisting Sunni tribes to help fight al Qaida’s Iraqi affiliate, which eventually became the Islamic State. “We made it clear to Maliki and other Iraqi leaders that the fight against terrorists and militias will require a holistic – security, political, economic – approach,” McGurk told the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Nov. 13 in describing talks held with the Iraqi leader during a visit he’d made to Washington a week earlier. The approach called for Maliki to be more accommodating to his Sunni Muslim political rivals. The administration called on Maliki to end a harsh crackdown on Iraq’s Sunni Muslim minority, restore their political rights and provide salaries and other benefits to Sunni tribes that agreed to fight the Islamic State. Maliki failed to make good on numerous assurances that he’d comply. Washington also had other priorities: trying to mediate a feud between Maliki and Kurdish leaders over oil revenues, boost the country’s petroleum industry and promote ties between Iraq and its Arab neighbors. It was only after Islamic State assaults in December on the Iraqi cities of Fallujah and Ramadi that the administration began stepping up military aid to Baghdad. It sent unarmed spy drones and 75 Hellfire missiles – which had to be dropped from propeller-driven passenger planes – for use against Islamic State bases in western Iraq. And the United States has yet to deliver helicopter gunships and F-16 jet fighters that Iraq already had purchased. It also dragged its feet on Baghdad’s request for U.S. military advisers, some 300 of whom were dispatched only after Mosul fell. While there are many reasons for the Obama administration’s failure to tackle the rise of the Islamic State earlier, lacking intelligence is not among them. By early 2013, U.S. intelligence agencies began delivering more than a dozen top-secret high-level reports, known as strategic warnings, to senior administration officials detailing the danger posed by the Islamic State’s rise, said a senior U.S. intelligence official. The reports also covered the threat to Europe and the United States from the return of thousands of battle-hardened foreign fighters, including dozens of Americans, who’d fought to topple Assad. Intelligence analysts well into this year “continued to provide strategic warning of (the) increasing threat to Iraq’s stability . . . the increasing difficulties Iraq’s security forces faced . . . and the political strains that were contributing to Iraq’s declining stability,” said the senior U.S. intelligence official, who requested anonymity in order to discuss the sensitive issue. On Feb. 11, Army Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn, the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told the Senate Armed Services Committee in public that the Islamic State “probably will attempt to take territory in Iraq and Syria to exhibit its strength in 2014.” Flynn warned then that Iraqi forces were “unable to stem rising violence in part because they lack mature intelligence, logistics and other capabilities.” They also “lack cohesion, are undermanned, and are poorly trained, equipped and supplied,” leaving them “vulnerable to terrorist attack, infiltration and corruption,” he said. Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said his committee had been regularly briefed on both Syria and Iraq. “I do not think it was an intelligence failure. I think that we got the information we needed to have,” he said recently when asked his assessment of the developments in the region. “I don’t feel like I could lay responsibility at the feet of the intelligence community for not seeing this coming, because they were aware of the growing risk.”
  7. just like i said.. these terroriist are well supported by the same that dont want you pray in scholl and mention jesus name,same people that don't want the priest in the arrmy while praying can't mention jesus name here in america...now that you see the leaders on tv smiling crack jokes,engaging in converstations and some questions during a speech or televised event. its what they show you on the front page of the paper,what they show you on tv,what they tell you on the radio is what you believe....those same faces behind close door is another face dont be fooled.. they have been killing christians include africa wide spread i am talking about minces of body parts... presidents know about it they are against christianity.the power is in his name JESUS!! if you are confronted with a evil spirit calling as much name as you can not going to save you lol...SAY JESUS AND WHAT HOW THINGS START TO CHANGE.
  8. just like a said people dont believe the hype!!! Iraq is very important to the agenda.....
  9. wow iraq trying to sensor social media? its not iraq its the highr power who stage these isis and terrorist happenings.
  10. HAVENT YOU GUYS REALISE WHERE THIS NEWS COMING FROM? CNN .....CAN'T BE TRUSTED PROPOGANDA NEWS NETWORK.. OPEN YOUR EYES PEOPLE.
  11. Their wheeling and dealing the dollar, looks like the only people making any money are the dealers.
  12. There is one guarentee: The Real Value of the dinar even with the trillions in circulation is more than the ridiculous .0009 to 1 program rate
  13. This crap is getting old, the current currency was state of the art when issued and was not worth the paper it was printed on then and still isn't. Last year alot of money was allocated for more De La Rue Machines. There has been absolutely no articles in the past 10 years stating that counterfiet currency was good enough to pass the De La Rue process? I honestly cannot see any difference in Iraq IN OR OUT OF CHAPTER VII. I'm sure we are in for a whole new BOOK OF EXCUSES before any changes occur. Printing articles like this is not the way to attract International business, and looking at some of the articles lately, Iraq is sure losing big business confidence quickly after gaining some after exiting Chapter VII.
  14. They can reduced the money supply pretty quick with the Currency Auctions, which adds value to the remaining in circulation. If they can draw in enough Dinar at todays rate "which they are by selling the Dollar for Dinars in the Auctions" take the reduction amount and add to the remaining in circulation they can offset or completly eliviate any costs. With the new added value remaining notes they can further reduced the money supply by calling in the large notes and introducing the new Lower denominations "which will be needed if a 1 to 1 you can't have people walking around with 25,000,00 notes" Talks have been that, they are going to have their currency broken down similar to the U.S. Denominations
  15. This is exactly what we want to see! In my opinion their using the dollar to "draw in dinar" and if destroyed and accounted for, they are reducing the money supply. The more they reduced the money supply, the more the remaining bills "Ours" are worth. Of course you can see it in the auctions, but due the Dinar being on a dirty float, and not being a transparent currency, We Can't See It Elsewhere ! Go Real Value !!!!!!!!!
  16. Another excellent article thanks Yota !!!!! Enough Talk Just Do It Already Go Rv !!!!!!
  17. Iraq has been under a dirty float for the last 10 years. The whole months of May & June the information on the Dinar has been bleek, and if you recall the Iraqi's were lining up at the banks exchanging their Dinars For Dollars. Thay have stated many times the plan is to reduce the money supply from Trillions to Billions: In my opinion we are not done hearing negatives about the Dinar, which will reduce it even further by using the US Dollar as a tool. The auctions are used to stabilize the dirty float " Which causes a False Demand for the Dinar and regulates the ridiculous .0009 rate"
  18. From what I understand payments come from the Oil Revenues and the payments made so far were made in record time! Go Iraq / Go RV
  19. Thanks for the link that just put the icing on the cake !
  20. Yota thanks for clearing things, the reuters article had my head spinning
  21. Thanks for the direct link, I watched the whole UN meeting, how could I miss this?
  22. Very strange that reuters does not have anything on site about this? Found a link http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation-world/sns-rt-us-iraq-kuwait-un-20130627,0,6979120.story? THE BALTIMORE SUN? Reuters12:04 p.m. EDT, June 27, 2013 UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The U.N. Security Council brought Iraq one step closer on Thursday to ending United Nations sanctions imposed on Baghdad more than two decades ago after former President Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait In 1990. The 15-member council unanimously agreed that the issue of missing Kuwaiti people, property and archives should be dealt with under Chapter 6 of the U.N. Charter - which urges countries to peacefully resolve any conflicts - instead of Chapter 7. Chapter 7 of the charter allows the Security Council to authorize actions ranging from sanctions to military intervention if states do not abide by council demands. The move by the council is a significant political boost for Baghdad as it struggles to restore its international standing a decade after a U.S.-led invasion of Iraq toppled Saddam in 2003. The Security Council resolution recognized "the importance of Iraq achieving international standing equal to that which it held prior to (1990)." U.S.-led troops drove Iraq out of Kuwait in the 1991 Gulf War. "This is a new beginning for the relations between our two neighborly and brotherly countries," Iraq's Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari told reporters after the vote. "This is an example for other countries also to resolve their disputes and differences through peaceful means." The only issues linked to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait that remain under Chapter 7 are an arms embargo and Baghdad's payment of $52 billion in compensation to Kuwait, diplomats say. Iraq still owes $11 billion and has said it expects to pay by 2015. There are still a range of Chapter 7 issues imposed on Baghdad after Saddam's ouster in 2003, diplomats say, including the freeze and return of Saddam-era assets and trade ban on stolen Iraqi cultural property. U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has recommended that the U.N. political mission in Iraq should take responsibility for facilitating the search for missing Kuwaitis, or their remains, property and the country's national archives. Read more: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-iraq-kuwait-un-20130627,0,1429155.story#ixzz2XR6N2eX8
  23. Why is this in the news section with no link, searched the reuters site and absolutly nothing about this
  24. In my opinion, the news coming out about the Internationally tradeability quest for the Dinar is a Hooka dream, if Chapter VII requirements aren't met and chapter VII is not lifted "nothing can change". Having a fully seated government "in my opinion is the missing link", After Chapter VII is lifted the possibilities are endless and would make sense "until then any article's stating a timeline are nothing more than HOT AIR"
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.