Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content

64jaguar

Platinum VIP
  • Posts

    972
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 64jaguar

  1. "I understand the youth's frustration, reform takes time," he added. And whether he would accept a second term as prime minister if he was chosen after the early parliamentary elections scheduled for next October, Al-Kazemi said: “I accepted this role to serve my country, if there is an Iraqi consensus, we will see, despite the slow progress, it is difficult to see any From the political elite in Iraq will try hard to bridge the sectarian divisions that threaten Iraq and the region."
  2. There is a thread on DV recently and I don't have the link, but Al-Kazemi said he might run if the people really want him to, only a few days ago. Maybe someone knows where that thread is.. Could have been when he was in the U.S. If i find it I'll post it.
  3. That link is dead NMP2017 but haven't heard anything on WARKA and VISA of late.
  4. For those of you who prefer not to read a long article I suggest clicking the link and watching the video. It didn't come over with the posting. It's my opinion that these Few GIANT CORPORATIONS control everything. They've even been labeled the 4th Branch of Government. To say they are influential to Governments worldwide is misleading Imo, They are calling the shots everywhere. I've often expressed the opinion that the IMF, BIS and other Bankster's are controlling the RV in Iraq, and I also believe these same people are on a mission to own the Crypto markets. Like Comedian George Carlin once said "It's a club and you ain't in it" https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/04/bill-sardi/who-runs-the-world-blackrock-and-vanguard/
  5. https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/04/bill-sardi/who-runs-the-world-blackrock-and-vanguard/ LewRockwell.comanti-state•anti-war•pro-market Who Runs The World? Blackrock and Vanguard By Bill Sardi April 21, 2021 donate FacebookTwitter If you’ve been wondering how the world economy has been hijacked and humanity has been kidnapped by a completely bogus narrative, look no further than this video by Dutch creator, Covid Lie. What she uncovers is that the stock of the world’s largest corporations are owned by the same institutional investors. They all own each other. This means that “competing” brands, like Coke and Pepsi aren’t really competitors, at all, since their stock is owned by exactly the same investment companies, investment funds, insurance companies, banks and in some cases, governments. This is the case, across all industries. As she says: “The smaller investors are owned by larger investors. Those are owned by even bigger investors. The visible top of this pyramid shows only two companies whose names we have often seen…They are Vanguard and BlackRock. The power of these two companies is beyond your imagination. Not only do they own a large part of the stocks of nearly all big companies but also the stocks of the investors in those companies. This gives them a complete monopoly. A Bloomberg report states that both these companies in the year 2028, together will have investments in the amount of 20 trillion dollars. That means that they will own almost everything. Bloomberg calls BlackRock “The fourth branch of government”, because it’s the only private agency that closely works with the central banks. BlackRock lends money to the central bank but it’s also the advisor. It also develops the software the central bank uses. Many BlackRock employees were in the White House with Bush and Obama. Its CEO. Larry Fink can count on a warm welcome from leaders and politicians. Not so strange, if you know that he is the front man of the ruling company but Larry Fink does not pull the strings himself. BlackRock, itself is also owned by shareholders. Who are those shareholders? We come to a strange conclusion. The biggest shareholder is Vanguard. But now he gets murky. Vanguard is a private company and we cannot see who the shareholders are. The elite who own Vanguard apparently do not like being in the spotlight but of course they cannot hide from who is willing to dig. Reports from Oxfam and Bloomberg say that 1% of the world, together owns more money than the other 99%. Even worse, Oxfam says that 82% of all earned money in 2017 went to this 1%. In other words, these two investment companies, Vanguard and BlackRock hold a monopoly in all industries in the world and they, in turn are owned by the richest families in the world, some of whom are royalty and who have been very rich since before the Industrial Revolution. Why doesn’t everybody know this? Why aren’t there movies and documentaries about this? Why isn’t it in the news? Because 90% of the international media is owned by nine media conglomerates. Covid Lie asks, “Who sponsors the organization and press agencies that produce our news? With Project Syndicate, we see the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Open Society Foundation and the European Journalism Centre. The organizations that bring the news get paid by non-profit organizations, of the same elite that also owns the entire media but also a part of taxpayers money is used to pay them.” Or, as George Carlin said, “It’s a small club and you ain’t in it.” So when Lynn Forester de Rothschild wants the United States to be a one-party country (like China) and doesn’t want voter ID laws passed in the US, so that more election fraud can be perpetrated to achieve that end,what does she do? She holds a conference call with the world’s top 100 CEOs and tells them to publicly decry as “Jim Crow” Georgia’s passing of an anti-corruption law and she orders her dutiful CEOs to boycott the State of Georgia, like we saw with Coca-Cola and Major League Baseball and even Hollywood star, Will Smith. In this conference call, we see shades of the Great Reset, Agenda 2030, the New World Order. The UN wants to make sure, as does Schwab that in 2030, poverty, hunger, pollution and disease no longer plague the Earth. To achieve this, the UN wants taxes from Western countries to be split by the mega corporations of the elite to create a brand new society. For this project, the UN says we need a world government – namely the UN, itself. And it is clear that the “pandemic” was orchestrated in order to bring this about. This video does an incredible job of explaining how it is all being done. TRANSCRIPT As you are watching millions fall into poverty because of the corona measures of the past year, even if the greatest economic crisis in history has not affected you yet, it will only be a matter of time until the rippling effects will hit you, as well This is not fear-mongering but it’s a harsh reality. I also think we might mitigate the damage and may even do better, provided we are informed correctly about our situation. This is why I would like to show you a few facts you can easily check facts that are of crucial importance. Less than a handful of big corporations dominate every aspect of our lives. That may seem exaggerated but from the breakfast we eat to the mattress we sleep on and everything we wear and consume in between is largely dependent on these corporations. Those are huge investment companies that determine the course of money flow. They are the main characters of the play that we are witnessing. I know your time is valuable, so I summarize the most important data. How does it work? THE FOOD INDUSTRY Let’s take Pepsico as an example. It is the parent company of many soda companies and snack companies. The so-called competitive brands are from factories from a few corporations who monopolize the entire industry. In the packaged food industry, there are a few big companies, like Unilever, the Coca-Cola Company, Mondelez and Nestlé. In the picture, you see that most brands in the food industry belong to one of these corporations. The big companies are on the stock market and have the big shareholders in the board of directors. On sources like Yahoo Finance, we can see detailed company info, such as who the biggest shareholders actually are. Let’s take Pepsico again, as an example. We see about 72% of stock is owned by no less than 3,155 institutional investors. These are investment companies, investment funds, insurance companies, banks and in some cases, governments. Who are the biggest institutional investors of Pepsico? As you can see, only 10 of the investors own together nearly one third of the stock. The top 10 of investors together amount to a value of $59 billion dollars but out of those ten, only three own more stock than the other seven. Let’s remember them and look up who owns the most stocks of the Coca-Cola Company, the biggest competitor of Pepsi. The biggest lump of stock is again owned by institutional investors. Let’s look at the top 10 and start at the bottom six of them. Four of these institutional investors we also saw at the bottom six of Pepsico. These are Northern Trust, JPMorgan-Chase, Geode Capital Management and Wellington Management. Now, let’s look at the four biggest stock owners. They are BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street. These are the world’s biggest investment firms, so Pepsico and Coca-Cola are not competitors, at all. The other big companies that own a myriad of brand names, like Unilever, Mondelez and Nestlé are from the same small group of investors. But it’s not only in the food industry that their names come up. Let’s find out on Wikipedia, which are the biggest tech companies. BIG TECH Facebook is the owner of Whatsapp and Instagram. Together with Twitter, they form the most popular social media platforms. Alphabet is the parent of all Google companies, like YouTube and Gmail but they are also the biggest investor in Android, one of the two operating systems for nearly all smartphones and tablets. The other operating system is Apple’s IOS. If we add Microsoft, we see four companies making the software for nearly all computers, tablets and smartphones in the world. Let’s see who are the biggest shareholders of these companies. Take Facebook: we see that 80% of the stock is owned by institutional investors. These are the same names that came up in the food industry; the same investors are in the top three. Next, is Twitter. It forms with Facebook and Instagram the top three. Surprisingly, this company is in the hands of the same investors, as well. We see them again, with Apple and even with their biggest competitor, Microsoft. Also, if we look at other big companies in the tech industry that develop and make our computers, TVs, phones and home appliances, we see the same big investors, that together own the majority of the stock. It’s true for all industries. I’m not exaggerating. THE TRAVEL INDUSTRY (AND ENERGY & MINING) One last example, let’s book a holiday on a computer or smartphone. We search for a flight to a sunny country on Skyscanner or Expedia. Both are from the same small group of investors. We fly with one of the many airlines. Many of which are in the hands of the same investors and of governments, as is the case with Air France, KLM. The plane we board is, in most cases a Boeing or an Airbus, also owned by the same names. We book through Booking.com or AirBnB and when we arrive we go out for dinner and place a comment on Tripadvisor. The same big investors show up in every aspect of our trip and their power is even bigger, because of the kerosene is from their oil companies or refineries. The steel from which the plane is made comes from their mining companies. This small group of investment firms and funds and banks are namely also the biggest investors in the industry that dig for raw materials. Wikipedia shows that the biggest mining companies have the same big investors that we see everywhere. Also, the big agricultural businesses, on which the entire food industry depends; they own Bayer, the parent company of Monsanto, the biggest seed producer in the world but they are also the shareholders of the big textile industry. And even many popular fashion brands who make the clothing out of the cotton are owned by the same investors. Whether we look at the world’s biggest solar panel companies or oil refineries, the stocks are in the hands of the same companies. They own the tobacco companies that produce all the popular tobacco brands but they also own all big pharmaceutical companies and the scientific institutions that produce medicine. They own the companies that produce our metals and also the entire car, plane and weapons industry, where a great deal of the metals and raw materials are used. The own the companies that build our electronics, they own the big warehouses and online markets and even the means of payments we use to buy their products. To make this video as short as possible, I only showed you the tip of the iceberg. If you decide to research this with the sources I just showed you, then you will see that most popular insurance companies, banks, construction companies, telephone companies restaurant chains and cosmetics are owned by the same institutional investors we have just seen. BLACKROCK & VANGUARD These institutional investors are mainly investment firms banks and insurance companies. In turn, they, themselves are owned by shareholders and the most surprising thing is that they own each other’s stocks Together, they form an immense network comparable to a pyramid. The smaller investors are owned by larger investors. Those are owned by even bigger investors. The visible top of this pyramid shows only two companies whose names we have often seen by now. They are Vanguard and BlackRock. The power of these two companies is beyond your imagination. Not only do they own a large part of the stocks of nearly all big companies but also the stocks of the investors in those companies. This gives them a complete monopoly. A Bloomberg report states that both these companies in the year 2028, together will have investments in the amount of 20 trillion dollars. That means that they will own almost anything Bloomberg calls BlackRock “The fourth branch of government”, because it’s the only private agency that closely works with the central banks. BlackRock lends money to the central bank but it’s also the advisor. It also develops the software the central bank uses. Many BlackRock employees were in the White House with Bush and Obama. Its CEO, Larry Fink can count on a warm welcome from leaders and politicians. Not so strange, if you know that he is the front man of the ruling company. But Larry Fink does not pull the strings, himself. BlackRock, itself is also owned by shareholders. Who are those shareholders? We come to a strange conclusion. The biggest shareholder is Vanguard. But now he gets murky. Vanguard is a private company and we cannot see who the shareholders are. The elite who own Vanguard apparently do not like being in the spotlight but of course they cannot hide from who is willing to dig. Reports from Oxfam and Bloomberg say that 1% of the world, together owns more money than the other 99%. Even worse, Oxfam says that 82% of all earned money in 2017 went to this 1%. Forbes, the most famous business magazine says that in March 2020, there were 2,095 billionaires in the world. This means that Vanguard is owned by the richest families in the world. If we research their history, we see that they have always been the wealthiest. Some of them, even before the start of the Industrial Revolution, because their history is so interesting and extensive, I will make a sequel. For now, I just want to say that these families of whom many are in royalty are the founders of our banking system and of every industry in the world, these families have never lost power but due to an increasing population, they had to hide behind firms, like Vanguard, which the stockholders are the private funds and non-profits of these families. NGOs AND FOUNDATIONS AND THEIR OWNERSHIP OF BIG PHARMA To clarify the picture, I have to explain briefly what non-profits actually are. These appear to be the link between companies, politics and media. This conceals the conflicts of interests a bit. Non-profits, also called “foundations” are dependent on donations they do not have to disclose who their donors are they can invest the money in the way they see fit and do not pay taxes as long as the profits are invested again in new projects. In this way, non-profits keep hundreds of billions of dollars among themselves according to the Australian government, non-profits are an ideal way of financing terrorists and of massive money-laundering. The foundations and funds of the families that are the richest stay in the background as much as possible. For issues that get much attention, the foundation of philanthropists are used that are lower in rank but very rich. I want to keep it short, so I will show you the three most important ones that connect all industries in the world. They are the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Open Society Foundation of the controversial multi-billionaire, Soros and the Clinton Foundation. I will give you a very short introduction to show you their power. According to the website of the World Economic Forum, the Gates Foundation is the biggest sponsor of the WHO. That was after Donald Trump quit USA financial support to the WHO in 2020. So the Gates Foundation is one of the most influential entities in everything that concerns our health. The Gates Foundation works closely with the biggest pharma companies, among which are Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Biontech and Bayer. And we have just seen who their biggest shareholders are. Bill Gates was not a poor computer nerd who miraculously became very rich. He’s from a philanthropist’s family that works for the absolute elite. His Microsoft is owned by Vanguard, BlackRock and Berkshire Hathaway. But the Gates Foundation, after BlackRock and Vanguard is the biggest shareholder in Berkshire Hathaway. He was even the member of the board there. We would need hours if we wanted to uncover everything in which Gates, the Open Society Foundation of Soros and the Clinton Foundation are involved. They form a bridge to the current situation, so I had to introduce them. THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA We need to start the next topic with a question. Someone like me, who never makes videos can, with an old laptop objectively show that only two companies hold a monopoly in all industries in the world. My question is, why is this never talked about in the media? We can choose daily between all sorts of documentaries and TV programs but none of them cover this subject. Is it not interesting enough or are there other interests at play? Wikipedia, again gives us the answer. They say that about 90% of the international media is owned by nine media conglomerates. Whether we take the monopolist Netflix and Amazon Prime or enormous concerns that own many daughter companies, like Time-Warner, the Walt Disney Company, Comcast, Fox Corporation, Bertelsmann and Viacom, CBS, we see that the same names own stocks. These corporations not only make all the programs, movies and documentaries but also own the channels on which those are broadcast. So, not only the industries but also the information is owned by the elite. I will show you briefly how this works in the Netherlands. To start with, all the Dutch mainstream media are owned by three companies. The first one is De PersGroep [DPG Media], the parent company of the following brands (. Apart from the many newspapers and magazines, they also own Sanoma, the parent company of some of the big commercial Dutch channels. Many media outlets from abroad, like VTM are also owned by the De PersGroep. The second one is Mediahuis, one of Europe’s biggest media concerns. In the Netherlands, Mediahuis owns the following brands. Until 2017, also Sky Radio and Radio Veronica were owned by Mediahuis, as were Radio 538 and radio 10. And then there is Bertelsmann, which is one of the 9 biggest media firms. This company owns RTL, that owns 45 television stations and 32 radio stations in 11 countries. But Bertelsmann is also co-owner of the world’s biggest book publisher, Penguin Random House. The stocks of these companies are owned by private funds of three families. Those are the Belgian Van Thillo family, the Belgian Leysen family and the German Bertelsmann-Mohn family. All three families sided with the Nazis in the War. According to Wikipedia, for this reason, the Telegraaf, the Leysen newspaper was temporarily forbidden in the Netherlands after the war. THE FAKE NEWS To complete this overview, look at where the news comes from. The daily news of all these media outlets the diverse news media do not produce news. They use information and footage from the press agencies, .ANP and Reuters. These agencies are not independent. .ANP is owned by Talpa, John de Mol. Thomson-Reuters is owned by the powerful Canadian Thomson family. The most important journalists and editors working for these agencies are members of a journalism agency, like the European Journalism Centre. These are one of the biggest European sponsors of media-related projects. They educate journalists, publish study books, provide training spaces and press agencies and work closely together with the big corporations, Google and Facebook. For journalistic analysis and views, the big media use Project Syndicate. This is the most powerful organization in the field. Project Syndicate and organizations like I mentioned are together with the press agencies. The link between all worldwide media outlets when news anchors reap from their autocues [teleprompters], chances are that the text stems from one of these organizations. That is the reason that worldwide media shows synchronicity in their reporting. And look at the European journalism center, itself. Again, the Gates Foundation and the Open Society Foundation. They are also heavily-sponsored by Facebook, Google, the Ministry of Education and Science and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Who sponsors the organization and press agencies that produce our news? With Project Syndicate, we see the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Open Society Foundation and the European Journalism Centre. The organizations that bring the news get paid by non-profit organizations, of the same elite that also owns the entire media but also a part of taxpayers money is used to pay them. In Belgium, there are protests regularly, since Mediahuis and De Persgroep receive millions of euros from the government, while many are abroad… THE DANGER WE ARE IN NOW Well, this was a lot to chew on and I tried to make it as short as I could. I only used examples that I thought were necessary to create a clear overview. This helps to better understand our current situation, that can shed new light on past events There will be enough time to dive into the past, but now let’s talk about today but my goal is to inform you about the danger we are in now. The elite governs every aspect of our lives, also, the information we get and they depend on a coordination, cooperation to connect all industries in the world to serve their interests. This is done through the World Economic Forum, among others, a very important organization. Every year in Davos, the CEOs of big corporations meet national leaders, politicians and other influential parties, like UNICEF and Greenpeace. On the supervisory board of the WEF is former Vice President, Al Gore, our own minister, Sigrid Kaag, Feike Sijbesma, Chairman of the Royal Dutch State Mines and the Commissioner of the Dutch bank, Christine Lagarde, the Chairwoman of the European Central Bank. Also, politician, Ferdinand Grapperhaus’ son works for the WEF. Wikipedia says that the annual fee for members is 35,000 euros “but over half of our budget comes from partners who pay the cost for politicians who otherwise could not afford membership.” According to critics, the WEF is for rich businesses to do business with other businesses or with politicians. For most members, the WEF would support personal gain instead of being a means to solve the world’s problems. Why would there be many world problems if the industry leaders, bankers and politicians from 1971 onwards have gathered every year to solve the world’s problems? Isn’t it illogical, that after 50 years of meetings between environmentalists and the CEOs of the most polluting companies, nature is gradually doing worse, not better; that those critics are right, it’s clear, when we look at the main partners that together make up more than half of the budget of the WEF. Because these are BlackRock, the Open Society foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and many big companies, from which Vanguard and BlackRock own the stocks. Chairman and founder of the WEF is Klaus Schwab, a Swiss professor and businessman. In his book, The Great Reset, he writes about the plans of his organization. The coronavirus is, according to him a great “opportunity” to reset our societies. He calls it “Build Back Better”. The slogan is now on the lips of all Globalist politicians in the world. Our old society must switch to a new one, says Schwab. The people own nothing but work for the state to have their primary needs met. The WEF says it’s necessary for the consumption society the elite forced upon us is not sustainable anymore. Schwab says in his book that we will never return to the old normal and the WEF published a video recently to make clear that by 2030, we will own nothing but we will be happy. THE GREAT RESET = THE NEW WORLD ORDER You probably heard of the New World Order. The media wants us to believe that this is a conspiracy theory, yet it has been talked about by leaders for decades. Not just George Bush Senior, Bill Clinton and Nelson Mandela but also world-famous philanthropists, like Cecil Rhodes, David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger and even George Soros. The UN presented in 2015 their controversial Agenda 2030. It is almost identical to the Great Reset of Klaus Schwab. The UN wants to make sure, as does Schwab that in 2030, poverty, hunger, pollution and disease no longer plague the Earth. Sounds nice but wait till you read the small print. The plan is that Agenda 2030 will be paid by us, the citizens. Just like they ask of us now to give away our rights for public health, they will ask us to give away our wealth to battle poverty. These are no conspiracy theories. It is on their official website. It comes down to this: The UN wants taxes from Western countries to be split by the mega corporations of the elite to create a brand new society. The new infrastructure, because fossil fuels are gone in 2030. For this project, the UN says we need a world government, namely the UN, itself. The UN agrees with Schwab that a pandemic is a golden chance to accelerate the implementation of Agenda 2030. It is worrisome that the WEF and the UN openly admit that pandemics and other catastrophes can be used to reshape society. We must not think lightly about this and do thorough research. Copyright © Bill Sardi, writing from La Verne, California. This article has been written exclusively for www.LewRockwell.com and other parties who wish to refer to it should link rather than post at other URLs.
  6. You want the JAB, GO ahead! It's still America for a few more minutes..... https://basedunderground.com/2021/07/20/scotland-confirms-5522-deaths-within-4-weeks-of-vaccination-in-a-population-smaller-than-minnesota/ Scotland Confirms 5,522 Deaths Within 4 Weeks of ‘Vaccination’ in a Population Smaller Than Minnesota According to government-provided records, nearly a 10th of a percent of Scotland's population has died within 28 days of receiving a Covid-19 shot. 0.1% of the U.S. population would be over 331,000. by Scott Boyd July 20, 2021 A freedom of information request made in Scotland in May yielded a report on the number of people who have died in the nation within 28-days following a Covid-19 injection. The results, delivered June 22nd, are startling. 5,522 people have died shortly after receiving at least one of the Covid-19 “vaccines.” To be fair, that does NOT mean that all of them died as a result of the jabs. In fact, one can assume a large percentage of those deaths had nothing to do with the injections at all. But even if half — and it’s likely much higher — of those deaths were influenced by the experimental drugs, then the number is still astronomical compared to what governments around the world are telling us. It has been nearly a month since the Public Health Scotland released the information and very little has been done with it, even in Scotland itself. News outlets across the United Kingdom and throughout the European Union have actively suppressed the information while accounts on social media have been censored for sharing it. Nevertheless, etitioner Mark McKee has tried to get the information out. The Daily Expose from the United Kingdom finally picked up on the story this week. Scotland’s population of just under 5.5 million is lower than the population of Minnesota. That means that just under 0.1% of the population has died within four weeks of getting jabbed. Keep in mind, that does not mean 0.1% of those vaccinated have succumbed to whatever it is that’s happening with these drugs. It’s 0.1% of the entire population, vaccinated or not. Extrapolating it out, if the same percentages were used in the United States, that would mean over 331,000 people have died within 28-days of receiving a “vaccine” dose. VAERS data reports over 11,000 deaths and their data is assumed to account for between 1%-10% of the actual cases since the vast majority of Americans do not even realize they are supposed to report adverse reactions to vaccines to the national database. Most simply tell their doctors, but most doctors have been instructed not to report to VAERS nor to encourage their patients to do so. With these numbers in mind, the extrapolated estimates based on the Scottish data falls within the range of the extended VAERS data. Here’s the article by The Daily Expose followed by a bit of commentary below. 5,522 people have died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 Vaccine in Scotland according to Public Health Scotland Public Health Scotland have revealed that 5,522 people have died within twenty-eight days of having a Covid-19 vaccine within the past 6 months in Scotland alone. Due to dozens of freedom of information requests being made, asking Public Health Scotland (PHS) to provide the current total number of deaths of any individual who has died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine, PHS decided the best way forward was to publish the information routinely and periodically within their Covid-19 statistical report. The most up to date figures published by PHS and within the report released by on the 23rd June 2021, and they reveal that between the 8th December 2020 and the 11th June 2021 a total number of 5,522 people died within 28 days of having a dose of a Covid-19 vaccine. According to the spreadsheet provided by Public Health Scotland; which includes the quantity of deaths by type of vaccine and the date they occurred, 1,877 deaths have been due to the Pfizer mRNA jab, 3,643 deaths have been due to the AstraZeneca viral vector jab, and 2 deaths have been due to the Moderna mRNA jab. This equates to an average of 920 deaths occurring every month due to the Covid-19 vaccines in Scotland alone. Outnumbering the average number of people who have died of Covid-19 in Scotland by 866 per month. A freedom of information request made on the 30th January asked the Scottish Government to reveal the total number of people who had died of Covid-19 since March 2020. To which the Scottish Government responded on the 11th March 2021 with – “The answer to your question is 596 deaths involving COVID-19 has been registered where there was no pre-existing medical condition between March 2020 and January 2021 (including).” Public Health England has so far refused to publish any data on the number of deaths occurring within 28 days of having the vaccine in England, but it is not for the want of people trying. Dozens of freedom of information requests have been made to PHE asking the question but they never fail to respond with the statement that “Public Health England can confirm it does not hold the information that you have requested. However, using the data on the number of deaths due to the Covid-19 vaccines in Scotland we can estimate what the likely number of deaths are due to the jabs in England. Adjusting to the size of the population we estimate the actual number of deaths due to the jabs in England in the past 6 months could be as high as 57,470. That number alone is precisely why PHE “claim” they do not hold that information. Why This Data Is Important We are on the verge of the “big push” for ubiquitous vaccinations in America. One might think that they’ve been pushing hard already for months, but it’s nothing compared to the full-blown, unhinged attacks on our healthcare freedom that are coming. The Delta Variant is already being used as a stepping stone to blame the unvaccinated for causing the additional harm despite the fact that it’s actually the vaccinated who are far more inclined to be causing mutations. You may be like me knowing that the only way they will be able to inject me or my family is if they incapacitate me first. But not everyone is as determined to remain jab-free. It’s imperative that we keep those who are on the fence armed with knowledge to fight the massive propaganda campaign we’re seeing before us. The pressure is coming from government, mainstream media, Big Tech, and the workplace. It’s coming from friends and family. It’s going to be coming from law enforcement in the coming months. Many skeptics will fall prey to the pressure, which is why we must get the word out. They’re suppressing us dramatically (which is why donations are greatly appreciated) so we need the voice of many to help to spread the truth.
  7. https://freedomfirstnetwork.com/2021/07/lawsuit-filed-today-accusing-government-of-hiding-more-than-45000-dead-americans-from-the-jab Lawsuit Filed Today Accusing Government of Hiding More Than 45,000 Dead Americans from the Jab by JD Rucker July 19, 2021 in Conspiracy Theory, Healthcare, News and Opinions When news like this comes out, the powers-that-be try to shut it down. Within moments of posting the article below from MAGA Institute on The Liberty Daily, the site was taken offline. We were able to get the information and put it below for posterity, but we do not want to risk taking their site down again so I’m publishing it here. The implications are striking. According to a whistleblower, the United States government is aware of far more Covid-19 “vaccine” deaths than they’re reporting. It’s not far-fetched that they would hide such information considering the obsessive push they’re engaged in to vaccinate every American regardless of natural immunity, age, health condition, or personal healthcare desires. We first heard about this from our very own Jeff Dornik yesterday who heard MAGA Institute Attorney Thomas Renz speak: This will be buried by mainstream media, of course, as they are willing participants in the brewing vaccine tyranny spreading across the nation and around the world. Big Tech will almost certainly take it down just as they took down our third YouTube channel today. Those asking why we even have a YouTube channel, it’s for livestreaming to our Locals channel. Until we have a sufficient number of paid subscribers there, we cannot livestream directly so we’re stuck going through YouTube. Nicolas Cage Doesn't Talk About His Son Much - Here's Why Bizinsight Ads by Revcontent Find Out More > 80,740 But I digress. Here’s the original article from the MAGA Institute: BOMBSHELL: Government Hiding More Than 45,000 Dead Americans from the Jab – RECORD DEATHS Hidden From View; Lawsuit Filed Today During Clay Clark’s ReAwaken America Tour in Anaheim, California this weekend, friend of MAGA INSTITUTE Attorney Thomas Renz announced that he has filed a motion to IMMEDIATELY CEASE administration of the COVID-19 vaccines as a result of MASSIVE HIDDEN DEATHS across the nation. Renz based his motion on sworn testimony he obtained from a whistleblower who has come forward alleging that the death rates she has been monitoring on government websites are much much higher than what the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Media are telling people. In sworn testimony, the whistleblower stated that the accurate COVID shot death tally is 45,000 people . Nicolas Cage Doesn't Talk About His Son Much - Here's Why Bizinsight Ads by Revcontent Find Out More > 80,741 You likely know about the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), but the whistleblower revealed that there are 11 other reporting systems that remain unknown by the public, hidden away by corrupt media and government agencies intent on keeping you in the dark about the deadly dangerous jab. These other 11 agencies are being used to hide a much higher mortality rate than even first thought possible. As the days move on, we find out that what was once considered a “conspiracy theory” is happening in record time. To date, VAERS reports over 11,000 deaths. The whistleblower stated that one of the secret reporting systems indicates that the reality is that more than 45,000 people have died from the experimental gene therapy injections. The lawsuit to stop these lethal shots will shine more light on this crime against humanity. Stay tuned, as this is breaking news!
  8. https://basedunderground.com/2021/07/14/blackrock-same-shady-people-who-own-pharma-and-media-want-your-house/ "BlackRock May Control the World’s Economic Future" "To put this into perspective, BlackRock, an investment firm, has more power than most governments on Earth, and it also controls the Federal Reserve, Wall Street mega-banks like Goldman Sachs and the WEF’s Great Reset, according to F. William Engdahl, a strategic risk consultant and lecturer who holds a degree in politics from Princeton University.13 Engdahl believes that, left unchecked, BlackRock will soon control the economic future of the world, and states, “BlackRock is the epitome of what Mussolini called Corporatism, where an unelected corporate elite dictates top down to the population.”14 For instance, three influential economic appointees of the current administration come from BlackRock." Home About Contact BlackRock: Same Shady People Who Own Pharma and Media Want Your House by Dr. Joseph Mercola July 14, 2021 Editor’s Commentary: The last time we covered BlackRock, it was the first time I had to deal with non-CCP bots and shills. The comments, hundreds of them, were filled with various defenses of the company. While I won’t accuse them directly of participating in the attempt to redirect or mislead, it’s conspicuous that of all the companies to have such an allegedly strong fanbase, it’s one of the most shrouded giant corporations in the land. This article by Dr. Joseph Mercola is both eye-opening and concerning. We often discuss globalist corporate agendas and how they both drive and are driven by an evil that is far more dangerous than greed alone. This deep dive into one of the many facets of the company should be spread far and wide. But first, here’s a video to set the stage… STORY AT-A-GLANCE In the first quarter of 2021, 15% of U.S. homes sold were purchased by corporate investors — not families looking to achieve their American dream The average American has virtually no chance of winning a home over an investment firm, which may pay 20% to 50% over asking price, in cash, sometimes scooping up entire neighborhoods at once BlackRock, one of the largest asset management firms, is among the firms buying up U.S. houses; they also control the media and Big Pharma If the average American is pushed out of the housing market, and most of the available housing is owned by investment groups and corporations, you become beholden to them as your landlord This fulfills part of the Great Reset’s “new normal” dictum — the part where you will own nothing and be happy; this isn’t a conspiracy theory — it’s part of WEF’s 2030 agenda Homeownership has long been considered an important tool for building financial security and wealth, but it’s becoming more difficult for Americans to achieve. Younger generations are less likely to own a home than those from older generations, with millennials’ homeownership rate 8% lower than that of generation X and baby boomers at the same age.1 If the rate had remained steady, about 3.4 million more people would own homes in the U.S. today but, instead, younger adults are increasingly choosing to either rent or live with their parents. There are a number of reasons why homeownership has become less attainable than it was decades ago, from rising debt in younger generations to increased cost of living. A report by the Urban Institute found half those aged 18 to 34 were spending upward of 30% of their income on rent, making them “rent-burdened.”2 Meanwhile, median housing prices increased 28% in the last two years,3 pricing some out of the market. However, the shift is not all happenstance. In the first quarter of 2021, 15% of U.S. homes sold were purchased by corporate investors4 — not families looking to achieve their American dream. While they’re competing with middle-class Americans for the homes, the average American has virtually no chance of winning a home over an investment firm, which may pay 20% to 50% over asking price,5 in cash, sometimes scooping up entire neighborhoods at once so they can turn them into rentals.6 BlackRock Is Buying Up US Houses BlackRock is one of a number of companies mentioned by The Wall Street Journal in a recent exposé. “Yield-chasing investors are snapping up single-family homes, competing with ordinary Americans and driving up prices,” they warned.7 The question is, why would institutional investors and BlackRock, which manages assets worth $5.7 trillion,8 be interested in overpaying for modest, single family homes? To understand the answer, you must look at BlackRock’s partners, which include the World Economic Forum (WEF),9 and their extreme political and financial clout. In a Twitter thread posted by user Culturalhusbandry, it’s noted:10 “Black Rock, Vanguard, and State Street control 20 trillion dollars worth of assets. Blackrock alone has a 10 billion a year surplus. That means with 5-20% down they can get mortgages on 130-170k homes every year. Or they can outright buy 30k homes per year. Just Blackrock. … Now imagine every major institute doing this, because they are. It can be such a fast sweeping action that 30yrs may be overshooting it. They may accomplish feudalism in 15 years.” If the average American is pushed out of the housing market, and most of the available housing is owned by investment groups and corporations, you become beholden to them as your landlord. This fulfills part of the Great Reset’s “new normal” dictum — the part where you will own nothing and be happy. This isn’t a conspiracy theory; it’s part of WEF’s 2030 agenda.11 The unstated implication is that the world’s resources will be owned and controlled by the technocratic elite, and you’ll have to pay for the temporary use of absolutely everything. Nothing will actually belong to you, including your home. All items and resources are to be used by the collective, while actual ownership is restricted to an upper stratum of social class. The wealth transfer has already begun. BlackRock’s Unrivaled Control The New York Times and a majority of other legacy media are largely owned by BlackRock and the Vanguard Group, the two largest asset management firms in the world, which also control Big Pharma. And it doesn’t end there. BlackRock and Vanguard are at the top of a pyramid that controls basically everything, but you don’t hear about their terrifying monopoly because they also own the media. You can watch all the details about BlackRock’s monopoly in this video, but Humans Are Free summed it up this way:12 “The power of these two companies is beyond your imagination. Not only do they own a large part of the stocks of nearly all big companies but also the stocks of the investors in those companies. This gives them a complete monopoly. A Bloomberg report states that both these companies in the year 2028, together will have investments in the amount of 20 trillion dollars. That means that they will own almost everything. Bloomberg calls BlackRock ‘The fourth branch of government,’ because it’s the only private agency that closely works with the central banks. BlackRock lends money to the central bank but it’s also the advisor. It also develops the software the central bank uses. … BlackRock, itself is also owned by shareholders … The biggest shareholder is Vanguard … The elite who own Vanguard apparently do not like being in the spotlight but of course they cannot hide from who is willing to dig. Reports from Oxfam and Bloomberg say that 1% of the world, together owns more money than the other 99%. Even worse, Oxfam says that 82% of all earned money in 2017 went to this 1%. In other words, these two investment companies, Vanguard and BlackRock hold a monopoly in all industries in the world and they, in turn are owned by the richest families in the world, some of whom are royalty and who have been very rich since before the Industrial Revolution.” BlackRock May Control the World’s Economic Future To put this into perspective, BlackRock, an investment firm, has more power than most governments on Earth, and it also controls the Federal Reserve, Wall Street mega-banks like Goldman Sachs and the WEF’s Great Reset, according to F. William Engdahl, a strategic risk consultant and lecturer who holds a degree in politics from Princeton University.13 Engdahl believes that, left unchecked, BlackRock will soon control the economic future of the world, and states, “BlackRock is the epitome of what Mussolini called Corporatism, where an unelected corporate elite dictates top down to the population.”14 For instance, three influential economic appointees of the current administration come from BlackRock. “There is a definite pattern and suggests that the role of BlackRock in Washington is far larger than we are being told,” Engdahl says.15 The Campaign for Accountability also released a report in 2019 detailing how BlackRock “implemented a strategy of lobbying, campaign contributions, and revolving door hires to fight off government regulation and establish itself as one of the most powerful financial companies in the world.”16,17 BlackRock founder and CEO Larry Fink also has close ties to WEF’s head Klaus Schwab, and joined WEF’s board in 2019. According to Engdahl: “Fink … now stands positioned to use the huge weight of BlackRock to create what is potentially, if it doesn’t collapse before, the world’s largest Ponzi scam, ESG [Environment, Social values and Governance] corporate investing. Fink with $9 trillion to leverage is pushing the greatest shift of capital in history into a scam known as ESG Investing. The UN ‘sustainable economy’ agenda is being realized quietly by the very same global banks which have created the financial crises in 2008. This time they are preparing the Klaus Schwab WEF Great Reset by steering hundreds of billions and soon trillions in investment to their hand-picked ‘woke’ companies, and away from the ‘not woke’ such as oil and gas companies or coal. … Oil companies like ExxonMobil or coal companies no matter how clear are doomed as Fink and friends now promote their financial Great Reset or Green New Deal … And we can expect that the New York Times will cheer BlackRock on as it destroys the world financial structures.” Blackstone Is the Largest Landlord in the US Another giant private equity firm, Blackstone, is also deeply entrenched in U.S. real estate. Blackstone is the largest landlord in the U.S. as well as the largest real estate company worldwide, with a portfolio worth $325 billion.18 In June 2021, Blackstone agreed to buy Home Partners of America, a company that rents single-family houses, and its 17,000 houses, for $6 billion. Blackstone and BlackRock sound alike for a reason. Blackstone’s co-founder, billionaire Steve Schwarzman, said during an interview on Squawk Box that he and Fink “started in business together. We put up the initial capital.” BlackRock used to be called Blackstone Financial, but Fink went off on his own. Schwarzman said, “Larry and I were sitting down and he said, ‘What do you think sort of about having a family name with ‘black’ in it,'”19 and BlackRock was born. Blackstone became notorious for swooping in after the housing bubble burst and buying tens of thousands of homes at deeply discounted prices. They then turned them into single-family rentals, taking advantage of the recession. In 2017, Bloomberg reported:20 “Blackstone built its rental-home business with an advantage few if any other buyers could match: billions of dollars in credit from large banks. Its Invitation Homes subsidiary quickly became the largest single-family home landlord in the U.S., with 50,000 properties. Altogether, hedge funds, private-equity firms and real estate investment trusts have raised about $20 billion to purchase as many as 200,000 homes to rent.” Now, with many struggling due to yearlong business shutdowns and lockdowns, and home prices rising, many Americans are having difficulty finding affordable single-family homes to buy.21 BlackRock Owns Your House, Gates Owns Your Farmland Both BlackRock CEO Fink and Bill Gates are pushing for “net zero” carbon emissions.22 But as BlackRock is busy buying up houses, Gates is hard at work amassing farmland and is now the largest owner of farmland in the U.S.23 By 2030, Gates is pushing for drastic, fundamental changes, including widespread consumption of fake meat, adoption of next generation nuclear energy and growth of a fungus as a new type of nutritional protein.24 The deadline Gates has given to reach net zero emissions is 2050,25 likely because he wants to realize his global vision during his lifetime. But according to Vandana Shiva, in order to force the world to accept this new food and agricultural system, new conditionalities are being created through net zero “nature-based” solutions. Navdanya’s report, “Earth Democracy: Connecting Rights of Mother Earth to Human Rights and Well-Being of All,” explains:26 “If ‘feeding the world’ through chemicals and dwarf varieties bred for chemicals was the false narrative created to impose the Green Revolution, the new false narrative is ‘sustainability’ and ‘saving the planet.’ In the new ‘net zero’ world, farmers will not be respected and rewarded as custodians of the land and caregivers, as Annadatas, the providers of our food and health. … ‘Net Zero’ is a new strategy to get rid of small farmers in first through ‘digital farming’ and ‘farming without farmers’ and then through the burden of fake carbon accounting. Carbon offsets and the new accounting trick of ‘net zero’ does not mean zero emissions. It means the rich polluters will continue to pollute and also grab the land and resources of those who have not polluted — indigenous people and small farmers — for carbon offsets.” A New Wave of Colonization Ultimately, we’re heading for a new wave of colonization in the name of sustainability and net zero carbon emissions. The solutions are complex. Some have suggested that one solution is to make building homes less expensive, so that new construction homes become less expensive. This, in turn, would drive down the cost of existing homes.27 The video at the top of this article goes into detail about another solution: ending the Federal Reserve to stop the central planning of our money supply and interest rates, which are artificially suppressed in a way that is most taken advantage of by the top 1%, contributing to growing wealth inequality.28 This engineered pandemic has catalyzed the transfer of wealth to the rich and, while the major players pushing for the Great Reset are still emerging, BlackRock and Blackstone are names to keep your eye on. 1, 2 CNBC November 25, 2020 3, 4 Slate June 19, 2021 5, 27, 28 YouTube June 10, 2021 6, 7 The Wall Street Journal April 4, 2021 8, 9 World Economic Forum, BlackRock 10, 21 Bitcoin.com, News June 11, 2021 11 Forbes November 10, 2016 12 Humans Are Free May 5, 2021 13, 14, 15, 17 WilliamEngdahl.com June 18, 2021 16 Campaign for Accountability September 5, 2019 18 ZeroHedge June 22, 2021 19 Yahoo Finance June 22, 2017 20 Bloomberg January 3, 2017 22 YouTube June 25, 2021 23 Fortune March 13, 2021 24 ZeroHedge February 16, 2021 25 Fox Business February 21, 2021 26 Navdanya, Earth Rights Are Human Rights. Page 14
  9. Thanks PeaceSign, 1st. I've heard of this. I'm well aware of ivermectin's success in fighting the Wuhan Flu. Recently India was the beneficiary of ivermectin's great success in treating Covid 19. What you are suggesting sounds promising. I'll definitely look it up. Thanks..
  10. 1st. I apologize for getting off topic though the narrative has switched to a conversation about Truth... Dereliction of duty on the part of SCOTUS and the Courts Carrello, sorry for the raspberry, feel free to return the favor. You know None of those cases were ever heard. The truth is coming.. Arizona will be a bombshell and the several States completing REAL audits will unleash the Truth... Whether SCOTUS chooses to ignore the Truth once revealed is anybodies guess. The States that are proven to have been stolen should decertify their election results... Will it change anything? who knows.. Stay tuned... Here's a little update on PA.
  11. Just speculation Longtimelurker, these symbols are not always the traditional designs.. They are an entirely secret and insidious bunch and said to control the highest offices in the world everywhere, even Chyna. I'm just trying to figure out why this investment has gone cold for some 18 years, aside from everyone involved being labeled a crook... Call me a conspiracy theorist but I also think the IMF and World banking powers are deeply involved. Cheers!
  12. Sure looks like the Freemason "All Seeing eye" to me.... Commission Of Integrity..Lol Just sayin...
  13. Common Law is NOT where your rights are. It's the "LEGAL" system where your Status has been changed and you Operate as a CORPORATION in the Legal system. People don't know who they are anymore. This guy "Crow" keeps saying he's a human being.... Not in the U.S. legal system your not, you're a CORPORATION. The living breathing "you" only exists in Equity. Equity and the Equity jurisdiction are where your rights are, article 3 section 2 of the Constitution guarantees Equity and the Legal system are available to all. Though the Foreign Courts, liars and the STATE have hidden Equity in plain sight. Equity will not help you if you commit a crime, but know that if you end up in Court you enter the Court as that CORPORATION not you, the living breathing sentient being, and will be at the mercy of the Liars and the Court, the Statutes and Codes, "Color of Law" and the Foreign Court and Legal system. Equity has always been heard in the Chancery Courts and several still exist (N.J.),(DE.) but generally they have been merged with the Superior courts. The Equity Jurisdiction is very much alive and well. Unfortunately, so is Ignorance... a. John Bouvier , Institutes of American Law 1882, Vol. 2, §3724, paragraph 4, pg. 100; “Law is nothing without equity, and equity is everything, even without Law. Those who perceive what is just and what is unjust only through the eyes of the law, never see it as well as those who behold it with the eyes of equity. Law may be looked upon, in some manner, as an assistance for those who have a weak perception of right and wrong, in the same way that optical glasses, are useful for those who are shortsighted, or those whose visual organs are deficient. Equity, in its true and genuine meaning, is the soul and spirit of the law; positive law is construed, and rational law is made by it.” A treatise on suits in chancery: setting forth the principles, pleadings, practice, proofs and processes of the jurisprudence of equity (1907) Author: Gibson, Henry Richard, 1837-1938 https://archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872/cu31924084259872_djvu.txt INDEX PAGE 1136 MAXIMS AND PRINCIPLES OF EQUITY http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n1161/mode/1up § 8. The Divine Law of Justice the Rule of Decision. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n30/mode/1up 31, note 5 § 31. Maxims generally Considered. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n50/mode/1up 64, note 27. § 64. Other Principles and Maxims. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n82/mode/1up maxims and principles of jurisdiction. 32-40. § 32. Equity Acts upon the Person. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n51/mode/1up § 33. Equity will not Suffer a Wrong Without a Remedy. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n52/mode/1up § 34. Equity Acts Specifically, and Not by Way of Compensation http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n54/mode/1up § 35. When Parties are Disabled to Act the Chancery Court will Act for Them. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n54/mode/1up § 36. When Chancery has Jurisdiction for One Purpose, it will Take Jurisdiction for All Purposes. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n55/mode/1up § 37. The Chancery Court never Loses its Jurisdiction by Implication http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n56/mode/1up § 38. Equity Delights to do Complete Justice, and Not by Halves. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n56/mode/1up § 39. He Who Seeks Equity Must Do Equity. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n57/mode/1up § 40. Courts of Equity will not Tolerate any Interference with their Officers,Process or Decrees, by the Courts of Law. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n58/mode/1up maxims and principles of adjudication. 41-60. THE TWELVE TABLES OF EQUITY. 1. Equity acts upon the person, (forcing him to do what conscience requires.) 2. Equity will not suffer a wrong without a remedy. 3. Equity imputes an intention to fulfil an obligation. 4. Equity acts specifically, and not by way of compensation. 5. Equity regards that as done which ought to be done. 6. Equity requires him who seeks equity to do equity. 7. Equity regards the beneficiary as the real owner. 8. Equity delights to do complete justice, and not by halves. 9. Equity acts for those disabled to act for themselves. 10. Equity looks to the intent rather than to the form. 11. Equity delights in equality. 12. Equity requires diligence, clean hands and good faith. Some of these maxims have been considered in the preceding Article, being, also, maxims of jurisdiction. In analogy to the Twelve Tables of the Roman Law. § 41. Maxims of Adjudication Generally Considered. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n60/mode/1up § 42. He who Comes into Equity must Come with Clean Hands. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n61/mode/1up § 43. Equity Looks to the Intent rather than to the Form. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n61/mode/1up § 44. Equity Imputes an Intention to Fulfil an Obligation. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n63/mode/1up § 45. Equity Regards that as Done which Ought to be Done. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n63/mode/1up § 46. No Person Bound to Act for Another in any Matter can, as to that Matter, Act for Himself. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n65/mode/1up § 47. Equity Delights in Equality. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n66/mode/1up § 48. Equity will Undo What Fraud has Done. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n67/mode/1up § 49. Equity Aids the Vigilant, not Those who Sleep upon their Rights. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n68/mode/1up § 50. So Use Your Own as Not to Injure Another. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n69/mode/1up § 51. No one Can Take Advantage of His Own Wrong. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n69/mode/1up § 52. Where One of Two Persons must suffer Loss He should Suffer whose Act or Neglect Occasioned the Loss. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n70/mode/1up § 53. Equity Follows the Law. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n70/mode/1up § 54. Where there is Equal Equity the Law must Prevail. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n71/mode/1up § 55. Where there are Equal Equities, the First in Order of Time shall Prevail. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n71/mode/1up § 56. To Protect and' Enforce Rights to Property the Object of Suits in Chancery. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n71/mode/1up § 57. Equity Regards the Beneficiary as the Real Owner. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n72/mode/1up § 58. Equity Enforces What Good Reason and Good Conscience Require. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n73/mode/1up § 59. Stare Decisis et Non Quieta Movere. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n74/mode/1up § 60. No One Should be Condemned without a Chance to be Heard. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n75/mode/1up § 61. Maxims Applicable to the Court, and its Orders. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n76/mode/1up equity enforces property rights only, except when. 56 ; 23, note 1 ; 825. § 56. To Protect and' Enforce Rights to Property the Object of Suits in Chancery. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n71/mode/1up 23, note 1 § 23. The Equitable, or Inherent, Jurisdiction of the Chancery Court generally Considered. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n42/mode/1up 825. § 825. Cases not Proper for Injunctive Relief. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n656/mode/1up § 62. Maxims Applicable to the Practice of the Court. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n77/mode/1up 62, sub-sec. 7. 7. Qui sentit commodum, sentire debet et onus. (He who enjoys the benefit ought also to bear the burden.) http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n78/mode/1up 62, sub-sec. 8. 8. Ubi lex aliquem cogit ostendere causam, necesse est quod causa sit justa et legitima. (Where the law requires any one to show cause the cause must be just and legal.) http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n78/mode/1up § 63. Maxims Applicable to Pleadings. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n79/mode/1up 65, note 1. Maxims Relative to Transfers of Property § 65. Notice, and Its Effects. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n83/mode/1up 48, note 45. Maxims and Sayings Relating to Fraud http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n68/mode/1up to contracts. 61, sub-sec. 3; 949, note 2. 61, sub-sec. 3 3. Consensus facit legem. (Consent makes law.) http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n76/mode/1up 949, note 2.MAXIMS RELATING TO CONTRACTS. § 949. Cases for Specific Performance. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n765/mode/1up 63, note 19. Maxims of Interpretation http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n80/mode/1up the law despises trifles, and quibbles. 62, sub-sec. 8, note 14. 62, sub-sec. 8, note 14. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n78/mode/1up maxims as to notice. 65; 66; 74; 76. § 65. Notice, and Its Effects. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n83/mode/1up § 66. Rule of Lis Pendens. http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084259872#page/n85/mode/1u... footnote 49 Gibson page 5 Proverbs 8:15 Complete Jewish Bible (CJB) 15 By me kings reign, and princes make just laws. http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs+8%3A15&version=KJV;CJB;NKJV;WLC;NIV 35 prerogative of grace 1 Pom. Eq. Jur. § 35 footnote § 8 gibson http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924018828925#page/n102/mode/1up 1 Pom. Eq. Jur. § 21 footnote § 8 gibson http://www.archive.org/stream/commentariesoneq01stor#page/23/mode/1up Bisp. Eq. § 7 footnote § 8 gibson http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924084250079#page/n161/mode/1up 1 Pom. Eq. Jur. § 55 footnote § 8 gibson http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924018828925#page/n122/mode/1up 1 Pom. Eq. Jur. § 33-37 footnote § 8 gibson http://www.archive.org/stream/cu31924018828925#page/n100/mode/1up 1 Sto. Eq Jur §§ 16-17 footnote § 8 gibson http://www.archive.org/stream/commentariesoneq01stor#page/18/mode/1up 1 Sto. Eq Jur § 44 footnote § 8 gibson http://www.archive.org/stream/commentariesoneq01stor#page/45/mode/1up
  14. Thanks jg1, Here's that article. Nothing to hide I'm guessing because it's been illegally Deleted. BREAKING: Maricopa County ElectionsOfficials DELETED ENTIRE DATABASE from Voting Machines – Including “All Election Information” from Main Database — With Copy of Senate Letter By Patty McMurray Published May 12, 2021 at 10:27pm 6253 Comments Share(8.3k)TweetShare to Gab Last week, the Gateway Pundit reported about the emergency meeting that was called by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, after the County was reportedly unable to provide passwords to the auditors performing an audit of the county’s 2020 Election results. They also did not provide access to the routers which were requested in the audit as well. This afternoon, it was discovered that “the entire database” for the 2020 General election, showing the “Results Tally and Reporting,” has been deleted! 100 Percent Fed Up reports– President of the Arizona Senate Karen Fann has written a letter to Chairman Sellers, demanding answers. Arizona Senate President Karen Fann TRENDING: BREAKING: Maricopa County Elections Officials DELETED ENTIRE DATABASE from Voting Machines - Including "All Election Information" from Main Database -- With Copy of Senate Letter Here is the letter to Maricopa County Supervisor Chairman Jack Sellers from Arizona Senate President Karen Fann: When inspectors received the boxes of ballots where the audit was being performed, the tamper-proof tape was cut on the boxes and the number of ballots inside the boxes was not the same as what was reported by the County reporter, and what was turned over to the Senate don’t line up. Advertisement - story continues below A week before the machines were turned over, records were deleted by an administrator—this has to be treated as an act of intentional cover-up! The Maricopa Arizona Audit team has also tweeted about the breaking bombshell: Breaking Update: Maricopa County deleted a directory full of election databases from the 2020 election cycle days before the election equipment was delivered to the audit. This is spoliation of evidence! Advertisement - story continues below Why would the database be deleted unless there was something massive they were trying to hide? This article is for everyone who’s been trying to convince Americans that no voter fraud took place in the November election and that it was the safest and most secure election in modern history. Nothing to see here! UPDATE — Here is the letter from the Arizona Senate to the Maricopa County Supervisors Advertisement - story continues below Exclusive Letter to Maricop… by Jim Hoft Patty McMurray Summary More Info Recent Posts Contact 100 Percent Fed Up Publisher. @100percFEDUP Facebook
  15. Praying here as well Edith, God bless you both!
  16. Regardless the info retained by the Routers, which I also believe from my limited experience, would not store any info, It's my understanding and I believe it is also the Law that the voting machines should not be "ONLINE" at any time during the Election which clearly they were. I cannot put my fingers on it but I do recall experienced auditors confirming that these machines were online and open to manipulation from Germany, China, Siria or Iran and others. If an audit is to be credible the Auditors should be allowed to research anything and Everything surrounding the implications of these machines being online during the Election and shortly thereafter. The fact that Dominion will not give up the passwords and the State officials claiming they don't have them is highly suspect. And this is a Huge problem as well. HUGE: Citizens Group in Arizona Drops a MOAB – Sues State for 2018, 2019, and 2020 Elections That Were Not In Compliance with Arizona Law By Joe Hoft Published May 9, 2021 at 4:17pm 1034 Comments Share(5.9k)TweetShare to Gab How does Arizona get out of this? If this happened in Arizona what other states does this apply to? This all leads back to our investigation of the outfits that certified the Arizona elections and were called back after the election by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors (MCBOS) to perform audits earlier after the 2020 election a few months ago. Advertisement - story continues below We reported that the MCBOS would not allow the Arizona Senate to perform an audit of the county’s 2020 Election results. The MCBOS sued to Senate to prevent the audit. Then when the Senate updated laws to clarify their right to audit and the courts found that the Senate has every right to audit the county’s results, the MCBOS said ok you can do an audit but we want to select the auditors. They then said the only firms they would allow to perform their audit were those certified by the EAS. The problem for the MCBOS was the choice of auditors that the Senate wanted to employ to perform the audit was not theirs. It was the Senates. Also, the firms the MCBOS said were certified were not certified. They hadn’t been for years. TRENDING: GOP Rep Tells Never-Trumper Chris Wallace: "I Will Never Apologize for My Vote on Jan. 6" -- Then Scolds Leftie Hack Chris Wallace (VIDEO) We reported this and within 4 hours the EAS certified these two firms. We’ve asked the EAS to provide us documentation and what they used to certify these two firms suddenly within hours of our article noting the firms were not certified. Advertisement - story continues below Now a group after reviewing Arizona law, claims that the 2018, 2019, and 2020 elections related to this law were out of compliance with state law. Their rationale is because the firms that reviewed their voting machine equipment were not certified by the EAS as Arizona law mandates. Here is the press release from the group suing Arizona for not being in compliance with their laws concerning elections. QW Official Presser by Jim Hoft on Scribd The suit makes the following point in the document below: Advertisement - story continues below Below is the case filed on Friday in Arizona with names of Petitioners redacted: QW Final Draft With Redactions by Jim Hoft on Scribd Wow. This could be really big. This would mean that any elections since 2018 that were impacted by this law must be undone. New elections will be necessary. Joe Hoft Summary Recent Posts Contact Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP's founder, Jim Hoft. His posts have been retweeted by President Trump and have made the headlines at the Drudge Report. Joe worked as a corporate executive in Hong Kong and traveled the world for his work, which gives him a unique perspective of US and global current events. He has ten degrees or designations and is the author of three books. His new book: 'In God We Trust: Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics' is out now - please take a look and buy a copy. @joehoft https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/huge-citizens-group-arizona-drops-moab-sues-state-2018-2019-2020-elections-not-compliance-arizona-law/
  17. Thanks Markinsa, heard all of this yesterday... Demonrats.. I mean Commies must be awful afraid of the truth. I think we all know these Dominion Voting machines were online during the election and very likely manipulating the Vote. What I don't understand are the Courts selling out their own Country. A few days ago the Courts approved a settlement whereby the Commies (D) objected to Voter canvassing comparing signatures on the Ballots mailed in with the Voter signatures on file with the registrars. If you're doing an audit why would the Court approve that?? I don't know when the people are going to say enough is enough!
  18. Thank you yota691 for all you bring to this forum... Desperate people do Desperate things, we could all assume these thieves are the elite, and a LOT of them are imo, but if you're starving there's a good chance you'll do things you wouldn't normally do... The Elite have created an entire country of the Desperate... you can only eat so much cake!!
  19. Macron, the Ex Rothchild's Bankster and the Chief Crook from the Kurdistan region... A match made in Heaven! Are you all suffering enough yet??
  20. https://www.lifesitenews.com/mobile/opinion/former-pfizer-vp-to-aflds-entirely-possible-this-will-be-used-for-massive-scale-depopulation Vaccination Passports are just another scheme to get people Vaccinated. Be prepared for future Vaccine schemes for whatever the PTB dream up... OPINION FREEDOM It’s ‘entirely possible’ vaccine campaigns ‘will be used for massive-scale depopulation’: Former Pfizer VP Dr. Mike Yeadon Arshad Ebrahim / YouTube Mordechai Sones Mon Mar 29, 2021 - 2:42 pm EST Introduction by LifeSiteNews journalist Patrick Delaney. March 29, 2020 (America’s Frontline Doctors) – Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former Vice President and Chief Science Officer for Pfizer, spoke with great urgency to America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) late last week warning that the drive to inject the largest possible portion of the population with experimental COVID-19 vaccines is “madness,” involves “evil,” includes “crimes against humanity” and may have the intention of “massive-scale depopulation.” Yeadon’s comments are also made in the broader context of a sharp debate over theories offered by Geert Vanden Bossche, a vaccine expert associated with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, who, with the appearance of a “whistleblower” has also warned of a “global catastrophe without equal” due to the way these vaccines have been utilized. Advertisement In short, Vanden Bossche fears these experimental vaccines, which do not prevent infection or transmission of the virus, will foster the development of “dangerous variants” that will be far more lethal to the unvaccinated and vaccinated alike, who, for different reasons, will not have sufficient immunity to protect them. In addition to the immediate halting of the current vaccination campaign, Vanden Bossche’s proposed solution is yet another worldwide vaccination of a different type. While Yeadon also fears terrible consequences due to these vaccination campaigns, he strongly disagrees with Vanden Bossche’s theory, and with the proposed solution of more vaccination. “I think the Gerrt Vanden Bossche story is highly suspect,” Yeadon said. “There is no evidence at all that vaccination is leading or will lead to ‘dangerous variants’. I am worried that it’s some kind of trick.” Last December, Yeadon, a British national, filed a petition with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to immediately suspend testing on these experimental vaccines due to many safety concerns, including pathogenic priming, which involves “an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, ‘wild’ virus after vaccination.” In their white paper on the topic, AFLDS warned that such reactions, which can be fatal, “are difficult to prove,” as they are often interpreted as infection with “a worse virus,” or, perhaps, a more dangerous variant. Having maintained that there is “no need of vaccines” for COVID-19, Yeadon emphasizes below, “PLEASE warn every person not to go near top up vaccines. There is absolutely no need to them.” ------------------------------ America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) spoke to former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer Dr. Mike Yeadon about his views on the COVID-19 vaccine, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the regulatory authorities, and more. At the outset, Dr. Yeadon said: “I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being perpetrated against a large proportion of the world’s population. “I feel great fear, but I’m not deterred from giving expert testimony to multiple groups of able lawyers like Rocco Galati in Canada and Reiner Fuellmich in Germany. “I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil (not a determination I’ve ever made before in a 40-year research career) and dangerous products. “In the U.K., it’s abundantly clear that the authorities are bent on a course which will result in administering ‘vaccines’ to as many of the population as they can. This is madness, because even if these agents were legitimate, protection is needed only by those at notably elevated risk of death from the virus. In those people, there might even be an argument that the risks are worth bearing. And there definitely are risks which are what I call ‘mechanistic’: inbuilt in the way they work. “But all the other people, those in good health and younger than 60 years, perhaps a little older, they don’t perish from the virus. In this large group, it’s wholly unethical to administer something novel and for which the potential for unwanted effects after a few months is completely uncharacterized. “In no other era would it be wise to do what is stated as the intention. “Since I know this with certainty, and I know those driving it know this too, we have to enquire: What is their motive? “While I don’t know, I have strong theoretical answers, only one of which relates to money and that motive doesn’t work, because the same quantum can be arrived at by doubling the unit cost and giving the agent to half as many people. Dilemma solved. So it’s something else. Appreciating that, by entire population, it is also intended that minor children and eventually babies are to be included in the net, and that’s what I interpret to be an evil act. “There is no medical rationale for it. Knowing as I do that the design of these ‘vaccines’ results, in the expression in the bodies of recipients, expression of the spike protein, which has adverse biological effects of its own which, in some people, are harmful (initiating blood coagulation and activating the immune ‘complement system’), I’m determined to point out that those not at risk from this virus should not be exposed to the risk of unwanted effects from these agents.” INTERVIEWER: In a talk you gave four months ago, you said: In other words, previous exposure to SARS – that is, a variant similar to SARS CoV-2 – bestowed SARS CoV-2 immunity. The Israel government cites new variants to justify lockdowns, flight closures, restrictions, and Green Passport issuance. Given the Supreme Court verdict, do you think it may be possible to preempt future government measures with accurate information about variants, immunity, herd immunity, etc. that could be provided to the lawyers who will be challenging those future measures? DR. YEADON: “What I outlined in relation to immunity to SARS is precisely what we’re seeing with SARS-CoV-2. The study is from one of the best labs in their field. “So, theoretically, people could test their T-cell immunity by measuring the responses of cells in a small sample of their blood. There are such tests, they are not ‘high throughout’ and they are likely to cost a few hundred USD each on scale. But not thousands. The test I’m aware of is not yet commercially available, but research only in U.K. “However, I expect the company could be induced to provide test kits “for research” on scale, subject to an agreement. If you were to arrange to test a few thousand non-vaccinated Israelis, it may be a double edged sword. Based on other countries experiences, 30-50% of people had prior immunity & additionally around 25% have been infected & are now immune. “Personally, I wouldn’t want to deal with the authorities on their own terms: that you’re suspected as a source of infection until proven otherwise. You shouldn’t need to be proving you’re not a health risk to others. Those without symptoms are never a health threat to others. And in any case, once those who are concerned about the virus are vaccinated, there is just no argument for anyone else needing to be vaccinated.” INTERVIEWER: My understanding of a “leaky vaccine” is that it only lessens symptoms in the vaccinated, but does not stop transmission; it therefore allows the spread of what then becomes a more deadly virus. For example, in China they deliberately use leaky Avian Flu vaccines to quickly cull flocks of chicken, because the unvaccinated die within three days. In Marek’s Disease, from which they needed to save all the chickens, the only solution was to vaccinate 100% of the flock, because all unvaccinated were at high risk of death. So how a leaky vax is utilized is intention-driven, that is, it is possible that the intent can be to cause great harm to the unvaccinated. Stronger strains usually would not propagate through a population because they kill the host too rapidly, but if the vaccinated experience only less-serious disease, then they spread these strains to the unvaccinated who contract serious disease and die. Do you agree with this assessment? Furthermore, do you agree that if the unvaccinated become the susceptible ones, the only way forward is HCQ prophylaxis for those who haven’t already had COVID-19? Would the Zelenko Protocol work against these stronger strains if this is the case? And if many already have the aforementioned previous “17-year SARS immunity”, would that then not protect from any super-variant? Advertisement DR. YEADON: “I think the Gerrt Vanden Bossche story is highly suspect. There is no evidence at all that vaccination is leading or will lead to ‘dangerous variants’. I am worried that it’s some kind of trick. “As a general rule, variants form very often, routinely, and tend to become less dangerous & more infectious over time, as it comes into equilibrium with its human host. Variants generally don’t become more dangerous. “No variant differs from the original sequence by more than 0.3%. In other words, all variants are at least 99.7% identical to the Wuhan sequence. “It’s a fiction, and an evil one at that, that variants are likely to “escape immunity”. “Not only is it intrinsically unlikely – because this degree of similarity of variants means zero chance that an immune person (whether from natural infection or from vaccination) will be made ill by a variant – but it’s empirically supported by high-quality research. “The research I refer to shows that people recovering from infection or who have been vaccinated ALL have a wide range of immune cells which recognize ALL the variants. “This paper shows WHY the extensive molecular recognition by the immune system makes the tiny changes in variants irrelevant. “I cannot say strongly enough: The stories around variants and need for top up vaccines are FALSE. I am concerned there is a very malign reason behind all this. It is certainly not backed by the best ways to look at immunity. The claims always lack substance when examined, and utilize various tricks, like manipulating conditions for testing the effectiveness of antibodies. Antibodies are probably rather unimportant in host protection against this virus. There have been a few ‘natural experiments’, people who unfortunately cannot make antibodies, yet are able quite successfully to repel this virus. They definitely are better off with antibodies than without. I mention these rare patients because they show that antibodies are not essential to host immunity, so some contrived test in a lab of antibodies and engineered variant viruses do NOT justify need for top up vaccines. “The only people who might remain vulnerable and need prophylaxis or treatment are those who are elderly and/or ill and do not wish to receive a vaccine (as is their right). “The good news is that there are multiple choices available: hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, budesonide (inhaled steroid used in asthmatics), and of course oral Vitamin D, zinc, azithromycin etc. These reduce the severity to such an extent that this virus did not need to become a public health crisis.” INTERVIEWER: Do you feel the FDA does a good job regulating big pharma? In what ways does big pharma get around the regulator? Do you feel they did so for the mRNA injection? DR. YEADON: “Until recently, I had high regard for global medicines regulators. When I was in Pfizer, and later CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco, later acquired by Novartis), we interacted respectfully with FDA, EMA, and the U.K. MHRA. Always good quality interactions. “Recently, I noticed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) had made a grant to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)! Can that ever be appropriate? They’re funded by public money. They should never accept money from a private body. “So here is an example where the U.K. regulator has a conflict of interest. “The European Medicines Agency failed to require certain things as disclosed in the ‘hack’ of their files while reviewing the Pfizer vaccine. “You can find examples on Reiner Fuellmich’s ‘Corona Committee’ online. “So I no longer believe the regulators are capable of protecting us. ‘Approval’ is therefore meaningless. “Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and I petitioned the EMA Dec 1, 2020 on the genetic vaccines. They ignored us. “Recently, we wrote privately to them, warning of blood clots, they ignored us. When we went public with our letter, we were completely censored. Days later, more than ten countries paused use of a vaccine citing blood clots. “I think the big money of pharma plus cash from BMGF creates the environment where saying no just isn’t an option for the regulator. “I must return to the issue of ‘top up vaccines’ (booster shots) and it is this whole narrative which I fear will he exploited and used to gain unparalleled power over us. “PLEASE warn every person not to go near top up vaccines. There is absolutely no need to them. “As there’s no need for them, yet they’re being made in pharma, and regulators have stood aside (no safety testing), I can only deduce they will be used for nefarious purposes. “For example, if someone wished to harm or kill a significant proportion of the world’s population over the next few years, the systems being put in place right now will enable it. “It’s my considered view that it is entirely possible that this will be used for massive-scale depopulation.” Reprinted with permission from America’s Frontline Doctors. LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here. RELATED Former Pfizer VP: ‘No need for vaccines,’ ‘the pandemic is effectively over’ Priest on COVID vaccine: ‘The risks far outweigh the benefits’ At least nine countries pull AstraZeneca’s vaccine over blood clot reports ‘Healthy’ 28-year-old mom dies suddenly following second Pfizer shot Portuguese mother, 41, dies two days after taking Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine 39-year-old nurse aide dies ‘within 48 hours’ of receiving mandated COVID-19 shot ‘Very healthy’ Miami obstetrician, 56, dies 16 days after receiving Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine Johns Hopkins scientist: ‘A medical certainty’ Pfizer vaccine caused death of Florida doctor
  21. "Moussawi warned that "the dollar exchange rate will rise to 160 thousand dinars if the current price is fixed," considering that "the policies followed by the Central Bank are wrong and they are subject to the policies of the International Monetary Fund." There are those three Letters again...... "IMF" I've said it before, All central banks around the world are IMF central banks, save chyna and North Korea. It wouldn't surprise me if we found out they were controlling the show in Iraq. Call me a conspiracy theorist, but they are a loathsome bunch!!!
  22. Not sure if anyone posted this already, but it's worth posting again IMO... https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/a-coming-covid-catastrophe/
  23. Thanks HeyJonesy, I've been sending that video to my family members, unfortunately I have two children in the healthcare industry that have both been vaccinated already. I tried to warn them but they were gaslighted by the lamestream media. I REALLY pray this Doctor is wrong but I really don't think she is... Both of them had rather serious reactions to the Vaccine but appear to be fine now, but according to this Doctor the Spike proteins start to develop at around 6 weeks. The real problems start when the vaccine recipient comes into contact with any of the existing Corona viruses in the environment down the road, exactly what the shot is supposed to protect you from. Needless to say, I won't be getting this vaccine Ever!
  24. Not imo, 7 Billion isn't that much money but it will allow the Iranians to continue to terrorize the region and I doubt the PTB over there will share the wealth with the people. Again, just my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.