divemaster5734

I don't think you understand. Romney is just a light skinned Obama. Maybe a little more conservative, but still a warmongering establishment puppet that will do nothing to actually help Americans. It is obvious you only use left leaning news as your primary input, so I can't expect you to have a realistic grasp of current events. I understand unless a person tries really hard, they can't accept Ron Paul's foreign policy. After all, we have been "taught" America NEEDS to be the global bully in order to "stay on top". That is nothing but BS. Usually, the PCO candidate's run unopposed. I just got notice there are 2 others in addition to me that are running in my district. Keep in mind, a primary district is only a couple square blocks. There are a LOT pf people standing up and making a difference. When you try to use your propaganda to sway opinions you only display how much you really don't comprehend. I choose to believe you are sincere, your posts indicate you are not afraid to post when you know your going to get negs. Why wont you try to wrap your head around the Ron Paul message?

Some brainwashed may try to claim Ron Paul is out of the race. not even close. Before listening to obots, read the truth below. Personally, I will be in Olympia representing RP as a delegate. And the first establishment goon that tries to stop me will understand voter anger first hand. "If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." ~ Samuel Adams Ron Paul is not OUT! He is UP! “We are absolutely not dropping out of this race! We are focusing our efforts squarely on winning delegates and party leadership positions at state conventions.” - Jesse Benton, Campaign Chairman Ron Paul announced today he would not be competing in the upcoming primary states, saying that he would focus, instead, on his delegate strategy. A strategy that is working, by the way, and transforming the Republican Party. It is something he has said many times since the February 11, 2012 caucus in Maine. Only this time, the main stream media gave the announcement full attention and treated it like the end of his campaign. Drudge ran it as a front page headline “Ron Paul is out.” It is all evidence that Alfred Harmsworth’s famous quote that “news is not when a dog bites a man but, rather, when a man bites a dog” has now been offciaily turned on its head. For the last two years the national media has been saying that Ron Paul is out. So how could that possibly be news? One might ask, “When has the mainstream media ever thought that Ron Paul was in?” Bracing for a Ron Paul win in Iowa, major new outlets last January announced that if he won, the Iowa Caucus, itself, would be discredited. According to the New York Times and the Associated Press, Ron Paul is still listed as the recipient of one, count em, one delegate from Iowa, a state that he now dominates. Likewise, the fact that Ron Paul supporters took a big chunk of the delegation of Mitt Romney’s home state of Massachusetts was not big news. This was evidently not a man biting a dog. There were no headlines, just small reports saying we were “flooding” state conventions with delegates. We were sucker punching the front runner. Even this, “we were stealing delegates.” Now, that’s a trick. It was a ridiculous assertion. One cannot “flood” state conventions with delegates. Nor can one “steal” a delegates, unless they mean we packed them away in vans and drove them off to camps behind barbed wired. Each delegate was elected at District or County caucuses by delegates that were elected at precinct caucuses. So yes, one can flood precinct caucuses with people who in turn must get elected but that had to happen last January or February. It was then that we beat Romney in Massachusetts, and all the other states, it was in the heat of battle. Now? We are trying to make nice. Like our attempt to “give” him the delegation from Arizona, an offer his man refused to make. So after three attempts to give him a majority we reluctantly won instead, thank you. The fact is that all of this fighting makes Ron Paul nervous. Yes, he is taking on the establishment. Yes, he wants the monetary policy reformed so that the poor and the middle class and even the excluded rich can know the thrill and opportunity of free markets that aren’t rigged for insider trading. But Dr. Paul is a happy warrior on these issues. He is a person who has always believed in a respectful dialogue and debate. As John Tate says, “That is what he wants his legacy to be.” . Shouting people down is not Ron Paul’s way. Winning a battle of ideals based on principles, in a respectful way, is how he approaches the contest and it is how he wants others to approach the contest, as well. . By ending the primary battles, Ron Paul is signalling to the field that this is the end of hostilities. In primaries you end up tearing each other down. It is millions of dollars spent on negative advertising. In caucuses, as brutal as they may be, you change the Republican Party, you empower the new and challenge the established. . The delegate strategy is working. That is the way we will impact the platform in Tampa. That is the way we will begin the process of change. It is through the caucuses that we are attracting youth, like the twenty-one year old woman recently elected to the national committee from Maine or the Ron Paul Hispanics or the Independents who have never been involved in party politics. . Yes there is pain. . The establishment turned off the air conditioning at the Arizona State GOP Convention last weekend, trying to sweat the Ronulans into leaving. . In Oklahoma they pulled out a ballroom divider to cordon off Ron Paul supporters and shut them out of participation. Later they turned out the lights. Voice votes that were clearly lost were declared won. . In Carson County, Nevada they turned off a microphone when a Hispanic tried to speak, they knew that Hispanics were for Ron Paul. . In Minnesota they told their people not to vote for any delegate under the age of fifty. . In Alaska, they defeated the majority by retaining the committee which “interpreted rules” and later, after taking the delegation, reluctantly gave up the party control to the new majority but transferred all of the money out of the Republican Party accounts. . In Virginia, at a District Convention, they coaxed the Ron Paul delegation outside and then locked the door. The pastor of the church that was hosting the event was, himself, locked outside. . In Missouri they had all the delegates sign up at County Conventions and then had their County Chairman take the rolls outside and lock them in their car trunks so they could block roll call voting and have their chairman declare lost voice votes as won. At another convention delegates were arrested. . Our people have been punched, yelled at, lied to and worked until they can hardly stand. But on they come, fighting for their children, fighting for their future, angry at the corruption of the banks, of Wall Street, of the lobbyists, of the congress, of the White House. The battle for liberty is not over. It has just taken on a new phase. It cannot be stopped by the national media. If that were the case it would never have been born in the first place. . And some will say that it is a lost cause, which I will not concede but it does remind me of Clarence Darrow’s famous line, “Lost causes are the only ones worth fighting for.” . Join the discussion online right now.

only thing you left out was America hating liar, so does that make him a; tyrannical usurping underachieving adolescent America hating Marxist bi-sexual half breed idiot liar?

The Islamic hypocrisy is almost as frustrating as the lies that came from all our presidents for the last 40 years. I agree with your principal, if we do engage in a war then it is no holds barred winner take all let's whoop some butt. That being said, almost every freaking war we have been involved in since WW2 we were set up through lies, deceit, false flag operations, and our "own side" participating in the murder of Americans, only to blame it on someone else in order to incite hatred and rage. If we do have an actual enemy in an actual war, I agree, show no mercy. The only problem with that is the people we have been killing for 100 years have been just as manipulated as us. It's all about divide and conquer. The elites against the commoner. In every country, around the globe.

Dedicated to restoring Constitutional government to the United States of America Home Don't give up, keep reading, and you will understand Joe's Law Submitted by Josf on Wed, 05/09/2012 - 13:51 in The Fight for Liberty Many people may not understand the power struggle being fought as in that link as Ron Paul spearheads defensive action against the offenses perpetrated by the group of people known collectively as The FED. A concept called Joe's Law can help in unraveling the very large web of deceit that covers up the crimes perpetrated by The FED group. Joe's Law goes like this: Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production. That is one sentence, in English, and it is an explanation of Political Economy and it can be used to answer the types of questions tabled in the link where Ron Paul is fighting against Legal Crime. Question (asked in the hearing televised live): 1. Do you think that the FED SHOULD be abolished? If you are at all uncertain as to the right answer to that question, having any doubt whatsoever as to the right answer to that question, then please consider employing Joe's (Political Economy) Law to remove even the slightest shadow of doubt as to the right answer to that question. The FED produces Legal Purchasing Power and therefore the question asked is a question concerning the legal license to produce Legal Purchasing Power. Purchasing Power is Purchasing Power with or without the legal license, Purchasing Power is the Power to Purchase and that is an accurately measurable fact. Rephrasing the question is necessary in the effort to make sense of it in the context of reasonable Political Economy. First listen to the question asked and then listen to a rephrasing of the question so as to make sense of the question in such a way as to allow for a reasonable answer (removing ambiguity): 1a. Do you think that the fed SHOULD be abolished? 1b. Do you think that the single license to produce legal purchasing power should be abolished? The reader may be confused even more after reading the revision of the original question, until, the reader now uses the revision in conjunction with Joe's Law as such: Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while legal purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production. Do you think that there is a difference between regular purchasing power and legal purchasing power, and if you don't think there is a difference between regular purchasing power and legal purchasing power then it may be a good idea to figure out if there is a difference. If there is a Central Bank by any name, such as The FED, then that fact is documented as fact on a legal account of legal purchasing power. Take that Central Bank away, abolish it, and there is no legal purchasing power account, there may still be an account, but not legal. What does the FED PRODUCE? Does the FED produce wisdom? Does the FED produce wealth? Does the FED produce productive employment? Does the FED produce a stable economy? Does the FED produce a dual mandate? Take away all the false window dressing, or pull back the curtain that hides the Wizard of Oz, and what is the accurate, indisputable, answer to the question? What does the FED produce? Counterfeit Money. If it were not counterfeit then The FED would be producing wealth, actual wealth, actual power to purchase, and they would not need an army to enforce the value of it, as their money would be as valuable with, or without, the army backing it up. Instead of a number of buildings filled with people at computers The FED would be a number of buildings filled with people producing powerful things, things of wealth, such as anything, anywhere, where money is needed to get these things that are things known as wealth. The FED does not produce wealth, therefore the things that The FED does produce is something other than wealth, yet the LAW enforces what The FED produces as if what The FED produces is wealth, which is demonstrably not wealth. How can it be demonstrated, beyond a shadow of doubt, that The FED produces counterfeit wealth, counterfeit purchasing power, or counterfeit money? Take away the army that is used to enforce the requirement to use the stuff that The FED produces and see if anyone still uses it. 1b. Do you think that the single license to produce legal purchasing power should be abolished? The answer is demonstrably, unequivocally, matter of factually: yes. It is, in fact, abolishing itself. Why wait? Way wait around for those who insist that it (The FED) is necessary to be shown that they are wrong, or that they may be lying on purpose (criminals), or that they may merely be stupid (duped), why wait for them to be proven to be the fools that they are, why wait for them to be proven to be criminals, and why wait around for those who profit from it (The FED) to use it (The FED) to steal as much as they can before they dump it, jump the sinking ship that they sunk on purpose, for something even more criminal, such as another World Reserve Currency Cabal run out of China, or some other place? Why wait? The reason for waiting concerns the collective power of falsehood shared by the ignorant victims. If all the victims knew better they would stop being victims, they would not wait, and they would suddenly, and irrevocably, choose a more powerful option. Like this: "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." Henry Ford Instead of hearings, and even instead of court cases, the former victims would be inventing, producing, and employing forms of competitive purchasing power rather than being forced by effective deceit, and instead of being forced by effective threats of violence, and instead of being forced by effective violence targeting the competitors, into the use of the one Counterfeit Money Produced by The FED. In the effort to remove even a shadow of doubt as to the right answer to the question... Which question? 1b. Do you think that the single license to produce legal purchasing power should be abolished? In the effort to remove even a shadow of doubt as to the right answer to that question I offer Joe's Law: Power produced into oversupply... Counterfeit power does not actually produce power. The opposite is true, as counterfeit power produces nothing of actual value, so words can be added to remove any remaining shadows of doubt: Productive Power Produced into oversupply reduces the price of power... That means: So much wealth being produced by so many productive people that the limits of abundance of wealth is allowed to happen instead of limits placed on the production of productive power being enforced by criminals who profit by using the power they steal to eliminate all competition (producers of competitive power - actual power). The Legal Criminals must make sure that no one else gains more power they their own small network of sociopaths. That is demonstrable fact, and those facts are actually well recorded in the documents that those criminals produce, in fact, but on a more principled account, the logic, and reason, of Power can remove all doubt about the right answer to the question. Productive Power Produced into oversupply reduces the price of Productive Power... That means: As more and more people are free to compete in the work that does effectively produce more wealth, more things of value, more actual value, more actual productive power, as more and more production is produced, the result of all that "economy" is a reduction in the price of all that "economy", as fewer people have nothing and more people have plenty, the stuff of value goes down in price, as a matter of fact, in reality. Here is the part where Politics enter reality in the form of money: Productive Power Produced into oversupply reduces the price of Productive Power WHILE Purchasing Power INCREASES... If there is Legal money then that same, steady, known, finite, and accurately accounted for supply of that exact amount of money, without increase or decrease in that finite supply of money, gains purchasing power as Productive Power increases to a condition of oversupply and as the price of Productive Power decreases. More power (more wealth) = lower prices of wealth (simple). Lower prices of wealth and the same amount of money to buy that wealth, and each dollar can then buy more wealth, since the price of wealth goes down. Same amount of total money in use, more stuff to buy = more purchasing power per unit of money. Where 1 dollar could only but 1 thing, now there are 2 things, at lower prices, so 1 dollar now buys 2 things. Simple. Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases... Where does politics fit in? If there is no legal money then there are no taxes and no demand to pay taxes, and therefore there is no connection between LAW and MONEY, but the Economic Law (without the political part) still applies. Economic Law remains true with or without LAW. What happens when crime is made legal? People either believe in the lie, are led by such falsehoods, or they know better. But in the real world: Productive Power Produced into oversupply reduces the price of Productive POWER WHILE Purchasing Power INCREASES with, or without anyone, anywhere, enforcing any TAX payments of any kind with any money of any kind. If prices go down the same amount of money buys more, and that is also a fact, but there is one more thing to note: Productive Power Produced into oversupply reduces the price of Productive Power while Purchasing Power increases (deflation) BECAUSE Productive Power reduces the cost of production. Only the frauds and their victims choose to believe in life without cost, sometimes known as a "something for nothing" scheme, or Pyramid Scheme. Buying into such things as "something for nothing", or Pyramid, or Ponzi schemes may be a very good investment for the Legal Criminals because the Legal Criminals reap all the rewards while the victims pay all the costs. There is only one way to reduce the costs of production and that way is to store (by producing more than consumed) Productive Power and the only way to store Productive Power is to make more of it than the amount of it that is consumed during the process of Production. Leaving even the shadow of doubt behind the reader can know better as to the actual answer to the question asked: 1b. Do you think that the single license to produce legal purchasing power should be abolished? Even the benefactors of such a ponzi, something for nothing, pyramid, scheme lose. It is unquestionable, irrefutable, and a natural fact, that everyone loses because the process of using Productive Power in the work of stealing Productive Power is the same process in nature when a parasite feeds upon a host and the parasite reproduces while the host is bled into a state of anemia, unable to reproduce, and the number of parasites increase while the host grows weaker, until the end result is a dead host, and the end result includes many parasites consuming each other, or some parasites finding another host to feed upon. It is a race to the bottom, so why let the Legal Criminals keep score: they cook the books? The only possible winners are the few who know better and the few who have a ready supply of new hosts to consume as these few parasites migrate from country to country each century that goes by while each host is consumed in turn. By whose measure is that called winning? America is almost bled dry, and the parasites on the top of that pyramid scheme are moving to China, when the measuring device is "The Dollar", when that dollar is produced by those Legal Criminals. The parasites on top of that pyramid scheme will dump The Dollar Hegemony on their exclusive schedule, and you won't be getting the memo, and they will be moving their parasitic behinds to China, where they are now very busy booming that new host. America, as a corporation, is being raided, and well documented, in fact, by the Legal Criminals own cooked books - The Dollar (The FED product). America is on the bust cycle and Americans, fellow parasites, and fellow net producers (those honest people who actually do produce more than they consume) alike, those not "leaving it", those "loving it" for its capacity to afford honest production, or for its capacity to connect to those who do produce (and feed off of that capacity) alike, everyone, in America, is on the schedule to lose World War III. Those who fraudulently take power here in America are using their power to wipe us out, maneuver us into a World War that we will lose, because that is how the War Mongers, the War Profiteers, do business, and Americans who still "believe" in the lies will be led into that slaughter as cannon fodder. There is still time to know better. Don't feed the Legal Criminals. End The FED by inventing, producing, and employing productive power, or money, accurate money, in competition with the fraudulent stuff, and they, those parasites, will either consume themselves, find another host somewhere (very bad for the new host for sure) else, or they will be forced to depend upon charity, or they too will learn how to produce real wealth honestly and then they too will join the true Friends of Liberty because then, in our time, crime won't pay so well, it won't be legal anymore. Ever again. Not here, not on our watch. My link

I've heard so much ballyhooing from the left about Ron Paul supporters using an "obscure" procedure to "take over" primaries. I am really sick of the hypocrisy. At least the RP people are staying LEGAL, and not destroying public property, defecating in public, raping fellow protesters, using drugs, or generally talking out the side of their neck. Least we forget, here's some of the outright CHEATING from the left to force their guy down everyone's throat in order to destroy this nation. Here's more; The Left’s National Vote Fraud Strategy Exposed James Simpson — May 8, 2012 This report reveals the Left’s vote fraud strategy for the 2012 elections. Like a KGB operation, it is thorough, multi-faceted and redundant. It has overt and covert, illegal and legal elements, the latter of which are designed, at least in part, to facilitate illegal activities later. It is a deliberate, premeditated, comprehensive plan to win the 2012 presidential election at all costs, and is in keeping with the organizational methods, associations and ethics of the Community-Organizer-in-Chief, Barack Obama. The Left seeks fundamental structural change to our entire form of government. In keeping with their amoral, means-justifies-ends philosophy, they will register any voters, dead or alive, legal or illegal, who will then vote as many times as possible, in order to establish a “permanent progressive majority.” As two New York Democrats recently caught in a vote fraud scandal told police, “voter fraud is an accepted way of winning elections…” Low income individuals are the perfect dupes for this strategy. An expanding welfare state makes them increasingly dependent on government benefits, a development that guarantees their vote for liberal-left candidates. At the same time, people with marginal attachment to society may be less inclined to report illegal activity at the polls—or actually participate. The “victim” narrative promoted in popular culture and press may even encourage such behavior. Meanwhile, a growing tax burden and public debt suck private enterprise dry—pushing ever more people onto the dole. Politicians of both parties are not above engaging in vote fraud. But this kind of corruption is relegated to individual campaigns or areas where corrupt political establishments have been able to develop unchallenged. It is not a systematic component of overall national strategy, as it is with the Left. This strategy has been under development for decades. They have constructed an entire industry devoted to this task and pursue a multifaceted strategy to accomplish it: 1. Swamp election officials with overwhelming numbers of registrations at the last possible minute, a huge proportion of which are deliberately fraudulent, in order to create systematic chaos. This accomplishes numerous goals: Makes verification of registrations difficult, given the small size and limited budgets of state and local election offices. Provides multiple opportunities for vote fraud. Throws the entire voting process into question, providing pretext for lawsuits where concessions may be obtained from election officials. When election officials challenge registrations, they are accused of “voter suppression.” This in turn serves complementary goals: Charge of “voter suppression” reinforces the Left’s narrative about America as an oppressive, “racist” country. Publicity and lawsuits intimidate election officials, who settle on terms favorable to the Left. 2. Activists sue state authorities for “voter suppression,” creating further chaos and pressuring them to become de facto taxpayer-funded voter registration operations; 3. Eric Holder’s Justice Department tacitly supports voter intimidation tactics, sues states and backs private lawsuits, and resists reform as “voter suppression.” 4. Leftist echo chamber discredits allegations of vote fraud, supports “suppression” theme, and promotes advantageous legislation. The ultimate goal is a systematized, taxpayer-funded voting machinery that will guarantee maximum participation from the Left’s voting demographic while undermining the ability to manage elections and prevent fraud. The ACORN Swamping Method Key to understanding the Left’s vote-fraud strategy is the community organizing group ACORN. ACORN has become synonymous with corruption, complicity in the subprime mortgage crisis and especially vote fraud. ACORN and its voter registration arm, Project Vote, hire marginal and unskilled workers at very low rates and use incentive bonuses or quotas to encourage them to collect as many voter registrations as possible. The resulting flood of registrations are fraught with duplicates, errors and omissions, and a large number are overtly fraudulent, including names like “Donald Duck,” “Mickey Mouse,” “Tony Romo” of the Dallas Cowboys, etc.[2] According to Matthew Vadum, the senior editor at Capital Research Center, a total of 400,000 bogus ACORN registrations were thrown out in 2008 alone. ACORN was supposedly disbanded in 2010 but resurrected itself under a slew of new names. Former ACORN President Bertha Lewis bragged that they created “…18 bulletproof community-organizing Frankensteins…” These are reproduced in the table below. Most of these groups occupy former ACORN offices, many with the same staff. ACORN is directly connected to Obama and the Democratic Party. Counsel to The Advance Group, a strategic planning company, is Michael Gaspard, Patrick Gaspard’s brother. Patrick is currently the DNC’s executive director and President Obama’s former political director. He has worked for ACORN, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and the Working Families Party, a descendant of the ACORN-founded New Party which Barack Obama joined in 1996. Obama has bragged of “fighting alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career.” ACORN’s former deputy regional director, Amy Busefink was convicted in 2010 of vote fraud stemming from a 2008 Nevada case. Judicial Watch found that, “while under criminal indictment in Nevada… [busefink] managed an online program for Project Vote’s 2010 Colorado campaign, the ultimate goal of which is to allow people without a driver’s license or state identification to register to vote online.” Busefink is now national field director for Project Vote. My link

Excellent video. The left/right politics were only designed to divide. The "celebrate diversity" was created to perpetuate racism. Judging a person's standing by their credit rating is idiotic when you realize our money is fake anyway. If you were not born into one of the "elites" family's, then you are the same as me. There is only one race on this planet, the Human Race. Everything else is an illusion intended to enslave and distract.

There are some on this forum that still worship obummer, and defend his every malicious move against America. There are some that would argue we are being too "closed minded" in our posture towards these avowed America haters. "Let those with eyes see, Let those with ears hear". I really feel like finishing with "and let the rest go to He**, but some might be offended, so I won't. Thanks for the post.

Truth? You obviously don't have a clue about truth. The primaries are far from over, yet you post this last ditch effort by the establishment to meekly attempt to sway voters that may be voting TODAY. How can "it be over' if the voting and counting isn't over? guess what IT ISN'T OVER YET!!!! Don't even try to ride some stinking high horse by trying to put words in my mouth. I have NEVER said to make RP a write in. If you EVER listened to him, he has said he didn't think a 3rd ticket is the answer. The people have not FINISHED voting, and all the votes are not counted. This is the same BS that you were shilling about last month, declaring RP only had 2% of Iowa, and look at it now, he has 50% or more, and may have actually WON Iowa. But that didn't stop you from running your mouth for a month and spreading lies. If he doesn't fine, I will vote for anybody but obummer, but people like you need to step back from the propaganda wagon and quit making stuff up just to try to influence people. All you are doing is telling people you don't care about honesty or integrity as long as you can try to force you opinion on others. "look at it in a certain point of view"? really? What obamabot rag did that come from?

Really TP? In the end, you are nothing but an agitator, aren't you? You carried on "discussions", even acted like you accepted when you were completely wrong. Yet, here you are, slinging mud and the primaries are not even started in some states, it's not yet 8am on the west coast.

GMO alert: top 10 genetically modified foods to avoid eating (NaturalNews) There is a conspiracy of selling out happening in America. Politics and personal interest it would seem determine government policies over and above health and safety issues. When President Obama appointed Michael Taylor in 2009 as senior adviser for the FDA, a fierce protest ensued from consumer groups and environmentalists. Why? Taylor used to be vice president for Monsanto, a multinational interested in marketing genetically modified (GM) food. It was during his term that GMO's were approved in the US without undergoing tests to determine if they were safe for human consumption. The danger of GMO's The question of whether or not genetically modified foods (GMO's) are safe for human consumption is an ongoing debate that does not seem to see any resolution except in the arena of public opinion. Due to lack of labeling, Americans are still left at a loss as to whether or not what is on the table is genetically modified. This lack of information makes the avoiding and tracking of GM foods an exercise in futility. Below are just some of the food products popularly identified to be genetically modified: 1. Corn - Corn has been modified to create its own insecticide. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has declared that tons of genetically modified corn has been introduced for human consumption. Monsanto has revealed that half of the US's sweet corn farms are planted with genetically modified seed. Mice fed with GM corn were discovered to have smaller offspring and fertility problems. 2. Soy - Soy has also been genetically modified to resist herbicides. Soy products include soy flour, tofu, soy beverages, soybean oil and other products that may include pastries, baked products and edible oil. Hamsters fed with GM soy were unable to have offspring and suffered a high mortality rate. 3. Cotton - Like corn and soy, cotton has been designed to resist pesticides. It is considered food because its oil can be consumed. Its introduction in Chinese agriculture has produced a chemical that kills cotton bollworm, reducing the incidences of pests not only in cotton crops but also in neighboring fields of soybeans and corn. Incidentally, thousands of Indian farmers suffered severe rashes upon exposure to BT cotton. 4. Papaya - The virus-resistant variety of papaya was commercially introduced in Hawaii in 1999. Transgenic papayas comprised three-fourths of the total Hawaiian papaya crop. Monsanto bestowed upon Tamil Nadu Agricultural University in Coimbatore technology for developing papaya resistant to the ringspot virus in India. 5. Rice - This staple food from South East Asia has now been genetically modified to contain a high amount of vitamin A. Allegedly, there are reports of rice varieties containing human genes to be grown in the US. The rice will create human proteins useful for dealing with infant diarrhea in the 3rd world. China Daily, an online journal, reported potential serious public health and environment problems with genetically modified rice considering its tendency to cause allergic reactions with the concurrent possibility of gene transfers. 6. Tomatoes - Tomatoes have now been genetically engineered for longer shelf life, preventing them from easily rotting and degrading. In a test conducted to determine the safety of GM tomatoes, some animal subjects died within a few weeks after consuming GM tomatoes. 7. Rapeseed - In Canada, this crop was renamed canola to differentiate it from non-edible rapeseed. Food stuff produced from rapeseed includes rapeseed oi (canola oil) l used to process cooking oil and margarine. Honey can also be produced from GM rapeseed. German food surveillance authorities discovered as much as a third of the total pollen present in Canadian honey may be from GM pollen. In fact, some honey products from Canada were also discovered to have pollen from GM rapeseed. 8. Dairy products - It has been discovered that 22 percent of cows in the U.S. were injected with recombinant (genetically modified) bovine growth hormone (rbGH). This Monsanto created hormone artificially forces cows to increase their milk production by 15 percent. Milk from cows treated with this milk inducing hormone contains increased levels of IGF-1 (insulin growth factors-1). Humans also have IGF-1 in their system. Scientists have expressed concerns that increased levels of IGF-1 in humans have been associated with colon and breast cancer. 9. Potatoes - Mice fed with potatoes engineered with Bacillus thuringiensis var. Kurstaki Cry 1 were found to have toxins in their system. Despite claims to the contrary, this shows that Cry1 toxin was stable in the mouse gut. When the health risks were revealed, it sparked a debate. 10. Peas - Peas that have been genetically modified have been found to cause immune responses in mice and possibly even in humans. A gene from kidney beans was inserted into the peas creating a protein that functions as a pesticide. The GMO link to strange disease As early as 2008, NaturalNews.com reported about a condition called Morgellon's disease. The article went on to report the symptoms of the disease as follows: crawling, stinging, biting and crawling sensations; threads or black speck-like materials on or beneath the skin; granules, lesions. Some patients report fatigue, short term memory loss, mental confusion, joint pain and changes in vision. Furthermore, there have been reports of substantial morbidity and social dysfunction leading to a dip in work productivity, job loss, total disability, divorce, loss of child custody and home abandonment. Prior to its reporting, the condition was dismissed as a hoax, but upon further investigation, the evidence pointed out that the disease was real and may be related to genetically modified food. Despite this link being established, the CDC declared Morgellon's disease of unknown origin. Worse, the medical community could not offer any information to the public regarding a cause for the symptoms. When a research study was conducted on fiber samples taken from Morgellons patients, it was discovered that the fiber samples of all the patients looked remarkable similar. And yet, it did not seem to match any common environmental fiber. When the fiber was broken down, and it's DNA extracted, it was discovered to belong to a fungus. Even more surprising was the finding that the fibers contained Agrobacterium, a genus gram-negative bacteria with the capacity of transforming plant, animal and even human cells. Morgellon's disease is not the only condition associated with genetically modified foods. A growing body of evidence has shown that it may cause allergies, immune reactions, liver problems, sterility and even death. Moreover, based on the only human feeding experiment conducted on genetically modified food, it was established that genetic material in genetically modified food product can transfer into the DNA of intestinal bacteria and still continue to thrive. Heeding the warning Time and again, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) has warned that GMOs pose a serious threat to health, and it is no accident that there can be a correlation between it and adverse health effects. In fact, the AAEM has advised doctors to tell their patients to avoid GMOs as the introduction of GMOs into the current food supply has correlated with an alarming rise in chronic diseases and food allergies. This should come as no surprise. More than 30 years ago a food supplement called L-trytophan killed 100 people and affected 5,000 to 10,000 more. The cause was narrowed down to the genetic engineering process used in its production. If the symptoms had not had three simultaneous characteristics - namely, they were unique, acute and fast-acting - the disease could never have been identified. If science could assure us with certainty that serious consequences do not wait for us at the end of the line, it might be to our best interest to let this opportunity pass. Progressive thinking in terms of profit is certainly not wrong. But to brush off precaution on the convenient argument that there is not enough evidence to prove that GM food is indeed harmful is sheer irresponsibility. It certainly is a lame excuse to offer in the event that GM foods are indeed proven to contain health hazards. Sources for this article: http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_11361.cfm http://www.naturalnews.com/027226_food_GMO_foods.html http://www.naturalnews.com/023004.html http://www.sustainabletable.org/issues/rbgh/ http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-02/04/content_9430645.htm http://www.actionbioscience.org/biotech/pusztai.html http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/database/food/238.honey.html My link

What a hard fought battle this is. The crazy thing is we are fighting for each other, but so many just don't understand. Every time I see another person speak up in favor of freedom it makes me just want to shout OH YEAH!!! The Ron Paul campaign is nothing short of a David vs Goliath thing.

I understand the frustration of trying to debate with an agitator. There are some that are so "establishment indoctrinated" that they just don't get it. It's like the fussing 1 year old that refuses to go to sleep but is so tired they are completely miserable. Nothing is as aggravating as someone that just twists your words to a whole different conclusion and refuses to acknowledge any points for abject fear of being wrong. If you don't ever get into a conflict, your just not communicating. Welcome Back.

uh, excuse me again, here's some "unfortunate" facts; Support for Ron Paul from the Left: The following is a Democrat / Liberal viewpoint on why it is important for everyone, regardless of party affiliation, to support Ron Paul in his bid to win the Republican party nomination. My link an excerpt "It is purely self interest for Democrats to support and encourage those within the Republican party who are real, Constitution-respecting, small government conservatives to retake their party. The fascist wing of the GOP doesn't see the Democratic party, or any opposition, as legitimate; real conservatives do. We are in the fight of our lives against those who would make opposition to their designs to radically alter our society a crime and use the powers of government to destroy their enemies. Our natural allies in that fight are not just other liberals (we are weakened if we limit our alliances such) but those in the other party who are just as disturbed by the past 6 years as we." Another articel Ron Paul Debate Flushes Out Gender-Baiting Right Wing Opportunists Masquerading as Progressives My link It should not be controversial to point out that the Democratic party uses identity politics as a cover for its policy of selling out the middle class to banks and big corporate interests, just on a slower and stealthier basis than the right. And we’ve seen the identity card used in a remarkably dishonest manner in this Ron Paul contretemps. The strategy used is shameless straw manning in combination with gender baiting. Both Katha Pollitt (in “Progressive Man Crushes on Ron Paul“) and Megan Carpentier (“Ron Paul’s useful idiots on the left“) grossly misrepresent Glenn Greenwald’s posts on Paul, in which he says repeatedly that he is talking about broad policy issues, and not standing behind any candidate: I’m about to discuss the candidacies of Barack Obama and Ron Paul, and no matter how many times I say that I am not “endorsing” or expressing support for anyone’s candidacy, the simple-minded Manicheans and the lying partisan enforcers will claim the opposite…”There are, as I indicated, all sorts of legitimate reasons for progressives to oppose Ron Paul’s candidacy on the whole. What does this become in Pollitt’s piece? She depicts Greenwald as being on a par with Ron Paul enthusiasts like Andrew Cockburn: Salon’s Glenn Greenwald is so outraged that progressives haven’t abandoned the warmongering, drone-sending, indefinite-detention-supporting Obama for Paul that he accuses them of supporting the murder of Muslim children…And yes, these are all white men; if there are leftish white women and people of color who admire Paul, they’re keeping pretty quiet. I could go on but what's the point. The only thing remaining is for the polar dividers to compel people to vote for the establishment candidates through fear and intimidation. They will try to force some into voting for no one other than a black man, or to vote for someone else for no other reason than the insecurity of not having troops around the world tn order to be the global bully. Their "arguments" are falling apart as quickly as the obummer facade did.

My link You have missed the point TP. The inconclusive results so far has RP winning it. There was so much fraud in the GOP reporting that there is now a tally for each states voters to register their votes after the respective caucus and primaries. Because of this the GOP has no choice but to try and rig the RNC by refusing to allow any delegates that do not support their puppet. Can you see what this means? The Ron Paul campaign has begun to instil real hope in real people. As a matter of fact we CAN make a difference. We CAN force the government to represent The People instead of oppressing us. We CAN refuse to be forced to capitulate to unethical corporatism through corrupt self-serving politicians. I think you are ready too, aren't you? after 8 years of Bush it was obvious the old GOP style was not going to work. Now after only 3 years of liberal progressiveness it is obvious that is not the way either. Time for a "new" thing. Time to go back to the founding principals. That ALL humans are created EQUAL. That each Human has RIGHTS, evidenced through life. Not privileges bestowed by a benevolent government.

Weird article. While it ends in a seemingly fair note, some of the "conclusions" are arrogant, "facts" are distorted, and the tone is contemptuous. What needs to be seen is neither "side" can afford to continue to ignore Ron Paul. All they can to so try to hijack whatever parts of his message happen to more or less follow their agenda. If the only two paths are the OWS gang and RP supporters, does that mean you either join druggies, rapists, haters, and other assorted progressives, or you can follow the hard working freedom loving individuals that respect each human as having equal standing and the exact same rights as you? hmmm, yeah, that "reporter summed it up well. Allow the progressives to continue to victimize the working people of the USA and demand a free ride through life, or make a stand for yourself, your country, and your children's future. Ron Paul 2012

Excellent article. It should be clear to all who can think for themselves. The strategy is obvious, divide and conquer.

OMG, that's the craziest song I have ever heard. I can't imagine what the person was on when they wrote that. It had to be a mix of some VERY powerful psychoactive drugs with a few street things thrown in. How do people even make that stuff up?

Whats this? no links... again... several states have not been officially counted, you can't post a prediction... show the link or it's bs here's mine Ron Paul supporters surged to victory in Sunday’s Minnesota and Iowa district conventions. A number of Romney Hawks are now deeply concerned that Paul has already laid the groundwork for success in six more caucus states. Yesterday’s results for Ron Paul will only increase the influence of Hawks inside the Mitt Romney camp. Dominating the process, Paul picked up more delegates to the Republican National Convention. Romney advisers are concerned that the rising total of Ron Paul delegates will lead to an unmanageable RNC. Some observers felt that the 1992 convention hurt an incumbent president George H. W. Bush and was a factor in his loss to Bill Clinton. In most states, victories at the district conventions decide who will move onto the state conventions, where most of the delegates to the Republican National Convention in Tampa will be selected. The rules in Minnesota are slightly different, and some of those final delegates were actually selected at scattered district conventions on Sunday. Reports from Minnesota show that Ron Paul now has 20 out of the 24 delegates already chosen to represent the state at the Republican National Convention in Tampa, and the campaign is poised to do just as well at the upcoming state convention, May 18-19, when the final 13 will be chosen. In Iowa, Jennifer Jacobs, a reporter for the Des Moines Resister, broke into open what had been a little secret, namely, the takeover of the GOP in Iowa. “A rising tide of Republicans who share Ron Paul’s philosophy of limited government are flooding into GOP party roles in Iowa,” Jennifer wrote, reporting on the Iowa district conventions. Actually, it is a phenomenon seen all across the country. It is viewed by many political observers as the biggest transformation of the Republican Party since 1988, when evangelical Christians joined the process and dominated state positions for a whole generation. While the Iowa Ron Paul campaign is keeping its cards close to the vest, we all got a sneak peak from the Des Moines Register story, which reported that six of the new Iowa GOP state central committee members elected Saturday have publicly expressed support for Ron Paul. Joes Kurtinitis, Kris Thiessen, Dave Cushman, Jeff Shipley, John Kabitzke and Marcus Fedler. “Two more,” Jennifer Jacobs reports, “have close ties.” The new state chairman is also a Ron Paul supporter, who served as a co-chairman for the congressman’s Iowa state organization. The Iowa state GOP convention is set for June 16, 2012. Meanwhile, the sleepy New York Times has posted for five months and still posts, even today, that the total delegate count for Ron Paul in Iowa is one. They say that the total delegate count for Ron Paul in Minnesota is nine. In fact, Ron Paul supporters will now dominate both state conventions. And the same trend is ongoing in states across the country. My link

uh, you need to recheck your statement. it is official, Ron Paul won Iowa and Nevada, with more final tally's to come, the medias deceptive remakes are now coming back to bit them in their lying asses.

Even though Ron Paul won over 50% of the Nevada vote, the corporatist s that control the RINO GOP are going to try to pull off a farce convention by ignoring the voice of the people. When I started talking to people about RP I got laughed at 4 out of 5 times. Now, no one is laughing except the morons at each end of the polar fringe. Now that more people have realized they will not be scorned for supporting the only candidate that has been telling the truth, we have seen a landslide of grassroots support. The GOP knows this, and are now attempting to "fix" the convention in order to get their puppet Romney the nomination. Even some left wing politicos are starting to support RP. The Republican National Committee has sent a stern letter to the Nevada Republican Party warning the state not to draw too heavily from supporters of Texas Congressman Ron Paul ® for its delegates, reports DC insider blog “The Hill.” If the delegation fails to feature the 20 out of 28 supporters it needs for former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney ®, the national committee has warned that it will refuse to seat them at the Republican National Convention this summer. Rachel Maddow has reported that at this juncture, no delegates have been awarded to any of the candidates from Michigan, Iowa and other states including Nevada. Paul and his supporters have been using their own strategy, including some of the more obscure rules of delegate selection, to pack state committees with their own delegates. Paul enjoys strong support in Nevada. National officials are becoming worried that the congressman’s popularity could throw a wrench into the works of an otherwise smooth nomination process for Romney. RNC chief counsel John R. Phillippe Jr. wrote to Nevada GOP chair Michael McDonald, “I believe it is highly likely that any committee with jurisdiction over the matter would find improper any change to the election, selection, allocation, or binding of delegates, thus jeopardizing the seating of Nevada’s entire delegation to the National Convention.” Typically, delegate distribution is meant to reflect the state’s caucus vote, which took place on February 4, with Romney winning more than 50 percent of the votes cast. National Republicans are concerned that Paul-friendly delegates will use their power in Nevada to game the state convention in Sparks, Nevada this weekend, thus opening the possibility that they will send a delegation to Tampa this summer that will flout party rules and support their candidate over the party’s nominee. Las Vegas Sun columnist Jon Ralston wrote that Nevada’s GOP chair McDonald is “close to some of the Paul folks. He adds that he doesn’t think Paul’s supporters “respect authority too much,” which creates the distinct possibility of havoc this weekend, a prospect that Ralston finds “too delicious.” Paul himself expressed optimism in an interview with Bloomberg TV on Monday. “Just look at this last week,” he said, “The news is very favorable to us. We could even end up winning Iowa, ironically enough. In Minnesota, we’re doing well, and Maine, Nevada and Missouri. We’re doing very, very well. Some of the states we could very well win or come up very much because the delegate process is completely different than these straw votes. We’re pleased … It’s another month or so until they count all the delegates and we find out where we stand.” Initial vote counts said that Mitt Romney won the Iowa caucus, which was one of the earliest primary votes, held on January 3. Recounts have since then shown that the majority of votes in the state were actually won by Paul. This just proves the media's collaboration to try to suppress RP. My link

Top Ten Country Western Songs 10. I Hate Every Bone In Her Body But Mine 9. I Ain't Never Gone To Bed With an Ugly Woman But I've Woke Up With a Few 8. If The Phone Don't Ring, You'll Know It's Me 7. I've Missed You, But My Aim's Improvin' 6. Wouldn't Take Her To A Dogfight 'Cause I'm Scared She'd Win 5. I'm So Miserable Without You It's Like You're Still Here 4. My Wife Ran Off With My Best Friend And I Miss Him 3. She Took My Ring and Gave Me the Finger 2. She Gets Better Lookin' with Every Beer And the Number One Country & Western song is... 1. It's Hard To Kiss The Lips At Night That Chewed My Ass All Day

I can accept that. There are some of us that have been trying for a very long time to call attention to the bias and expose the lies of the establishment. After so many years a lot of us have become extremely biased ourselves, while we see that as patriotic, I realize that those immersed in actively perpetuating establishment government may also feel the same way, while others are oblivious, and only follow orders because that's all they are capable of, but that's for another topic I will endeavor to devise subject lines that have a bit more neutrality, perhaps that alone will induce more people to read the content. I would submit to you that every single Ron Paul stance is based on one single feature-- Individual Liberty. What? Pull troops out of foreign countries? Oh nooo, what about all those "bad guys" that want to hurt us? We HAVE managed to make some real enemies in the last 70 years of unconstitutionally meddling with other countries, illegally infiltrating societies we decided we "didn't like", and influencing their politics by either terrorist attacks blamed on certain factions, or by offering seemingly "free" money, only to "sink the hook" and cause third world economies to collapse, thereby enslaving the "ruling class", and forcing them to allow us to exploit their natural resources. So because the USA was the aggressor that caused the controversy, does that mean we are now forced to maintain that aggressive stance for fear of what might happen? It is time to leave other countries be. Guard our OWN borders, concentrate on being a true EXAMPLE of Individual Freedom. One of the biggest lies perpetuated by our own government is all the "boogeymen" out there ready to hurt us. So far, the governments main job has been to protect ITSELF from us, by whatever means necessary. Once you can wrap your head around those points you will begin to see the unwavering focus of Ron Paul.

hmmm, not sure why you are defending the media shab. The only time they tell the truth is when it aligns with their agenda. All you need to do is look at other posts from today to see how the media is intentionally not reporting certain crimes while gleefully exaggerating others,( remember the travon story), and that's only this week. If the media had been fair in their coverage of obummer he would have never made it. I find it hard to believe some still accept the networks as having any type of integrity. In almost every single article you read on any of the sites you can see the bias. It is blatant. I'm going to stand my ground on this one. It is Lame Stream, no doubt about it.

This is the result of "celebrating diversity" taught in school. All they are taught is racism. Abolish the DOE