Tyranosauruss

Understand you're just "passing along" but do you know how old the post was ? Is "next week" THIS coming week ?or "NEXT" week?"

I've have already replied with contest answer but further thought and 'solution". If the Motel owner had told the guy if he took the room, he'd "throw in" a "bedmate" for the night for an EXTRA $100, allowed the prostitute to "work" off her debt in trade and kept the $200 from the Traveler...you'd have happy campers all the way around ! ESPECIALLY the "pig" farmer !! Ain't capitalism great?

The Flaw: When the motel owner gives the money back to the original party...he in effect has not 'retired' the prostitutes debt because he is still "out" for cost/profit for the room to the prostitute...no sale was made to the "new customer" as he didn't like the conditions of the rooms, so he took his money back, and the Motel owner did not "keep" (bank or use) the hundred so no debt was erased.. The basic flaw here is he's still a hundred short...I'm not much of a math or accounting guy, but I think this is correct...Tyrannosauruss

I'm sorry...I'm very new here...what does this mean or indicate, exactly?

Good thinking ! A former President (rumor has it) beat you to it. I have heard it said...quite a bit in the last few years since I first bought dinar, that GHW Bush financed Desert Shield and Storm this way (with Kuwaiti dinar rv (one of the reasons that war effort didn't contribute to our Nat Debt for long)...and that W vested heavily both personally, and on behalf of US in the IQD....to the tune of about 5B....whether it is so or not...who knows? But it sure makes me feel better speculating about it. Also...you better believe if we are on the right side of this (which I pray we are !) that there will be a ton of Government "chest thumping" after the RV about how "smart" they were. C'mon RV !! "Mama needs a new pair of pants...and shoes...and house (lost mine)....a car (lost that , too) would be nice.... a savings plan...etc..etc."