Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

robear's Achievements


Newbie (1/14)



  1. I just read another post about the govt trying to impose a gag order on us after cash in. I would think that the "real" reason behind all of this is that the PTB have empowered themselves and their friends to a much more significant return per dinar cashed in. Obviously, they wouldn't want everyone knowing about this. What else could all of this fuss be about. Think about it. What is the big secret about a currency exchange being made by anyone who has invested in Iraq over the past decade. We have actually supported the Iraqi govt. So: what is the big deal? Maybe they are afraid of what we would find out. Just my thoughts.
  2. I was wondering: if we only have 30 days to cash in here in the US. Would there be a longer period of time in Canada, Carribean or maybe in Mexico or any other country outside of the USA?
  3. The post I made the other day regarding school indoctrination of our children into the Muslim way religion was way out there. NOW, this is the same thing but indoctrinating very young children into sex. I may be old fashioned , but: introducing very young children to sexual activity and planned parenthood. GOVT MONEY MONEY MONEY Wonder why so many teenage pregnancies? I guess this explains it ‘Hooking Kids on Sex’: Graphic New Vid Report Shows How Planned Parenthood Is Creating ‘Future Customers’ Posted on February 14, 2012 at 12:34pm by Jonathon M. Seidl On the heels of the fracas that resulted from the Susan G. Komen Foundation pulling Planned Parenthood funding, and then reinstating it, comes a new report that might make the breast cancer research giant a little uncomfortable. The American Life League has released a graphic new video report that it says shows how Planned Parenthood “exposes children to sexual material in order to seed a generation of sex addicts, who will become future customers for the abortion giant.” “If you aren’t convinced by now that there are some truly sick pups behind Planned Parenthood, this video from the American Life League should erase any lingering doubts,” the Right Scoop says. “In the name of ‘education,’ Planned Parenthood exposes children as young as 10 years old to pornographic illustrations of masturbation, nudity, sexual activity, and much much more.” “Any parent that sees the video of Planned Parenthood’s material for school children will be horrified,” Jim Sedlak, vice president of the American Life League, told Life Site News. “Planned Parenthood’s business model is aimed at making money from people who are engaged in sexual activity. Those are the women who will have abortions, which made up 51% of Planned Parenthood’s clinic revenue in 2010.” What’s he talking about? Here’s an explanation: In one section the video, “Hooking Kids on Sex,” talks about a book for 10-year-olds with graphic images about how to masturbate, put on a condom and have sexual intercourse. [...] The video also discusses Planned Parenthood of the Upper Hudson’s S.T.A.R.S (Seriously Talking About Responsible Sex), which required applicants to the program to be high school students and go to the sexually explicit Capital Pride. The video begins with graphic images showing how Planned Parenthood regularly uses props shaped as male and female genitals — including suckers — in their pitches. You can watch the video blow. But warning, there is some graphic content:*E18KioXdLTfMp6YHns7WsN0gzQmJ4uMdoinDs9aP6F1P4uT34OlDzQiSJ6/plannedparenthood2.jpg -------- WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS? Tags: Anti-American, Anti-Family, Culture, Customers, Future, Hooking, Kids, Parenthood, Planned, Report, More…
  4. Reprint This is not some "whacked out conspiracy theory". This is what has happened time after time in HISTORY !! HISTORY DOES INDEED REPEAT ITSELF READ YOUR HISTORY HITLER & THE NAZIs REVISITED !!!!! Obama stops soldier from speaking Something you'll want to be aware of: Obama stops soldier from speaking ..Sent by Retired Vice Admiral Bob Scarborough, of Arlington , Va. "I wanted to give you all some disturbing information on our wonderful president. I work with the Catch-A-Dream Foundation, which provides hunting and fishing trips to children with life-threatening illnesses. This past weekend we had our annual banquet/fundraiser event in Starkville . As a part of our program, we had scheduled Sgt. 1st Class Greg Stube to come; he's a highly decorated U.S. Army Green Beret and inspirational speaker who was severely injured while deployed overseas and didn't have much of a chance for survival. Greg is stationed at Ft. Bragg , NC and received permission from his commanding officer to come speak at our function. Everything was on go until Obama made a policy that NO U.S. SERVICEMAN CAN SPEAK AT ANY FAITH-BASED PUBLIC EVENTS ANYMORE. Needless to say, Greg had to cancel his speaking event with us. Didn't know if anyone else was aware of this new policy. You're just starting to see the Obamanation. This is just how the Nazis did it in the 1930s -- slowly, one step at a time. This should be forwarded to everyone regardless of party affiliation! We have lost 50% of our freedom of speech in the last 2 years. The news media is not allowed to print anything negative about this evil Obama. ARE YOU STILL GOING TO REELECT HIM??????????? -- Robert D. Sinacola COL (Ret), AVN, USAR Thanks To ALL Who Served And Are Serving.. Please Pray For Our Troops And Leaders. God Bless America ... Land That I love
  5. Every American citizen should listen to this. One of the major problems with the US of A. This is a real shock, especially if you have school age children I am sending this to each of you because it is a must see, let me know if you agree. Now here is a woman that tells the truth in unvarnished English, not one person can misunderstand her message. It is powerful and she should be on every news program speaking loud and clear to Obama and all his henchmen and women. Well worth your time to hear these words. This is a 15 minute video and, yes, it takes some time to view, but it is a MUST view! (The organization sponsoring this is MUST READ -Will Leave You Breathless,this will open your eyes & ears.......... Please watch and listen. Very frightening, infuriating, and informative. Click here: TaboolaArticle
  6. Obviously, Mitt Romney needs to be vetted. We CAN"T have this happen to the USA again. One UN-American was enough. If the link doesn't open, copy and paste into google. This is a link to the full story. Home
  7. OBAMA-IN-WONDERLAND ECONOMICS Print E-mail Written by Richard Rahn Wednesday, 01 February 2012 President Obama keeps demanding that the rich pay more because ‘it is only fair.' In his State of Union address, he said millionaires should pay a minimum of 30 percent of their income in taxes. The 30 percent number seems to have come from divine inspiration rather than an exercise in logic. In fact, the very rich pay far more in taxes than the relatively low nominal numbers they report on their tax returns. Many very wealthy people obtain most of their income from dividends, capital gains and interest on tax-free state and municipal bonds. The actual tax rate Mitt Romney, Warren Buffet and most other wealthy people pay on dividends, when correctly calculated, is about 52 percent, as reported by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which includes the federal and state corporate-level-profits tax burden, plus federal and state taxes on dividends. My Cato colleague, Chris Edwards, who prepared the accompanying chart, notes: ‘Just about every industrial country provides relief for the double taxation of corporate equity, either by having a lower personal rate on dividends, a personal tax credit for dividends or a lower corporate-level tax. Despite the 2003 dividend tax cut, the overall U.S. rate of dividends ‘ is still the fourth-highest among the 34 high-income nations of the OECD.' Mr. Obama seems to think it is ‘fair' to tax the same income multiple times, at a total effective rate of more than 50 percent. rahn_013112.png Capital gains are taxed at 15 percent but will be subject to a higher rate as a result of revenue provisions in Obamacare. Now the president seems to be proposing that the rate be doubled to 30 percent, given his comments in his State of the Union address. Over the past half-century, the United States has raised and lowered the capital-gains tax rate many times. When rates went up, revenues went down and vice versa, because for the most part, people can choose when to take their capital gains or losses. Virtually all independent economic studies and even a U.S. Treasury study show that a capital-gains tax-rate increase will almost certainly be a big revenue loser and job killer and will depress economic growth. When Mr. Obama was asked about this during his first presidential campaign, he acknowledged that a capital-gains tax increase might lose revenue, but he wanted it anyway because of ‘fairness.' So, according to the president, it is ‘fair' that everyone has to pay higher taxes or have fewer government services in order to make sure that high-income earners pay an increased rate of tax for risking their capital and creating jobs. This is perhaps the best description of ‘Alice in Wonderland' economics. As with dividends and capital gains, interest is also subject to multiple levels of taxation, and so the nominal tax rate on it is far lower than the properly measured real rate. Many wealthy people buy state and local government bonds, which are tax free but normally have a lower rate of interest. The reason state and local governments are allowed to issue tax-free bonds is to enable them to have access to low-rate capital for building schools, roads, bridges, etc. To force high-income people to pay higher tax rates, this ‘tax preference' would need to be abolished, resulting in much higher interest-rate costs for state and local governments, which, in turn, would mean fewer new schools and highway improvements. I expect that many in the president's political base who want more schools would not view this required tax change as being ‘fair.' The federal government admits that hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars are wasted through fraud and mismanagement. Medicare fraud alone costs tens of billions of dollars each year. Nevertheless, somehow the president thinks it is more ‘fair' to enact job-destroying tax increases rather than insisting that officials in his own administration clean up the fraud and waste or lose their jobs, as would happen in any private company. Much of the president's mental confusion about what is ‘fair' seems to stem from viewing people as ‘classes' rather than individuals. The American Constitution is all about protecting individual (not class) liberties and rights. If you think the ‘rich should pay more,' then you are thinking in class terms. Assume for the moment there are two individuals, each 45 years old with the same IQ, who went to the same college and dental school and are equally skilled dentists in private practice. However, one is married with four children in expensive colleges, and thus chooses to work 60 hours per week. The other dentist has no children and chooses to work just 30 hours per week and thus makes half as much. The president thinks it is ‘fair' to tax the industrious dentist at a higher tax rate. (Note: the bottom 50 percent of taxpayers pay just 2.3 percent of federal income tax, and the top 1 percent of taxpayers pay 36.7 percent, more than twice their share of earning.) Those who are mentally mature enough to understand that people change their behavior in response to economic incentives and penalties and who view their fellow citizens as individuals rather than impersonal members of a class will have a very different notion of what ‘tax fairness' means than those who are not so mentally mature. By the way, did you see the report from the University of Minnesota's Smart Politics that ‘President Obama's 2012 State of the Union address rated at an 8th-grade comprehension level using the Flesch-Kincaid readability test, the third-lowest score of any State of the Union address since 1934'? Richard W. Rahn is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and chairman of the Institute for Global Economic Growth.
  8. I knew that our government was over employed and over paid but, I never could imagine how much. This 3 minute 40 second video clip may be the most important clip you have ever watched ... This is probably the most intelligent presentation of the truth you have seen in a long time ... Please take the time to view this clip and then share it with others View Video Clip Here!! If link doesn't work, copy and paste link into your browser.
  9. ON JANUARY 1 ST 2012, THE GOVERNMENT IS REQUIRING EVERYONE TO HAVE DIRECT DEPOSIT FOR SS CHECKS. WONDER WHY? 1% tax on all bank transactions HR4646 Watch for this AFTER November elections; remember this BEFORE you VOTE in case you think Obama's looking out for your best interest. 1% tax on all bank transactions HR 4646 This government just cannot think of enough ways to hurt the American people! I sure hope this dies!!!!! FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW 1% tax on all bank transactions HR 4646 - ANOTHER NEW OBAMA TAX SLIPPED IN WHILE WE WERE ASLEEP. Checked this on snopes, it's true! Check out HR 4646. President Obama's finance team is recommending a one percent (1%) transaction fee (TAX). Obama's plan is to sneak it in after the November elections to keep it under the radar. This is a 1% tax on all transactions at any financial institution - banks, credit unions, savings and loans, etc. Any deposit you make, or even a transfer within your account, will have a 1% tax charged. ~If your paycheck or your social security or whatever is direct deposit, it will get a 1% tax charged for the transaction. ~If your paycheck is $1000, then you will pay Obama $10 just for the privilege of depositing your paycheck in your bank. Even if you hand carry your paycheck or any check into your bank for a deposit, 1% tax will be charged. ~You receive a $5,000 stock dividend from your broker, Obama takes $50 just to allow you to deposit that check in the bank.. ~If you take $1,000 cash to deposit at your bank, 1% tax will be charged. Mind you, this is from the man who promised that, if you make under $250,000 per year, you will not see one penny of new tax. Keep your eyes and ears open, you will be amazed at what you learn about this guy's under-the-table moves to increase the number of ways you are taxed. Oh, and by the way, if you receive a refund from the IRS next year and you have it direct deposited or you walk in to deposit that check, you guessed it. You will pay a 1% charge of that money just for putting it in your bank. Remember, any money, cash, check or whatever, no matter where it came from, you will pay a 1% fee if you put it in the bank. Some will say, oh well, it's just 1%. Are you kidding me? It's a 1% tax increase across the board. Remember, once the tax is there, they can also raise it at will. And if anyone protests, they will just say, "Oh,that's not really a tax, it's a user fee"! Think this is no big deal? Go back and look at the transactions you made from on year's banking statements. Then add the total of all those transactions and deduct 1%. Still think it's no big deal? -- "A government big enough to give you everything you want is also big enough to take away everything you have." - Barry Goldwater -- Alvin Seay Elder Community of Christ
  11. PROOF THAT WE HAVE SOME IDIOTS IN WASHINGTON ! OR IS IT A CALCULATED PLAN? Georgia Arms is the 5th largest retailer of ...223 Ammo in America .. They sell 9mm, ...45, .223 ammunition. They normally buy spent brass from the US Department of Defense. Spent brass is "one time used" shell cases used by our Military for training purposes. They buy the brass, recondition it, and then reload the brass for resale to Law Enforcement, Gun Clubs, Gun Shops, and stores like Wal-Mart. They normally buy 30,000 lbs of spent brass at a time. This week the DoD wrote a letter to the owner of Georgia Arms and informed him that from now on the DoD will be destroying the spent brass, shredding it. It will no longer be available to the ammo makers, unless they buy it in a scrap shredded condition (which they have no use for). The shredded brass is now going to be sold by the DoD to China as scrap metal, after the DoD pays for it to be shredded. The DoD is selling the brass to China for less money than the ammo makers have been paying, plus the DoD has to pay to have the brass shredded and do the accounting paperwork. This sure helps the economy now doesn't it? Sell cheaper to China , and do not sell at all to a proven US business. Any hidden agenda working here? Obama going after the Firearms Industry and our ammunition!! The Georgia Arms owner even related a story that one of his competitors had already purchased a load of brass last week. The DoD contacted him this week and said they were sending someone over to make sure it was destroyed. Shell cases he had already bought! The brass has no value to the ammo maker if it is destroyed/shredded/melted. The ammo manufacturer only uses the empty brass cases to reload different calibers, mainly .223 bullets. The owner of Georgia Arms says that he will have to lay off at least half of his 60 workers, within 2-3 months if the DoD will no longer sell spent brass cases to the industry. Georgia Arms has 2-3 months of inventory to use, by summer they're out. If the Reloading Industry has to purchase new manufacture brass cases, then the cost of ammunition will double or even triple, plus Obama wants to add a 500% tax on each shell. You can read the information and see the DoD letter to Georgia Arms here: The Shootist Site If you're not outraged at what this administration is doing you should be! Be Afraid! Be Very Very Afraid! Get involved! It's Your Freedom and Our Country They're Stealing! If You Fail to Act Now, there may not be a Free United States tomorrow! I implore you to get involved and forward this to as many people as you can. Contact your legislators and put them on notice, We're fed up with what's going on in the name of stimulating our economy!
  12. Jared Law Yet Another Obama Epic Fail: ChiComms Secure Brazilian Oil Posted by Jared Law on January 20, 2012 at 5:47pm in Activism/Events Send Message View Discussions Barack Hussein Obama has failed America at every turn. And that's assuming you presume Obama is actually trying to do what's best for America. When it comes to energy, Obama has failed America so miserably, it's only logical to presume that he's actually trying to hurt America. He has shut down our offshore oil production in the Gulf of Mexico Texas, he has blocked oil exploration & development in Alaska, in the Rocky Mountains, and he only seems to want to give permits to non-American companies. Now Obama has allowed Brazil's massive oil reserves to go to China, which has a massive military that cannot conduct invasions without massive amounts of oil. How many massive, multi-Billion dollar oil fields, in OUR HEMISPHERE, will Obama allow the Communist Chinese to pump dry? Oh, yeah. Thanks to his rejection of the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada, that oil is now going to go to China. It should be useful in powering PLA jets, tanks, ships, and troop transports. America's enemies must be wanting to throw parades for Barack Hussein Obama, the most effective anti-American activist in world history! With Clinton selling emp, stealth and nuclear technology to China(you can google it), and, with Obama destroying our financial system, cutting way back on the defense budget and not allowing oil exploration and production, the USA doesn't need enemies to destroy it. Interesting that the guy that gave information to Wikileaks is being prosecuted(deserves it), but nothing was ever done to Clinton. He should have been tried for espionage and treason.
  13. New Navy Budgets May Sink Plans For Aircraft Carriers Fight is on to save flattop fleet By Rowan Scarborough | The Washington Times |Sunday, January 15, 2012 New Navy Budgets May Sink Plans For Aircraft Carriers Fight is on to save flattop fleet By Rowan Scarborough | The Washington Times |Sunday, January 15, 2012 On the surface, the Navy’s cherished fleet of 11 active aircraft carriers seems safe from President Obama’s budget slashers. Conventional wisdom says the requirement to cut $488 billion from the Pentagon within 10 years will not necessitate banishing a single carrier because the president’s military strategy focuses on two carrier-dependent regions: Asia, where China is building a robust navy, and the Persian Gulf, where Iran threatens to block international oil shipping. As Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta prepares to introduce the strategy’s first budget next month, the Navy has been in a furious fight behind the scenes to protect only 10 carriers, sources familiar with the issue told The Washington Times. The sources say that, while the fiscal 2013 budget may well continue 11 carriers, the Navy will be down to 10 or even nine carriers within in the next five years. A carrier typically transports about 80 aircraft and leads a battle group comprising 7,500 sailors, a guided-missile cruiser, two guided-missile destroyers, an attack submarine and a supply ship. Eliminating one carrier battle group would save billions of dollars. In addition, the Navy complements its carriers with amphibious-ready groups of warships, helicopters, fighter jets and Marines for sea-land operations. Some of those groups also might be scrapped. A scenario discussed inside the Navy: Reduce the carrier fleet by retiring the flattops short of their 50-year life spans, and continue to build more advanced carriers at the Newport News, Va., shipyard at seven-year intervals instead of launching one every five years. Reducing one carrier would set off a fight in Congress, which under law has required the Navy to maintain 11 active flattops. A source familiar with the discussions said the Obama administration would not want to take up that fight until after November’s presidential election, given the importance of Virginia and its 13 electoral votes. In general, the Navy has three carriers at sea, three returning from six-month deployments, three preparing to be deployed and two in some type of overhaul. For example, the USS Ronald Reagan, commissioned less than 10 years ago, is going into dry dock this month for a year of extensive repairs. Under Mr. Panetta, the Pentagon has clamped down on the release of any details about the budget — following the model of predecessor Robert M. Gates, who forced senior officials to sign nondisclosure forms. But sources say a $488 billion in mandated savings will come from two principal sources: cutting the Army and Marine Corps ground forces by more than 100,000 troops combined and reducing the purchase and delaying the procurement of big weapons systems, such as the F-35 fighter. Cutting back to 10 carriers would save the Pentagon additional billions of dollars. A carrier’s payroll for a crew of officers and sailors, not counting its air wing, is about $225 million annually. “I think the United States will continue to operate at least 10 carriers over the next five years,” said Loren Thompson, who heads the Lexington Institute defense think tank. “But over the long run, it’s likely the cost and operating concept will gradually shift the Navy away from carriers.” In fact, the Navy will soon undergo a 10-carrier trial. When the USS Enterprise is retired in November, 10 carriers will be active until the USS Gerald R. Ford becomes operational in 2015. Congress granted the Navy a waiver for the 33-month breach of the law. “They’re going down to 10 for programming reasons,” Mr. Thompson said. “It is supposed to be temporary, but I think during the period the Enterprise is gone and the Ford class has not arrived, the Navy may grow accustomed to operating with only 10 carriers.” Mr. Thompson said carriers face three basic challenges. “First of all, they have become extremely expensive to build and operate,” he said. “Secondly, some countries, such as China, are developing the capacity to target and disable them from long distances. “And, thirdly, the advent of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and unmanned aircraft will make it easier to accomplish air missions from other sea-based platforms.” Mr. Obama’s strategy echoes that of his first defense chief, Mr. Gates. At the U.S. Military Academy in February, Mr. Gates said: “Any future defense secretary who advises the president to again send a big American land army into Asia or into the Middle East or Africa should ‘have his head examined,’ as Gen. [Douglas] MacArthur so delicately put it.” Indeed, the strategy announced this month downplays the chances of a big land war, saying that active forces will be shaped to fight a limited ground conflict of a short duration. The Gates imprint may well show itself when it comes to carriers. “Do we really need 11 carrier strike groups for another 30 years when no other country has more than one?” Mr. Gates asked during a 2010 speech to the Navy League, a naval support association. “In my view, Gates was right the first time,” said Winslow Wheeler, an analyst at the Center for Defense Information, a military reform group. “We have too many for show-the-flag exercises and strikes against incompetents like Iraq. “If ever we encounter a competent military with an air force, a navy with ultrasilent diesel electric submarines — and both with superfast, superlow anti-ship missiles — I suspect carriers will quickly be extinct if they go into unsafe waters. At $13 billion-plus each, more are an unwise investment for the future.” Advocates of aircraft carriers note that the White House often asks in crisis, “Where are the carriers?” “China is going great guns to develop a maritime superiority,” said Jon Ault, a retired Navy pilot who served on eight carrier deployments. “Imagine 20, 30, 40 years from now, when the U.S. is down to its last two or three battle groups. A fatigued 40-, 50-year-old carrier gasping for breath and a nuke shipbuilding industry that no longer exists. Works for China, perhaps not so well for us.” --------
  14. Imo, I feel that we meddle too much in other countries government and civil affairs. However, with that said, I would strip every inch of skin and pour salt on it if it would save one American life or get information about a terrorist cell, location or plot.
  15. With the beginning of the new year, we are seeing patients being denied or, being released from companies that have historically serviced medicare and medicaid patients, due to new and upcoming regulations regarding reimbursement and payment for services by Medicare. I would imaging that many physicians and clinics will also begin not to take elderly patients unless they are privately insured or have a serious bank account. This is the beginning of OBAMACARE. Below is a link to a call in from a neurosurgeon regarding new regulations and elderly patients. Please remember this next November, He is not OUR friend. ONE LAST THING. When the RV finally does come down, Obama will try to take credit for everything that happens. Remember, this was in play long before he was even elected. He just happened to get elected before the Iraq revaluation of its currency. He had nothing to do with anything and, should the economy improve because of the rv: It will be in spite of Obama, not because of Obama. From all indications, Obama is doing a really good job of destroying the economy of the USA. Not improving it.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.