Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About TaintedMeat08

  • Birthday 11/12/1989

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

TaintedMeat08's Achievements


Newbie (1/14)



  1. Your title is a double negative, meaning it actually says the Dinar WILL RV soon. Even at that, its a really goofy and hard to understand double negative if you act like you said it like that on purpose and literally .
  2. Have you not noticed, that most people that come on here with this style of information have critically foul English structure, and are ecstatic over CAPS LOCK? His typo/grammatical mistake is not even comparable to this other guys.
  3. So having a faceless name to somebody you will never meet in person does what exactly to credit information? Oh that's right, it personifys it, typical Ad Hominem mentally. Ignore the information, lets deal with this author clown. Its not even though, you have other issues since you act like a fake name would be sufficient, which is is counterproductive in what you act like is the issue. You just wanted to insult the person who wrote this stuff, just admit it or argue information instead. Whether I agree with the site is irrelevant, but that comment was lame.
  4. Sarcasm wasn't necessary, it wasn't like the article was crystal clear. It should have elaborated a little more on why they used dollars on the second figure instead of dinar like the first. I didn't think it happened at all, but nobody likes being talked down to, so why waste your time trying to make somebody feel a little bad for not getting it? Maybe I'm just too tired and read it wrong, and if so then I'm sorry, if I'm not then don't be so pompous next time you contribute to somebody trying to bring something to the table. Nearly everybody else on here was mislead as well, so it isn't like he misunderstood something that was extremely spelled out by himself like you make it sound.
  5. I know all about the CIA/Al Qaeda connection, and yes; bad things did happen in the name of Christianity, and it wasn't all good, simple as that. You are very inaccurate with all of your points though (not that they are even yours), I can't say anything for what is written past the first paragraph, because I'm not going to bother reading that much on internet forum. All I am responding to is the so called killing of people in Canaan. Study Genesis 6, and understand those giant entities called Nephilim, were Satans attempt to have the prophesied Messiah kept from being born by corrupting the blood line. That is why in Genesis 6:9, it indicates Noah was "Perfect in his generation", meaning he had no tainted bloodlines that led back to the Fallen Angel/Human hybrid in Genesis 6. The angels who committed this act were the same angels mentioned in 2 Peter 2:4-7 (and 1 Peter 3:19) and Jude 1:6, this offspring had one goal, and that was to keep the Messiah from being born. That is why the land of Canaan was infested, and the surrounding cities, to keep the progenitors of Jesus's lineage from taking this Promised Land, keeping the Tribe of Judah from continuing, and Jesus was the "Lion of the Tribe of Judah". In Numbers 13:33 the Israelites described themselves as being "grasshoppers in their sight" to these giants. Throughout Deuteronomy you find the Anakim and dozens of other groups of these things, and by definition the titles mean "fearful/giants", Deuteronomy is a much more important book than it seems to lead on to understand much of the death in the bible. Goliath was one of these entities, Og the King of Bashan was as well in Deuteronomy 3:11 tells you he was a giant, and his bed was basically 13 feet long, (In which the crucifixion is being described in first person in Psalm 22:12, and the Bulls of Bashan are relevant), they are also known to have 24 digits as the Giant of Gath in 2 Samuel 21:20 as having six digits on each hand and foot. This may come off as sounding strange to you, but there is much historic evidence to it, involving the Celtic giants warring against the Romans, Josephus records much of this type of activity. Also don't pull Matthew 22:30 on me, because those are the angels who stayed in heaven, not the angels who stepped down with the one we call Lucifer. Point being, the killing of "people" in Canaan and such, were not regular people that you have everyday contact with. They were an abomination to say the least, they were the reason Sodom/Gomorrah/Admah/Zeboim and theoretically Zoar were all destroyed, due to the "lust after strange flesh". That is why when the angels came to Lot, the men of the city lusted after them and rejected Lots daughters, they didn't want ordinary sex. Not because the cities were necessarily infested with Nephilim, but they were doing the same things that took place during Noah's time to bring them about, and this is also why the Flood and Sodom/Gomorrah are mentioned on par with each other when talked about elsewhere in the Bible. I suggest you do a little more research on the world you live in before talking about things as if you are an expert. Until you have studied the bible itself, and instead of googling things, or using wiki'ing (which you so obviously did), or some kind of pamphlets to teach you things religious things, or whatever you may do, because obviously you are doing it wrong, then you need to not make such bold claims. I especially like the "feeble mind" comment, as if you are by definition a Genius, which also takes its root to the term Jinnee/Geni or as we would say Genie, which takes its roots to the definition of Daemon/Demon, and not the lame definition of "a disembodied spirit", because that isn't an accurate definition that everybody gives. A Genius, by it's original definition is essential one who is under demonization (not possession), getting knowledge from a spirit, yet we throw that word around today like it's something normal, but it all ties itself back to this same incident of the Flood. Don't tell me it isn't either, until you understand the Greek definition that is shared for Genius and Daemon. Perhaps you will copy and paste another 15 page wiki page about something? I won't read any responses if I can help it, I don't spend much time on internet forums, and if you are as big of a deal as you make it seem to be, then you wouldn't either.
  6. We don't agree biblically, but I agree with everything you just said.
  7. I'm sorry, but your version is out of line. Hab 1:12 Art thou not from everlasting, O LORD my God, mine Holy One? we shall not die. O LORD, thou hast ordained them for judgment; and, O mighty God, thou hast established them for correction. KJV uses we because the set of words there are, "Lo lo lo", and it makes no sense in context for the writer to mention the ability of God to not die. It makes no sense at all for him to randomly say that, he is prior talking of captives and then in this same verse mentions multiple people whom are ordained for judgment, and talking about "we" translated, as the writer included. Not dying, involving judgment, ever heard of the second death? Joh 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. Punctuation is important in this verse, and the Numbers verse you used. Here the ; is used to further expand on what was said prior, "No man hath seen God at any time;" it is then further given a second title to the entity talked about "the only begotten Son". It wasn't at all like you put it, and Numbers is even worse. Num 23:19 God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good? "is not" is the same "Lo lo lo" phrase as in Habakkuk, and this time it is rendered is not, because the entity being refered to is the prior word. The Habakkuk has "we" inserted so you don't make the mistake that the writer is talking about God. God is not a man , (COMMA) that he should lie; (semi-colon to furthre elaborate on the previously made statement) neither the son of man, that he should repent. This is key, "neither the son of man", which the word for man is "Adam". We by sons of Adam inheret the sin curse, by salvation through Jesus we become "sons of God", not to be mistaken with the Sons of God in Genesis 6 (Fallen angels in that case). I wonder how Jehovahs Witness deals with the Fallen Angels producing the Nephilim which wrought the Flood?
  8. Jehovah's Witness has many pamphlets to attempt to disprove the deity of Jesus. You have a serious issue with your bible study. I'll simply post two instances that go hand in hand with Jesus taking that role. John focuses on the God aspect of Jesus more than the other Gospel writers, and he gives the introduction with this... John 1:1 "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God." The word for that is Logos, we use this term even today for the representation by a single "word" as the KJV translates. Mainly because the Logos for a written text would be a word, but in today's system, we use a Logo for a business to be identified by. It is essentially the same case for Jesus, as with words on a page, to become logos with words it would be more words. For Logos to become Logos to man, it would become man. With that said, this is where Jesus Himself says He is God, deny it if you want, but if you are diligent with your Bible study you will understand this. Joh 8:56 Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad. Joh 8:57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham? Joh 8:58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. Joh 8:59 Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by. You miss this, but in verse 58 Jesus says "before Abraham was, I am." That is one of several I am statements that Jesus gave himself, calling Himself God, how can I prove this? That is why in verse 59 they took up stones to cast at him, because He JUST proclaimed himself to be God. He took the claim to be the voice of the Burning Bush by saying this. The bible isn't a simpleton book, you need to study it more carefully. Joh 10:30 I and my Father are one. Joh 10:31 Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him. Joh 10:32 Jesus answered them, Many good works have I shewed you from my Father; for which of those works do ye stone me? Joh 10:33 The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God. I hate using just verses without being able to use the chapter in it's entirety, but it's a message board and doing that isn't realistic. Especially since you will probably shun this anyway, and make a shrewd remark as you have about all Jesus/Eternal/Hell related things I've seen. Lastly, prior to the I AM statement in John 8, you have - Joh 8:39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham. Joh 8:40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham. Joh 8:41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God. Joh 8:42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. Joh 8:43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. Joh 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. Joh 8:45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not. Joh 8:46 Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me? Joh 8:47 He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God. In verse 41 "Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God." You miss it in the English, but essentially they were calling Jesus the 7 letter B word, meaning fatherless. Jesus then replies, not focusing on their attempt at pointing out His supposed illegitimacies, but rather theirs. He says "Ye are of your father the devil, nd the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning"..... Question Bane - Who was this murderer? Many bible commentator's say this is Cane being brought up here, but that really doesn't make any sense. The first murder was NOT Cane, but was Satans murder of Adam. Adam had immortality, and by Satan having him and Eve eat of the fruit of the knowledge of Good and Evil, taking away his immortaility was the murder mentioned here. I love the topic of the Trinity, but I'm not going to waste my time trying to get into it if all you are going to do disregard anything you hear and point to a "Bible Contradiction", even though you don't realize, but the same stuff Jehovahs Witness use for coming against the Trinity, the world uses to attempt to invalidate the Bible as a whole. It is without error, and the enigmatic way is not by accident, it is to keep us digging into the Word. We can understand this stuff by skimming over it and getting the gist, but if we dig deeper, it furthers our understanding of it, and removes error of our interpretation by translation issues. There is a language barrier between you and the Bible, and scholars mixed with many different concordances help fix that, but Prayer ultimately is what bridges that gap, and a relation with the Living God. By the way Bane, this is saying God cannot die? Hab 1:16 Therefore they sacrifice unto their net, and burn incense unto their drag; because by them their portion is fat, and their meat plenteous. I know that's not the verse you were talking about, but thats funny.
  9. Because people don't want to admit fault, so they use you as their mental scape-goat. It makes no sense to me either, even if I tried to unfairingly make it your fault, it just doesn't make any sense. One word - inane.
  10. That's what I thought when I read "I sent a test email to noreply and it didn't go through " haha. No offence hike, but that was funny.
  11. I don't think I could ever take you seriously with a Pokemon as your picture. Of course punctuation, and proper grammatical eloquence could never hurt. I'd still be stuck on the Pokemon though....
  12. Adam doesn't have anything to do with him getting your Email address if it were made public on here, I don't know if there is a setting or not for it. I do see how that would be frustrating though, especially since my e-mails go to my phone, and I hate getting a daily Amazon and EBay message. The person made a huge post called our "geanology" instead of genealogy or something like that which was HUGE, then posted links to it on others. Whoever it is has an agenda, most likely a good one, except is conducting it in an obnoxious manner.
  13. This is 22 pages, and 10,202 words. This is such an extremely long text for a Forum/Message Board post, if anybody on here actually reads the entire thing, it would probably only be about 15 people. I'm not mocking you or anything, but in all honesty, most people won't even read the articles on dinar themselves, without somebody explaining or practically reading it to them and highlighting the "important" parts. Unless somebody is just really board, I think it is just too long of a post for a message board, as soon as they see the scroll bar on the right side of the screen shrink, and find that it is all one post, the majority are hitting backspace.
  14. It means they think it mignewness redenominated, its nothing new, but always new to some. Thanks for the post though.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.