miraj

Please tell me this is not a serious conversation

Would that not be awesome 🙂

That is not an interview of Clapper..sorry..and all this other mumbo jumbo is just that.. I cannot take that serious

Not trying to correct or debate because it all sounds 1984-ish more and more. https://cpsinvest.com/news/ New Rules for Retirement Plans, and Estate and Gift Tax Hikes Several new retirement plan rules will apply to high-income taxpayers. Taxpayers with retirement plan balances over $10 million will not be allowed to make additional contributions. They would also be required to take immediate distributions of 50% of their retirement plan balances over this limit. Taxpayers with over $20 million in retirement accounts would be required to take 100% distributions from their Roth IRAs. In addition, high-income taxpayers would be prohibited from converting traditional IRAs to Roth IRAs. Estate and gift taxes would also see significant increases. Current law excludes the first $11.7 million of assets from estate taxes, while the new legislation would cut this amount in half. It would also limit using trusts in estate planning and assess estate taxes on many trust-owned assets currently not subject to it.

I need to borrow that head slapping meme of Markinsa for a moment..

That is totally off subject but I would wager a 5,000 note of dinar (big spender me 😉) that you could not bring a shred of legitimate evidence to back that statement

I do not recall anything that was prophesied by Q worthwhile taking place...but that is a different direction .. must stay on subject 🙂

I cant because there was not enough to warrant any case and she did not appeal..so she knew, but she accepted any and all donations willingly

I am a patriot and I say Sidney blew it..along with the pillow dude..and Guilliano

Not the case..the manner in which they were FILED..they did not even get past the filing. Trump put people in power to help him..there were none in place to exppse them..most never made it far..he fired them.

Please present evidence worthy of consideration by ANY court. the case was presented each time and she never appealed...not once..she accepted the decisionNot a lot of conviction it appears.

If she was such an outstanding attorney they should have never happened

You keep chasing your tail on this..there WAS no evidence..or maybe you should produce the evidence you claim was presented which again was no evidence.

Exactly..the presentation itself was frivelous. She could not produce one shred of evidence.

So the judge that tossed them is a moron or are you referring to an individual that would believe a judge over Sidney Powell. This entire facade is partison. She has no proof and never dod..kraken and all.

That sums it up well

Lots of legalese..does not alter the end results that her filings were frivilous https://www.11alive.com/article/news/politics/elections/sidney-powell-georgia-kraken-lawsuit-dropped/85-cbb9aab8-0ca9-4bc1-b601-a06f2c1f52ff https://www.reuters.com/world/us/judge-sanctions-sidney-powell-other-pro-trump-lawyers-who-claimed-voter-fraud-2021-08-25/

Double Standards in place..

Thats not a "humble" opinion..it is rather direct and very condescending. I do not recall the word stupid in Caddiemans replies..but that is YOUR opinion, and you ofcourse are a lover of the constitution ..1st and 2nd and all that..right?

https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2021/03/22/facing-defamation-sidney-powell-says-no-reasonable-person-thought-her-election-fraud-claims-were-fact/?slreturn=20210907204657 .. Your man Attorneys for Sidney Powell are asking a federal judge to dismiss a defamation lawsuit filed against her, claiming that “no reasonable person” thought the pro-Trump lawyer’s statements about the 2020 election results were factual. She allowed her 2 attorneys..not her..her attorneys to make that statement..https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2021/03/22/facing-defamation-sidney-powell-says-no-reasonable-person-thought-her-election-fraud-claims-were-fact/ Your man Patrick is tied to a 501(c)(4).. 501(c)(4) groups are commonly called "social welfare" organizations that may engage in political activities, as long as these activities do not become their primary purpose. Similar restrictions apply to Section 501(c)(5) labor and agricultural groups. Of course he is biased as it now appears the bias is increasing on both sides. Is this one of your go to's for true information?..just curious

The filings state obsvure items but no verifiable proof..just conjecture. When a judge allowed the Dominion case to continue against Sidney Powell and the Michigan attorney general said Sidney Powell made "stunning admissions" in Dominion's lawsuit against her...she said..No reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact. I could actually ask you the same question..you aren't THAT obtuse are you ?

No attack..and there was no flaw. No..not upset..and ..I did not say they went off the deep end. They are part of the flaws of the entire narrative going on a stolen election. Not my view, just a lot of judges in different states that have to deal with their ridiculous filings that do not state in reality what they state publicly..typical of most of the mainstream, maybe all, and all connected. Time will tell. Although it is fun to watch you smack yourself so often .. try not to get carried away with it though.

Try to get a grip as you pull your head out

I will.

Hey..was not a wish from me..maybe a wish from thee ..does not matter in the scope of things but I am certain it must matter in your view