miraj

Because at 15..she should have kept her legs together..and the A Hole should have kept his wiener in his pants.....oh..but wait..he did not..and besides the beat down she took and the hospital bills she received..she was supposed to be a mom..are you really serious.

Then you sir should start a 501C .. that way you can support a child from a teenage mother that has no idea how to care for a newborn and has no support except from this government if she is even capable of getting that far without giving up..that way you put money where your ideals are? Oh..and the A Hole got away with the rape.

Maybe from me? I repeat myself? I respect the choice of anyone that chooses for them selves? My Body My Choice (MBMC) regardless of the subject. I so loathe the the statements from men that have no uterus (wait..CL says they might have had...) but if a family member, friend, relative, neighbor is raped or falls within my stated minimum..what..so you step up and raise that child..she is in her teens,,and was raped .. has no family, or reasonably sane family, and you force her to have that child..then you and your like will be held accountable in the same manner you claim me as an outsider will in the end..

Sorry .. I am not going to play this game with you. You are the one that stated I had or have. Maybe you should seek assistance with Joe on memory retention....this conversation is actually from your accusation LGD..maybe slow down on the alcohol or the herb..whatever. 😎

Did not consider it funny. At a minimum the decision if raped or pregnant by incest by a a hole family member should be a choice given .. not yours..not mine. when the Peter is a weapon. But...we are off topic.

True Pitcher..as CL states..we should be more constructive regardless of viewpoints.

Yes sir, I have, and continue to do so 🙂

That's a good one..millions of woman have been saying that very same thing for years

I have no idea about your "Twitter" and I have never met my "alter ego" as you keep referring to. My perception is fine. I actually enjoy You Tube and utilize it quite often. I have no idea what government handouts I am getting, please enlighten me why my world is about to be upended huh..but yours will be fine?

See what I mean CL..what is constructive about this ? In the scope of politics and lgd's obsession with demInic possession its just killing time. This is not a cut big wave..just an observation. No manner of cliche's or you tube videos and you tube news commentators are making a change..just adding subscribers. The corruption is permanently in place on both sides.

Constructive would involve focusing as a group on something positive for the overall benefit of the country...not a continuous parroting of news..videos..and heresay that accomplishes nothing. That was not an attack any more than his claim that his was not, but we all know it was a sneaky go around in the quest to be right and first. I am far from the voice of reason CL..and..I realize I am in a small minority..not the left or the right. I have also been a natural male since birth and plan on remaining so until passing. Enjoy your day. I shall mine. 🙏

Once again..your ignorant arrogance is showing .. “Tika hatta onda ora batta ronda aka aka ora manda rasa ta, etc.,” or as you .. the Bible Thumper says..Sha Naw Naw Han Na Naw

There is more to that story but of course, it will be the proverbial chasing the tail.. An affidavit is admissible evidence, although some courts may consider it hearsay and require you to testify to the affidavit in order to avoid this distinction. Thus, you should never assume that signing an affidavit will exempt you from testifying in court as a witness although affidavits are necessary as a proffer of the evidence that will be presented at the hearing, they are not sufficient to constitute evidence on the jurisdictional issue when the facts are controverted. Another area of law where affidavits are necessary is in the summary judgment context.

Should Ms. Ellis have first hand knowlege of a crime, then she needs to file a signed, criminal complaint with the FBI

4

That is definitely a mouthful and a lot of information..thanks for finding that explanation. I am always suspect of plans and bills that appear in rather rapid form once an announcement or incident occurs. I am always suspect of government regardless 😳🙂

It was not about CNN BigWave..and I think stated that..it was about the statements by the Big G and Sidney, which reminded me of the late late 60's and early 70' of politician speak during their ridiculous justification for Nam'..and I will probably get spanked for that statement cause it is not relevant to something by someone that matters or not...done for now..sleep well.

I have, and I plan on. I am not a PARTY fanatic, do not give a rats ### about either.

I have begun to notice that we are not part of the equation on either side any longer unless they need to keep us at each other and it serves their parties purpose. I am and have been a registered independent for decades so I am not able to vote in preliminaries. The Rep and dem are or have become about their preservation, not yours or mine..maybe they never have .

By the way..do not get your panties in a wad becauser the video comes from a cnn link ..if you prefer, I will find another 😳🙂

Provisional ballots are a normal part of the process. There claims are ludicrous at the least. If you listen to the entire video and listen to Guilliano and Sidney..Sidney..making claims without evidence..The FireHose of Festivus.. I again am not a fan of either side, but this is almost 10 months of nothing..no proof..and we keep sliding down the rabbit hole.. https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/07/politics/giuliani-powell-voter-fraud-claims-vetting-eric-coomer/index.html

You did a lot of homework..one paragraph stands out in several which I hope to understand but some of it is quite clear, so until I go through the list I will reserve comment. (ary 🙂).. Note 1: Some Non-Merit reasons for stopping lawsuits from going forward are for: a) Standing, b) Timing [Laches], c) Judicial authority [Jurisdiction], and d) Moot (e.g. not enough malfeasance to make a difference). In each of these situations, the case was not fully heard. In US Supreme Counrt Cases, "Cert Denied" means that the case will not be heard, and the lower court's decision stands. This happens in 90%± of cases submitted to SCOTUS. It does not necessarily mean SCOTUS agrees with the lowe court. In the "Dismissed Moot/Cert Denied" cases above, the majority of the judges did not state why they would not hear these cases. However, Judge Thomas wrote a strong argument against denying Cert here, and he objected to other judges using Moot as an excuse. Note 2: Disposition breakdown of the 90 lawsuits: Non-Merit = 39 (beige); To Be Determined (TBD: active) = 14 (white); Trump Statutory Wins = 18 (green); Trump Statutory Losses = 7 (red); Voluntarily withdrawn (due to consolidation, etc.) = 12 (blue).

Pitcher, of all the folks in this mess along with us, I have a lot of respect for you. I do not necessarily agree with your views, but I respect them. I believe Caddieman has not defended anymore than you and many others defended. I am not even certain Caddieman defended anything. These are troubling times, and there is a lot of talk of civil war, socialism, etc. If we took the politicians out of this equation, there might be a middle ground that we could all deal with. That will never happen in the present environment. Never. Caddieman never came on this board saying Biden was doing a better job..the bulk of this any other conversations have been about the "steal"..not defending an administration. I have stated previously that Biden reminded me of Carter. Maybe he is worse than..but shame on the system that only gave us these 2 choices and shame on us for letting them.

"You are about to enter another dimension. A dimension not only of sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land of imagination. Next stop—The Twilight Zone." I can't go down this road..it is truly bizarre

Are you Markinsa in disguise?