RV4Me333

I purchased this Dinar from Dinar Banker. I have to sell "some" dinar so I'm selling the lower denoms since they are worth more. They are uncirculated, come with certificate of authenticity, etc. Retail price is $1130 plus shipping, COD or wire x-fer fees. This is easy to verify at dinarbanker.com. I'm asking a fair price, but still a good deal to somebody wanting 5,000 denom notes. Make me an offer. You can email me at xxxxx.com. Leave post on their profile

If somebody really did call Trump's organization and they said "yes, The Donald loves Iraq Dinar" how many more calls do you think they would get? A LOT! Everybody would have to verify for themselves. And if he did buy and said "YES", that could be taken as an endorsement, which is probably not the best plan for a rich guy. Never endorse anything, unless they pay you and you are willing to assume the risks.

If you hate this guy so much why do you take his posts from other sites and put them on your site? I just don't get all the bashing between "gurus". If everybody worked together, we would all be better off. We all have the same goal as investors...to make money on the RV. Nobody at another site is making money off of ads, VIP, book sales, IBC and asset protection sales, trust sales, dinar sales, etc. They are just people trying to figure out what the heck is going on. So, either appreciate that or don't bring that info here. The negativity serves no useful purpose. Everybody is on information overload. Nobody is going to be right all the time, especially when the information about what's going on in Iraq changes multiple times per day. It's easy to misunderstand a lot of these articles as well. Much is lost in translation!

So what does this mean? Are you referring to this pdf document? My link

Do you ever wonder if these guys really think that they can just proclaim they are in power and continue to get away with it indefinitely? Every day there's some new story claiming either Allawi or Maliki as the winner. It's ridiculous. I just want to shake somebody and say "pick a lane and go with it people!"

Interesting video. I'm glad it's a black person spouting off because a white person could never get away with saying this. At least nobody can tell this guy he is saying these things because he is a racist. It is a bit inflammatory but I respect his right to say what he wants to say. The Tea Party people are accused of being racist and dangerous. It's ridiculous. These are our grandparents who are peacefully protesting to help us keep the rights our Founding Fathers worked so hard to establish for us and our soldiers fought so hard to protect. Things are really messed up now, aren't they? And really, it's not a Democrat vs. a Republican thing. It's the Progressive movement that has permeated both sides of the aisle that is causing all of the trouble. Socialism is just a pit stop on the way to Communism and that ALWAYS ends badly, usually with a lot of people dead. It's interesting how these lyrics still stand up today...gotta love the Beatles!!! REVOLUTION You say you want a revolution Well, you know We all want to change the world You tell me that it's evolution Well, you know We all want to change the world But when you talk about destruction Don't you know that you can count me out Don't you know it's gonna be all right all right, all right You say you got a real solution Well, you know We'd all love to see the plan You ask me for a contribution Well, you know We're doing what we can But when you want money for people with minds that hate All I can tell is brother you have to wait Don't you know it's gonna be all right all right, all right Ah ah, ah, ah, ah, ah... You say you'll change the constitution Well, you know We all want to change your head You tell me it's the institution Well, you know You better free you mind instead But if you go carrying pictures of chairman Mao You ain't going to make it with anyone anyhow Don't you know it's gonna be all right all right, all right all right, all right, all right all right, all right, all right

It's Greek to me. Can somebody interpret this please?

WOW!!!!!!! I am shocked by the condescending words and the disrespect shown here by Mr. Montana for the people who build the content of his site...a site which earns him quite the hefty income from ads, clicks and VIP. Mr. Montana, you might want to show a little respect for your customers. The reason your chat room is so boring lately is people are tired of the disrespect and they are going elsewhere. You also ban anybody who dares to speak up so I assume I'll be the next to go. If so, I wish you all well in this investment.

WOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO POSSUM!!!!! Nice to see your post! GO RV!!!!!!!!

Tenses are always a problem in these translations. My guess would be THIS Thursday, as in the 20th.

I agree...LET IT DIE for good. There will be NO LOP..."NOT GONNA HAPPEN, WOULDN'T BE PRUDENT!"

Maliki is sure making a lot of friends isn't he? LOL

2 PM Press Conference Anybody know the results?

The rumors I heard were for Monday. I'm not aware of any Sunday rumors. However, since the Maliki/Allawi meeting was pushed back, I doubt those rumors are even still in play here.

And what does this mean to us? Any thoughts people?

Now that's what I'm talking about!!!!! YAY!!!!!!

I just have to wonder why they even bothered to have an election. Hopefully they get something DONE now! Thanks for the post!!!!!! You post a lot of great info. Keep it up!

LINK end of the line for allawi niqash | Muhammad Ashour | thu 06 may 10 After a month of painful negotiation, described by Prime Minister, Nouri al-Maliki as ‘sterile’, a new coalition formed of the State of Law list and Iraqi National Coalition is finally expected to redraw Iraq’s political map and allow the country to move forward politically. The coalition of the two lists forms the largest parliamentary bloc ever in Iraq, with the two lists occupying 159 of the 325 parliamentary seats. The formation of the coalition, announce on 4 May, was unexpected and put an end to the constant predictions and counter-predictions over the shape of the new parliamentary bloc that will form the next Iraqi government. The Kurds have also expressed their willingness to join the coalition, complicating matters for and putting more pressure on Iraqiya, whose leader, Iyad Allawi, will be forced to abandon his dream of becoming Prime Minister and settle for a lower-ranking ministerial portfolio. Allawi recently called upon the UN Security Council to intervene as the various blocs squabbled and bickered and got nowhere with forming a governing coalition. It is believed that it was this step that pushed the State of Law and the National Coalition together, as both a feared a repeat of the 2004 situation when Allawi took power after the UN stepped in to form the government. This prospect convinced the National Coalition that they should abandon their demand to agree on the name of the new Prime Minister before negotiating on the formation of a coalition. Faleh al-Faysd, a leading member of the National Coalition was quick to play down these claims. “The two parties were very close to each other right from the beginning,” he said. “The Iraqiya list’s call upon the Security Council to intervene in Iraq’s affairs has nothing to do with the formation of the coalition.” Ali al-Adeeb, of the State of Law bloc, said the formation of the new coalition was “an important step towards the formation of the government and towards ending the country’s current crisis.” He criticised those who accused the coalition of being based on sectarian grounds, adding that the constitution “has guaranteed political blocs’ right to form coalitions in order to reach their political aims. However, some parties insist on accusing others with sectarianism while they themselves practice it.” “The two blocs were one bloc in the last parliament and during the two election rounds that took place in Iraq in the past years. They will have the exclusive right to select the new prime minister from among members of the two blocs because they were able to gather 50% of the parliament seats,” said Adeeb, who headed the State of Law negotiation delegation. Al-Adeeb, whose name was once circulated as a potential alternative Prime Minister to Nouri al-Maliki, stressed that Iraqiya would definitely be invited to participate in the new coalition. “It is the Sunni expression and it has presence in 5 provinces with Sunni majority,” he said. He continued to express optimism about the length of time it will take to form a new government. “The coalition map is now much clearer and the coming days will allow parties to reach agreements on all their outstanding issues. This should lead to a speedy formation of the new government.” The Kurdistan bloc, which recently met in Erbil to unify their stance on parliamentary alliances, should prove a key supporter of the new coalition, as Kurds hope to install Jalal al-Talabani in the post of President. To do so, they need the support 217 of the 325 parliament members. If all the Kurds vote together alongside the State of Law and National Coalition, they will be just one seat short of the majority needed to approve Talabani’s Presidency. The Kurdish parties have formed the backbone of Iraqi political alliances since the outset and sent a clear signal to the new coalition expressing their readiness to rejoin on 14 April. President Talabani visited his former political opponent, Ibrahim al-Jaafari, and told him that the Kurds were waiting for the Shia to name their candidate for Prime Minister, so they can support the nomination. Talabani was criticised for his words, especially by members of the Iraqiya list, but many observers believe his intention was to speed up the formation of a political alliance following the elections. While Iyad Allawi heads a secular list made-up of a mix of Sunni and Shia politicians, his background caused many Shia to fear that he could be a ‘Trojan Horse’, bringing Sunnis back to power in Iraq. The new coalition, which is clearly Shia in identity, is a clear counter against this prospect. One of the biggest surprises is the abandonment by the Sadrists, who won 40 of the National Coalition’s 70 seats, of its hardline stance on cooperation with Maliki. However, with international intervention looming and another potential Allawi-headed UN-mandated government, divided on sectarian and ethnic lines, rather than on share of the popular vote, it is thought the Sadrists saw the need to compromise to maintain a strong share of important ministerial portfolios. Nothing detailed was released regarding talks held between Ibrahim al-Jaafari, Jamal Jafar and Moqtada al-Sadr in Iran but they only began when Allawi threatened the internationalisation of the electoral dispute. The prospect of complete exclusion from a salvation government, as happened in 2004, meant the Sadrists had to accept membership of a coalition they had previously promised not to join.

I'm in San Diego. I've gotten all of mine from Dinar Trade in Santa Monica. I can't find a bank here that has any.

FOREX EXPLAINED

Way to go Willie!!!!

In some parts of the world, they actually date things differently. We write our dates MONTH/DATE/YEAR. i.e. 5-8-2010 They write their dates DAY/MONTH/YEAR. i.e. 8-5-2010 SAME DATE, make sense?

OK just got these links, somebody else is posting in news section for me. http://translate.goo...819&sl=ar&tl=en http://article.wn.co...s_Joining_Them/

I heard a rumor that Allawi was chosen as PM, Talabani is President and Maliki was given some newly formed position. Does anybody have any information to substantiate this or debunk it (other than believing or not believing it)?

I like this part!