Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content

bikertrash

Platinum VIP
  • Posts

    241
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About bikertrash

  • Birthday 08/04/1951

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Texan
  • Interests
    Golf, Riding my Harley

bikertrash's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

10

Reputation

  1. and wait................and wait.............................and wait...............and wait................................and wait..........................................................................................................
  2. Good one ..................I agree
  3. A plane ticket home would be nice................................and of cource RV
  4. I hate to be a stick in the mud but....................31 Dec 2010 was also the deadline So for everyone here I hope 31 Dec 2011 is a good date
  5. One to one is a good start........but what is 90 days after waiting for 7 years
  6. Sounds pretty good so........................it is as good any the last one I read
  7. President May be (hopefully) in Deep Trouble > > > > > > > This will be an interesting turn of events if it does come to the > surface.....bring it on!! > > > > Our New Dictator May Be In Deep Trouble...with Chief Justice John > Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court. > > According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal > government, a smack-down of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may > be inevitable. > > > Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered > him on a number of Constitutional issues. Critics have complained that > much, if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into > Constitutional roadblocks on the power of the federal government. Obama > certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used > the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to > publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants > the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time > of an election. The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with t he > Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his > head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,' when Obama told a > flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling. As it has turned out, this > was a watershed moment in the relationship between the executive and > the judicial branches of the federal government. Obama publicly > declared war on the court , even as he blatantly continued to propose > legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional > principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years. > > Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one > enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, > and so on. And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, > Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of > retiring until 'Obama is gone.' Apparently, the Court has had enough. > The Robert's Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, > that it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have > been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any one of > these important issues could potentially cripple the Administration. > Such a thing would be long overdue. > > First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle > barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase > something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring > drivers to purchase car insurance, as some of the > intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution limits FEDERAL > government, not state governments, from such things, and further, not > everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could opt not to purchase > car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a vehicle. In the > ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.' > > Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted > information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise > serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. > The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This > information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security > number in Connecticut , while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii > .. > > And that is only the tip of the iceberg. > > Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of > interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many > Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the > Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing > comes close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this > Administration, not even during the Nixon years. Nixon and the > Watergate conspirators look like choirboys compared to the jokers that > populate this Administration. > > In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the > dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona . That, > too, could send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, > given that the Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal > aliens. > > And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of > cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the > Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New > Black Panther Party. The group was caught on tape committing felonies > by attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the > polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging > Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, > particularly those who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the > New Black Panthers, who have been caught on tape calling for the murder > of white people and their babies. This one is a biggie that could send > the entire Administration crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the > guts to draw a line in the sand at the Constitution and the Bill of > Rights
  8. Is it time to start planning my trip home??????????
  9. WOAH watch this video from FOX they leaked the news OKIE SCOTTIG and Bear Post Check this out >>pay close attn at about 45-50 seconds in... guy refers to "a global market interventio over the weekend" >>> WATCH THIS = http://video.foxbusi...aylist_id=87247 ALSO HEARING WELLS FARGO HAS REMOVED THEIR VOICE MESSAGE THAT USED TO SAY "WELLS FARGO DOES NOT DEAL IN IRAQI DINAR NOR PLANS TO DO SO" THIS WAS PLAYED AT THE ONSET WHEN YOU CALLED THEIR FOREIGN CURRENCY DEPT - ITS' NOW REMOVED -THIS HAD BEEN UP NOW FOR ABOUT 9 MONTHS NOW ITS GONE....THATS GIGANTIC!!! 800-626-9430 Read more: 9/11/11 would be a good date
  10. Boy you got that right!!!!!!!!!!!
  11. Damn .......................there is that bug again
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.