GemGirl7 Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 Sigh... What's the next date we're holding out hope for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex38 Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 Is that EST or PST? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danan Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 I think it looks good on you, Creepy but good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazzz27 Posted August 24, 2011 Report Share Posted August 24, 2011 Rv before the 24th? ....totally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dysan23 Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 Lets shoot for labor day.... I don't have any plans until then... Need some cash for that weekend.. All in favor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inbedded HorseHead Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 Rv before the 24th? ....totally Yes, the 24th is correct---11/24/2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gpoki Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 But is that Iraq's midnight or US (enter time zone here) midnight? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TELLTHETRUTH Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 Just my opinion.FWIW: According to Motion for extension filed in the Unitied States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, CMKX Share Holder case will be settled on or before August 24,2011. In other words they will get paid. Why will they get paid? For Fine and Penalty. F & P for what? This will need pages to explain, so google for 3.87 Trillion law suit against SEC. Who will pay them? UST UST is broke, how will they pay 50,000 plus share holder. UST will be able to afford to pay CMKX share holder after RV(Speculation, not mine most share holders speculates that they will get paid $0.80/share F&P). In conclusion RV has to occure before August 24, 2011. See link below... http://www.411-room....equest72111.pdf http://cmkxunofficia...ead=8913&page=1 Well as you can see here is another thing that has to occur, well wrong answer nothing has to occur except death and taxes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GT5Junkie Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 (i) Appellants have good cause and substantial need for this thirty (30) day extension of time, since within just the past hours, I have learned that there is a substantial and serious likelihood that sustained and comprehensive official efforts to settle and conclude this matter are now underway, and the substantive elements thereof would provide to Appellants-Plaintiffs the compensation and relief requested in their Complaint. Given the very recent and unanticipated appearance to me of this information, it would be impossible for Appellants to have exercised a more timely due diligence by moving this Court for an extension of time seven (7) days before July 25, 2011, as contemplated by 9th Cir. R. 31- 2.2(b ). Likewise, this request for an extension of time to file a brief is an application for procedural relief, and is not therefore a matter contemplated by 9th Cir. R. 27-3 (and Circuit Advisory Committee Note to 27-3(3). (ii) Accordingly, the information described above, gathered by or through me, or presented to me by persons within the scope of protected, professional privilege, and work product confidentiality, my resulting conclusions, taken to their logical and legal conclusion, strongly indicate and make it much more likely than not, that the instant appeal will soon become moot. (iii) Continuing this case for thirty (30) days, and extending Appellants' deadline to file its opening brief accordingly, would be well within the parameters of the stated rules of this Court, and an appropriate exercise of the Court's discretion inherent in deciding procedural matters such as this. (iv) Appellants' motion would likewise serve to lessen the unnecessary, yet considerable expense and hardship attendant to all parties if required to continue this appeal even though there is now pending an expected, imminent settlement of this case; and (v) Appellant and Appellee are both in accord and have stipulated and agreed to join in this motion, thereby asking the Court to agree with the litigants and treat this matter as consensual, routine and appropriate. By telephone conference late in the afternoon of July 20, 2011, counsel for Appellees-Defendants (AUSA, John Nordin, Esq.) have agreed to join in and otherwise stipulate to Appellants' Motion. they have 30 days from july 25th they have until midnight and midnight is when everythign will change in the bank systems and on forex and on CBI....ALL IMO.....we wait for midnight.....not 2pm-4pm....not gonna happen in the middle of the day.......wait for midnight Link? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
umbertino Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 (edited) Well as you can see here is another thing that has to occur, well wrong answer nothing has to occur except death and taxes. I beg to differ... You can avoid and/or evade ( at worst/best) taxes.....When Death comes... It's over.. At least on this earthly plane. Edited August 25, 2011 by umbertino Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hitman Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 We sure did see it before the 24th 24th of what 2013? Nice conjecture.... no basis just another Okie wannabe ... care to try again tomorrow? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OhioTom1 Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 Hitman... you made laugh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chooch Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 If somebody has access to PACER, they can check the status of the case online and post it for everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
umbertino Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 This theory is now debunked. Yep...Debunked for good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankenSLI Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 Ahoy, ships at sea.... Ummmmmm... Missed the boat man... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dog53 Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 Well It`s the 25th. PUMPER !!!!!!!!!!! hahahahahhahahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA_TRUTH Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 Just my opinion.FWIW: According to Motion for extension filed in the Unitied States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, CMKX Share Holder case will be settled on or before August 24,2011. In other words they will get paid. Why will they get paid? For Fine and Penalty. F & P for what? This will need pages to explain, so google for 3.87 Trillion law suit against SEC. Who will pay them? UST UST is broke, how will they pay 50,000 plus share holder. UST will be able to afford to pay CMKX share holder after RV(Speculation, not mine most share holders speculates that they will get paid $0.80/share F&P). In conclusion RV has to occure before August 24, 2011. See link below... http://www.411-room....equest72111.pdf http://cmkxunofficia...ead=8913&page=1 WHY DO PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT THE RV IS TIED TO THIS IN ANY WAY.....THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CBI..........IN CONCLUSION YOU SIR ARE A MORON!!! 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GBOY Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 Ummmmmm Hmmmmmmm sure looking good in them tight shorts. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cavebruce Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off-the-grid Posted August 25, 2011 Report Share Posted August 25, 2011 A motion is merely asking the the court to act. Was probably denied, and certainly never directly tied to IQD, although isn't this the whole "Global Settlements" case in which said settlements have never been proven to exist? I suspect the lawsuit was filed just to avoid fraud charges (IMO). Or at least buy time. Peace and Prosperity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts