Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Professor Speaks Out About Alleged Sexual Assault By Kavanaugh


Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, new york kevin said:

Karsten, additionally the FBI does not investigate crimes of this nature. Such crimes are investigated by local law enforcement .  All accusers deserve to be heard, but how can this accuser be heard if she is unwilling to come and be heard. Putting aside the statute of limitation issue.

 

They just want to use this as a stall tactic so until the FBI investigates she will refuse to be heard or testify then next Wednesday when they go ahead with the Confirmation Vote and he is Approved/Confirmed the liberals will dig in that much harder that she was not given her days.

 

A true Catch 22 as either way nothing will get done but the liberals will run with it for as long as they can.

 

Just dirty politics and the way of this current democratic party.

 

Karsten

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

And her knowing that the 11 Republicans she needs to tell her story to have already made up their minds just like you, why would you not think she would want it investigated first?  Heck you already want her prosecuted for false accusations and she hasn't even testified yet.  Wow.

 

Good RV, then BV

Funny choice of word Shabs. " 11 Republicans she needs to tell her story to have already made up their minds just like you. You mean like every Democrat in the Senate and House stating that they will never vote for any person President Trump nominates for the Supreme Court.  She should be prosecuted because she falsely accused a man of a crime. What is there to investigate? The accuser cannot recall the exact date the act allegedly occurred on .  She cannot recall the house the alleged act occurred in. She cannot say exactly who else was at the party, eliminating possible witnesses that may have seen a shaken victim after such a horrendous act occurred.  Had she been drinking too? Is she recalling the correct aggressor ? 

Edited by new york kevin
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, new york kevin said:

Funny choice of word Shabs. " 11 Republicans she needs to tell her story to have already made up their minds just like you. You mean like every Democrat in the Senate and House stating that they will never vote for any person President Trump nominates for the Supreme Court.  She should be prosecuted because she falsely accused a man of a crime. What is there to investigate? The accuser cannot recall the exact date the act allegedly occurred on .  She cannot recall the house the alleged act occurred in. She cannot say exactly who else was at the party, eliminating possible witnesses that may have seen a shaken victim after such a horrendous act occurred.  Had she been drinking too? Is she recalling the correct aggressor ? 

 

It's also funny Kevin that you went from she needs to be heard to she needs to be prosecuted, in a matter of minutes.

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The burden of proof is on the accuser not the accused.

That is the way our system is set up.

She needs to prove beyond a shadow of doubt that he did this. So far from what has been presented she is confused about who, what. where. when and why.

 

 

Innocent until PROVEN guilty.

Something liberals seem to forget conveniently when it goes against a political opponent.

 

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is not the way it works Professor Ford.  Particularly when the accuser becomes more and more uncredible at each and every turn. Allow the local PD to investigate the allegations provided you can give them a place to start. If local PD can prove what you claim occured, even after Judge Kavanaugh gets promoted to the Supreme Court you and the DNC can have him removed from the Court via impeachment. Yet now even the Senator who held onto her accusation is questioning her credibility. We have heard her, and have tried to supportive along the way. Giving her the choice of a public or private 

 

Also, Senate Judiciary Committee ranking Democrat Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-CA, has now admitted she “can’t say everything’s truthful,” with what Ford alleges. So, many people are asking what is the point of all of this if she won’t even testify and the top Democrat on the committee says she doesn’t know if the accuser is even being truthful?

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.westernjournal.com/kavanaugh-accusers-lawyer-contradicts-original-story-cnn-interview/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=newsletter-WJ&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=western-journal

 

From the above.........

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee are currently calling for a full FBI investigation into Ford’s allegations, arguing that no vote can take place on Kavanaugh’s nomination until the FBI has investigated her claims.

 

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

 

We all know just how trust worthy the FBI appears these days and I am sure they could drag a 36 year old allegation out for say 5-6 years if need be to see that the liberals keep the SCOTUS Seat Vacant.

 

Feinstien nor the FBI had a clue for 20 years that her driver was a Chinese Spy yet at the 11th Hour they can come through with a decades old claim against someone the liberals all Vowed they would not vote for no matter what.

 

Just keeps getting deeper and deeper.

 

Karsten

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

It's also funny Kevin that you went from she needs to be heard to she needs to be prosecuted, in a matter of minutes.

 

GO RV, then BV

Shabs: It is simply a matter of prosecuting her for the crime of " false police report " . Ford has every right to be heard, she has no right, and there is no legal precedence  to set pre-conditions under which she will testify. They took 3 days to investigate the Anita Hill accusations against Clarence Thomas. They have 4 more days to investigate this claim . If nothing is found, vote on Tuesday or Wednesday to affirm or not on Kavanaugh .

Edited by new york kevin
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it all to be hypocritical in many ways.

 

Both sides have their own style of tactics usually to cover or hide evidence, or simply outright denial.

 

Washington politics are dirty and both sides play the game well. Meanwhile, there are many other issues we should be

focused upon rather than what a person did or did not do sexually 30 years ago.

 

The amount and price of covering up various abuse claims within Washington is huge, it is not anything new and 

how those on the inside react to something of a sexual nature is comical, when they all know it is rampant on both 

sides.

 

We have no idea who is telling the truth. Both sides should be heard and I hope this is not just more drawn out drama,

because most folks are getting very tired of how politics is slowly destroying our land...and how politicians continue 

to think up ways to distract and divide.

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I am concerned he is innocent until proven guilty. No, well if he did it he should?????

He should make a statement that if this charade goes on and she is found to be making it up or is being used as

a shill he will sue for defamation of character and give her the chance to turn on who ever put her up to it. 

Take no prisoners.   

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This event is so typical old school left........Pelosi, Waters, Schmuer and  Feinstein....

 

And I think they are digging an even deeper hole for themselves........

 

This whole event is controlled by the Senate....and the left believes they might take control of the Senate back in 2018......

 

However.......

 

There are roughly a half a dozen Senate Seats up for grabs in States where Trump won easily.........and many of these Democrat candidates were expected to vote yes for Cavenaugh in the hopes of getting a boost for the election.........so what do they do now.........?

 

We know Corker and Flake may vote no......just to spite Trump........but what about these others.........

 

So perhaps this gets derailed.........and again the Right holds the Senate.......the next SCJ Trump nominates will probably be extremely Right wing conservative...........and with the retained majority.............that individual will be appoved and tip the scales pretty sharply......

 

Cavenaugh is about the most left friendly choice Trump could have made.......The old guard is making a big mistake with this tactic.............CL

 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, coorslite21 said:

.....the rudeness and unproffesional behavior from the left....

 

Oh, Yeah, CoorsLite21, we have the Snowflake and Buttercup Idiot Brigade Volunteer Forces showing up here all day everyday to PROUDLY prove Your point!!!

 

   :shakehead:               :shakehead:               :shakehead:

 

:facepalm2:       :facepalm2:       :facepalm2:

 

Wait For It...............................................Wait For It.........................................................

 

Here THEY come NOW issuing THEIR Red Ruby Citations for "Display Of Intellectual Speed And Power" as Badges Of Honor For ME!!!

 

:backflip:       :backflip:       :backflip:

 

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU Red Rubymeisters of the Snowflake and Buttercup Idiot Brigade Volunteer Forces for ALL the Red Ruby Citations!!!

 

:twothumbs:   :twothumbs:   :twothumbs:

 

:tiphat:   :tiphat:   :tiphat:

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Indraman said:

 

I hope to God that if I am ever on trial, that you are not one of the jurors...JMHO.

 

Indy

 

I was speaking of the court of public opinion....not an actual court.  These priests have no chance....the mere allegations have been enough to destroy them.  That was my point, nothing more.  

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, ford named a 3ed person at the party and he also has no idea what she is talking about........they didn't think this one through very well or get the proper cover.

 

They should have used ford's friends that have came out claiming she talked about the incident many times in the past when of her on accord she claims she had Never discussed it with anyone until 2012 and the marriage counselor.

 

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/3rd-person-room-kavanaugh-attack-comes-forward-blows-story-apart/?utm_source=Email&amp;utm_medium=CTBreaking&amp;utm_campaign=breaking&amp;utm_content=conservative-tribune

 

This about seems appropriate.

 

 

 

Karsten

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hits just keep on coming in.......Appears the Holton Girls were quite down for the party life .

 

https://conservativedailypost.com/kavanaugh-accusers-yearbooks-vanish-from-internet/

 

From the above article

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

Indeed, the books seemed to praise the pursuit of “boys, beer, and ‘the Zoo.'”

 

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

 

In a picture in SCRIBE 83, ‘Chrissy’ was pictured at Halloween during that year (her junior year). The caption mentioned “striving to extend” the educational ‘experience’ beyond the confines of the classroom, by playing drinking games.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

I remember girls like this from way back when.

 

Karsten

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Jim1cor13 said:

I find it all to be hypocritical in many ways.

 

Both sides have their own style of tactics usually to cover or hide evidence, or simply outright denial.

 

Washington politics are dirty and both sides play the game well. Meanwhile, there are many other issues we should be

focused upon rather than what a person did or did not do sexually 30 years ago.

 

The amount and price of covering up various abuse claims within Washington is huge, it is not anything new and 

how those on the inside react to something of a sexual nature is comical, when they all know it is rampant on both 

sides.

 

We have no idea who is telling the truth. Both sides should be heard and I hope this is not just more drawn out drama,

because most folks are getting very tired of how politics is slowly destroying our land...and how politicians continue 

to think up ways to distract and divide.

 

 

 

 

I agree with you, but in this case the democrats are playing dirty politics which is showing their ugly rear head. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.