Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Federal: members of the parliamentary opposition exercise full constitutional guarantees


yota691
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, mr.unlikely said:

Okay, so, 10,000 people counting 10,000,000 ballots lest see 10,000,000 % 10,000, carry the one... that's four to five months in sandy math, if they don't lose count and have to start over. That doesn't count teaching those 10,000 people how to count. The other thing is, who's counting the counters and how many votes they have counted? I hope y'all got a lot of life left in this you cause this may take a while.

 about the only thing you can count on over there is the lack of accountability

mr.unlikely, their not counting 10 million votes or whatever the total count was for the entire election. Their just counting the contested areas or polls an they've already started so I would assume that's where the 3 days is coming from. I'm still optimistic that July 1st is a good date...

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what about all those ballots that got burned?????  How are they going to justify counting those??????

 

Malarky at his finest trying to screw things up still since his time is about up and the gallows are a waiting.  Along with all his cohorts that are hanging by a thread trying to keep there pockets lined and the money train rolling for them.

 

It will be very interesting to see how this "final" count will turn out.  Ala 2000 and the hanging chad, thanks Al "I invented the internet, am the father of global warming, and still a stooge" Gore.

 

SR

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, King Bean said:

 

    Sorry but I'm with 10-years on this one. Talking about exact plans...…...GOI stated in January 2016,

January 2017 and January 2018 that "oil and gas law 'HCL' and article 140 will be voted on in parliament

'this session'. They seem to keep kicking that can...……but they're awful worried about extending their

                                  jobs another 3 months. It's the 3-stooges..... x 100 …… on crack.

            Image result for three stooges images

 

I'm thinking we'd have better luck with Larry Moe & Curly running Iraq . . . what could possibly wrong, Right ? :lol:

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DinarDavo said:

 

The Stooges took a much more intellectual approach to problem solving.....

ask-magic-8-ball.jpg

 

YES INDEED ! Nothing beats straight forward logical decision making process' when you have the  . . . TA DA - " The Magic 8 Ball " . . .and again It's Larry Moe & Curly exhibiting again, the awesome power of Leadership, Wisdom & a few laughs to keep it cool. :rake:

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Refused To Cancel The Vote Of Displaced Persons And Expatriates To End The Growing Controversy Between The Political Parties

"Iraqi Federation" supports the parliament's decision on a manual counting of votes in the elections

GMT Friday, June 22
 
 

Arabs today - "Iraqi federal" support the parliament's decision on a manual counting of votes in the elections

Members of the Federal Supreme Court of Iraq
Baghdad - Nahal Qabbani

BAGHDAD ( Reuters) - Iraq 's Supreme Federal Court has upheld the parliament's decision on a manual vote-counting in last month's parliamentary elections but has refused to cancel the vote for displaced people and expatriates, ending a growing debate among political parties since the results were announced.

The Iraqi parliament amended the election law in an extraordinary session, because of what was raised after the results of suspicions of "widespread fraud", the result of the adoption of electronic counting and sorting devices. The amendment provided for a manual screening of votes and cancellation of the voting results of IDP committees and Iraqis abroad. The Electoral Commission appealed the amendment, which was decided by the Supreme Court.

"The session of the Chamber of Deputies to amend the election law is legal, as allowed by Article 60 first and second of the Constitution and the rules of procedure of the House of Representatives, which exercised its authority in accordance with the Constitution," said Medhat al-Mahmoud, the president of the court. He added that "the validity of the House of Representatives and its members, which was decided by the Constitution remain until the end of its electoral session on June 30," noting that "the Federal Court to respond to appeals to amend the election law and considers it constitutional."

He explained that the court decided "after studying the articles of this law in its final form and the proceedings of the session of the Council of Representatives, which began" to "re-counting and the results of the election manually by the Constitution to ensure the voters, and to guide the House of Representatives a regulatory action to reassure the voter." However, Mahmoud al-Mahmoud pointed out that the court considered the exception of the results of the minorities from the abolition of the constitution, and that "canceling the results of the elections abroad and voting for the displaced represents a waste of voters' votes."

He pointed to "the unconstitutionality of Article III of the amendment of the election law and its abolition," noting that "the Federal Court decides not to prejudice the votes of voters that have received properly and have not received complaints." The court supported the "assignment of judges to assume the mandate of the Electoral Commission." The constitutional expert Jamal al-Asadi said that "the Federal Court approved in accordance with the promulgation of new constitutional principles in the jurisprudence of the Constitution, including that the right of the House of Representatives to enact laws in the extraordinary session, and is entitled to change the laws of elections after the conduct and before the announcement of the results, To the President of the Republic ".

He added that "Among the court confirmed the cancellation of the text of Article III of the third amendment to the law of the elections of the Council of Representatives, which abolished the results of the outside and the movement of the population of four provinces and the special voting elections for the Kurdistan region, depending on the constitutional provisions in Articles 14 and 20 on the grounds that Iraqis are equal before the law of Without distinction as to race, race, nationality, origin or religion, and that citizens have the right to participate in public affairs, including election and voting. "

The Minister of Displacement and Migration, leader of the Kurdish "Movement for Change" Jassim Jaf, supported the decision of the Federal Court. He told Asharq Al-Awsat that "the decision issued by the Federal Court was fair and in accordance with the Constitution, and reaffirmed the neutrality of the Supreme Court and the justice of the Iraqi judiciary." "It is expected that our seats will increase by 3 to 4 seats, and there may be other surprises on the way," Jaf said.

The deputy head of the "Turkmen Front" MP for the province of Kirkuk, Hassan Turan, the Federal Court decision "a victory for the will of the Iraqi people in all its aspects, because it refused to fraud in the elections of the House of Representatives, especially in the province of Kirkuk, which launched the popular revolution to expose the forgers.

And welcomed the political blocs of what was issued by the Federal Court, most notably the "National Coalition" led by Iyad Allawi and "victory" led by Haider Abadi and "decision" led by Osama Najafi. Allawi said that the decision "dealt a severe blow to the wills of fraud and corruption," while Nujaifi called in a statement to "tighten control of the storage areas of all electoral funds, in preparation for the audits to equate the will of the people and restore confidence in the political process and to protect the rights of legitimate political forces from manipulation or Fraud, as well as swift legal action against manipulators and counterfeiters. " He expressed his hope that "the decision of the Federal Supreme Court is a key building block in building confidence in the electoral process, and a gateway to move towards the future at a pace confident."

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Editorial Date: 2018/6/22 12:00  356 times read
Party Barzani: Federal court decision politicized and create a new problem
(Baghdad: al-Furat News) The MP from the Kurdistan Democratic Party bloc, headed by Massoud Barzani, said the decision issued by the Federal Court on the parliamentary elections "was consensual and politicized clear."
"The decisions issued by the Federal Court imposed on a number of matters and the Constitution was applied to certain matters, including the House of Representatives has the right to issue important decisions in special sessions, and the right to issue a decision on the elections after the conclusion, as he has The right to challenge the results even if there is a preliminary declaration of it, "noting that" this set of points will be things that prepare the legal precedent of the next sessions in parliament. " 
He added, "We are in front of a legal dilemma is the largest bloc, that was the biggest winner was the process easier and the chain of legal heresy that said that the largest bloc that forms the government," noting that "the issue of the distribution of Iraq to 18 constituencies to be a legal majority imaginary, Now there are no statistics that determine the souls of Iraq and these are dilemmas facing the democratic process and political. "
"The decision of the court was a political consensus and the consensus was clear and politicized," he said, adding that "the main responsible for what happened in the Commission is the House of Representatives and the political blocs that insisted on the appointment of a group on the basis of interests in the Commission." 
Promised that "what was issued by the court is a clear condemnation of the work of the old commission and the restoration will be a condemnation of the decision taken to form and carried out by the House of Representatives and the blocks that participated in it is responsible for the reality that occurred today." 
"The judiciary has done its job but created new legal problems in the political arena. We thank him for trying to get out of the crisis, but this does not mean that we have finished the problem completely and there are signs of extending the current council," he said.
The Federal Court declared, Amsalmakhis, the constitutionality of the decision of the House of Representatives in the Third Amendment Law of the House of Representatives Law No. 45 of 2013 amended, and responses to the appeals filed. 
The head of the court, Medhat al-Mahmoud, said in a press conference held yesterday that "the recounting of the results of the elections manually conform to the Constitution in order to reassure the voters, and that the House of Representatives a regulatory action to reassure the voter," noting that "the decision to cancel the voting results for the Kurdistan region and voting and the outside vote is contrary Of the Constitution "
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Release date: 2018/6/21 21:55  363 times read
A legal expert points out three important issues in a Federal Court decision today
A legal expert, three important issues in the announcement of the Federal Supreme Court, on Thursday, the constitutionality of the decision of the House of Representatives in the Third Amendment to the Law of the elections of the Council of Representatives No. 45 of 2013 amended, and the responses to the submitted.
Jamal al-Asadi said in a statement received by the {Euphrates News} copy of it, "the Federal Supreme Court today issued a decision in the cases numbered [99, 104, 106} and established by the Electoral Commission for elections and the President of the Republic in addition to their jobs and the Kurdistan Democratic Party, respectively, To the Speaker of the House of Representatives in addition to his job. The Court has consolidated the three cases in short time and effort based on the provisions of Article 75 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and that the same subject and that the defendant is one.
He added that "the Federal Court, has approved three new constitutional principles in the jurisprudence of the Constitution may be contrary to the general constitutional principles in its decision, which are as follows: {The right of the House of Representatives to enact laws in the extraordinary session, or in open meetings, and the right of the House of Representatives to change the laws Elections after the elections and after the announcement of the results and before ratification by the Federal Court, and approved the principle of the constitutionality of non-sending laws to the President of the Republic, and certainly ended the role of the President of the Republic in the area of ratification of legislation.
"As the court also confirmed the constitutional principle and one contained in the provisions of Article 14 and Article 20 of the Iraqi Constitution, which are as follows: (Cancel article 3 of the third amendment to the law of elections of the House of Representatives, which canceled the results of the outside and the movement of the population of four provinces and special voting elections for the Kurdistan Region In accordance with the constitutional provisions of articles 14-20, considering that Iraqis are equal before the law without distinction as to race, race, nationality, origin or religion, and citizens have the right to participate in public affairs, including election and voting. " 
He pointed out that "the thing that draws attention in the decision of the Federal Court, which is the other side of the decision, has come in two places restricted by the provisions of the third amendment to the law of the House of Representatives:
1- In the first three lines on page 13 of the ruling and in the first three lines of page 14 of the ruling, which states: "As for the consequences of irregularities such as forgery and others, in which complaints were submitted to the Commission in accordance with the provisions of Article 8 of the law of the Commission or The irregularities mentioned in the official reports, which are based on substantial legal evidence, can be postponed until the announcement of the results negatively or positively, with the aim of walking the rest of the electoral process legally and transparent and the announcement of the final results and sent to the Federal Supreme Court for approval after the To verify and according to its competence} ".
2 - What is stated in the lines from {9 to 16} of page 17 of the ruling, which states that {by canceling the votes in the polling stations in all of Iraq and abroad, which raised or will raise the complaints or reported violations in the relevant official reports if there is a Violations in obtaining such votes, such as forgery and other irregularities affecting the freedom of elections and the character of the will of the voter, after the process of counting and sorting manual provided for in Article 1 of the Third Amendment Law of the elections of the House of Representatives for these votes only and not to prejudice the votes of voters that I got suspicious Legal and sound and without any irregularities have not received complaints or mentioned in the official reports related to violations and without the need for the process of counting and sorting manually by whether these votes received inside or outside Iraq. "
The legal expert explained that "the concept in these two positions in the decision of the Federal Supreme Court follows: 
1 - the continuation of the Commission to complete the final results announcement and send the names of the winners to the Federal Court to be able to ratify the final results and the postponement of the announcement of the consequences of the irregularities such as forgery and others, complaints in accordance with Article 8 of the Law Commission or contained in the reports of the Committee set up by the Council of Ministers, which means that the Federal Court considers that the Council of Representatives as possible to be organ who befriends them permanently in any number whatsoever. 
2. open the way to receive Complaints for all to be determined in the centers or stations 
3 - Counting and sorting is in part, and specifically in respect of which complaints have been received or mentioned in the official reports related to violations only.
To view the text of the court's decision, click here
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

image.php?token=371ef820107d3c25f691d34f7a777dca&size=

Iraq Counting
 
Number of readings: 6386 22-06-2018 10:27 AM

 
 

22-06-2018 10:27 AM 

 

The coalition of Iraqi forces on Friday welcomed the decision of the Federal Supreme Court, describing it as fair and balanced. 

The coalition of Iraqi forces in a statement, 'full commitment to the decision of the Federal Supreme Court for the third amendment to the election law returned to him came the governor of the voters and the will of the people to change'

The Alliance called in a statement that 'everyone should respect the decision in the belief in the democratic political process and the rule of law and related laws are organized for the legitimacy of the electoral process and the resulting government and state institutions'.

The Coalition of Iraqi Forces called in its statement, the Council of Judges of the Electoral Commission, that 'counting and counting, which was approved by the decision of the Federal Court all polling stations in all of Iraq without exception or favoritism, strengthening and guarantee and to preserve the votes of Iraqis who sought change.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D8%B6%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8

The interests of Iraq's conflicting parties on the results of the elections are secondary to the interests of foreign parties competing for influence in the country, but in the end they meet when the status quo must be preserved and the political process protected from collapse, forcing the result to push for a political settlement and under judicial cover for the election crisis.

BAGHDAD - Iraq's highest judicial authority on Thursday approved most of the decisions taken by the Iraqi parliament to deal with the widespread uncertainty surrounding last month's legislative elections, with the exception of abolishing the votes of voters and displaced people, but in practice indirectly endorsed most of the results. Declared for this election.

Thus, the court's decision is the closest thing to a process of appeasing all the conflicting political parties on the election results, paving the way for a political settlement of the crisis, which is likely to be urgently required by internal and external parties interested in the Iraqi situation and to calm it in order to preserve its influence and interests in Iraq.

Since 2003, Iran and the United States, despite their differences and conflicting interests, have come to a meeting point on the political situation in Iraq, neither of which seems ready to accept the collapse of the political process they have sponsored together and guarantee each other control over the resolution. Iraq and its diversion to its own advantage.

The parliament held an extraordinary session, following the announcement of the results on the nineteenth of May last, during which he approved fundamental amendments to the elections that took place on the twelfth of the same month, obliged to apply retroactively.

These include the freezing of the functions of the High Electoral Commission responsible for the conduct of the ballot and the announcement of its results, and the assignment of judges to perform the counting and counting of votes, following doubts about the electronic counting process applied by the Office. The parliament also canceled in its extraordinary session the results of the elections held for Iraqis living abroad, and displaced from their areas because of the war on the inside.

Several parties appealed to the judiciary in the parliamentary decisions on the elections, and said that current members who lost in the elections were behind them.

The Federal Supreme Court of Iraq, with its irrevocable and irrevocable judgments, held a public hearing on Thursday to announce its decisions after the appeals. The court approved most of the amendments made by parliament, with the exception of abolishing the votes of voters and displaced people, but observers say the effect of this measure will be formal on the election results.

The decision of the court ensures that the declared results remain the same, with the manual counting and counting of the funds in question at 100 percent, but canceled the third article of the amendment in full, which provides for the abolition of the votes of voters abroad and displaced.

Thus, the court has proven to win the list of others backed by the leader of the Sadrist movement Moqtada al-Sadr in first place and win the list of the opening supported by Iran in second place, and victory list led by Prime Minister Haider Abadi ranked third.

As parliament approaches the end of its term, a question arises about the government's continued functioning without parliamentary oversight

In preliminary forecasts, observers believe that the procedures established by the Federal Court will not change much in the equation of the declared results for both the big and young winners, especially with the keeping of the voices of outsiders and displaced people, Led by Jamal Karbouli and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan.

As the Iraqi parliament approaches the end of its constitutional mandate, a question arises as to how the executive branch will continue its work with the absence of the supervisory authority represented by the House of Representatives. This question translates the fears of the various political parties about the possibility of the government taking advantage of its wide powers to clamp down on its competitors. Political parties and political currents.

According to the Iraqi constitution, the government turns to the conduct of business by the end of the parliament, which is four calendar years starting from the first session of the House of Representatives. But Iraqi laws do not separate the powers of the caretaker government, which is considered by the jurists of the Constitution completely to their hands.

The powers of the caretaker government are not new to Iraq, as the country has witnessed for several months in 2010, when many parties resorted to challenging the results of the legislative elections that year, which hindered the negotiations of forming the new government at that time, Maliki in the conduct of business for an additional 8 months, above the age specified in the Constitution, four years.

In the meantime, the legal controversy did not result in any variable, and left al-Maliki full powers, engaged in a judicial dispute of his rival on the then prime minister, Iyad Allawi, who won the list in the elections but denied the right to form a government on the pretext that a larger bloc of them formed under the dome The new parliament has the right to form a new government.

It was said that Maliki used the powers of his broad office to influence the Iraqi judiciary and to obtain an explanation from the Supreme Court strips the winning list in the elections of its right to form a government.

Opponents of the current prime minister, Haidar al-Abadi, fear that the scenario of the government's secession to power in Iraq will be repeated during the negotiations to form a new government, which may be easier to liquidate or pressure them.

They are pushing to restrict the powers of the caretaker government after the thirtieth of this month, limited to daily affairs. But the Abadi group says the laws in force are free of any restrictions that can be imposed on the government after the end of the parliament's term.

The Arabs

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Expert: The Iraqi judiciary approved the right of parliament to legislate the laws in an extraordinary session and change the laws of elections before the announcement of the results

acourt.jpg

The Constitutional Court, in accordance with a decision on the parliamentary elections yesterday, approved new constitutional principles in constitutional jurisprudence, constitutional expert Gamal al-Asadi said on Friday.

"The Federal Court has approved new constitutional principles in constitutional jurisprudence, including the right of the House of Representatives to legislate the laws at the special session, and it is entitled to change the election laws after they were held and before the announcement The results, as well as the constitutionality of non-submission of laws to the President of the Republic. "

He added that "Among the court confirmed the cancellation of the text of Article III of the third amendment to the law of the elections of the Council of Representatives, which abolished the results of the outside and the movement of the population of four provinces and the special voting elections for the Kurdistan region, depending on the constitutional provisions in Articles 14 and 20 on the grounds that Iraqis are equal before the law of Without distinction as to race, race, nationality, origin or religion, and that citizens have the right to participate in public affairs, including election and voting. "

The Federal Court on Thursday approved the constitutionality of all articles of the third amendment law to the electoral law, which was legislated by the House of Representatives on June 6, while the third article on the cancellation of the votes of voters abroad and displaced and the movement of population in four provinces and the special vote in the Kurdistan region.

The Court separated the articles of the law, to decide on each hand, and came as follows:

 (Article 1) of the Third Amendment Law on the Law of Elections of the Council of Representatives, (replaced Article 38 of the Law of the House of Representatives, replacing the method of counting and sorting to the hand, in the whole of Iraq), the Court finds that the direction of Parliament is a regulatory action, This trend is not contrary to the provisions of the Constitution.

(Article 2) of the Third Amendment Law on the Law of Elections of the Chamber of Deputies, which states that (the Commission must implement the application of the ballot papers of the report issued by the electronic investigation and take the necessary decisions thereon), the Court finds that this procedure is not contrary to the Constitution.

(Article 3), which abolishes the elections abroad, the elections of the displaced in the camps, and the special vote in the Kurdistan region, the cancellation of these results in absolute terms, without discrimination, whether this was done by the accelerator or other, this cancellation is a waste of votes, Contrary to the constitution and the citizen's right to equality, nomination, voting, and opinion in the general elections.

As for the results of the fraud, the announcement of their results can be postponed until they are finally decided. On the other hand, in Article 3, the abolition of votes without discrimination violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

(Article 4) of the Third Amendment Law on the Law of Elections of the Council of Representatives, which states that (in the event of irregularities requiring the cancellation of some of the results of the elections, the judiciary may cancel these results), the court finds that the provision contained in article 4 of the law does not violate Provisions of the Constitution.

(Article 5), which provides for the assignment of 9 commissioners, instead of the Board of Commissioners, and the duration of the term not exceeding three years, this article constitutes an amendment to Article 49 of the Law on Judicial Organization, in addition to the provision contained in this article, Articles 47 and 98 I) of the Constitution.

(Article 6), which makes Iraq for the seats (quota) one circle, it is a regulatory issue does not violate the Constitution.

(Article 7) The provisions of the third amendment to the 2018 elections shall apply to the fact that the elections are not yet complete and therefore do not constitute a violation of the Constitution.

(Article 8), which stipulates that no provision of the law is inconsistent with the provisions of the Third Amendment to the Elections Law, which does not violate the provisions of the Constitution.

The Court stated that, based on the foregoing, when reviewing appeals, the promulgation of the law as aspects or appeals contained in the articles of the Act, the Federal Court decides:

First: Article 3 is unconstitutional and repealed for violating articles 14, 20 and 38 of the Constitution, respecting the will of the voter and not wasting his vote.

Second: Matching the rest of the articles of the Third Amendment Law to the Law of Elections of the Council of Representatives to the provisions of the Constitution.

Thirdly, the two sides should bring the costs of the cases in the three cases, amounting to 100 thousand dinars only.

The court concluded that the ruling was issued by the court, binding on all parties, by agreement, and was followed publicly in the session of 21 June. Finished (1)

https://www.iraqpressagency.com/?p=276983

 
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Opponents of the current prime minister, Haidar al-Abadi, fear that the scenario of the government's secession to power in Iraq will be repeated during the negotiations to form a new government, which may be easier to liquidate or pressure them.

They are pushing to restrict the powers of the caretaker government after the thirtieth of this month, limited to daily affairs. But the Abadi group says the laws in force are free of any restrictions that can be imposed on the government after the end of the parliament's term."

 

IF I understand this, Abadi gets to form a caretaker government after the current session runs out June 30th, with greater powers than his opponents are comfortable with.  They want to extend the current government instead (and continue their immunity).

 

IIIIIIM OK with that.   Maybe he can get some things done without having to worry about excessive holidays, political infighting and meeting a quorum.  Maybe even push through some overdue legislation.  Maybe round up some crooks whose immunity has expired on June 30th.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Carrello said:

Thank you Yota, Buti, DOD, fnbplanet, and others that add to the conversation with thoughtful, factual comments that give us a better understanding as to what is taking place in Iraq and our investment.

 

Have a great weekend!  😎

Your welcome

thanks for the kind words

i try

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎6‎/‎22‎/‎2018 at 8:46 AM, 10 YEARS LATER said:

….kinda sounds like “ getting to change the law(s) as we go.”

 

So parliament got their 're-do'. I think if they also get a 3-month extension on their jobs then they should be forced to clean up all those laws still sitting on the books from the last 4-years of doing a lot of nothing. What about the water crisis that developed right after the elections, where they could only cobble together 50 folks for a 'discussion' ?? And how about that HCL, article 140. They shouldn't be allowed to just sit around while the re-count happens. They can't dump these losers fast enough.

                                                                                                                                                                                  ;)

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m out of pocket and unable to do my normal reading but I think I remember reading something about Iraq was going to take 3 days to recount the election results.  When is this going to take place?  Have they stated the recount?  To me nothing is going to happen until there is a  government!

Thanks for your response.  I just don’t have time to check out all the articles. 

 

 

 

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, King Bean said:

 

So parliament got their 're-do'. I think if they also get a 3-month extension on their jobs then they should be forced to clean up all those laws still sitting on the books from the last 4-years of doing a lot of nothing. What about the water crisis that developed right after the elections, where they could only cobble together 50 folks for a 'discussion' ?? And how about that HCL, article 140. They shouldn't be allowed to just sit around while the re-count happens. They can't dump these losers fast enough.

                                                                                                                                                                                  ;)

 

Right you are again KB - :twothumbs:

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Former Commission President: Three days to end the process of counting and sorting

The head of the Electoral Commission, former Adel Lami, Thursday, the end of the Electoral Commission of the process of counting and manual counting of the results of the elections within three days, indicating that more than 10 thousand polling staff assigned to complete the process.
Al-Lami said in an interview with «Journal News», that “the process of counting and sorting will be completed within one day and will be checked the next day and then will announce the final results after only 3 days,
adding that “the Commission summoned more than 10 thousand polling staff to complete the counting and manual sorting and auditing results With electronic counting and sorting, “noting that” the political parties will be divided in the hands of a supporter and refused to change the results and the detection of fraud in polling stations and the electronic retrieval of electoral data. ”
The Federal Court has supported the parliamentary amendments to the election law No. (45) for the year 2013 except for Article III, which provides for the cancellation of the results of the elections abroad and displaced.

http://www.aljournal.com/%D8%B1%D8%A6%D9%8A%D8%B3-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%81%D9%88%D8%B6%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A8%D9%82-%D8%AB%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AB%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%85-%D9%83%D9%81%D9%8A%D9%84%D8%A9/

 

There's the 3 day article...sorry that's all I know.

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you IQD=Freedom 

 

Thank you Yota for putting my request with articles concerning this, made my reading easy.  I’m only able to pop in for a few minutes so your organization really helps me.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to Federal: members of the parliamentary opposition exercise full constitutional guarantees
  • Adam Montana locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.