Federal: members of the parliamentary opposition exercise full constitutional guarantees

[pacmen]

14 hours ago, 3n1 said:

 

Aug. 19th ratified election .... by constitution up to 90 days to gather, get the Speaker,  Pres and PM ... articles have stated it wont take that long but goi history proves otherwise , the no compromise backbiting fighting spirit is something to behold ... with any luck the loritering & hanging out in the cafeteria all day till time to clock out are over   

Thanks 3n1....Have a Bless Week 

[yota691]

The Iraqi judiciary details the changes in the election results

 Twilight News    
 36 minutes ago

Shafaq News / The Supreme Judicial Council announced details of the changes in the electoral process during the tenure of judges assigned to the functions of running the Electoral Commission. 
The Council outlined in a statement the details of the changes: 
• The issuance of the Third Amendment Law of the Elections Law No. 45 of 2013 which became effective from the date of voting by the House of Representatives on 6/6/2018 The Supreme Judicial Council formed a committee that moved to the Electoral Commission for elections to see the details The work of the Commission.
- After the objection to the amendment law mentioned and submit cases to the Federal Supreme Court and requested the revocation of the law was careful in the commencement of practical procedures for the implementation of the process of sorting and counting manual awaiting the decision of the Federal Court on that and during this period a meeting of the Supreme Judicial Council for the assignment of judges members of the Board of Commissioners to manage the High Commission The appointment of judges to the directors of the electoral offices of the governorates and the examination of options for the manual counting and counting process. 
- After the decision of the Federal Supreme Court containing a response to the opposition to the law to amend the elections met the Board of Commissioners and decided to implement the decision of the Federal Supreme Court that the manual counting and counting for the stations for which complaints were submitted and that the process is under the supervision of observers of the United Nations and political entities and the media.
- The Board of Commissioners delegated the practical procedures for the process of sorting and counting manual and the distribution of tasks among the members of the Board of Commissioners, where the section moved them to the provinces, which found it better to conduct the process of counting and sorting in the field in those provinces, while the stations were brought in respect of complaints from other provinces to Baghdad A number of UNHCR staff and staff of the Higher Judicial Council were present in the presence of United Nations observers, led by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General of the United Nations (Jan Kubic), his assistant (Alice Wolbol), a number of ambassadors and representatives Diplomatic corps 
in Iraq and observers of political entities. 
- Regarding the elections abroad, the official reports received from the committee formed by the Council of Ministers were transferred to three countries - Jordan, Iran and Turkey - to conduct the counting and manual counting process for the stations submitted complaints.
- The number of appeals received on the decision of the Board of Commissioners delegated regarding the results of counting and 
manual counting (248) appeal was reviewed by the judicial body for the elections, which consists of three judges in the Court of Cassation and a number of them were accepted and the rest responded according to the evidence provided by each applicant. 
• As a result of the process of sorting and counting of the manual stations and stations in all governorates of Iraq resulted in variables with the results of agencies: - 
First: changes in the candidates in the same list. 
1 - Baghdad (Asrun) candidate Nasreen Fadel Rahm Ali instead of the candidate Azad Hamid Shafi Ross Mohammed. 
2 - Baghdad (National Coalition) candidate Yahya Ahmed Faraj Hammadi instead of the candidate Hassan Khudair Abbas Shuwaird. 
3- Al-Anbar (Al-Anbar, our identity) candidate Faleh Younis Hassan Jadoua instead of candidate Zeinab Abdel-Hamid Saleh Mubarak.
4 - Anbar (Abrun) candidate Ibtisam Mohammed Darb Khalaf instead of candidate Nuri Ghafel Hamadi Tohma. 
5. Nineveh (Democratic Party of Kurdistan) candidate Safwan Bashir Younis instead of candidate Khaleda Khalil Rasho HH. 
6- Nineveh (Party of the masses) candidate Siham Abbas Ali Hamadeh instead of candidate Mohamed Farman Shaher Salman. 
7 - Dhi Qar (Asrun) candidate Hamadullah Mezher Gul Hamdan instead of the candidate and Sunan Abdul Hussein Fleih Hassan. 
8- Dhi Qar (Stream of Wisdom) candidate Ajyal Karim Salman Mohi instead of the candidate Star Jabbar Abbas Taher. 
9 - Salah al-Din (Iraqi decision coalition) candidate Shamael Sahab rain instead of candidate Khaleda Ibrahim. 
10 - Basra (Victory) candidate Mzahim Mustafa Mansour instead of candidate Farouk Hilal Juma. 
Second: The changes that took place in the transfer of a seat from one list to another.
1 - Baghdad (Alliance of conquest) candidate Mohammed Sahib Khalaf instead of the candidate of the Baghdad Alliance Mahmoud Hussein Mutlaq Shalash. 
2 - Baghdad (Nofal al-Nashi) Nominee Nawfal Sharif Jouda Shahar instead of candidate for Mia Shawi Cup Mahana because of forging her testimony. 
• The work of the judges assigned to carry out the functions of the Board of Commissioners and the directors of electoral offices in the governorates ended with the approval of the Federal Supreme Court on the results of the elections on 12/8/2018 according to the provisions of Article 5 of the Third Amendment Law of the House of Representatives Elections Law No. 45 of 2013. Thus, The Supreme Court has entrusted the task assigned to it under the Third Amendment Law to the House of Representatives Election Law.

Keywords: 

[Butifldrm]

The Elections Of The Council Of Representatives

 

 

POLITICAL NEWS

 Last updated 28/08/2018  33 0

 

Baghdad conscious

With the issuance of the Third Amendment Law of the Elections Law No. 45 of 2013 which became effective from the date of voting by the Council of Representatives on 6/6/2018, the Supreme Judicial Council formed a committee that went to the Independent High Electoral Commission for details of the work of the Commission.

- After objecting to the amendment of the said law and submitting cases to the Federal Supreme Court and requesting the revocation of the law was careful in the commencement of practical procedures for the implementation of the process of counting and counting manual awaiting the decision of the Federal Court on that and during this period a meeting of the Supreme Judicial Council for the assignment of judges members of the Board of Commissioners to manage the High Commission The appointment of judges to the directors of the electoral offices of the governorates and the examination of options for the manual counting and counting process.

- After the decision of the Federal Supreme Court containing a response to the opposition to the law to amend the elections met the Board of Commissioners and decided to implement the decision of the Federal Supreme Court that the counting and manual counting for the stations for which complaints were filed and that this process is under the supervision of the observers of the United Nations and political entities and the media.

- The Board of Commissioners delegated the practical procedures for the process of counting and counting manual and the distribution of tasks among the members of the Board of Commissioners, where the section moved them to the provinces, which found better to conduct the process of counting and sorting in the field in those provinces, while the stations were brought in respect of complaints from other provinces to Baghdad A number of UNHCR staff and staff of the Supreme Judicial Council were also involved in the process of counting and counting, in the presence of UN observers, led by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General of the United Nations (Jan Kubic), his assistant (Alice Wolbol), a number of ambassadors and representatives of the Diplomatic corps

In Iraq and observers of political entities.

- Regarding the elections abroad, the official reports received from the committee formed by the Council of Ministers were transferred to three countries, namely Jordan, Iran and Turkey, to perform the counting and counting process for the stations submitted complaints.

- Number of appeals received on the decision of the Board of Commissioners delegated regarding the results of counting and counting

(248) appeal was examined by the Judicial Commission for the elections, which consists of three judges in the Court of Cassation and was accepted number of them and the rest of the rest according to the evidence provided by each applicant.

As a result of the counting and manual counting of polling stations and stations in all governorates of Iraq resulted in variables with the results of agencies:

First: Changes in candidates in the same list.

1 - Baghdad (Asrun) candidate Nasreen Fadel Rahm Ali instead of the candidate Azad Hamid Shafi Ross Mohammed.

2 - Baghdad (National Coalition) candidate Yahya Ahmed Faraj Hammadi instead of the candidate Hassan Khudair Abbas Shuwaird.

3- Al-Anbar (Al-Anbar, our identity) candidate Faleh Younis Hassan Jadoua instead of candidate Zeinab Abdel-Hamid Saleh Mubarak.

4 - Anbar (Abrun) candidate Ibtisam Mohammed Darb Khalaf instead of candidate Nuri Ghafel Hamadi Tohma.

5. Nineveh (Democratic Party of Kurdistan) candidate Safwan Bashir Younis instead of candidate Khaleda Khalil Rasho HH.

6- Nineveh (Party of the masses) candidate Siham Abbas Ali Hamadeh instead of candidate Mohamed Farman Shaher Salman.

7 - Dhi Qar (Asrun) candidate Hamdallah Mezher Gul Hamdan instead of the candidate and Sen

Abdul Hussein Faleh Hassan.

8- Dhi Qar (Stream of Wisdom) candidate Ajyal Karim Salman Mohi instead of the candidate Star Jabbar Abbas Taher.

9 - Salah al-Din (Iraqi decision coalition) candidate Shamael Sahab rain instead of candidate Khaleda Ibrahim.

10 - Basra (Victory) candidate Mzahim Mustafa Mansour instead of candidate Farouk Hilal Juma.

Second: The changes that took place in the transfer of a seat from one list to another.

1 - Baghdad (Alliance of conquest) candidate Mohammed Sahib Khalaf instead of the candidate of the Baghdad Alliance Mahmoud Hussein Mutlaq Shalash.

2 - Baghdad (Nofal al-Nashi) Nominee Nawfal Sharif Jouda Shahar instead of candidate for Mia Shawi Cup Mahana because of forging her testimony.

The judges appointed to carry out the tasks of the Board of Commissioners and the directors of the electoral offices in the governorates ended with the approval of the Federal Supreme Court on the results of the elections on 12/8/2018 according to the provisions of Article 5 of the Third Amendment Law of the House of Representatives Elections Law No. 45 of 2013, The Supreme Court has entrusted the task entrusted to it under the Third Amendment Law to the House of Representatives Election Law.

http://ina.iq/archives/57565

[yota691]

The Supreme Judiciary details the changes in the election results

Readers

 

 

The Supreme Judiciary details the changes in the election results

 

28-08-2018 03:52 PM

 

The Euphrates -

 

The Supreme Judicial Council announced details of the changes in the electoral process during the tenure of judges assigned to the functions of running the Electoral Commission. 
In a statement, the council outlined the details of the changes: 
• With the issuance of the Third Amendment Law of the Elections Law No. 45 of 2013 which became effective from the date of voting by the Council of Representatives on 6/6/2018, the Supreme Judicial Council formed a committee that went to the Independent High Electoral Commission for details of the work of the Commission. 
- After the objection to the amendment law mentioned and submit cases to the Federal Supreme Court and requested the revocation of the law was careful in the commencement of practical procedures for the implementation of the process of sorting and counting manual awaiting the decision of the Federal Court on that and during this period a meeting of the Supreme Judicial Council for the assignment of judges members of the Board of Commissioners to manage the High Commission The appointment of judges to the directors of the electoral offices of the governorates and the examination of options for the manual counting and counting process. 
- After the decision of the Federal Supreme Court containing a response to the opposition to the law to amend the elections met the Board of Commissioners and decided to implement the decision of the Federal Supreme Court that the manual counting and counting for the stations for which complaints were submitted and that the process is under the supervision of observers of the United Nations and political entities and the media. 
- The Board of Commissioners delegated the practical procedures for the process of sorting and counting manual and the distribution of tasks among the members of the Board of Commissioners, where the section moved them to the provinces, which found it better to conduct the process of counting and sorting in the field in those provinces, while the stations were brought in respect of complaints from other provinces to Baghdad A number of UNHCR staff and staff of the Higher Judicial Council were present in the presence of United Nations observers, led by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General of the United Nations (Jan Kubic), his assistant (Alice Wolbol), a number of ambassadors and representativesDiplomatic Corps 
In Iraq and observers of political entities. 
- Regarding the elections abroad, the official reports received from the committee formed by the Council of Ministers were transferred to three countries - Jordan, Iran and Turkey - to conduct the counting and manual counting process for the stations submitted complaints. 
- Number of appeals received on the decision of the Board of Commissioners delegated regarding the results of counting and counting 
(248) appeal was examined by the Judicial Commission for the elections, which consists of three judges in the Court of Cassation and was accepted number of them and the rest of the rest according to the evidence provided by each applicant. 
• As a result of the process of counting and counting manual stations and stations in all governorates of Iraq resulted in variables with the results of agencies: - 
First: Changes in candidates in the same list. 
1 - Baghdad (Asrun) candidate Nasreen Fadel Rahm Ali instead of the candidate Azad Hamid Shafi Ross Mohammed. 
2 - Baghdad (National Coalition) candidate Yahya Ahmed Faraj Hammadi instead of the candidate Hassan Khudair Abbas Shuwaird. 
3- Al-Anbar (Al-Anbar, our identity) candidate Faleh Younis Hassan Jadoua instead of candidate Zeinab Abdel-Hamid Saleh Mubarak. 
4 - Anbar (Abrun) candidate Ibtisam Mohammed Darb Khalaf instead of candidate Nuri Ghafel Hamadi Tohma. 
5. Nineveh (Democratic Party of Kurdistan) candidate Safwan Bashir Younis instead of candidate Khaleda Khalil Rasho HH. 
6- Nineveh (Party of the masses) candidate Siham Abbas Ali Hamadeh instead of candidate Mohamed Farman Shaher Salman. 
7 - Dhi Qar (Asrun) candidate Hamadullah Mezher Gul Hamdan instead of the candidate and Sunan Abdul Hussein Fleih Hassan. 
8- Dhi Qar (Stream of Wisdom) candidate Ajyal Karim Salman Mohi instead of the candidate Star Jabbar Abbas Taher. 
9 - Salah al-Din (Iraqi decision coalition) candidate Shamael Sahab rain instead of candidate Khaleda Ibrahim. 
10 - Basra (Victory) candidate Mzahim Mustafa Mansour instead of candidate Farouk Hilal Juma. 
Second: The changes that took place in the transfer of a seat from one list to another. 
1 - Baghdad (Alliance of conquest) candidate Mohammed Sahib Khalaf instead of the candidate of the Baghdad Alliance Mahmoud Hussein Mutlaq Shalash. 
2 - Baghdad (Nofal al-Nashi) Nominee Nawfal Sharif Jouda Shahar instead of candidate for Mia Shawi Cup Mahana because of forging her testimony. 
• The work of the judges assigned to carry out the functions of the Board of Commissioners and the directors of electoral offices in the governorates ended with the approval of the Federal Supreme Court on the results of the elections on 12/8/2018 according to the provisions of Article 5 of the Third Amendment Law of the House of Representatives Elections Law No. 45 of 2013. Thus, The Supreme Court has entrusted the task entrusted to it under the Third Amendment Law to the House of Representatives Election Law

[Butifldrm]

Decisions of the Federal Court on the largest bloc and the first session of Parliament

2 hours ago

10652 views

+ -

NRT

The Federal Supreme Court issued a decision earlier in which it defined the concept of the largest bloc number, as indicated the steps followed during the first session of the parliament to choose a speaker of the House of Representatives and his deputies .

According to documents issued by the Federal Court, the largest bloc number is either that bloc formed after the elections through a single electoral list, and entered the election on behalf of a certain number and won the most seats, or the cluster that gathered from two or more lists of electoral Entered the elections with different names and numbers and then gathered in one bloc in the House of Representatives.

The court explained that during the first session of the parliament called by the President of the Republic, the President commissioned the candidate of the parliamentary bloc, which became the number of seats in the first session of the House of Representatives more numerous than the rest of the blocks.

The Federal Court stated in a decision issued in 2010 that the House of Representatives is elected at its first session as its president and then first deputy and second deputy in accordance with the provisions of Article 55 of the Constitution.

 It is scheduled to hold the first meeting of the House of Representatives next Monday, September 3, a date called for by President Fuad Masum, for the first session of the new parliament.

http://www.nrttv.com/AR/News.aspx?id=3829&MapID=2

[Butifldrm]

 

2018/09/09 13:08

• Number of readings 36
• Section: Iraq
•  

Issuing a constitutional ruling regarding the appointment of a member of the House of Representatives as an official position

 

 

Baghdad / المسلة: The Federal Supreme Court, Sunday, September 9, 2018, the absence of a constitutional impediment of assuming the member of the House of Representatives official position provided that the abandonment of his seat, "pointing out that" the alternative is the highest votes, followed by the same electoral entity and the province. "

"The Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all the members of the judges and considered an appeal in paragraph (1) of Article (1) of the Law on the replacement of members of the House of Representatives No. 6 of the year 2006 ".

He added that "this paragraph states that" membership in the House of Representatives expires for one of the following reasons: the member of the Council shall assume a position in the Presidency of the State or the Council of Ministers or any other government post. "

He pointed out that "the plaintiff also appealed the unconstitutionality of Article 15 of the rules of procedure of the House of Representatives, which stipulates that" a member of the Council who becomes a member of the Presidency Council, or in the Council of Ministers resigned from the membership of the Council and does not enjoy privileges of membership.

"The court confirmed that there is no constitutional obstacle to the assumption of a member of the House of Representatives an official position, provided that he relinquishes his parliamentary seat, and that the alternative holder of the highest votes followed by the same electoral entity and the province and the province in respect of the will of the Iraqi voter.

He stated that "the Court referred to Article 49 / VI, which states that" the membership of the Chamber of Deputies, any work or other official position may not be combined, "and accordingly decided to dismiss the case because it was not based on the Constitution.

The obelisk

http://almasalah.com/ar/news/149675/صدور-حكم-دستوري-بشأن-تبوء-عضو-مجلس-النواب-منصبا-رسميا

[yota691]

Issuing a constitutional ruling regarding the appointment of a member of the House of Representatives as an official position

Readers

 

 

Issuing a constitutional ruling regarding the appointment of a member of the House of Representatives as an official position

 

09-09-2018 01:27 PM

 

The Euphrates -

 

The Federal Supreme Court confirmed on Sunday that there is no constitutional impediment to appointing a member of the Chamber of Deputies as an official position, provided that he relinquishes his parliamentary seat, pointing out that the alternative is the highest number of votes followed by the same electoral entity and governorate. 

"The Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all the members of the judges and considered an appeal in paragraph (1) of Article (1) of the Law on the replacement of members of the House of Representatives No. (6) for the year 2006." 

"This paragraph states that" membership in the House of Representatives shall end for one of the following reasons: 1. The member of the Council shall assume a position in the Presidency of the State or the Council of Ministers or any other governmental office. " 

He pointed out that "the plaintiff also challenged in his lawsuit the unconstitutionality of Article (15) of the rules of procedure of the House of Representatives, which stipulated that" the member of the Council who becomes a member of the Presidency Council, or in the Council of Ministers resigned from the membership of the Council and does not enjoy privileges of membership). 

"The court confirmed that there is no constitutional impediment to the assumption of a member of the House of Representatives official position, provided that he relinquishes his parliamentary seat, and that the alternative of the highest votes followed by the same electoral entity and the province and the province in respect of the will of the Iraqi voter. 

He added that "the court referred in its ruling to Article (49 / VI), which states that (it is not permissible to combine the membership of the House of Representatives, and any work or other official position), and accordingly decided to respond to the case because it is based on a charter of the Constitution"

[yota691]

URGENT A constitutional ruling on the appointment of a member of the House of Representatives official position

Release date: 2018/9/9 12:53 • 786 times read

(Baghdad: Euphrates News) The Federal Supreme Court confirmed that there is no constitutional impediment to the assumption of a member of the House of Representatives an official position provided that he relinquished his seat of parliament, "pointing out that" the alternative is the highest votes followed by the same electoral entity and the province.

"The Supreme Federal Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all the members of the judges and considered an appeal in paragraph {1} of Article {1} of the Law on the replacement of members of the House of Representatives No. 6 of 2006 ". 
He added that "this paragraph provides for" the end of membership in the House of Representatives for one of the following reasons: 1 - assume the member of the Council a position in the Presidency of the State or the Council of Ministers or any other government post. " 
He pointed out that" the plaintiff also challenged his claim unconstitutional article { 15] of the rules of procedure of the House of Representatives, which stipulates that «prepares a member of the Council who becomes a member of the Presidency Council, or in the Council of Ministers resigned from the membership of the Council and does not enjoy the privileges of membership».
"The court confirmed that there is no constitutional obstacle to the assumption of a member of the House of Representatives an official position, provided that he relinquishes his parliamentary seat, and that the alternative holder of the highest votes followed by the same electoral entity and the province and the province in respect of the will of the Iraqi voter. 
He stated that "the court referred in its ruling to Article (49 / VI), which stipulates that" the membership of the House of Representatives shall not be combined with any work or other official position "and accordingly decided to dismiss the case because it is not based on a charter of the Constitution.

[yota691]

Issuing a constitutional ruling regarding the appointment of a member of the House of Representatives as an official position

 

Sunday 9 September

 

 

 

Alsumaria News / Baghdad The Federal Supreme Court confirmed on Sunday that there is no constitutional impediment to appointing a member of the Chamber of Deputies as an official position, provided that he relinquishes his parliamentary seat, pointing out that the alternative is the highest vote followed by the same electoral entity and governorate.  "The Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all the members of the judges and considered an appeal in paragraph (1) of Article (1) of the Law on the replacement of members of the House of Representatives No. (6) ) Of 2006 ".     Al-Samok pointed out that "this paragraph states that (the membership of the House of Representatives shall end for one of the following reasons: 1. The member of the Council shall assume a position in the Presidency of the State or the Council of Ministers or any other governmental office.")  He added that the plaintiff also appealed the unconstitutionality of Article (15) of the House of Representatives' rules of procedure, which stipulates that "the member of the Council who becomes a member of the Presidency Council or the Council of Ministers shall be considered a member of the Council and not enjoy the privileges of membership."  He explained that "the court confirmed that there is no constitutional obstacle to assume the member of the House of Representatives an official position, provided that he gives up his parliamentary seat, and that the alternative of the highest votes followed by the same electoral entity and the province in respect of the will of the Iraqi voter." He continued, "The court referred in its ruling to Article (49 / VI) of the Constitution, which stipulates that (the membership of the House of Representatives, and any work or other official position), and therefore decided to return the case for not based on the Constitution of the Constitution "He said.

[yota691]

Federal Lawsuit against the unconstitutionality of the Personal Status Law in force

Readers

 

 

Federal Lawsuit against the unconstitutionality of the Personal Status Law in force

 

10-09-2018 12:53 PM

 

The Euphrates -

 

On Monday, the Federal Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the unconstitutionality of the Personal Status Law No. 188 of 1959. 

"The Supreme Federal Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and considered the appeal against the unconstitutionality of the Personal Status Law in force on the grounds that it was not ratified in accordance with the provisional constitution of 1958," the court spokesman Ayas al-Samuk said. 

"The prosecutor said that one of the members of the Council of Sovereignty in 1959 did not sign the law," noting that "the court confirmed that the law contested unconstitutionality was issued in line with the previous Constitution and the current Constitution in accordance with Article 130, which states that" The window is in force, unless revoked or amended, in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution) ". 

He noted that "the court said that one of the members of the Council of sovereignty, which did not sign was his objection to the equality of inheritance between men and women, which was amended in 1963." 

"The plaintiff also challenged the unconstitutionality of article 39 (3) of the law, which provides for the compensation of women who are arbitrarily divorced, but the Supreme Federal Court found that Islamic law does not prevent reparation if the most recent is arbitrary in its creation , And accordingly decided to return the case for not based on the support of the Constitution.

[yota691]

The Federal Court establishes a condition for the official appointment of a deputy

Date of release: 2018/9/9 12:58 • 317 times read

[Ayna - Baghdad] 
The Federal Supreme Court confirmed that there is no constitutional impediment to the assumption of a member of the House of Representatives an official position provided that he relinquished his seat of parliament, "pointing out that" the alternative is the highest votes followed by the same electoral entity and the province.

"The Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all the members of the judges and considered an appeal in paragraph [1] of Article [1] of the Law on the replacement of members of the Council Deputies No. 6 of 2006 ". 
He added that "this paragraph provides for" the end of membership in the House of Representatives for one of the following reasons: 1 - assume the member of the Council a position in the Presidency of the State or the Council of Ministers, or any other government post. " 
He pointed out that" the plaintiff also challenged the claim of unconstitutional article [ 15] of the rules of procedure of the House of Representatives, which stipulated that [is a member of the Council who becomes a member of the Presidency Council, or in the Council of Ministers resigned from the membership of the Council and does not enjoy the privileges of membership].
"The court confirmed that there is no constitutional obstacle to the assumption of a member of the House of Representatives an official position, provided that he relinquishes his parliamentary seat, and that the alternative holder of the highest votes followed by the same electoral entity and the province and the province in respect of the will of the Iraqi voter. 
Al-Samok explained that "the court referred in its ruling to article [49 / VI], which stipulates that [the membership of the House of Representatives shall not be combined with any other work or official position] and accordingly decided to dismiss the case because it is not based on the Constitution" .

[yota691]

Federal Lawsuit against the unconstitutionality of the Personal Status Law

12/9/2018 12:00 am  Baghdad / Al-Sabah The Federal Supreme Court rejected the appeal against the unconstitutionality of the Personal Status Law No. 188 of 1959. "The Supreme Federal Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and considered the appeal against the unconstitutionality of the Personal Status Law in force on the grounds that it was not ratified under the 1958 Interim Constitution," the court's spokesman Ayas al-Samuk said in a statement received by al-Sabah.  He added that "the prosecutor said that one of the members of the Council of sovereignty in 1959 did not sign the law," noting that "the court confirmed that the law contested unconstitutionality was issued in line with the previous Constitution and the current Constitution in accordance with article 130, which states that" Unless repealed or amended, in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution ").  He noted that "the court said that one of the members of the Council of sovereignty, which did not sign was his objection to the equality of inheritance between men and women, which was amended in 1963." He added that "the plaintiff also challenged the unconstitutionality of paragraph (3) of Article (39) of the law, which provides for the compensation of women arbitrarily divorced, but the Federal Supreme Court found that Islamic law does not prevent the reparation of damage if the most recent arbitrarily in its creation, It is decided to respond to the lawsuit because it is not based on the basis of the   Constitution. "

[yota691]

A leader in Soiron: The presidency of parliament will be named the largest bloc instead of the Federal Court

 

 

 

Number of readings: 1569 17-09-2018 01:29 PM

 

 

17-09-2018 01:29 PM 

 

 

The leader of the alliance of the al-Shammari, said on Monday that the presidency of the House of Representatives will call the largest bloc instead of the Federal Court because of 'embarrassment' while the consensus denied naming any person to take over the next prime minister .

Shammari said in a press statement followed by the Tigris that 'the political negotiations between the blocks are complex and did not reach understandings on the selection of a candidate for the presidency of the next government as some of the media '.

He added that "all the names traded in the media burned and can not take over the next government," noting that the reform alliance seeks to achieve the demands of the religious authority by nominating an independent person untrained capable of taking responsibility as requested by the reference without specifying names and if we fail will resort to the opposition.

He said   Shammari 'embarrassing the Federal Court to determine the biggest bloc, stressing that it will be determined by the mass of the Presidency of the parliament , according to the census and the counting of the number of names to a statement from the largest bloc.

[Butifldrm]

the Supreme Judiciary responds to Abbadi and is surprised by the "ignorance" of a minister in his government

 Twilight News    

 5 hours ago

 

The official spokesman of the Supreme Judicial Council Judge Abdul Sattar Birekdar on Wednesday to the press conference of the Prime Minister Haider Abadi on the request of the House of Representatives to postpone the issuance of a law to include the Judicial Institute to the Council of Adjudication.

"This law has already been approved by the House of Representatives No. (70) for the year 2017 and was published in the Iraqi fact sheet and became effective on 31/7/2017 and since that date, the Supreme Judicial Council is Who runs the Judicial Institute and this is the natural thing that was supposed to happen since 2003 when the Supreme Judicial Council was separated from the Ministry of Justice because the Judicial Institute is the school where the judges and the public prosecutors graduate and is overseen by judges and judges.

He added that "the Supreme Judicial Council is surprised by the prime minister's request and does not know about it. More surprisingly, the prime minister is conveying during the press conference Madar in the cabinet, which means that the minister of justice, a member of the cabinet, also knows that the Judicial Institute is not one of the ministry's formations. Which he has been running for more than a year. "

Keywords: 

http://www.shafaaq.com/ar/Ar_NewsReader/807b4e2a-b69d-494a-8747-91ed184ac640

[Butifldrm]

The judiciary issues a statement on Abadi's request to wait for the issuance of a law to include the Judicial Institute of the Judicial Council

 

09:48 - 19/09/2018

BAGHDAD - 
The Supreme Judicial Council on Wednesday issued a statement on the request of Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi of Parliament to postpone the issuance of a law to include the Judicial Institute to the Judicial Council, expressing surprise at the request.

The spokesman of the Council, Judge Abdul Sattar Birqdar, in a statement received / Mawazine News / a copy of it, "what was stated at the press conference of the Prime Minister on 18/9/2018 regarding the request of the House of Representatives to postpone the issuance of a law to include the Judicial Institute to the Supreme Judicial Council "He said. 
Berkdar explained that "this law has already been approved by the Council of Representatives No. (70) for the year 2017 and was published in the Iraqi fact sheet, and became effective on 31/7/2017 Since that date, the Supreme Judicial Council is the one who runs the Judicial Institute and this matter Which was supposed to happen since 2003 when the Judicial Council is separated from the Ministry of Justice because the Judicial Institute is the school where the judges and public prosecutors graduate and is supervised by judges and judges.
The official added: "Therefore, the Judicial Council is surprised by the request of the Prime Minister and does not know about it. What is more surprising is that Abbadi is being transferred at the Madar press conference in the Council of Ministers. This means that the Minister of Justice, a member of the Council of Ministers, Which it has run for more than a year. "

https://www.mawazin.net/Details.aspx?jimare=11683

[Butifldrm]

The Secretariat of the Council of Ministers issued a clarification on the law to include the Judicial Institute of the Judicial Council

4 hours ago

14004 views

+ -

NRT

The General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers announced on Wednesday that the legislation of the Judicial Institute of the Judicial Council had been legislated "without objection or reservation" from the Council of Ministers, indicating that it had hoped the Supreme Judicial Council to stand on the intention of Prime Minister Haider Abadi before issuing any statement.

In a statement issued today (September 19, 2018), the Government Information and Communication Office at the General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers stated that "while the General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers affirms its commitment to the independence of the judiciary with all its components, Supreme Court No. (70) for the year 2017, was legislated without objection or reservation from the Council of Ministers and with the support of this secretariat when the subject of disconnection of the Judicial Institute and the Council of State from the Ministry of Justice.

He added that "the decision of the Council of Ministers issued on September 18, 2018 included the delay in proceeding with the proposed law of the first amendment to the law of the annexation of the Judicial Institute proposed by the House of Representatives for lack of convincing reasons to follow the procedures of its legislation and did not refer at all to delay in the law of the Judicial Institute To the Supreme Judicial Council. "

He pointed out that "we wish the Supreme Judicial Council and in the context of cooperation relationship between him and the executive authority to determine the meaning of the statement of the Prime Minister before issuing any statement, and this is what the Council of Ministers in dealing with other authorities.

On Wednesday, the Supreme Judicial Council issued a statement on what was stated at the conference of Prime Minister Haider Abadi on the Parliament's request to delay the inclusion of the Judicial Institute of the Council, while surprised by the request of Abadi and not aware of it

It is worth mentioning that the Council of Ministers had recommended in its meeting held yesterday, Tuesday, not to support the proposed amendment to the first law to include the Judicial Institute to the Supreme Judicial Council No. (70) for the year 2017 .

H

http://www.nrttv.com/AR/News.aspx?id=4577&MapID=2

[nannab]

Have a great night Butifldrm and DV  

[Butifldrm]

1 hour ago, nannab said:

Have a great night Butifldrm and DV  

 

 

Night Night nannab  ❤️

[10 YEARS LATER]

the Supreme Judiciary responds to Abbadi and is surprised by the "ignorance" of a minister in his government.

 

Ya know . . . when they provide us with material like this, is it any wonder we bury 'em under a barrage of smarmy remarks !  

[Butifldrm]

 sharp debate over the inclusion of the Judicial Institute to the Judicial Council

BAGHDAD - A spokesman for the Supreme Judicial Council, Abdul Sattar Birqdar, responded to the clarification of the General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers regarding the announcement by Prime Minister Haider Abadi of the delay in the law of annexing the Judicial Institute to the Judicial Council.

Berkdar said in a statement that Abadi's statement at his press conference last Tuesday, "was very clear in front of the media and is asking the House of Representatives to postpone the issuance of a law to include the Judicial Institute to the Judicial Council," noting that "the Secretariat can refer to the records of the said press conference for accuracy "He said.

He added that "the Judicial Council had hoped the Secretariat to correct what Abbadi said and to clarify that the intention is as indicated in the clarification of the Secretariat of the Council of Ministers and not criticism of others who identify the errors that were received by the Prime Minister."

"The General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers seems not to know that the law of the annexation of the Judicial Institute was not submitted to the Council of Representatives through the Council of Ministers, but presented by the proposal of the law is the Presidency of the Republic in coordination with the Supreme Judicial Council at the time," noting that " The ministers have no role in that. "

The Prime Minister, Haider Abadi, said in his weekly press conference on Tuesday that "the Council of Ministers recommended - in its ordinary session yesterday - the Iraqi Council of Representatives not to support the proposed amendment to the first law to include the Judicial Institute to the Supreme Judicial Council No. 70 of 2017.

What is more surprising is that the Prime Minister transfers during the press conference Madar in the Council of Ministers, which means that the Minister of Justice, one of the members of the Council of Ministers, also knows that the Judicial Institute is not one of the formations of the ministry he has been running since. More than a year".

And criticized the General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers, yesterday expedited the Supreme Court in response to the request of Abadi, said in a statement, "We wished the Supreme Judicial Council and in the context of cooperation between him and the executive authority to determine the intended statement of the Prime Minister before issuing any statement, Ministers in dealing with other authorities. "

It is noteworthy that the House of Representatives voted in its last parliamentary session on 23 May last to include the Judicial Institute to the Supreme Judicial Council and disengage from the Ministry of Justice, and the President of the Republic on July 17, the law and issued in the Official Gazette.

The reasons for the enactment of this law were "to link the Judicial Institute with the Supreme Judicial Council as the body responsible for the preparation and appointment of judges and public prosecutors, and for the elimination of its dual administration and for the purpose of developing it to promote the independence of the judiciary and respect for the rule of law.

Share this topic:

https://www.iraqpressagency.com/?p=286081

[yota691]

Official statement issued by the Supreme Judicial Council on the statement of the last Haider Abadi

20-09-2018 All times are GMT +3

Readers

 

Baghdad News -

 

 

A spokesman for the Supreme Judicial Council, Abdul Sattar Birqdar, said on Thursday that the General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers on the announcement of Prime Minister Haider Abadi, the delay in the law to include the Judicial Institute to the Judicial Council.

 
"Abadi's statement at his press conference on September 18 was very clear to the media and he asked the House of Representatives to wait for a law to include the Judicial Institute to the Judicial Council," Berkdar said in a statement. "The Secretariat can refer to the press conference records Mentioned for accuracy '.

 
The statement added that the Judicial Council had hoped the Secretariat to correct what Abbadi said and to clarify that the intention is as explained in the clarification of the Secretariat of the Council of Ministers and not criticism of others who identify the errors that were received by the Prime Minister.

The statement added that the General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers seems not to know that the law of the annexation of the Judicial Institute was not submitted to the Council of Representatives through the Council of Ministers, but presented by the proposal of the law is the Presidency of the Republic in coordination with the Supreme Judicial Council at the time, noting that it was not the Council of Ministers Role in it.

The General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers confirmed on Wednesday that the annexation of the Judicial Institute of the Judicial Council was passed without objection, while noting that it was 'wishing' the Judicial Council 'to stand on the meaning' with the permission of Prime Minister Haider Abadi before issuing any statement.

 

 

 

[yota691]

The judiciary responds to the criticism of the Secretariat of the Council of Ministers in his surprise at the request of the servants

Editorial Date: 2018/9/20 13:27 • 98 times read

[Ayna-Baghdad] The 
spokesman of the Supreme Judicial Council, Abdul Sattar Birqdar, commented on the clarification of the General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers on the announcement by Prime Minister Haider Abadi of the delay in the law to include the Judicial Institute to the Judicial Council.

In a statement received by the All-Iraq agency [INA], Berkdar said that Abadi's statement "was very clear to the media [we ask the House of Representatives to delay the issuance of a law to include the Judicial Institute in the Judicial Council]. The General Secretariat can refer to the press conference Mentioned for accuracy ". 
"We wished the General Secretariat to correct what the prime minister said and to clarify that what is meant is in accordance with the clarification of the secretariat of the Council of Ministers and not criticism of others who identify the errors that were received by the Prime Minister."
"The General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers seems not to know that the law of the annexation of the Judicial Institute was not submitted to the Council of Representatives through the Council of Ministers, but presented by the proposal of the law is the Presidency of the Republic in coordination with the Supreme Judicial Council at the time and the Council of Ministers had no role in that for the science Council The supreme judiciary in advance the Ministry of Justice to keep the Judicial Institute within the formations of the ministry. 
The Prime Minister, Haider Abadi, said in his weekly press conference on Tuesday that "the Council of Ministers recommended - in its ordinary session yesterday - the Iraqi Council of Representatives not to support the proposed amendment to the first law to include the Judicial Institute to the Supreme Judicial Council No. 70 of 2017.
And criticized the General Secretariat of the Council of Ministers, yesterday expedited the Supreme Court in response to the request of Abadi, said in a statement, "We wished the Supreme Judicial Council and in the context of cooperation between him and the executive authority to determine the intended statement of the Prime Minister before issuing any statement, Ministers in dealing with other authorities. "

[Butifldrm]

Abadi calls for "bold reform" of the Iraqi judiciary and the tracking of capital

18:52 - 25/09/2018

0

 

  

Information / Baghdad. 
Prime Minister Haider Abadi on Tuesday called for a "bold reform" of Iraq's judicial system and the pursuit of capital. 
"The government needs a bold reform of the judicial system in Iraq so that it will not be compromised," Abbadi told a weekly press conference attended by the agency. 
"The Iraqi government needs to activate capital tracking systems," he said. 
On the other hand, Abadi stressed that "any candidate for the presidency of the Republic must be committed to the unity of Iraq and maintain its sovereignty." End 25 T

http://www.almaalomah.com/2018/09/25/348162/

[yota691]

The Federal Court rejects objections to the nomination of the President of the Republic   Monday, October 1,         Alsumaria News / Baghdad Alsumaria News publishes a document issued by the Federal Court containing its response to the objections on the nomination for the post of President of the Republic.   The document included a response to the objections of four candidates based on Article 68 of the Iraqi constitution.

 

 

 

[yota691]

The Federal Court hears a case concerning the system of distribution of parliamentary seats

Date of release: 2018/10/9 12:15 • 135 times read

{Baghdad: Al Furat News} The Federal Supreme Court considered a case concerning the system of distribution of seats in the House of Representatives No. 12 of 2018, and decided to postpone the pleading until the 13th of next month.

The court spokesman Ayas al-Samuk said in a statement received by the agency {Euphrates News} a copy of it that "the Federal Supreme Court held its session under the chairmanship of Judge Medhat al-Mahmoud and the presence of all members of the judges, and considered an appeal concerning the system of distribution of seats in the House of Representatives, where the plaintiff in his lawsuit Chairman of the Board of Commissioners Commission Independent High Electoral Commission / in addition to its function. " 
"The court has asked the prosecutor to present an explanatory note to the statement of his case, and I feel that its role is to consider the constitutionality of legislation and not the illegality of the proceedings," he said. 
He pointed out that "the Federal Supreme Court requested that the memorandum be submitted ten days before the date of the next hearing, which will be on 13/11/2018."