US Ambassador: The preparation of our forces in Iraq began to decrease and our presence with a desire from Baghdad

[yota691]

A newspaper in London: parties in the National Alliance seeks to embarrass Abadi before the elections

 

 Since 2018-02-27 at 09:10 (Baghdad time)

Baghdad Mawazine News

Al-Hayat newspaper reported on Tuesday a political movement led by deputies from the National Alliance to raise the issue of the presence of US forces in Iraq before the parliament, in a move embarrassing Prime Minister Haider Abadi before the elections.

The newspaper quoted a parliamentary source as saying that "the deputies of the National Alliance are preparing to raise the issue of the presence of US troops in the country in front of parliament within days," revealing that "they will demand the government to clarify the number and the functions of US forces deployed in Iraq after the end of fighting against Dahesh."

The source added that "the deputies of the coalition of the rule of law and the Supreme Council and Asaib Ahl al-Haq and factions in the popular crowd, demanding the exit of US forces, and seek to obtain clarifications from Abbadi whether there are agreements signed by the government in this regard."

[yota691]

Parliament blocks Abadi's choice between attending tomorrow's meeting or "taking responsibility" for the American presence

13:55 - 27/02/2018

 

  

Information / Baghdad ...

The head of the Dawa party bloc, "Organization of the Interior" MP Ali al-Badiri, on Tuesday, the intention of the political blocs to load Prime Minister Haider Abadi, "full responsibility" for the presence of US forces in the event of his presence to the meeting tomorrow, noting that Abadi bears the breach of the sovereignty of the country in his capacity Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.

 "The political blocs will vote to bring Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi full responsibility for the increasing US military presence and its consequences for the unity of the country in the event of not attending a meeting on Wednesday to discuss this file," al-Badairi said in a statement.

 He added that "Abadi did not confirm his presence so far," noting that "Abadi as commander-in-chief of the armed forces bear the breach of national sovereignty of the country." 

Al-Badairi pointed out that "the regional situation in the region does not bear any other crises raised by Iraq on the increase in the number of US forces involved in supporting terrorism and bringing a criminal organization and the smuggling of leaders from the fronts." Ending / 25 d

[yota691]

Parliamentary demands to conclude a new agreement with the United States to limit its military presence

13:26 - 27/02/2018

 

  

Information / Baghdad ..

The Security and Defense Committee on Tuesday called on the government to conclude a new security agreement with the United States to limit its military presence in Iraq, indicating that the old agreement did not require the number of bases and soldiers and there are many rationales.

MP MP Iyad al-Jubouri said in a statement that the "federal government to conclude a new security agreement with the United States on the US presence in Iraq, especially after the victory against criminal gangs."

Jubouri added that "the previous agreement did not require the number of bases and soldiers and a lot of rationales," asserting "to invite military leaders to host them in the House of Representatives on the military presence."

A senior government source ruled out Tuesday, the presence of Prime Minister Haider Abadi to the House of Representatives to discuss the US military presence in Iraq. Ending / 25 h

[jmartin1145]

Thankless is the only nice word I could come up with.

[sonjasdca]

Ummm No! Been there, done that!  

[Rockymtnhi]

Take their oil to pay us back our $2T plus war expenses and leave when we darn well feel like it.  Who do they think liberated their country the ingrates.  The corruption from Parliament will never end.  Their poor people will never improve with the current regime in place.  

[yota691]

Jaafar: Abadi agreed with Washington on a specific program for the exit of the Americans and the establishment of military bases

17:52 - 01/03/2018

 

Information / Special ...

Jassim Mohammed Jaafar, the state lawmaker, announced on Thursday the agreement of Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi with the US side on a specific program for the withdrawal of their forces and the establishment of any US base in the country.

"The Prime Minister Haider Abadi discussed with the American side extensively their presence in the country," Jaafar said. "A specific program was agreed upon to get out of the country with timetables and an agreed context."

"Abadi told Egypt that he told Washington that there was no desire for the Iraqi people to establish any military base or combat headquarters on the Iraqi territory," he said, adding that "Washington is likely to build military bases in Kurdistan and order outside the will of the government."

On Thursday, the House of Representatives voted on a resolution requiring the government to prepare a timetable for the withdrawal of US troops from the country.

Iraqi lawmakers called on the government to explain why US forces remain in Iraq until the liberation of the country from the "Da'ash" organization, calling for the removal of those forces "as quickly as possible."

The deputies stressed that "the Iraqi government should not live in the circle of embarrassment of the survival of US forces and it must make clear to the Iraqis how many numbers of these forces and when will be removed and what is the role and reason for their survival so far on the territory of Iraq after the announcement of victory over gangs Daash terrorist," indicating that talk about The presence of US advisers is to mix the papers and cover the survival of these forces, if they are advisers, what is the reason for the presence of military tankers, tanks and aircraft and these large numbers of soldiers and what is their role. "

[Bama Girl]

33 minutes ago, yota691 said:

The deputies stressed that "the Iraqi government should not live in the circle of embarrassment of the survival of US forces and it must make clear to the Iraqis how many numbers of these forces and when will be removed and what is the role and reason for their survival so far on the territory of Iraq after the announcement of victory over gangs Daash terrorist,"

Because, as General Kelly said today, ISIS have morphed and they will be back. And the Iraqi military is very doubtfully, imo, strong enough to resist them without the U.S. military. “Circle of Embarrassment”???  Geez. 😒😒

[3n1]

thanks yota, typical dawa party not upset that iran's terrorist military is running amuck in the land ... go figure 

[yota691]

Newspaper reveals negotiations between Abadi and the Americans on the "formal reduction"

11:38 - 02/03/2018

 

  

Information / Baghdad ..

Lebanese Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi and the United States have agreed on a "formal reduction" of the number of troops, the daily Al-Akhbar reported on Friday.

"Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi has recently entered into talks with the US side to reduce the number of US troops in the country," the newspaper quoted a government source as saying, saying it was "a formality to ensure that a broad audience is not lost."

The source added that "those who voted on the resolution seem to forget the assurances of Dr. Abbadi continued the absence of ground forces or military bases, the most recent in his press conference last Tuesday."

The government source said that the parliamentary decision "comes within the framework of political bidding and early election propaganda, and an attempt to embarrass the government of Dr. Haider Abadi in front of public opinion."

According to the newspaper, "the decision is the first of its kind after the end of the war against« Daash », and escalating threats« resistance factions »of US forces in the country. Ending / 25

[jcfrag]

10 hours ago, Bama Girl said:

Because, as General Kelly said today, ISIS have morphed and they will be back. And the Iraqi military is very doubtfully, imo, strong enough to resist them without the U.S. military. “Circle of Embarrassment”???  Geez. 😒😒

Yeah, those lawmakers in Iraq are either so retarded that they didn’t see the Iraqi army dropping their guns and running in the face of ISIS as embarrassing, or they were promoting it and just sorry ISIS isn’t running Iraq now. Dont they know ISIS  won’t be quiet so easy to steal from? They’ll chop off their heads if they catch the lawmkers hands in their pot o gold!! 

[gregp]

The US and other countries have supplied Iraq with various equipment in personal training.  Iraq just fought one of the bloodiest, toughest urban combat wars in history.  It was tough at first and they needed heavy assistance but I’m going to give them some credit For a job well done.

[yota691]

Abdul Latif: The spread of US forces in the liberated areas a new occupation under the cover of the elections

17:30 - 04/03/2018

 

Information / Special ...

Judge Wael Abdul Latif, on Sunday, the deployment of US forces in Mosul to protect the elections as a first plan to return US troops to the country that came out in 2011, indicating that these forces responded with the blessing of the government.

"The United States is sorry to leave the country in 2011 and we are opposed to Obama's plan to withdraw," Abdul Latif told al-Maaloumah.

He added that "Trump is trying to return these forces in various ways and with the blessing of the government, which gave him approval and the green light." He said that "their plan to supervise the elections special forces enter Anbar, Salah al-Din and Mosul as a start and a plan to get around to return them to Iraq again."

He explained that "the first step applied to the entry of these forces to the Nineveh Plain to return the forces that came out earlier."

The spokesman for the so-called "Arab Nineveh tribes," Muzahim al-Hewitt revealed, on Sunday, the arrival of an American force charged with "protecting" the upcoming elections to Nineveh and Arbil al-Anbar, indicating that these forces will spread in the Nineveh Plain and disputed areas.

Experts believe that the Americans are trying in various ways to form a crisis after the crisis in order to return their forces to Iraq and stay in the region for a longer period to carry out their combat tasks unknown, which contributed and still revive terrorist groups and feed them with money and weapons to be the long hand and executor of its malicious policy in Iraq in particular and the region in general.

[yota691]

A prominent member of the Trump Party: We are calling back because of us and we have to respect the decision of the parliament and leave Iraq

14:27 - 06/03/2018

0

 

  

Information / Translation ..

A senior member of the Republican Party and former presidential candidate Ron Paul on Tuesday called for respect for the House of Representatives' resolution, which called on the Iraqi government to set a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign troops.

"With the 15th anniversary of the US invasion of Iraq, which the US media was a partner in the Bush administration's aggressive crime and the lies that it has repeatedly propagated, Iraq was not," Paul said in an article published by the daily Eurasia Review. Is a threat to the United States in any way. "

He added that "the US invasion caused the deaths of more than a quarter million Iraqi civilians directly and one million Iraqis indirectly and destroyed infrastructure and the country has collapsed after decades of development and away from the false democracy that we promised," adding that "Iraq has become hell, That the US use of depleted uranium and white phosphorus will cause Iraqis to suffer from diseases and birth defects for generations. "

"The Iraqi parliament has recently done something exceptional. Most of the elected representatives voted to demand that their prime minister (Haidar al-Abadi) set a timetable for the withdrawal of US troops from the country."

"We did not have work to go to Iraq from the ground and we have no remaining jobs in the country," said Paul, a member of the US House of Representatives. "The emergence of Al Qaeda and Hadash was only the result of our occupation of the country 15 years ago and the creation of a fertile environment for extremism. Something to stay, so let's listen to the Iraqis and pull our troops home. "

It is noteworthy that the Iraqi parliament voted on Thursday (March 1) on a resolution obliging the federal government to set a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign troops from Iraq after the war against "Daash," while the deputies stressed that the decision is "binding and binding" to the government. Ending / 25 z

[mr.unlikely]

Bull ****

[Laid Back]

We will stay in Iraq like it or not.

 

For geopolitical reasons 

To fight terrorism 

To prevent Iran taking over Iraq 

To protect the citizens 

 

Go  USA 

Go Trump

Go troops 

Go democracy

Go freedom 

[yota691]

US Ambassador: The preparation of our forces in Iraq began to decrease and our presence with a desire from Baghdad

 

 Since 2018-03-06 at 16:18 (Baghdad time)

Baghdad - Mawazine News

The US ambassador to Baghdad, Douglas Silliman, said Tuesday during a meeting with press chief Muayad al-Lami and a number of Iraqi journalists in Baghdad that US troop numbers in Iraq had begun to decrease, pointing out that his country's troops were wanted by the Iraqi government.

"I appreciate the positions of Iraqi journalists in the face of terrorism and national reconciliation," Sailiman said at a panel discussion held with journalists' leader Moayad al-Lami and a number of Iraqi journalists at the union's headquarters. "The press in America is the one who played a role in empowering Democracy and in Iraq requires the position that Iraqi journalists have the task of embodying democracy and the success of the experiment and to establish it effectively and effectively. "

"I can not count the cooperation between the US embassy in Baghdad and the union on the subject of empowering Iraqi journalists and we have a broad program of cooperation with the union," he said.

"I call upon the voters to go and vote for the candidate and the party according to the vision they want," Sileman said, calling on voters to "not vote for the past and vote for the future in accordance with a vision they are convinced of."

"The embassy will help the Electoral Commission and non-governmental organizations to monitor the elections and ensure fair elections," he said. "It is the responsibility of the Iraqis to hold free, fair and fair elections."

"There are no US forces or the international coalition to protect the elections, and this is the responsibility of the Iraqi forces that have succeeded in difficult circumstances," he said, adding that "Iraqi forces have represented the world in the face of terrorism and have won it."

He pointed out that "the unity achieved by the Iraqis and the role of the embassy is limited in the consolidation of unity and reconciliation," stressing that "the time in Iraq has come to look to the future and achieve development and recovery and reconciliation."

"My wife called Umm Qusay and met her as an opportunity to meet this courageous Iraq," said the American ambassador, "Umm Qusay, an Iraqi woman who has faced the terrorists and proved a positive role for Iraqi women in supporting national unity. I was surprised during her interview with courage and personal strength."

As for the number of US troops in Iraq, Sileman said, "the number of US troops in Iraq has begun to decrease," noting that "the presence of these forces in Iraq, the desire of the Iraqi government as long as the need for this presence.