Parliamentary power: Kurds did not provide a convincing justification for non-commitment to pay oil money

[yota691]

This site doesn't allow copy to paste kinda rough typing it out threw translate... Newspaper reveal: Abadi and Barzani agreed to hold final talks in Baghdad to reduce the scandal of the referendum and this is the date                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 2018/02/21 14:37 Baghdad today _ follow-up              A senior Kurdish delegation will visit Baghdad soon to finalize an agreement ending the crisis with the federal government, the newspaper Al-Mada reported on Wednesday.            The newspaper quoted informed sources as saying that "there is a good convergence between the federal government and the Kurdistan region to resume the work of Sulaymaniyah and Erbil airports in front of international flights," explaining that "the two parties agreed during the meeting that brought together the Kurdish delegation in Munich to resolve many of the points of contention. The sources said that "the final touches to this agreement will be completed soon in the capital Baghdad," asserting that "the meetings (the three) broke the situation of stalemate and rupture between the parties and contributed to reach an agreement on the points of contention." She added that "the two parties agreed to solve the problem of the distribution of salaries of employees of the Kurdistan region, which will be through the federal government," explaining that "the Kurdish delegation demanded to accelerate the pace of the work of technical committees to resolve the problem of salaries."  She pointed out that "the Prime Minister Haider Abadi offered to the Kurdish delegation the possibility of sending a force of the federal police to participate in the management of the airports of Sulaymaniyah and Erbil," noting that "the government of Erbil will respond to the proposal Abadi next week " The sources described the meeting, which brought Abadi to the Kurdish delegation in Germany as "successful", explaining that "the resolution of these points, which have been discussed in detail need a crucial negotiating round between the two teams will be in Baghdad soon." And revealed that "significant decisions and important will be taken by the two sides this week, to resolve the outstanding problems and differences." The sources pointed out that "there is almost agreement on the establishment of a mechanism for the export of Kirkuk oil through the federal government," asserting that "the perpetrators of Ibrahim Khalil and Fishkhabour were not at the table of the talks between the parties in their last meeting."                                                                               

[yota691]

4 minutes ago, bostonangler said:

Does anyone over there read each other's statements

It all about the reporting and the agenda..You should know better then anyone....The Subject still remains the same...

[10 YEARS LATER]

Clueless - nothing but chin wagging 24/7 & results are negligible 

[justchecking123]

1 hour ago, yota691 said:

It all about the reporting and the agenda..You should know better then anyone....The Subject still remains the same...

Well stated.

[Butifldrm]

2018-02-21 BY SOTALIRAQ

Parliamentary warns of the handover of Kurdistan to this oil field to Baghdad: you can not then secure any salaries

Warned a member of the Parliament of the Kurdistan Region on the mass change Ali Hama Saleh on Wednesday from the Kurdistan Regional Government to hand over the "Khormala" oil to the federal government in Baghdad, demanding at the same time to open an investigation on the deposit of Arbil amount of 60 million US dollars in the account of the governor of Kirkuk, By Baghdad Najmuddin Karim.

Saleh said in a press conference held today in the Parliament of Kurdistan, that "the Government of the Territory is the sole concern to run its companies in the fields of" Avana "," Bay Hassan "and Kharmala," as he put it.

He pointed out that "during the 12 months of 2016, and the first half of 2017, the Kurdistan Regional Government deposited 60 million dollars in the account of Kirkuk Governor Najmuddin Karim," and called for an investigation to find out where the money went.

Saleh said that "if the KRG waived the Khormala field to Baghdad, the export of oil from the region will drop from 260 thousand b / d to 150 thousand b / d and then will not be able to pay salaries even every three months once."

https://www.sotaliraq.com/2018/02/21/برلماني-يحذر-من-تسليم-كوردستان-لهذا-ال/

[newbieDA]

4 minutes ago, Butifldrm said:

handover of Kurdistan to this oil field to Baghdad

 

Like I said. They have too for Article 140, along with ports and airport, as well as having the government and army up there in the area.

 

It is a mess...

[MyLadiesDaddy]

10 hours ago, yota691 said:

Spokesman of the Ministry of Oil (Basneoz): We are close to reaching an agreement with Erbil

294 days later. 

[tigergorzow]

17 minutes ago, newbieDA said:

 

Like I said. They have too for Article 140, along with ports and airport, as well as having the government and army up there in the area.

 

It is a mess...

Agree,   Yes Yes they do....😊😁.....Hurry the heck up!!

[newbieDA]

2 minutes ago, tigergorzow said:

Agree,   Yes Yes they do....😊😁.....Hurry the heck up!!

 

Since I have your attention, do you think the US within the Kurdish regions in Syria and Iraq are there to help can Independence or to make sure the Iraq government and troops get in the region for Article 140?

 

just thinking out loud with you

[Butifldrm]

We need to go Back Down Memory Lane!  We were almost there before the referendum.

 

 

 

PM Abadi: Baghdad, Kurds reach agreement to reactivate Article 140, hold census

By Rudaw 6/4/2017

Kurdistan Region delegation in a meeting with Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi. Photo: Iraqi presidency

ERBIL, Kurdistan Region — The visiting Kurdish delegation during their meeting with the prime minister of Iraq on Wednesday night discussed possible ways of removing the stumbling block before the reactivation of the controversial 140 Article and laying the groundwork to hold a census in the city of Kirkuk.

  

According to a readout of the meeting published by Haider al-Abadi’s  office, an agreement has been reached between Abadi and the Kurdish delegation to reactivate the 140 Article and hold a general census across the province once [ISIS] militants have been driven out of some key areas the group still holds, including Hawija, Rashad and Riyaz.

 

Article 140 of the Iraqi constitution calls for normalization of areas it refers to as disputed, to be followed by a referendum on whether or not those regions want to be part of the Kurdistan Region.

 

According to the constitution, the article should have been implemented by the end of 2007, and so far no referendum has been conducted on this issue.

 

This statement comes as the high-ranking Kurdish delegation comprised of the ruling Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) are meeting with authorities in Baghdad including leaders from the major Iraqi political parties.

 

“The right of the people of Kurdistan to self-determination and referendum will be on the table. We want to find political and peaceful ways to address this issue with Baghdad, so that we arrive at an understanding while the interests of both sides are preserved,” said Adnan Mufti, a member of the Kurdish delegation. 

 

Abadi told Rudaw in an interview last week that an immediate referendum may not be the best approach.

 

"Kirkuk is for all the people of Kirkuk with all its communities. There are Kurds, Arabs, Turkmen, Christians and others in Kirkuk who must live together,” Abadi said. “I think the issue should not be deal[t] with in the context of majority because that is the matter of coexistence and coexistence means living in one frame.”

 

Hamid al-Khazri of the National Alliance faction in the Iraqi parliament led by Hakim told Rudaw, the timing is not right for the Kurds to go forward for the referendum as Iraq suffers from many crisis, as does the Kurdistan Region.

 

He urged the unification of all the efforts from all the parties to erase ISIS in Iraq as the group’s poses serious threat to all the nations and groups living in Iraq.

 

Commenting on raising Kurdistan flag in Kirkuk which drew condemnation and praise on a regional scale, the national alliance MP said “the Kurdish brothers should think logically and wisely.”

 

He believes this question has to be resolved “within the framework of the constitution.”

 

In addition to Khazri’s comments, Ziya Asadi, in charge of the Political Board of the Sadir Movement, led by the Shiite leader Muqtada al-Sadir, said “we have to respect any decree made within the context of the constitution and understanding between the KRG [Kurdistan Regional Government] and Baghdad," referring to the controversial hoist of the Kurdistan flag in Kirkuk.

 

The delegation is also holding meeting on Thursday with Ammar al-Hakim, leader of the Shiite National Alliance and leader of Iraq’s Supreme Council, and will hold a string of meeting with other officials.

 

Yesterday the Kurdish delegation met with Iraqi officials including President Fuad Masum and Salim al-Jabouri, the speaker of the parliament.

 

http://www.rudaw.net/english/kurdistan/06042017

 

 

Resolving Article 140: Settling the Issue of Iraq’s Disputed Territories

7/13/2017 10:53:00 AM

Views 6724

 

Megan Connelly, Matthew Barber

 

+ -

 

Resolving Article 140: Settling the Issue of Iraq's Disputed Territories Ahead of an Independence Referendum for Kurdistan

 

Contested Lands

Last month, talks led by the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) at the presidential residence, Seri Resh, in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq (KRI) led to a decision to hold a referendum this September on Kurdistani independence. Though the obvious assumption would be that only residents of the area seeking independence (i.e., the Kurdistan Region) would be able to vote on a decision to secede from Iraq, this referendum is being presented as a vote in which residents of Iraq’s disputed territories will also participate.

The disputed territories are areas in Iraq over which both the Iraqi Federal Government (IFG–based in Baghdad) and the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG–based in Erbil) claim administrative rights. Currently, the Kurdistan Region is an autonomous jurisdictional entity that is part of a federal Iraq but which has its own government, armed forces, immigration laws, administrative bureaucracies, and so forth. Prior to any discussion of potential independence for the Kurdistan Region, it should be understood that the disputed territories are parts of the Nineveh, Salah ad-Din, Kirkuk, and Diyala governorates over which the respective governments of Baghdad and Erbil have been locked in conflict since the fall of Saddam Hussein. Even if the KRI was to not seek independence, the status of each disputed territory as a domain of the Federal Government or the Regional Government must be resolved. Kurdistani independence, therefore, involves more than the question of whether the inhabitants of the KRI desire independence; it also requires determining which disputed territories (all of which are outside of the official boundaries of the KRI) would be included in the KRI, and ultimately within the new independent state.

For years, the disputed territories have been exploited for their deposits of oil and natural gas, but have often been neglected amid a state of political and administrative limbo between Baghdad and Erbil. Many disputed territories have been under Kurdish military or administrative control following the US invasion of Iraq, even though services and infrastructure in many of these territories continue to be funded through the IFG budget. Now, as Kurdish security forces, Hashd al-Sha’bi, and other ethno-sectarian militias seek to consolidate their territorial gains with the liberation of the remaining Islamic State (IS) enclaves in the disputed territories, it is urgent the IFG and the KRG establish clear jurisdictional boundaries by peaceful means—to not do so could spell their eventual delineation in battle. Therefore, Erbil and Baghdad must revisit Article 140, the transitional provision of the Iraqi Constitution that mandates the normalization, census, and referendum processes that must occur to determine the future status of each disputed territory, individually. This will resolve whether the territories will become part of the KRI or will remain within the IFG’s system of governorates.

Why the Referendum Does Not Provide a Solution for the Disputed Territories

Acting KRG President Barzani has declared that the referendum will be a solution to the ongoing Article 140 dispute. But according to Hemin Hawrami, Senior Advisor to the acting president, the sole question that will be posed to voters in the referendum is: “Do you want an independent Kurdistan?”

No one disputes the fact that the vast majority of Kurds desire independence. One Kurdish researcher framed this observation as follows: “Kurdistan does not need a referendum because the history and geography and 100 years of struggle have answered this question for the whole world.” The referendum’s question, therefore, would seem almost superfluous for the KRI. But while the referendum’s proposed question may nevertheless be appropriate to direct at residents of the KRI, it is a premature question for inhabitants of the disputed territories. Whether or not voters want independence is not a relevant inquiry as regards the complex geographic, demographic, and political realities in the disputed territories, where the question that should be posed is: “Do you want your district to become a part of the Kurdistan Region?”

The idea that populations living outside of the Kurdistan Region could participate alongside residents of the KRI in a vote that would establish a basis for the statehood of a region whose future borders are not yet determined is simply confusing for Kurds, Iraqis, and outside observers alike. It is clear that at least two questions—not one—must be answered by separate groups of Iraqis.

Manipulating Patriotism

The phrasing of the referendum’s question is indicative of ethnic outbidding. By asking voters if they “want independence,” as opposed to inquiring, for example, as to whether voters approve of a parliamentary motion to declare independence, the KDP is playing a semantics game designed to force voters to deliver a “patriotic” or “unpatriotic” response, a tactic to rally broad nationalist support behind the KDP’s drive for political dominance while discrediting the domestic opposition by casting doubt on their supporters’ kurdayeti.

Beyond the realm of mere words, Kurdish authorities have already begun arresting dissenters and shutting down media centers that publish literature that “uses inappropriate language in connection with the referendum,” as well as harassing and assaulting journalists and writers who have expressed opposition to the referendum.

To garner support for the vote, the Kurdish nationalist parties—and the KDP in particular—have been aggressively fueling  Kurdish irredentist sentiments and issuing provocative statements, such as KRG PM Nechirvan Barzani’s affirmation that the “disputed territories are no longer disputed,” the acting president’sassertion that opposition to the referendum would be met with a “bloody war,” and a KDP MP’s call for the legal prosecution and punishment of the political opposition to the vote. Moreover, the KDP has linked issue of Kurdish statehood with that of Masoud Barzani’s continued leadership and his defiance of Parliament’s attempts to limit presidential power.  The alarming tone of this discourse rose to a crescendo this week when Barzani, before the European Parliament, accused opposition MPs of concocting an “attempted coupt d’etat”against him in Parliament prior to its dissolution by the KDP, and of being responsible for the deaths of children in the 2015 riots in the Sulaimaniyah Governorate.

Furthermore, the language of the referendum announcement itself does not acknowledge that disputed territories are “disputed,” instead referring to them as “Kurdish areas outside of the KRG’s administrative area.” This language does not recognize the presence of the very populations whose existence is the origin of the disputed territory dilemma: Arabs, Assyrian and Chaldean Christians, Turkoman, certain Yazidis who do not identify as Kurds, and others.

In addition to validating aggression against Kurdish domestic opposition, this kind of antagonistic, nationalist campaign will do nothing to assuage the fears and mistrust of minorities and non-Kurdish populations with competing claims to self-determination in the disputed areas. This could ultimately provoke violent reactions with armed sectarian and partisan militias, with their various regional sponsors poised to intervene.

Ahead of Referendum, Yazidis Targeted for Supporting Baghdad

In the last few years, observers have become increasingly familiar with how intimidation is employed to pressure minority populations of the disputed territories into political submission. Recent punitive measures against Yazidis who favor IFG rather than KRG administration for Shingal (Sinjar in Arabic) are a characteristic—and unsurprising—case in point.

A new Human Rights Watch report has this week exposed a tactic that the KDP asaish are using to deter Yazidis from aligning with Baghdad: expelling displaced Yazidi families from the IDP camps in Dohuk and evicting them from the KRI, if a family member joins the Baghdad-supported Hashd al-Sha’bi forces in Shingal. This tactic is unsurprising, as the KDP asaish already expelled (from the same camps in 2015-2016) displaced Yazidi families if a family member joined the PKK-affiliated YBŞ, a local Yazidi force in Shingal that challenges KDP hegemony.

The Yazidis of Shingal are a perfect example of the challenge of Iraq’s disputed territories. This population has long stymied KDP attempts to smoothly incorporate Shingal into the KRI. Yazidis are independently-minded, have repeatedly been victimized by external parties vying for control of their areas, and as a result are mixed as to whether they even identify as Kurds. Unlike Yazidis from villages inside the KRI, many Yazidis from Shingal resolutely identify only as “Yazidi,” maintaining that it is not only their religious affiliation but also their ethnic identity. The vast majority resent Kurdish politics and would prefer a quiet form of local governance. This hasn’t stopped the KDP from insisting that Shingal’s population wants to be included in the KRI, and they always have an array of token Yazidi mouthpieces ready to authenticate this claim.

The displacement of the majority of Shingal’s Yazidi population to the KRI during the Yazidi Genocide stirred fears among much of the community that they could be subjected to attempts to be resettled in the KRI rather than helped to return to Shingal and rebuild their lives. A KDP-enforced economic blockade of Shingal (implemented all of 2016 and early 2017) deliberately slowed the returns of Yazidi IDPs to Shingal. One motivation for this measure appears to have been to try to starve the YBŞ of resources and prevent a larger civilian support base for the YBŞ from growing in Shingal. Despite this measure to inhibit civilian returns, the KDP did not hesitate to evict families from the camps and return them to Shingal when their family members joined the YBŞ. Though many families wanted to return and rebuild in areas that had been freed from IS, other families were not yet ready to do so, and this punitive measure placed pressure on families to beg their young people to not join those forces.

For about two years, the KDP has branded the PKK affiliates as “foreign” entities, not acknowledging that their rank and file are comprised of local, Shingali Yazidis. The “foreign” argument is even less applicable to the Hashd al-Sha’bi: Yazidis are effectively being criminalized for the choice to work with their own federal government. Nevertheless, the asaish’s current expulsions follow the same pattern as the earlier YBŞ evictions: Though Yazidi families ultimately hope to return to a secure Shingal, many are not ready to leave the camps—for economic reasons as well as out of concern regarding the now three-way political standoff in Shingal. Targeting vulnerable families with forced evictions is therefore a powerful political deterrent.

Shingal is now divided by three political competitors, each having its own Yazidi militias on the ground: KDP-affiliated Peshmerga, PKK-affiliated YBŞ, and the Baghdad-affiliated Hashd al-Sha’bi. Two out of these three factions (with their associated civilian supporters) obviously do not favor inclusion into a KDP-dominated KRI. Most of Shingal’s Yazidis, therefore, do not oppose Kurdistani independence, but simply view it as none of their concern since they hope to administer Shingal locally and separately from the KRI. This should adequately illustrate how a single-question referendum on Kurdistani independence is entirely incapable of resolving disputed territory issues.

Practical Problems with Holding the Referendum in Disputed Territories

The proposed date of September 25, 2017 for the referendum initially gave the KRG less than four months to raise and allocate money, resources, and personnel to ensure that residents of the disputed territories would be represented. Facilitating the participation of people from the disputed territories will be extremely difficult, and quite costly, due to high rates of internal displacement. So far, only $6 million have been ear-marked for the referendum and the KRG can expect no financial support from its neighbors and international supporters, virtually all of whom have come out against the referendum. Even Turkey, one of the closest allies of the KDP,has spoken out strongly against the referendum. Additionally, none of the KRG’s international partners or the United Nations have thus far expressed a willingness to monitor the referendum. In fact, the United Nations recently issued a statement emphasizing that it “has no intention to be engaged in any way or form” in monitoring the independence referendum due to its commitments to the territorial integrity of Iraq. Therefore, aside from repeated assurances from Erbil that the process will be fair to ethno-religious minorities in the disputed territories, the KRI has not announced any plan to accommodate them or hold separate referenda on their preferences.

Rudaw has recently reported that as of yet, no preparations have been made for the referendum in Kirkuk, the most populated of all disputed territories. Typically, funding for elections would come from the Independent High Electoral Commission of Iraq (IHEC), but the Commission’s Kirkuk office has denied that it has a budget or a plan for the referendum. Since the referendum was initiated unilaterally, not through mutual discussion with Baghdad, the KRG cannot expect to receive support for the referendum from the IFG. The President of the Kirkuk Provincial Council, Rebwar Talabani, has proposed that Kirkuk prepare on its own for the referendum without relying on funding from the IHEC, but with just another two and a half months to prepare, there has been no consensus in the Provincial Council on how the referendum should be funded, or even regarding the legality of holding the referendum in the province.

Holding the vote for the people of Shingal could be even more difficult. Shingal’s Yazidis are now divided among the many thousands in the IDP camps of Dohuk; thousands more in IDP camps in Syria and Turkey; tens of thousands of recent migrants to Europe (most of whom would prefer to return to a secure Shingal); others who have migrated to Canada, the US, and Australia; IDPs in camps on Shingal Mountain administered by PKK-affiliated institutions; returnees to damaged/destroyed areas in KDP-administered areas north of Shingal; returnees to Yazidi villages south of Shingal now under the control of Hashd al-Sha’bi. What is the KRG’s plan to make sure that all of these people are able to freely and fairly vote in the referendum?

In a recent interview with Kirkuk Now, Mahama Khalil (appointed by the KDP to act as unelected mayor of the Shingal District) also said that no preparations had been made to conduct the vote in Shingal. In the interview, he also exhibits a certain confusion as to the proper legal channels through which to conduct the vote and stated defiantly that the PKK and Hashd al-Sha’bi will not be able to disrupt the freedom of Yazidis to vote in the referendum. But the real question should be: What will guarantee that the KDP does not apply pressure on the voters? If the KRG intends to facilitate the Shingali people’s free, democratic decision as to the future of their district, things are off to a bad start with their asaish already punishing and intimidating those who express a desire to see Shingal remain under Baghdad’s administration.

Opposition to the Referendum within the KRI

Beyond the anticipated debacle of trying to hold the referendum in the disputed territories, the Kurdish mainland may also temper the success of the referendum. Though the vast majority of Kurds support the principle of Kurdish independence, there is significant anxiety among many in the KRI as to whether this referendum is being pursued in the right way and for the right reasons.

Contrary to assertions that this referendum has the backing of a broad political coalition, this has not been the case. The June 7 meeting at Seri Resh that resulted in the decision to hold the referendum did not include Gorran or the Kurdistan Islamic Group. The Gorran-led political opposition regards the referendum as a vote on the legitimacy of the KDP’s monopolization of power, Masoud Barzani’s unilaterally extended presidency, and the abandonment of parliamentary democracy. Their sense is that the referendum would effectively make the KDP the vanguard of the nationalist movement and discredit the opposition, which insists upon institution-building or at least having working democratic institutions prior to statehood. Together, Gorran and the Kurdistan Islamic Group constitute 25% of Parliament. The Kurdistan Islamic Union has also announced its refusal to back the vote without parliamentary approval.

It is also unclear the degree to which the PUK supports the referendum. Despite the participation of PUK Leadership Council members in the Seri Resh conference on June 7^th, the issue of holding an independence referendum has divided the PUK. In general, the PUK supports the reactivation of Parliament prior to holding an independence referendum. However, while some have backed the KDP’s proposal to reactivate the legislature with the current Speaker, Dr. Yusuf Muhammad, for one session, thirty-four out of fifty-five PUK Leadership Council members  support not just reactivation, but “normalization”—i.e. Gorran’s argument that Parliament must be reactivated and remain active until the next parliamentary elections (with Dr. Yusuf as Speaker)—and oppose the nomination of a PUK delegate to the Referendum Committee prior to Parliament’s reactivation. KRG Vice-Prime Minister Qubad Talabani and Kirkuk Governor Najmaddin Karim’s attendance—in defiance of the wishes of the majority of the Leadership Council—at the Referendum Committee hearings and at the KRG’s delegation to the European Parliament this week (to garner support for the referendum) prompted outrage within the PUK politburo. Mahmoud Sangawi, a member of the Leadership Council and General Commander of the Germian Region, lashed out at Talabani and Karim: “They are not representatives of the PUK. They represent only themselves.”

Is the Referendum Actually Binding?

While acting President Masoud Barzani has promised that the referendum on independence would be “binding,”  Barzani and others, including KDP executive and former Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, have qualified this by saying that independence will not be declared immediately after the vote, but rather that the vote would give the KRG a mandate to open independence negotiations with Baghdad.

In fact, it is doubtful that the KRI would benefit politically or financially from declaring independence. With a budget shortfall of over $25 billion, the KRI has had extreme difficulty paying public salaries and pensions, providing services, and maintaining infrastructure in its administrative areas. A declaration of independence would mean that the KRI would not only be responsible for providing salaries to KRI employees, but also for public servants that are currently paid by the IFG, as well as providing utilities, water, and other services to the disputed territories. The KRI’s Ministry of Natural Resources, along with the provinces of Kirkuk, Nineveh, and Salah ad-Din also have production-sharing agreements (PSAs) with the IFG to extract and market Kirkuk crude that provide for significant infrastructure development in the disputed territories, the salaries of KRI civil servants, and healthy dividends for KDP- and PUK-linked production and marketing firms and the KDP-led Ministry of Natural Resources.Moreover, the announcement on the referendum came less than two weeks after the KRG Central Bank announced that it agreed to be taken over by the Iraqi Central Bank and the Iraqi Oil Ministry announced plans to finance the construction of a new oil refinery in Kirkuk to the tune of $5 billion.

With all of the above in mind, it seems that participating parties in the Referendum Committee are more interested in gaining leverage against the IFG and their domestic political rivals, and in maximizing the political and financial gains of the KRI’s two dominant parties (the KDP and PUK).

Whether the KRG actually intends to declare independence or not, the referendum campaign itself could nevertheless stir violent tensions among the various populations and political factions contending for the disputed territories. The referendum’s lack of planning, preparation, legal definition, or multilateral participation sets a dangerous precedent and may also be perceived as anticlimactic by many Kurds who have long struggled for independence.

The Solution

To ensure the stability and security of Iraq and Kurdistan, both the Federal and Regional governments must revisit Article 140 and make a concerted effort to determine once and for all the status of the disputed territories. Of course, implementation will be even more difficult now than it was twelve years ago, mainly because demographic normalization (which must precede the execution of a census and referendum) has been disturbed by population displacements in the wake of the IS invasion. With so much at stake and so many competing territorial claims to evaluate and negotiate, it will be extremely difficult for two governments that doubt each other’s good faith to commit to this long and arduous process. Yet, continuing to avoid the Article 140 process, as the pressure continues to build on all sides, will yield severe consequences for both governments as well as for their international allies.

Most analysts agree that the international community, particularly the United Nations and the United States, must step up its involvement in order to help stabilize Iraq’s post-IS landscape and adopt a framework to address the challenges posed by the jurisdictional conflicts in the disputed territories. Currently, the United Nations Assistance Mission to Iraq (UNAMI)’s mandate is limited to humanitarian and diplomatic assistance at the request of the Government of Iraq. Furthermore, the mandate’s scope is overly-broad, expressing the UN’s intention to promote economic and institutional development throughout Iraq, but without any clear focus on addressing the territorial disputes between the KRG and the IFG. Therefore, the UN will need a mandate specifically tailored to the mediation of the Article 140 process that will provide for the necessary resources for resolving territorial and property disputes and completing the normalization (or de-Arabization) process, conducting censuses, and referenda.

More than simply revisiting Article 140, the mandate must also address the effects of civil war, population displacements, and genocide that have occurred since the passage of the Iraqi Constitution. It will be necessary to secure KRG and IFG cooperation to reconstruct and provide adequate services to recently liberated cities like Shingal and Jalawla. It should also bring community leaders, regional and federal officials together to respond to the requests of small, territorially concentrated ethnic minorities for local administrative autonomy. Finally, but most importantly, the mandate should include the deployment of armed peacekeepers to prevent the eruption of clashes that could sabotage progress on the diplomatic and humanitarian end. Indeed, research has shown that multi-faceted missions (those that include diplomatic, humanitarian, and security provisions) are more likely to have successful, long-term outcomes than missions with a purely humanitarian or security focus.[ii]

Although such a mission will depend on the KRG’s withdrawal of the present referendum proposal, independence for the KRI should not be off the table. Iraqi PM Haider al-Abadi has even conceded that the Kurds have a right to self-determination, up to and including their own state. However, if the Kurdish parties truly intend to secede from Iraq, the UN and Iraq’s international partners should condition their support for the independence process on the KRG’s commitment to the peaceful resolution of territorial, energy, and water disputes with the IFG, as well as its observance of the Region’s own laws and the authority of its own legally established Regional decision-making bodies. For example, the UN should require that the KRG reactivate its Parliament, hold legislative and presidential elections, and encourage the passage of a motion in Parliament authorizing the formation of a high committee to plan an independence referendum before it agrees to monitor the vote. Likewise, by obtaining guarantees from the international community to support a future independence referendum that is conducted in accordance with the above conditions, Barzani could save face domestically while withdrawing the current referendum.

Although UN peacekeeping missions do not have a stellar success rate, this can be partly attributed to the difficulty of the missions that the UN accepts, the lack of willingness on the part of host nations to give the UN the flexibility it needs to succeed, and a lack of cooperation from regional and international partners. While resolving territorial disputes will invariably be a grueling process, a mission to carry out Article 140 can still succeed if domestic, regional, and international partners are committed to it. Of course, a UN peacekeeping mission would be a bitter pill to swallow for both Baghdad and Erbil. It will be costly, it will require a long-term commitment, and parties will have to accept compromises that they may perceive as sub-optimal. Ultimately, the value of peace for both sides will outweigh the value of the benefits that either side would expect to gain from continuing down the current path, which will inevitably lead to armed conflict, whether by design or miscalculation. The diplomatic efforts of Iraq’s neighbors and international partners, particularly the US, will be crucial in raising the IFG and KRI’s perceived costs of noncompliance (such as threatening a withdrawal of military or financial support from the KRG and/or IFG) and reducing their perceived costs of compromise by offering incentives for both to accept UN conditions. Additionally, US influence will be necessary to secure the resolution from the Security Council to authorize a multi-faceted peacekeeping mission in the disputed territories.

Conversely, the UN must obtain guarantees of cooperation from the potential regional spoilers Iran and Turkey, as well as the United States. This will also require mutual assurances and recognition that a peaceful resolution of the Article 140 disputes is the optimal outcome and that all parties will commit their resources to that end. However, with the Iranian-backed Hashd al- Sha’bi making gains along the Syrian border and the mobilization of Turkish armed forces in the KRI (as well as Turkish air strikes against PKK and YBŞ positions in Shingal), regional actors appear to be on a war footing in Iraq. So is the US. With a weakened Department of State, a newly-empowered Pentagon, and an Ambassador to the UN who recently bragged about cutting the peacekeeping budget by over half a billion dollars, hope of US support for peacemaking in Iraq may prove illusory as well.

 ---

Megan Connelly is a PhD candidate with the Department of Political Science at SUNY University at Buffalo, concentrating in civil war, peace-building, and power-sharing studies with a focus on the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. She can be followed on Twitter: @meganconnelly48

 

Matthew Barber is a PhD student studying Islamic thought and history in the Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations at the University of Chicago, who has conducted research on the Yazidi minority. He was working in Kurdistan when the Yazidi Genocide began and later led humanitarian and advocacy projects in the country for one year (2015-2016). He can be followed on Twitter: @Matthew__Barber

 

http://www.nrttv.com/en/birura-details.aspx?Jimare=6823

[tigergorzow]

27 minutes ago, newbieDA said:

 

Since I have your attention, do you think the US within the Kurdish regions in Syria and Iraq are there to help can Independence or to make sure the Iraq government and troops get in the region for Article 140?

 

just thinking out loud with you

newbieDA,  I do believe that the U.S. fully supports Iraq to have full Federal Authority over KRG & all other provinces.  I also believe our soldiers will help protect the Sunni's & KRG citizens during the upcoming May elections from the Iranian militias to include the Popular Crowd crowd made up of Shites.

 

The KRG Leadership needs to go meaning the Corrupt Barzani's & Talabani''s, Zebari, etc who are holding up progress because of "Greed".

 

We all know Maliki and the Gang needs to be hung by the neck.

[Rochester]

We will have an agreement soon. In the next month or less. When it happens you can thank President Trump. He led the way by calling Iraqi politicians "the smartest crooks I have ever met".....or something like that. And that meant everyone knew, NOT to give the Iraqis money at the Kuwaiti conference. And that meant the Iraqis knew they were in a corner, could not rob us of money again, and that they must come to an agreement among themselves....so that is what they are doing.

 

Don't forget to thank President Trump when they do. His leadership helped, a lot. If that fool Obama was still in office, we would have no hope, just hype.

 

God bless President Obama....best President since Ronald Reagan.

[yota691]

Party Barzani: Kurdish blocs will not nominate in the disputed areas

15:56 - 21/02/2018

0

 

  

Information / Special ...

A member of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), Islam Hussein, said on Wednesday that Kurdish blocs would not be nominated in the disputed areas.

"The Democratic Party wanted the Kurdish alliance to include all the Kurdish parties on a single list, but it has not succeeded so far," Hussein said in a statement to Al-Maaloumah. "The Democratic Party will enter a single electoral list."

"Alliances will be formed after the elections, despite the fragmentation of the Kurdish blocs and the departure of some well-known Kurdish figures to Arab lists."

He stressed that "the majority of Kurdish blocs and parties will not run in the disputed areas because we consider them occupied by the security forces crowd, (as he put it)."

The Iraqi forces and the popular crowd control most of the disputed areas after a security operation in the past, especially in the areas of Kirkuk, especially after the catastrophic error committed by Massoud Barzani, the referendum on the secession of the territory from Iraq, and his attempt to annex Kirkuk and other areas of the region. Finished 25 k

[yota691]

The federal government to transfer the staff of the border crossings in the Kurdistan Region on their salaries

 Twilight News    
 59 minutes ago

The head of the border crossings Kazim al-Aqabi on Thursday that it is decided to transfer all employees at the border crossings in the Kurdistan Region on its staff within the process of imposing the federal authority.

"We will shift the staff of the border crossings in the Kurdistan Region to our shelters," he said, adding that "salaries will be paid to them from the Commission to subject all the ports of the province to the federal authority."

He added that "Article 114 of the Constitution refers to the joint management of ports," but said that "I can not find a material that talks about the financial revenues obtained from those ports, so it should go to the treasury of the Iraqi state."

From: Rudaw

Keywords: 

 

[yota691]

Details of the opening of a new crossing between the Kurdistan region and Turkey

22-02-2018 02:02 PM

Readers

 

Baghdad News -

 

 

The Minister of Trade and Customs of Turkey, the efforts to open a new border crossing with the Kurdistan region, in order to stimulate trade between the border areas on both sides. 

Turkish Foreign Minister Bulent Tufenkegi was quoted as saying that the ministry has submitted a draft to both Turkish President Ben Ali Yildirim and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, including the opening of a new border crossing with the Kurdistan Region in the town of Oludra, (Kurdistan Turkey), in front of Zakho district in Dohuk governorate. 

The opening of the new crossing is intended to prevent illegal smuggling activities in the area and to preserve the lives of citizens. 

The minister pointed out that the project aims to stimulate trade in this region within the controls as an alternative to smuggling, "at the request of the local population."

He pointed out that the current trade between Turkey and Kurdistan through the gates by a certain category of traders, and Abizaid «we seek to do this trade the local population», and revealed that there are efforts to expand the list of materials allowed in trade. 

The border trade will also be duty-free.

[yota691]

Sulaymaniyah: Stopped salaries will be disbursed soon

February 21, 2018

18 views

 

  

Knozmedia 

 

The director of the planning department in the Directorate of Education Sulaymaniyah Khokar Khaled, that the stages of auditing the salaries of teachers and teachers of the region is going smoothly, stressing that salaries will be spent in accordance with the ongoing audit.

 

"The federal government has sent a list to the Ministry of Education in the provincial government," Khaled said in a press release. "The work is continuing and smoothly to complete the list and information about the staff, teachers and school staff.

 

He added: "The committee of the federal government to follow up the audit functions in the Directorate of Education Sulaymaniyah, pointing out that the lists will be returned to Baghdad within two days coming, so that the salaries of the Ministry of Education according to these lists." Ss 

[TexasMike1958]

11 hours ago, Rochester said:

We will have an agreement soon. In the next month or less. When it happens you can thank President Trump. He led the way by calling Iraqi politicians "the smartest crooks I have ever met".....or something like that. And that meant everyone knew, NOT to give the Iraqis money at the Kuwaiti conference. And that meant the Iraqis knew they were in a corner, could not rob us of money again, and that they must come to an agreement among themselves....so that is what they are doing.

 

Don't forget to thank President Trump when they do. His leadership helped, a lot. If that fool Obama was still in office, we would have no hope, just hype.

 

God bless President Obama....best President since Ronald Reagan.

 

You mean God Bless President Trump don't you???

[10 YEARS LATER]

If their definition of “ close “ is anything like “ soon “ or “ in the coming days “ no telling how long this will take. 

[DinarDavo]

Compared to the rest of the solar system, Venus is "close" to the earth......just say'n.

[nannab]

Well if May of 2017 when Yota first posted this topic is any indication 

WE ARE IN BIG TROUBLE MISTA !!!   

[fancy]

12 hours ago, Rochester said:

We will have an agreement soon. In the next month or less. When it happens you can thank President Trump. He led the way by calling Iraqi politicians "the smartest crooks I have ever met".....or something like that. And that meant everyone knew, NOT to give the Iraqis money at the Kuwaiti conference. And that meant the Iraqis knew they were in a corner, could not rob us of money again, and that they must come to an agreement among themselves....so that is what they are doing.

 

Don't forget to thank President Trump when they do. His leadership helped, a lot. If that fool Obama was still in office, we would have no hope, just hype.

 

God bless President Obama....best President since Ronald Reagan.

Totally agree Rochester, well said. And I know you meant President Trump because Obummer was the worst President we have ever had

[10 YEARS LATER]

28 minutes ago, DinarDavo said:

Compared to the rest of the solar system, Venus is "close" to the earth......just say'n.

 

  

[yota691]

Massoud Barzani arrives in Washington to discuss two issues

 Twilight News    
 5 hours ago

"The adviser of the Security Council of the Kurdistan Region pleased Barzani to Washington to meet with a number of US officials. 
Barzani is scheduled to discuss with White House officials and members of Congress the relations between the United States and the Kurdistan Region, the developments of the discussions between Baghdad and Erbil and the solution of problems.

According to an official in Barzani's office told the twilight news, the visit will take several days.

Keywords: 

[yota691]

Masoum discusses with US delegation the relationship between Erbil and Baghdad and the need to end outstanding problems

- 2/22/2018 8:33:00 AM53 Number of readings

 

 

 

 

Khandan -

President Fuad Masum discussed with US Assistant Secretary of Defense Robert Karem and his accompanying delegation the relationship between the federal government and the Kurdistan Region and stressed the need for the parties to work for dialogue and end the outstanding problems. 
 
The presidency said in a statement that the infallible speech during the meeting on political and security developments in Iraq and regional relations, stressing "to continue Iraq's war against terrorism with the support of friends in the international community, and to create the conditions for the upcoming elections and the reconstruction of the devastation and destruction of terrorism." 

For his part, the US Assistant Secretary of Defense expressed "pride and pride that the United States is an essential part of the victory factors achieved by the Iraqis against Da'ash", expressing "the aspiration to deepen relations and long-term participation in security cooperation in the face of terrorism."

The statement said that during the meeting, which was attended by US Ambassador to Baghdad Douglas Silliman discussed the relationship between the federal government and the Kurdistan region and stressed the need for the parties to work for dialogue and end the outstanding problems.

[jcfrag]

23 hours ago, tigergorzow said:

newbieDA,  I do believe that the U.S. fully supports Iraq to have full Federal Authority over KRG & all other provinces.  I also believe our soldiers will help protect the Sunni's & KRG citizens during the upcoming May elections from the Iranian militias to include the Popular Crowd crowd made up of Shites.

 

The KRG Leadership needs to go meaning the Corrupt Barzani's & Talabani''s, Zebari, etc who are holding up progress because of "Greed".

 

We all know Maliki and the Gang needs to be hung by the neck.

I say hang Maliki by his little tiny huevos. Have a second noose hanging around his neck to catch him when the Huevos dissapear!

Edited February 23, 2018 by jcfrag