Theory of Meditation in Economic Decision Making

[yota691]

Theory of Meditation in Economic Decision Making

 

Appearance of Mohammed Saleh

Appearance of Mohammed Saleh Economic life is rising today, without exception, to test an economic trend that has begun to transcend the barriers of the neo-classical school since 1979 and to turn into the so-called behavioral economics, which adopts the theory of meditation and perception in economic decision-making. This theory is considered as a crossroads in the integration of psychological behavioral factors in economic models and models Related to the economic decision, the traditional framework for the decision-making process adopted by mainstream or prevailing trends such as the neoclassical economy, for example, is to adopt options between the various alternatives available depending on the desired outcomes and The righteousness of the goals looking forward to the same decision maker which is summarized in the sports economy are aware of the benefit of a function mostly.   The economic decision theory is based on a description of the conditions under which the option can be achieved. "When there is an economic risk" ie loss, the alternative available for each option will provide a probability distribution of the possibility of achieving the results by which the decision maker chooses Best probability distributions.   Apart from this and that in addressing the issue of decision-making in the main currents of economics, the basic principles of the theory of meditation and the construction of perceptions have been attributed to five principles since its birth in 1979. The trend in behavioral economics as a new school of economics led pioneers such as Daniel Kanman and Richard Thieler, who won two Nobel Prizes in economics in 2002 and 2017, respectively.   This leads us to gather ideas to summarize the five basic principles of the theory of meditation and perception of economic decision makers and in accordance with the vision that came Danital Kanman and others as follows: The first principle goes to the idea that the actual decision in economic action responds (to changes in wealth) rather than wealth The change in the total value of the net assets of individuals and their assets. This principle contrasts with the traditional trends in economics which see decision-making as a response to "profit and loss" issues.   The second principle of meditation theory is "difference in attitude to risk," ie, the degree of difference in risk tolerance, especially in the face of loss. Differences exist even within the same point in time and depend on the decision-making power of the decision-maker whether the loss really exists. This requires the ability to diagnose loss avoidance contexts where the importance of avoiding loss is important for contextual diagnosis.   The third principle is based on the phenomenon of the so-called "diminishing sense" of profits and losses, as diminishing sensitivity requires an accurate range based on estimates that come according to the different contexts of decision-makers. It is observed in Principle 4 that economic decision-makers and their makers do not build in the theory of meditation their options on probability theory as the neo-classical school of economics goes, but rely on what they see as a chance of success, that is, the element of optimism. A situation that is seen as a "state of shift in probability." Here the theory of meditation differs from the theory of probability among decision-makers, especially in weak or verifiable probabilities, which are often too overestimated or sometimes underestimated or even neglected. The more objective it needs to be "transformation or change", which necessitates the limitation and marking.   Finally, it is noted that the theory of meditation addressed by behavioral economics is still evolving. Therefore, the predominant basis in decision-making is based on a principle of contemplation called "visualization." The perceptions are subject to two types of choices: The latter is called the narrow choice of short-sighted decision-making, but perceptions remain important in decision-making and the need for it continues as a discretionary power as long as the theory of meditation appears to be of paramount importance in decision-making.   Finally, the major economic schools of economics, such as the New School and the modern Ecclesiastical School, have shown a strong reservation in the use of the theory of meditating in economic decision-making for the first two reasons. The first is that the expectations are modifiable because of the probability shift and the second is the point of reference or points of reference Naturism of meditation is still incomplete and suffers from a lack of characterization in decision-making in the real world, and thus the development of economic thought in the shadow of the Fourth Technological Revolution or the current digital age was influenced by the theory of biological or biological The economic behavioral pattern of the twenty-first century and away from the thought patterns of the physical pattern and its constancy led by the second and third technological revolutions of the twentieth century.       Financial Adviser to the Prime Minister of Iraq       Quoting the network of Iraqi economists   Number of Views 35   Date Added 08/01/2018

[DinarThug]

LINK

The theory of hope in economic decision-making

 

6th January, 2018

Economic life is rising today, without exception, to test an economic trend that has begun to transcend the barriers of the neo-classical school since 1979 and to turn into the so-called behavioral economics, which adopts the theory of meditation and perception in economic decision-making. This theory is considered as a crossroads in the integration of psychological behavioral factors in economic models and models Related to the economic decision, the traditional framework for the decision-making process adopted by mainstream or prevailing trends such as the neoclassical economy, for example, is to adopt options between the various alternatives available depending on the desired outcomes and The righteousness of the goals looking forward to the same decision maker which is summarized in the sports economy are aware of the benefit of a function mostly.

The economic decision theory is based on a description of the conditions under which the option can be achieved. "When there is an economic risk" ie loss, the alternative available for each option will provide a probability distribution of the possibility of achieving the results by which the decision maker chooses Best probability distributions.

Apart from this and that in addressing the issue of decision-making in the main currents of economics, the basic principles of the theory of meditation and the construction of perceptions have been attributed to five principles since its birth in 1979. The trend in behavioral economics as a new school of economics led pioneers such as Daniel Kannman and Richard Thieler, who won two Nobel Prizes in economics in 2002 and 2017, respectively.

This leads us to gather ideas to summarize the five basic principles of the theory of meditation and perception of economic decision makers and in accordance with the vision that came Danteal Kanman and others as follows: The first principle goes to the idea that the actual decision in economic action responds (to changes in wealth) rather than wealth The change in the total value of the net assets of individuals and their assets. This principle contrasts with the traditional trends in economics which see decision-making as a response to "profit and loss" issues.

The second principle of meditation theory is "difference in attitude to risk," ie, the degree of difference in risk tolerance, especially in the face of loss. Differences exist even within the same point in time and depend on the decision-making power of the decision-maker whether the loss really exists. This requires the ability to diagnose loss avoidance contexts where the importance of avoiding loss is important for contextual diagnosis.

The third principle is based on the phenomenon of the so-called "diminishing sense" of profits and losses, as diminishing sensitivity requires an accurate range based on estimates that come according to the different contexts of decision-makers. It is observed in Principle 4 that economic decision-makers and their makers do not build in the theory of meditation their options on probability theory as the neo-classical school of economics goes, but rely on what they see as a chance of success, that is, the element of optimism. A situation that is seen as a "state of shift in probability." Here the theory of meditation differs from the theory of probability among decision-makers, especially in weak or verifiable probabilities, which are often too overestimated or sometimes underestimated or even neglected. The more objective it needs to be "transformation or change", which necessitates the limitation and marking.

Finally, it is noted that the theory of meditation addressed by behavioral economics is still evolving. Therefore, the predominant basis in decision-making is based on a principle of contemplation called "visualization." The perceptions are subject to two types of choices: The latter is called the narrow choice of short-sighted decision-making, but perceptions remain important in decision-making and the need for it continues as a discretionary power as long as the theory of meditation appears to be of paramount importance in decision-making.

Finally, the major economic schools of economics, such as the New School and the modern Ecclesiastical School, have shown a strong reservation in the use of the theory of meditating in economic decision-making for the first two reasons. The first is that the expectations are modifiable because of the probability shift and the second is the point of reference or points of reference Naturism of meditation is still incomplete and suffers from a lack of characterization in decision-making in the real world, and thus the development of economic thought in the shadow of the Fourth Technological Revolution or the current digital age was influenced by the theory of biological or biological The economic behavioral pattern of the twenty-first century and away from the thought patterns of the physical pattern and its constancy led by the second and third technological revolutions of the twentieth century.

Financial Adviser to the Prime Minister of Iraq

Quoting the network of Iraqi economists

[vato96]

Sure wish he'd be useful in something other than talk about how great iraq is doing and put some action to his words and advise the central bank it's time to rv

[sailin12]

Blame the rise of the dinar on meditation or lack of...wake up, smell the roses and get your country moving

to the future😖😖😖😖

[Gypsygirl11]

They sure do like to talk it to death, don't they?!?

[DinarThug]

Theory of Meditation in Economic Decision Making

Author: Dr. Appearance of Mohammed Saleh  11/1/2018 12:00 am  Economic life is emerging today, without exception, to test an economic trend that has begun to transcend the barriers of the neo-classical school since 1979 and turn into so-called behavioral economics, which adopts the theory of meditation and perception in economic decision-making.  This theory has been considered as a crossroads in the integration of psychological behavioral factors into economic models and models related to the economic decision.  The traditional framework for decision-making adopted by major currents, such as the neoclassical economy, tends to adopt options between the various alternatives available, depending on the desired outcomes, and through the goals that the decision-maker itself aspires to summarize and often summarizes.  The economic decision theory is based on the description of the conditions under which the option can be achieved (ie, the optimal option and its characteristics). When there is an economic risk (ie loss), the alternative available for each option will provide a probability distribution of the possibility of achieving the results by which the decision maker chooses Best probability distributions.  Regardless of this and that in addressing the issue of decision-making in the main currents of economics, the basic principles of the theory of meditation and the construction of perceptions have been anchored in the five principles since its birth in 1979.  This trend in behavioral economics as a new school of economics has led pioneers such as Daniel Kanman and Richard Thieler, who won two Nobel Prizes in Economics in 2002 and 2017, respectively.  This leads us to gather ideas to summarize the five basic principles of the theory of meditation and perception of economic decision makers and according to the vision that came by Daniel Kanman and others as follows:  The first principle goes to the idea that the actual decision in economic action responds to changes in wealth rather than the wealth itself, ie, the change in the total value of the net assets and assets of the individual. This principle contrasts with the traditional trends in economics, Comes in response to my case (profit and loss).  The second principle addressed by the theory of hope is (different positions on risk), ie, the degree of difference in risk tolerance, especially the face of loss. The difference is achieved even within the same time point and depends on the strength of diagnosis in the decision maker whether the loss really exist or not? This requires the ability to diagnose loss avoidance contexts where the importance of avoiding loss is important in diagnosing contexts.  The third principle is based on the phenomenon of the so-called (diminishing sense) of profits and losses. The diminishing sensitivity requires a precise range based on estimates that come according to the different contexts of the decision-makers.  The fourth principle notes that economic decision-makers and their makers build in the theory of hope their options on probability theory as the neo-classical school of economics goes, but they rely on what they see as a chance of success: the availability of optimism, ). Here the theory of meditation differs from the theory of probability in decision-makers, especially in the weak or verifiable possibilities, which are usually too overvalued or sometimes very underestimated or even neglected. The most objective possibilities need (transformation or change) The case is limited and marked.  Finally, it is noted that the theory of meditation addressed by behavioral economics is still evolving. Therefore, the predominant basis in decision-making is based on a principle associated with meditation called (visualization). The perceptions are subject to two types of options: the wide choice or the narrow alternative. The latter is called the narrow option of visualizing the phenomenon of short-sighted decision-making. However, perceptions remain important in decision-making and need to continue as a discretionary power. The importance of decision-making.  In conclusion, the main economic schools such as the New School and the modern Ecclesiastical School have shown a strong reservation in the use of the theory of hope in economic decision-making for two main reasons: the expectations are modifiable because of the probability shift and the second, the points of reasoning or points of reference The theory of meditation is still incomplete and suffers from a lack of characterization when making decisions in the real world.  Thus, the evolution of economic thought in the shadow of the Fourth Technological Revolution or the current digital age was influenced by the biological or biological theory of the economic behavioral pattern of the 21st century, and away from the thought patterns of the physical pattern and its constancy led by the second and third technological revolutions of the twentieth century.  (*) If the probability means a quantitative measure in the verification of a randomized randomized event expressed by the number zero, which means the probability of occurrence of the event and the number one, which means the achievement of the event completely. While the probability distribution of the random variable to the diagnosis by which the random variable can take any Value or range of Value. link

[yota691]

Theory of Meditation in Economic Decision Making

Author: Dr. Appearance of Mohammed Saleh 11/1/2018 12:00 am Economic life is emerging today, without exception, to test an economic trend that has begun to transcend the barriers of the neo-classical school since 1979 and turn into so-called behavioral economics, which adopts the theory of meditation and perception in economic decision-making.  This theory has been considered as a crossroads in the integration of psychological behavioral factors into economic models and models related to the economic decision.  The traditional framework for decision-making adopted by major currents, such as the neoclassical economy, tends to adopt options between the various alternatives available, depending on the desired outcomes, and through the goals that the decision-maker itself aspires to summarize.  The economic decision theory is based on the description of the conditions under which the option can be achieved (ie, the optimal option and its characteristics). When there is an economic risk (ie loss), the alternative available for each option will provide a probability distribution of the possibility of achieving the results by which the decision maker chooses Best probability distributions.  Apart from this and that in addressing the issue of decision-making in the main currents of economics, the basic principles of the theory of meditation and the construction of perceptions have been anchored to the five principles since its birth in 1979.  This trend in behavioral economics as a new school of economics led Such as Daniel Kanman and Richard Thieler, who won two Nobel Prizes in economics in 2002 and 2017, respectively. This leads us to gather ideas to summarize the five basic principles of the theory of meditation and perception of economic decision makers and according to the vision that came from Daniel Kanman and others as follows:  The first principle goes to the idea that the actual decision in economic action responds (to changes in wealth) rather than wealth The change in the total value of the net assets of individuals and their assets, and this principle is contrary to the traditional trends prevailing in economics, which considers that decision-making comes in response to the issues (profit and loss). The second principle addressed by the theory of hope is (different positions on risk), ie, the degree of difference in risk tolerance, especially the face of loss. The difference is achieved even within the same time point and depends on the strength of diagnosis in the decision maker whether the loss really exist or not? This requires the ability to diagnose loss avoidance contexts where the importance of avoiding loss is important in diagnosing contexts.  The third principle is based on the phenomenon of the so-called (diminishing sense) of profits and losses. The diminishing sensitivity requires a precise range based on estimates that come according to the different contexts of the decision-makers.  The fourth principle notes that economic decision-makers and their makers build in the theory of hope their options on probability theory as the neo-classical school of economics goes, but they rely on what they see as a chance of success: the availability of optimism, ).  Here the theory of meditation differs from the theory of probability in decision-makers, especially in the weak or verifiable possibilities, which are usually too overvalued or sometimes very underestimated or even neglected. The most objective possibilities need to be (shift or change) The case is limited and marked. Finally, it is noted that the theory of meditation addressed by behavioral economics is still evolving. Therefore, the predominant basis in decision-making is based on a principle associated with meditation called (visualization). The perceptions are subject to two types of options: the wide choice or the narrow alternative. The latter is called the narrow option of visualizing the phenomenon of short-sighted decision-making. However, perceptions remain important in decision-making and need to continue as a discretionary power. The importance of decision-making. Finally, the main economics schools such as the New School and the modern Ecclesiastical School have shown a strong reservation in the use of the theory of hope in economic decision-making for two main reasons: the expectations are modifiable because of the probability shift and the second, the points of reasoning or points of reference The theory of meditation is still incomplete and suffers from a lack of characterization when making decisions in the real world.  Thus, the development of economic thought in the shadow of the Fourth Technological Revolution or the current digital age was influenced by the biological or biological theory of the economic behavioral pattern of the 21st century, and away from the thought patterns of the physical pattern and its constancy led by the second and third technological revolutions of the twentieth century. (*) If the probability means a quantitative measure in the verification of a randomized randomized event expressed by the number zero, which means the probability of occurrence of the event and the number one, which means the occurrence of the event completely. While the probability distribution of the random variable to the diagnosis by which the random variable can take any Value or range of   values.

[jcfrag]

On 1/8/2018 at 7:47 PM, Gypsygirl11 said:

They sure do like to talk it to death, don't they?!?

Beat that horse some more Mohammad....I don’t think it’s dead yet!!!

[Gypsygirl11]

5 hours ago, DinarThug said:

random variable can take any Value or range of value

That's what I'm talkin about.....Again, quit talking and DO SOMETHING!

[vato96]

Is he high?

[NoviceInvestor]

2 hours ago, Gypsygirl11 said:

That's what I'm talkin about.....Again, quit talking and DO SOMETHING!

Well said Gypsygirl.. This old girl here is not getting any younger and I have a "Bucket List" waiting to be completed.

[MyLadiesDaddy]

6 hours ago, vato96 said:

Is he high?

Na, he's just Arab

[WheresmyRV?]

7 hours ago, Gypsygirl11 said:

That's what I'm talkin about.....Again, quit talking and DO SOMETHING!

The more they talk about it and do studies on makes me think that we have a long ways to go yet. 

[Gypsygirl11]

7 hours ago, NoviceInvestor said:

Well said Gypsygirl.. This old girl here is not getting any younger and I have a "Bucket List" waiting to be completed.

I'm with you - God willing we will be able to start checking off on our bucket list.....SOON, lol

 

2 hours ago, WheresmyRV? said:

The more they talk about it and do studies on makes me think that we have a long ways to go yet. 

God, don't say that!  

[10 YEARS LATER]

9 hours ago, vato96 said:

Is he high?

 

Stoned and Soaring in Outer Space. 

[Laid Back]

I meditate every morning, I'm happy 😀

 

Namaste 🙏🏼

[SnowGlobe7]

Me too Laid back

[Laid Back]

Feeling the love @SnowGlobe7