Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Trump warns Mueller, Upset at Sessions


Recommended Posts

It's Mueller's responsibility to find the truth, thus following all leads and go wherever the clues might lead him....if that means picking apart Donald's finances, then so be it.  The fact that this makes Donald more insecure is a red flag.  Just like he says about the states not wanting to share voter information....in this case, what is Trump hiding?  Back in the 90's, Monica L. wasn't on the radar during the investigation into President Clinton either, but that's where it ended up.  Follow all leads Mr. Mueller, and if you or any of the justice department folks get fired for it.....the real American people will have Trump's @ss in a ringer, just like Nixon.  The A.G. is not your puppet Donald....he belongs to America, bound by the U.S. Constitution to follow the law.  Now I know the spin doctors are going to show up and bring their Obama, Lynch, Clinton baggage with them.....but the fact remains, the man in our White House is center stage now, not the previous administration and certainly not the Clintons. 

 

http://nypost.com/2017/07/19/trump-warns-mueller-not-to-probe-into-his-finances/

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/07/19/trump-sessions-should-have-never-recused-himself-from-russia-investigation.html

 

GO RV, then BV

Edited by Shabibilicious
  • Upvote 5
  • Downvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Trump is now attacking his own administration, including Jeff Sessions

 

President tells New York Times he wouldn’t have hired attorney general had he known he’d recuse himself from Russia inquiry, because it’s ‘extremely unfair’

 

 

Ed Pilkington

Thursday 20 July 2017 07.18 BST

 

 

2550.jpg?w=700&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=ec10023b7519cfa5ae1e47a33121a1b9
Jeff Sessions, whose actions Trump described as ‘extremely unfair’.
Photograph: John Locher

 

 

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/19/donald-trump-jeff-sessions-recusal

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IT's a DEMOCRATIC witch hunt - Nothing More!!!

 

Hillarious and the other criminals in D.C. can sell America to the highest bidder for personal enrichment and get away with it - but God forbid someone come along and try to whip America back into shape and clean up the corruption in politics - because they'll find some error somewhere and claim it's proof that Russia hacked the election and the foxes will be in charge of the hen house again and America can kiss her ass goodbye!!!

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BJinMontreal said:

IT's a DEMOCRATIC witch hunt - Nothing More!!!

 

Hillarious and the other criminals in D.C. can sell America to the highest bidder for personal enrichment and get away with it - but God forbid someone come along and try to whip America back into shape and clean up the corruption in politics - because they'll find some error somewhere and claim it's proof that Russia hacked the election and the foxes will be in charge of the hen house again and America can kiss her ass goodbye!!!

 

Quite an amazing feat perpetrated by Democrats considering Republicans control all of congress, don't you think?  :huh:

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

No deflection....simple mathematics.  And we won't know if there is an issue to tackle until Mueller has completed his ethical work.  

 

GO RV, then BV 

simple math from a simpleton? :wacko:

 

Math had nothing to do with the Clinton cabal's stooges Lynch and Comey manipulating the Justice Department to put the dems in charge of the witch hunt!!

 

ETHICAL?!?!?

 

If Mueller was ethical he would have recused himself from leading this crucifixion!!

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, BJinMontreal said:

simple math from a simpleton? :wacko:

 

Math had nothing to do with the Clinton cabal's stooges Lynch and Comey manipulating the Justice Department to put the dems in charge of the witch hunt!!

 

ETHICAL?!?!?

 

If Mueller was ethical he would have recused himself from leading this crucifixion!!

 

Simpleton....Yep, that's me.  Let me guess....you're one of those brilliant logical thinking members of a superior brain trust that still believes the Clinton's ran/run a child sex ring out of a pizzeria.  And let me go a step further and riddle you this:  Rod Rosenstein is the one who appointed Mueller as special counsel, is he not?  He is also the one who convinced DTJ to fire Comey, is he not?  If so on both counts.....how can he possibly be part of "Clinton's cabal" without the knowledge of one DJT?

 

Not only that, but you brought up ethics......DJT is throwing Sessions under the bus for being ethical and recusing himself from the Russian investigation.  How do you reasonably brush these facts aside? 

 

GO RV, then BV   

Edited by Shabibilicious
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean the one who investigated the Clintons over Whitewater and gave them a pass?  That Rod Rosenstein?

 

He played a key role investigating Bill and Hillarious Clinton.

Comey was allegedly fired for mishandling his investigation of Hillarious Clinton. If that’s true, he may have learned from Rosenstein, who was praised for his own Clinton probe two decades ago.

In 1995, Rosenstein joined the team of lawyers investigating the Whitewater scandal, which involved allegations of illegal real estate dealings by the Clintons. The allegations against the Clintons were ultimately unproven, but they led to the exposure of the Monica Lewinsky scandal and President Clinton’s subsequent impeachment.

 

Rosenstein headed one of the few successful Whitewater prosecutions, which led to the conviction of former Arkansas Gov. Jim Guy Tucker and Clinton associates James and Susan McDougal. He questioned Hillarious Clinton at the White House in 1998 as part of a separate case, according to the Baltimore Sun, but she was never implicated.

  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BJ I think you should worry about you country and it's focus....

 

 

 

 

A recent Toronto Sun editorial criticized the Canadian government under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for donating $20 million Canadian dollars to the Clinton Foundation.

Verdict: True

Canadian government filings reveal Canadian tax dollars are indeed financing a foreign health initiative by an organization under the Clinton Foundation.

Fact Check:

The Toronto Sun editorial, published July 12, was titled, “Canada Shouldn’t Donate to the Clinton Foundation.”

The editorial voiced concern with the Canadian government’s decision to “hand $20 million over” to the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), a charity under the Clinton Foundation umbrella. The editorial went on to describe the nonprofit organization as “the heart of the cash-for-access scandal” that “dogged” Hillarious Clinton’s 2016 campaign.

The Liberal Party government, led by Trudeau, reiterated Canada’s commitment to foreign aid and development in its 2017 budget. A significant component of this global commitment is the budget’s $650 million Canadian dollar (CAD) earmark for foreign aid to specifically “address gaps in sexual and reproductive health and rights in the world’s poorest and most vulnerable communities.”

A spokesperson for Global Affairs Canada, department of the Canadian government, confirmed to The Daily Caller News Foundation that CHAI submitted an “Unsolicited proposal” for public Canadian funds. The $20 million CAD grant that CHAI received will be used for a four-year project in Nigeria to “improve access to SRH [sexual and reproductive health] choices for young women and adolescent girls” with public and private partners, as per Global Affairs Canada’s website.

These initiatives fall under Canada’s explicit “feminist international assistance policy,” as stated by the Canadian government. Foreign aid administered by Global Affairs Canada thus seeks to support sex education, family planning, and abortion access across the world.

Both Canadian and international organizations are eligible to receive these funds to advance the government’s goals, a spokesperson for Global Affairs Canada told TheDCNF.

The sexual and reproductive health project isn’t the first Clinton Foundation-affiliated project that the Canadian government has funded. Canada has previously committed or granted $19.2 million CAD to CHAI for a vaccination project, $14.2 million CAD for a dysentery treatment project, and $460,000 CAD to a tuberculosis research project.

Unsolicited proposals – like the kind CHAI submitted for its most recent $20 million CAD grant – are “assessed using an established process and criteria,” the spokesperson for Global Affairs Canada told TheDCNF. These proposals must include signed agreements relating to procurement, financial recording, and conflict of interest policies as well as an anti-corruption declaration.

The Clinton Foundation has been at the center of a controversy surrounding Hillarious Clinton after it was revealed that the charity accepted foreign contributions from Canada as well as from Australia, Germany, Morocco, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The Wall Street Journal reported on this controversy in 2016, revealing that the Foundation accepted nearly $500,000 from a Canadian government agency that was tasked with promoting the Keystone XL pipeline proposal.

Discussions about any controversy and donations to the Clinton Foundation aside, claims that Canadian tax dollars are financing Clinton Foundation initiatives are true.

The Clinton Foundation did not respond to TheDCNF for comment.

Follow Kush on Twitter

Send tips to Desai@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

 

 

 

 

B/A

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Shabibilicious said:

It's Mueller's responsibility to find the truth, thus following all leads and go wherever the clues might lead him....if that means picking apart Donald's finances, then so be it.  The fact that this makes Donald more insecure is a red flag.  Just like he says about the states not wanting to share voter information....in this case, what is Trump hiding?  Back in the 90's, Monica L. wasn't on the radar during the investigation into President Clinton either, but that's where it ended up.  Follow all leads Mr. Mueller, and if you or any of the justice department folks get fired for it.....the real American people will have Trump's @ss in a ringer, just like Nixon.  The A.G. is not your puppet Donald....he belongs to America, bound by the U.S. Constitution to follow the law.  Now I know the spin doctors are going to show up and bring their Obama, Lynch, Clinton baggage with them.....but the fact remains, the man in our White House is center stage now, not the previous administration and certainly not the Clintons. 

 

That is not what was said about Loretta Lynch and her conversation with WJC on the tarmac when HRC was running for POTUS. After that clandestine" how are the grand kids" meeting she should have recused herself if only to prevent the appearance of improprities ; but that would have taken character which she did not have. I hope Mueller sticks to the probable cause behind the investigation, and not go down some rabbit hole not connected to the fake Russian collusion stories.

 

8 hours ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

Quite an amazing feat perpetrated by Democrats considering Republicans control all of congress, don't you think?  :huh:

 

GO RV, then BV

I hope Trump will break the backs of all Repub's in Congress and the Senate and install spines connected to an actual brain, that thinks about the people that gave them all they claimed they needed to get done what the people were screaming for. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lou Dobbs and guest Gregg Jarrett urged President Trump to take aggressive counter-measures in the midst of a witch hunt that seems to be spiraling out of control with rogue investigators unrestrained by a flailing DOJ under Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Russia Witch Hunt – @POTUS threatens to expose Mueller’s many conflicts of interest. #MAGA #TrumpTrain #DTS #Dobbs pic.twitter.com/x0BTpuXyp6

— Lou Dobbs (@LouDobbs) July 20, 2017

 

“I personally believe it’s time for President Trump to get rid of [Deputy AG Rod] Rosenstein, and get rid of [special investigator Robert] Mueller, clear out the Obama leftovers in the Department of Justice, and appoint officials to investigate the real corruption and toxic collusion in the D.C. swamp,” declared Dobbs during his monologue. “As Deputy AG Rosenstein said, ‘It’s time to do the right thing’ – it’s past time.”

Dobbs, who has been a staunch supporter of the president throughout his candidacy and first six months in office, denounced the blatant conflicts of interest infesting the ‘Trump-Russia election collusion’ conspiracy theory being investigated by Mueller and his team of Democrat operatives, noting, “Nearly half of them gave money to Hillarious Clinton or to President Obama.”

“Mueller was interviewed to replace Comey as FBI director, a man he’s known since at least 2003 – President Trump turned down Mueller to have that job,” he explained. “The men have been described as ‘brothers-in-arms’.”

#COMEY & #Mueller were brothers in arms in famous 2004 standoff over domestic surveillance. Cagey choice by DAG Rosenstein.

— Jim Sciutto (@jimsciutto) May 17, 2017

 

“Comey and Mueller were brothers in arms in famous 2004 standoff over domestic surveillance,” tweeted CNN correspondent Jim Sciutto in May. “Cagey choice by DAG Rosenstein.”

Rosenstein has overseen the probe since AG Sessions recused himself in March under pressure from Democrats – a decision for which the President has recently expressed disappointment and perhaps a modicum of betrayal.

“Jeff Sessions takes the job, gets into the job, recuses himself, which frankly I think is very unfair to the president,” he told the New York Times. “Sessions should have never recused himself, and if he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me before he took the job and I would have picked somebody else.”

Dobbs accused Rosenstein of being in “complete denial” of the “massive conflicts of interest which surround him,” before rolling footage of Rosenstein offering meaningless platitudes about his decision to appoint Mueller and his faith in Mueller’s “reputation” and “integrity.”

In a follow-up discussion with guest and fellow Fox News host, Gregg Jarrett, Dobbs called Sessions’ DOJ the “most politicized Justice Department in the history of this country.”

No Justice- @GreggJarrett: Biased DOJ rife w/ conflicts of interest, unfairly targeting @realdonaldtrump #Dobbs #MAGA #TrumpTrain pic.twitter.com/d9DKsGfkU9

— Lou Dobbs (@LouDobbs) July 20, 2017

 

“My god – it looks like a gentlemen’s club right now,” he exclaimed. “It’s sickening to watch the inactivity, the passivity – they’re innervated, unfocused, seemingly utterly unmotivated, and don’t have targets.”

“On the campaign trail, the President repeatedly promised that he would have his attorney general appoint a special prosecutor to reopen the Clinton investigation, into not just the email controversy, but the potential pay-to-play – it hasn’t happened,” responded Jarrett. “Instead, what you have is – according to the President – an attorney general that he appointed who immediately sandbagged him and recused himself, which then resulted in Robert Mueller eventually being appointed as special counsel, who has a glaring, blatant conflict of interest.”

“Not only does Robert Mueller have a disqualifying conflict of interest that’s mandatory under the special counsel law, but you’ve got Rod Rosenstein as the one who engineered the firing of James Comey, and Mueller, who’s investigating that firing, is supposed to report to the man who engineered the firing? That’s a conflict of interest.”

“You can’t make this stuff up – there are so many conflicts,” Jarrett continued. “The President made it clear last night: He’s going to start making a very public case about these conflicts of interest, and that there ought to be people who are fair and unbiased heading up this investigation – not people who are just the opposite.”

Dan Lyman: Facebook | Twitter

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, bostonangler said:

BJ I think you should worry about you country and it's focus....

 

 

 

 

A recent Toronto Sun editorial criticized the Canadian government under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for donating $20 million Canadian dollars to the Clinton Foundation.

Verdict: True

Canadian government filings reveal Canadian tax dollars are indeed financing a foreign health initiative by an organization under the Clinton Foundation.

Fact Check:

The Toronto Sun editorial, published July 12, was titled, “Canada Shouldn’t Donate to the Clinton Foundation.”

The editorial voiced concern with the Canadian government’s decision to “hand $20 million over” to the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), a charity under the Clinton Foundation umbrella. The editorial went on to describe the nonprofit organization as “the heart of the cash-for-access scandal” that “dogged” Hillarious Clinton’s 2016 campaign.

The Liberal Party government, led by Trudeau, reiterated Canada’s commitment to foreign aid and development in its 2017 budget. A significant component of this global commitment is the budget’s $650 million Canadian dollar (CAD) earmark for foreign aid to specifically “address gaps in sexual and reproductive health and rights in the world’s poorest and most vulnerable communities.”

A spokesperson for Global Affairs Canada, department of the Canadian government, confirmed to The Daily Caller News Foundation that CHAI submitted an “Unsolicited proposal” for public Canadian funds. The $20 million CAD grant that CHAI received will be used for a four-year project in Nigeria to “improve access to SRH [sexual and reproductive health] choices for young women and adolescent girls” with public and private partners, as per Global Affairs Canada’s website.

These initiatives fall under Canada’s explicit “feminist international assistance policy,” as stated by the Canadian government. Foreign aid administered by Global Affairs Canada thus seeks to support sex education, family planning, and abortion access across the world.

Both Canadian and international organizations are eligible to receive these funds to advance the government’s goals, a spokesperson for Global Affairs Canada told TheDCNF.

The sexual and reproductive health project isn’t the first Clinton Foundation-affiliated project that the Canadian government has funded. Canada has previously committed or granted $19.2 million CAD to CHAI for a vaccination project, $14.2 million CAD for a dysentery treatment project, and $460,000 CAD to a tuberculosis research project.

Unsolicited proposals – like the kind CHAI submitted for its most recent $20 million CAD grant – are “assessed using an established process and criteria,” the spokesperson for Global Affairs Canada told TheDCNF. These proposals must include signed agreements relating to procurement, financial recording, and conflict of interest policies as well as an anti-corruption declaration.

The Clinton Foundation has been at the center of a controversy surrounding Hillarious Clinton after it was revealed that the charity accepted foreign contributions from Canada as well as from Australia, Germany, Morocco, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The Wall Street Journal reported on this controversy in 2016, revealing that the Foundation accepted nearly $500,000 from a Canadian government agency that was tasked with promoting the Keystone XL pipeline proposal.

Discussions about any controversy and donations to the Clinton Foundation aside, claims that Canadian tax dollars are financing Clinton Foundation initiatives are true.

The Clinton Foundation did not respond to TheDCNF for comment.

Follow Kush on Twitter

Send tips to Desai@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

 

 

 

 

B/A

 

As I explained once before - my country is toast if and when you and all your Trump-hating tools let the country railroad him out of the Presidency by any illegal means possible.  The main stream media is doing their very best to highlight all the purported illegalities (by making sh*t up) of everything he tries to do and the truth be damned.  The truth is your deep-state security agencies are so far up the globalists asses that they can`t see for shyte or don`t want to lose all their perks and billions of dollars of stolen loot!!

Obama, Hillarious & Bill, all the Bushes - they all need to go down for their crimes!  Starting at the bottom and working the way up the ladder to them is NOT working.  Take one of them to jail now and the others will finally start talking to save their hides!!

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Trump condemns Sessions: 'I wouldn't have hired him' – audio

 

US president reveals his anger about attorney general Jeff Sessions’s decision to recuse himself from the Russia inquiry, saying if he had known that would happen he would have ‘picked somebody else’ for the job. Trump, speaking to the New York Times on Wednesday, also branded Sessions’s decision as “extremely unfair ... to the president”

 

 

Source: AP/ New York Times

Thursday 20 July 2017 18.47 BST

 

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2017/jul/20/trump-jeff-sessions-criticism-attorney-general-audio

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

US intelligence intercepts detail what Russia’s Kislyak told supervisors

 

Trump tweets anger against ‘Amazon Washington Post’ and ‘illegal leaks’

 

 

Rory Carroll in Los Angeles and Martin Pengelly in New York

Saturday 22 July 2017 12.10 BST

 

 

 

5316.jpg?w=700&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&s=cacbf1051d350485a76a75dcdd5eff79
Jeff Sessions’ accounts of his meeting with the Russian ambassador to the US, Sergey Kislyak, clash with those of Kislyak.
Photograph: Matt Rourke/AP

 

 

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jul/21/jeff-sessions-meeting-russian-ambassador-trump-campaign

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 4:32 PM, bostonangler said:

BJ I think you should worry about you country and it's focus....

 

 

 

Really BA, who put you on a high horse to make a comment as such.  Because his opinion differs from yours, his opinion speaks truth. Dare you not ask Umbertino to focus on his country, hmmm.:facepalm:

  • Upvote 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, patrickgold said:

Really BA, who put you on a high horse to make a comment as such.  Because his opinion differs from yours, his opinion speaks truth. Dare you not ask Umbertino to focus on his country, hmmm.:facepalm:

 

The difference between the two is Umbertino posts news stories from around the world giving us a different perspective. Believe it or not, people around the world may see things differently, and BJ wants to tell us how to run our country... I think BJ needs to become a citizen and run for office.

 

Oh, and why is it okay for him to post his opinions but it isn't ok for me? That sounds like a double standard, but of course that seems to be the nature of our country these days. Everyone disagrees and no one wants to listen to anything they don't want to hear... Pretty sad state of affairs if you ask me, but then again you probably don't want to hear such an opinionated opinion.

 

B/A 

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bostonangler said:

 

The difference between the two is Umbertino posts news stories from around the world giving us a different perspective. Believe it or not, people around the world may see things differently, and BJ wants to tell us how to run our country... I think BJ needs to become a citizen and run for office.

 

Oh, and why is it okay for him to post his opinions but it isn't ok for me? That sounds like a double standard, but of course that seems to be the nature of our country these days. Everyone disagrees and no one wants to listen to anything they don't want to hear... Pretty sad state of affairs if you ask me, but then again you probably don't want to hear such an opinionated opinion.

 

B/A 

First of all Umbertino brings articles over without his personal opinion, in for which he chooses, and because of his lack of his input we give ours. BJ, gives his thoughts because he can see what is happening in our country.  "Believe if or not, people around the world may see things differently"  (B/A)

Umbertino in his own way through his news stories is doing the exact same thing, coursing us into thinking differently on how to run our country.

 

Finally no one has told you couldn't voice your opinion.  You're twisting Patrickgold's words. (read his statement again)   Yes it's a pretty sad state when we stoop so low as to make the topic about you... not letting you voice your opinion.  I say voice away.   

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, pattyangel said:

Umbertino in his own way through his news stories is doing the exact same thing, coursing us into thinking differently on how to run our country.

 

I don't think reading news stories lends itself to how I think we should run our country. If you are that affected by a story it is a bit surprising to me. Umbertino doesn't attempt to tell us how to run our government, BJ does. Big difference.

 

B/A

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bostonangler said:

 

I don't think reading news stories lends itself to how I think we should run our country. If you are that affected by a story it is a bit surprising to me. Umbertino doesn't attempt to tell us how to run our government, BJ does. Big difference.

 

B/A

My statement was a statement regarding in a "general"  manner.  If you are not affected by some of these stories on making a judgment call, then you are from another planet. JKidding ;) In general, there are a lot of individuals who depend on the news stories to make judgement calls, such has finances, medical, buying a home, which doctors to choose from, what and where to eat and so on.  C'mon B/A your argument is weak.   BJ gives his honest opinion, Umbertino does not.  Simple as that. 

 

By the way good distraction from the original topic. 

Edited by pattyangel
  • Upvote 5
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, pattyangel said:

My statement was a statement regarding in a "general"  manner.  If you are not affected by some of these stories on making a judgment call, then you are from another planet. JKidding ;) In general, there are a lot of individuals who depend on the news stories to make judgement calls, such has finances, medical, buying a home, which doctors to choose from, what and where to eat and so on.  C'mon B/A your argument is weak.   BJ gives his honest opinion, Umbertino does not.  Simple as that. 

 

By the way good distraction from the original topic. 

 

Thanks Patty always a pleasure to have honest and peaceful discussions... I can do without the conflict others seem to enjoy so much!!!

 

B/A

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bostonangler said:

 

The difference between the two is Umbertino posts news stories from around the world giving us a different perspective. Believe it or not, people around the world may see things differently, and BJ wants to tell us how to run our country... I think BJ needs to become a citizen and run for office.

 

Oh, and why is it okay for him to post his opinions but it isn't ok for me? That sounds like a double standard, but of course that seems to be the nature of our country these days. Everyone disagrees and no one wants to listen to anything they don't want to hear... Pretty sad state of affairs if you ask me, but then again you probably don't want to hear such an opinionated opinion.

 

B/A 

You seem to be the ONLY person who gets "triggered" by my posts!!!  Why is that?  Afraid of the truth?

 

Umbertino brings different news from around the world?  Really?  If you look at most of his posts (which you approve of) they're all hit pieces from the Trump-hating Guardian ... hmmm ... wonder why?  AND he never gives his opinion on any of the hit pieces he posts - no matter how many people ask him why he is posting them or to try and find more honest news coverage. 

 

"Everyone disagrees and no one wants to listen to anything they don't want to hear"  WOW - You've described your own problem right there !!!

 

Bottom line is still I'm allowed to have my opinion and if that means trying to let liberal loons like you know that you're anti-Trump bias is hurting your country, then so be it!!!  STOP thinking you are in charge of who can and cannot post on an American topic!!!  Your democratic roots are showing!!!

  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.