Fox News: Iraqis Are Skeptical About The Departure Of US Forces After The Elimination Of Daesh !

[DinarThug]

CNN. Broadcasting On Fox While Wondering Who Killed O'Reilly ?

 

 

Fox News: Iraqis are skeptical about the departure of US forces after the elimination of Daesh

 

 

 

2017/4/27 01:17:39 PM

The length of the long history down to the Republic of Iraq, the nation has been invaded and occupied the routine and torn by fighting by foreigners and their regimes authoritarian and most recently Daesh.

 Once you eliminate the jihadi extremists in the country, which is likely to be in a few months, you will be the nation ready to stand on its feet at the end of its own ?, or the continued US military presence in Iraq for security necessity?

 

A spokesman for the US mission in Iraq, told "Fox News": "We are here at the request of the Iraqi government to help defeat militants Daesh, and future operations will depend on the government needs us."

However, US Defense Secretary Jim Mattis took a more positive stance last month when he testified before the subcommittee in the Senate on that it is wrong to leave Iraq after the victory, saying that this case repeats the same mistake in 2011 when US troops pulled out of Iraq. These voices claim the survival of US forces in Iraq, agree that the people has become deeply divided.

 

 Nassif rhetorical, chairman of Karbala told Fox News "on Iraq to deepen diplomatic ties to America and not military relations," he said. "Let's choose our own destiny," and noting the same time, it is better that there is no external interference.

 

Bahadli supporter, 30-year-old from Baghdad is opposed to the US to stay because, according to his opinion, "the game to create a clear terrorist armed groups trying to discredit Islam." Citing the production of al-Qaeda to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan.

 

Besides the opinion Bahadli, the majority of Iraqis who spoke to Fox News in all parts of Iraq are in favor of the survival of the United States forces for a longer look. Naeem Ahmed believes that the survival of US forces is necessary for the reason that "to talk about the US Alanhsab cost us the blood of our children and our children, if America withdrew from Iraq in 2011, and these results, what going to get after this latest withdrawal?".

Moreover, Mazen al-Obeidi, who is 28 years of Baghdad says, that US troops stay in Iraq would be similar to the style of survival in Japan, Germany and Korea after World War One. Mazen is the survival of the United States military also is to ensure that the non-return Daesh, as will limit the Saudi forces and Qatar from supporting terrorists, according to the expression of Mazen.

 

Marwa al-Zaidi, a 25-year-old university graduate studying modern geography, supported the US presence, but not for long, because the leaders for a longer period will generate more on the challenges of Iraq.

 

Marwa said, "We do not want to be part of the threats that come from America through neighboring countries and then pay the price." Government during the visit of Prime Minister al-Abadi in last March, said he supported the preservation of US forces in the long term.

Tom Basil, a political researcher says, "there is a need to combat Daesh media, and the struggle against the existence of the organization requires a long-term effort beyond major combat operations currently under way." He added, "Iraq will continue to need support to protect regional interests."

 

The US government for Iraq and provided $ 58.8 million to Iraq last year, of which other services for humanitarian, social, education and military equipment. It remains the continued US presence in Iraq is too expensive for the military Americans.

 

He warned one of the young professionals who belongs to the Sadrist movement led by cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, that "the US presence will face stiff resistance and violent." He added, "America is accused of stealing oil and control of Iraq, because it is considered the country's

strategic location for big oil."

 

[DinarThug]

Trump called the hands of his army moved .. "confusingly" inside the White House centered on Iraq

 

 

 

2017/4/27 01:31:24 PM

 

US President Donald Trump gave the military authority to change confusingly system to determine troop levels in Iraq and Syria, critics have said he allowed the White House to control every nook and cranny of the decisions of the battles, and ultimately led to the lack of clarity in the real numbers of US forces.

 

 

And he confirmed the US Department of Defense (Pentagon), on Wednesday 2017 this procedure, and said he had so far been no change to US troop levels.

 

She also stressed that the US strategy in Iraq and Syria continue to focus on supporting local forces battling al Daesh, a tactic that led to avoid the need for US ground force large.

 

However, the change in troop levels, another sign of the big powers, which Trump was relieved apparently to give his military commanders in making decisions about the battles courtyards, and allow for more rapid increases in troop numbers in the future.

 

The system, known as the level of forces management system has been developed in Iraq and Syria during the rule of President Barack Obama's administration, as a way to gain control of the US military.

 

Obama has lifted restrictions on periods, including allowed to increase the number of troops in Iraq and Syria, with the development of the campaign against Daesh.

 

The number of troops on the ground

 

However, the numbers were not reflect the US commitment on the size of the Earth, since the military leaders were finding ways not usually ideal to circumvent restrictions, including sometimes bringing troops temporarily or hiring more contractors.

 

It is believed that troop levels formally amounting to 5262 in Iraq and 503 in Syria less than two thousand more troops from the actual number of US forces in the two countries.

 

Said Dana White, a spokeswoman for the Pentagon, said Trump awarded Defense Minister Jim Mattis determine troop levels in Iraq and the authority of Syria from now on.

 

He said in a statement published by BuzzFeed News earlier on Wednesday: "We will review to ensure that the numbers that we provide to Congress and the public to reflect realities on the ground carefully. It comes to transparency."

 

Supporters say regime change from within the US military as well, the transfer of decision-making to the Pentagon from the White House authority will allow more flexibility in dealing with sudden developments in the battlefield.

 

Switch forces determine the level of another system may be more important thorny transparency, especially because of political sensitivities in Iraq against US forces.

 

However, the Iraqi and US governments to the need for continued They noted the US military presence. Not yet the size of such a presence is determined.

 

Experts say many information on the arrival or departure of US forces, especially if announced in advance, you may give the enemy information.

Source: Huffington Post

 

http://oneiraqnews.com/index.p.....QIrOtIrLIU

 

[10 YEARS LATER]

Not to worry-We're not going anywhere this time. The petulant  little boy who rides a girls bike that used to be in the W. House is gone.

[DinarThug]

2 hours ago, 10 YEARS LATER said:

The petulant little boy who rides a girls bike that used to be in the W. House is gone.

 

I Don't Know About Those 'Mom Jeans' ?  

 

But That's A Pretty Bad A$$ Splash Guard On That Huffy !  

 

 

      

[siberian_shaddow]

Much appreciated Thugs, Were not going anywhere for awhile. We got to much invested there. 

[King Bean]

47 minutes ago, DinarThug said:

But That's A Pretty Bad A$$ Splash Guard On That Huffy !  

 

Apparently Hillarious told him on Election Day, "It's OK to take the training wheels off now.

                    I will right there in the Whitehouse to catch you."  Ooops.

                        

[10 YEARS LATER]

1 hour ago, DinarThug said:

 

I Don't Know About Those 'Mom Jeans' ?  

 

But That's A Pretty Bad A$$ Splash Guard On That Huffy !  

 

 

      

 

     . . . to think THAT used to be be " Leader of the Free World "

 

What a world, huh !

[Tonygrasso]

And now this is the leader of the not so free world.

Edited April 28, 2017 by Tonygrasso
Pic boy upload first time

[Luigi1]

Luigi found a news article of Dinarian interest.

Let's get 'er done Iraq.

 

Trump Gives Pentagon Power To Reset Iraq.

27 April 2017  Reuters News Service... 

President Donald Trump has given the military the authority to reset a confusing system of troop limits in Iraq and Syria that critics said allowed the White House to micro-manage battlefield decisions and ultimately obscured the real number of U.S. forces.

The Pentagon, which confirmed the move on Wednesday, said no change has yet been made to U.S. troop limits. It also stressed the U.S. strategy in Iraq and Syria still was focused on backing local forces to fight Islamic State – a tactic that has averted the need for a major U.S. ground force.

But the shift on troop limits was another sign of the greater authority Trump appears comfortable giving his military commanders to make battlefield decisions and could allow for more rapid increases in troop levels in the future.

 

read more @Reuters.

[pokerplayer]

Thxs Luigi1

 

pp

[ChuckFinley]

Love to see him step back and trust the military to do there thing.  

[Officiallytook]

Love the title