CLINTON RECEIVED DEBATE QUESTIONS WEEK BEFORE DEBATE, ACCORDING TO SOURCES

[Markinsa]

CLINTON RECEIVED DEBATE QUESTIONS WEEK BEFORE DEBATE, ACCORDING TO SOURCES

 

The first presidential debate was held and Hillarious Clinton was proclaimed the winner by the media. Indeed Clinton was able to turn in a strong debate performance, but did she do so fairly? Multiple reports and leaked information from inside the Clinton camp claim that the Clinton campaign was given the entire set of debate questions an entire week before the actual debate.

Earlier last week an NBC intern was seen hand delivering a package to Clinton’s campaign headquarters, according to sources. The package was not given to secretarial staff, as would normally happen, but the intern was instead ushered into the personal office of Clinton campaign manager Robert Mook. Members of the Clinton press corps from several media organizations were in attendance at the time, and a reporter from Fox News recognized the intern, but said he was initially confused because the NBC intern was dressed like a Fed Ex employee.

The reporter from Fox questioned campaign staff about the intern, but campaign staff at first claimed ignorance and then claimed that it was just a Fed Ex employee who had already left. No reporters present who had seen the intern dressed as a Fed Ex employee go into Mook’s office saw him leave by the same front entrance. The Fox reporter who recognized the intern also immediately looked outside of the campaign headquarters and noted that there were no Fed Ex vehicles parked outside.

Clinton seemed to have scripted responses ready for every question she was asked at the first debate. She had facts and numbers memorized for specific questions that it is very doubtful she would have had without being furnished the questions beforehand. The entire mainstream media has specifically been trying to portray Trump as a racist and a poor candidate. By furnishing Clinton with the debate questions NBC certainly hoped to make Clinton appear much more knowledgeable and competent than Trump. And though it is unlikely that anyone will be able to conclusively prove that Clinton was given the debate questions, it seems both logical and likely.

[Indraman]

If this is true, then the fix is in. The PTB are in full force trying to push Hillarious across the finish line in her gurny bed...wouldn't it be interesting if another email hack results in emails proving this rumor...right before election night.

Indy

[gymrat76541]

Strangely I do believe this statement.

Clinton/Democrat's has been cheating/bribing at every turn. With the support of the main stream media - it does appear that the fix is in.

Trump has been winning the popular vote but the extent of the corruption can not be underestimated. I believe that Obama is influencing the government at every turn. The FBI it appears has already been influenced.

 

[Shabibilicious]

She spent the majority of the debate responding to Trump's lunatic fringe.  If anything, over the last year, Trump has given her everything she needed to know and all she had to do was watch episodes of "Are You Smarter Than A 5th Grader?" to prepare.  

GO RV, then BV

[Markinsa]

 

[bigwave]

On 9/27/2016 at 8:42 PM, gymrat76541 said:

Strangely I do believe this statement.

Clinton/Democrat's has been cheating/bribing at every turn. With the support of the main stream media - it does appear that the fix is in.

Trump has been winning the popular vote but the extent of the corruption can not be underestimated. I believe that Obama is influencing the government at every turn. The FBI it appears has already been influenced.

 

Very much agreed.

If TRUMP has any chance it has to be a landslide.

Mr Trump is up in early voting in FL and is leading in OH, IA, PA, and NC.

[captl1]

Good morning DV. There is no doubt that the debate was biased. Hellen Keller could has seen this.As far as Nc goes I live here and truly believe Trump will take it with ease.

[BJinMontreal]

Don't forget October 1st the control of the internet is given over to the UN.

NO more alternative media, as I'm sure they already have their marching orders to start shutting down Infowars, Drudge, Breitbart, Savage (well, they already took him off the air the other day for discussing Hillarious's health), and so many more ...

It starts with a simple "let's protect womens' rights" ... but it won't be long before anyone who brings an alternative viewpoint to the PTB's globalization plan will also be censored, if not thrown in jail and labeled a radical or worse terrorist!!!

 

The United Nations has a radical, dangerous vision for the future of the Web

By Caitlin Dewey September 24, 2015

(United Nations Broadband Commission for Digital Development)

It may not have intended to, precisely, but the United Nations just took sides in the Internet’s most brutal culture war.

On Thursday, the organization’s Broadband Commission for Digital Development released a damning “world-wide wake-up call” on what it calls “cyber VAWG,” or violence against women and girls. The report concludes that online harassment is “a problem of pandemic proportion” — which, nbd, we’ve all heard before.

[Men who harass women online are quite literally losers, new study finds]

But the United Nations then goes on to propose radical, proactive policy changes for both governments and social networks, effectively projecting a whole new vision for how the Internet could work.

Under U.S. law — the law that, not coincidentally, governs most of the world’s largest online platforms — intermediaries such as Twitter and Facebook generally can’t be held responsible for what people do on them. But the United Nations proposes both that social networks proactively police every profile and post, and that government agencies only “license” those who agree to do so.

“The respect for and security of girls and women must at all times be front and center,” the report reads, not only for those “producing and providing the content,” but also everyone with any role in shaping the “technical backbone and enabling environment of our digital society.”

How that would actually work, we don’t know; the report is light on concrete, actionable policy. But it repeatedly suggests both that social networks need to opt-in to stronger anti-harassment regimes and that governments need to enforce them proactively.

[Contrary Internet crybabies, online speech in the U.S. is really free, actually]

At one point toward the end of the paper, the U.N. panel concludes that “political and governmental bodies need to use their licensing prerogative” to better protect human and women’s rights, only granting licenses to “those Telecoms and search engines” that “supervise content and its dissemination.”

In other words, the United Nations believes that online platforms should be (a) generally responsible for the actions of their users and (b) specifically responsible for making sure those people aren’t harassers.

Regardless of whether you think those are worthwhile ends, the implications are huge: It’s an attempt to transform the Web from a libertarian free-for-all to some kind of enforced social commons.

This question, of course, mirrors other, larger debates playing out across the culture, including tiffs over academic “trigger warnings” and debates about Reddit’s foggy future. Writing at Breitbart several weeks ago, the conservative columnist Allum Bokhari described a growing social movement that he dubs “cultural libertarianism”: the rejection of any and all limitations on absolute free expression.

[How Reddit became the perfect illustration of free speech on the Web]

Intersect newsletter

The corner of the Internet and interesting.

 

 

It’s no coincidence that the “cultural libertarians” Bokhari cites are all leading figures in Gamergate, just as it’s no coincidence that the U.N. report references Zoe Quinn, the first victim of that movement. Well over a year after Quinn’s harassment became international news, we still haven’t answered these fundamental questions about what values the Internet should protect and who is responsible for it.

This U.N. report gets us no closer, alas: all but its most modest proposals are unfeasible. We can educate people about gender violence or teach “digital citizenship” in schools, but persuading social networks to police everything their users post is next to impossible. And even if it weren’t, there are serious implications for innovation and speech: According to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, CDA 230 — the law that exempts online intermediaries from this kind of policing — is basically what allowed modern social networks (and blogs, and comments, and forums, etc.) to come into being.

As reports like this are making increasingly clear, however, these platforms were developed by people who never imagined the struggles that women face online. We’re using tools that weren’t designed for us; they had other people and values and priorities in mind.

Is a reckoning — or at least rebalancing — imminent? The United Nations suggests it has to be. But it certainly won’t look like the model dreamt up in this report. For better or worse, that’s several steps too revolutionary.

[Shabibilicious]

On 9/27/2016 at 9:22 PM, Markinsa said:

CLINTON RECEIVED DEBATE QUESTIONS WEEK BEFORE DEBATE, ACCORDING TO SOURCES

At least now we know.........one of the candidates can actually read.  

GO RV, then BV

[MyLadiesDaddy]

 Was it, "RIGGED", by one candidate or, "SCRIPTED", and rehearsed by both candidates? 

[Whatshername]

Hillarious’s Podium Was a Thing of Interest For Some Sneaky Looking People

September 29, 2016 BFH 

 

When Hillarious first arrived at Hofstra, the first person she sidled up to was ex-NBC employee George Lewis.

They engage in some private conversation.

Immediately after the debate, George Lewis, Hillarious’s greeter, becomes fixated on Hillarious’s podium.

Lewis, within seconds of the conclusion of the debate, takes Hillarious’s notepad off the podium.

But he’s not done. Moments later he doubles back, notepad in hand, and becomes obsessed with something else in the podium. He looks a bit sneaky.

He doesn’t quite get what he’s trying to get.

He gets scared away by a photographer and nonchalantly walks away.

A woman who was always lurking in the background, watching George Lewis’s movements, almost like a lookout, makes eye contact with Bill Clinton and says something to him.

Clinton whispers back.

Immediately following this brief conversation Bill takes Hillarious’s hand and, oddly, leads her back toward the podium.

The Clinton’s and their entourage form a weird scrum and surround the podium. George Lewis reappears.

Lewis bends into the podium, while the woman looks to see if he’s accomplished what they’ve set out to accomplish.

Lewis is taking a box from the podium, shielded by this weird scrum. (I brightened the screen capture so you could see.)

Mission (whatever it was) Accomplished.

Note the woman’s suspicious and guilty look. The entourage then exits the stage after their bizarre detour.

Lewis is holding whatever it was he retrieved behind his back.

This happened.

It looked suspicious.

It looked weird and sneaky.

Decide for yourself what an ex-NBC employee is doing for the Clintons.

The Conservative Treehouse has more. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/09/29/the-cleaner-part-ii-cleaner-identified-the-plot-thickens/#more-122434

http://iotwreport.com/hillarys-podium-was-a-thing-of-interest-for-some-sneaky-looking-people/

[divemaster5734]

4 hours ago, BJinMontreal said:

Don't forget October 1st the control of the internet is given over to the UN.

 

All the giants, google, yahoo, amazon, etc, have already spent millions registering hundreds of DNS, like .lol, .glg. They all look like they intend to create their own internet "universe". The cost of each DNS was $200,000.

As for the .com's, I don't think the existing ones can be "revoked". The turnover was claimed to be part of taking the government out of the internet, but with all the giants part of globalists, I wouldn't be surprised if the dark web was to become the only non-propagandized source. 

 

1 hour ago, Whatshername said:

Hillarious’s Podium Was a Thing of Interest For Some Sneaky Looking People

September 29, 2016 BFH 

 

It was pretty blatant, especially in her demeanor, she knew what was going to be asked.

[MyLadiesDaddy]

 AAAAWWWWEEEEE it was just a simple question.

[MyLadiesDaddy]

Crybabies,  who's the,"stealth neger now

[Shabibilicious]

4 hours ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said:

Crybabies,  who's the,"stealth neger now

Even hinting that Trump may be involved in anything shady is strictly forboden round these parts.......Trumpsters have the numbers, Trumpsters make the rules.....desperately I might add.  

GO RV, then BV  

[rw.sutton]

BREAKING: “Tens of thousands” of fraudulent Clinton votes found in Ohio warehouse

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Election officials in Franklin County, Ohio are reportedly stumped over what one maintenance worker found in a dilapidated downtown Columbus warehouse earlier this week.

 

 

According to sources, Randall Prince, a Columbus-area electrical worker, was doing a routine check of his companies wiring and electrical systems when he stumbled across approximately one dozen black, sealed ballot boxes filled with thousands of Franklin County votes for Hillarious Clinton and other Democrat candidates.

“No one really goes in this building.  It’s mainly used for short-term storage by a commercial plumber,” Prince said.

 

So when Prince, who is a Trump supporter, saw several black boxes in an otherwise empty room, he went to investigate.  What he found could allegedly be evidence of a massive operation designed to deliver Clinton the crucial swing state.

Prince, shown here, poses with his find, as election officials investigate.

Early voting does not begin in Ohio until October 12, so no votes have officially been cast in the Buckeye state.  However, inside these boxes were, what one source described as, “potentially tens of thousands of votes” for Hillarious Clinton.

Christian Times Newspaper has not yet been able to obtain a photocopy of one of the ballots found inside the box, but an affiliate in Ohio passed along a replica of what was found.

 

It is important to note that the above replica coincides with a ballot that a Franklin County voter would cast at the polling place on Election Day, meaning the Clinton campaign’s likely goal was to slip the fake ballot boxes in with the real ballot boxes when they went to official election judges on November 8th.

 

Ohio, a perennial swing state in the presidential election, has been a challenge for Clinton and her Democrat counterparts in 2016.  Many national Democrat groups have pulled funding from the state entirely, in order to redirect it to places in which they are doing better.

 

Clinton herself has spent less time in Ohio, and spent less money, in recent weeks as it has appeared that Trump will carry the crucial state.

 

With this find, however, it now appears that Clinton and the Democrat Party planned on stealing the state on Election Day, making any campaigning there now a waste of time.

 

This story is still developing, and CTN will bring you more when we have it.

[Indraman]

2 hours ago, rw.sutton said:

BREAKING: “Tens of thousands” of fraudulent Clinton votes found in Ohio warehouse

 

September 30, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Election officials in Franklin County, Ohio are reportedly stumped over what one maintenance worker found in a dilapidated downtown Columbus warehouse earlier this week.

 

 

According to sources, Randall Prince, a Columbus-area electrical worker, was doing a routine check of his companies wiring and electrical systems when he stumbled across approximately one dozen black, sealed ballot boxes filled with thousands of Franklin County votes for Hillarious Clinton and other Democrat candidates.

“No one really goes in this building.  It’s mainly used for short-term storage by a commercial plumber,” Prince said.

 

So when Prince, who is a Trump supporter, saw several black boxes in an otherwise empty room, he went to investigate.  What he found could allegedly be evidence of a massive operation designed to deliver Clinton the crucial swing state.

Prince, shown here, poses with his find, as election officials investigate.

Early voting does not begin in Ohio until October 12, so no votes have officially been cast in the Buckeye state.  However, inside these boxes were, what one source described as, “potentially tens of thousands of votes” for Hillarious Clinton.

Christian Times Newspaper has not yet been able to obtain a photocopy of one of the ballots found inside the box, but an affiliate in Ohio passed along a replica of what was found.

 

It is important to note that the above replica coincides with a ballot that a Franklin County voter would cast at the polling place on Election Day, meaning the Clinton campaign’s likely goal was to slip the fake ballot boxes in with the real ballot boxes when they went to official election judges on November 8th.

 

Ohio, a perennial swing state in the presidential election, has been a challenge for Clinton and her Democrat counterparts in 2016.  Many national Democrat groups have pulled funding from the state entirely, in order to redirect it to places in which they are doing better.

 

Clinton herself has spent less time in Ohio, and spent less money, in recent weeks as it has appeared that Trump will carry the crucial state.

 

With this find, however, it now appears that Clinton and the Democrat Party planned on stealing the state on Election Day, making any campaigning there now a waste of time.

 

This story is still developing, and CTN will bring you more when we have it.

My only question is, whenever the Right claims that "voter fraud" is common, the Left always claims "voter suppression." I think it's time to fight the Left at their own game...load these ballot boxes up with Trump votes...Ohio is going to be close and Trump will need every vote possible. 

Indy

[Indraman]

E.T. Williams breaks this "Hillarious Voter Fraud" down in simple terms for all to understand...

https://youtu.be/A4CNQOswTrk

Indy

[bigwave]

I love the doctor of common sense. 

[yota691]