Karl Rove: Only Way To Stop The Violence Is To Repeal Second Amendment

[Jim1cor13]

We must realize that more of these posers will be calling for this kind

of action. It no longer matters what party it is, because the actions

of both deny and betray their words. I am not surpised by this, but

it does disappoint me. We are going to start to see more of the agenda

over the next year, and it includes continued 2nd amendment issues.

 

Little by little, we are watching the slow decay that was put into affect

over 50 years ago, and I wonder how far Washington will get? Remember,

what we are watching is a "ruse", yet most still cannot understand how it is

conducted, much of it has roots in keeping people divided, and it works, while

the steps continue behind the scenes, most still are party loyalists and refuse

to see how we are and have been played for many decades. We can continue to

deny this, but it will not change anything until folks understand it.

 

These guys like Rove do not have a clue. Guns in the wrong hands are a problem, but it has

nothing to do with the 2nd amendment. The problem is always violent people, many who are

on psych drugs, which cause additional problems as side effects that are ignored.

---

 

Link

 

Republican strategist Karl Rove said on “Fox News Sunday” the only way to stop gun-related violence, like the Wednesday massacre at Emmanuel African Methodist Church in Charleston S.C., was to repeal American citizens’ Second Amendment rights.

 

When Chris Wallace asked Rove how we can, “stop the violence,” the long-time gun-rights advocate stated that we have made great strides as a nation in empathizing with the victims of these types of shootings, but the only way to guarantee they will stop is to “remove guns from society.”

 

 

WALLACE:

 

How do we stop the violence?

 

ROVE: 

I wish I had an easy answer for that, but I don’t think there’s an easy answer We saw an act of evil. Racist, bigoted evil, and to me the amazing thing is that it was met with grief and love. Think about how far we’ve come since 1963. The whole weight of the government throughout the South was to impede finding and holding and bringing to justice the men who perpetrated the [birmingham] bombing.

 

And here, we saw an entire state, an entire community, an entire nation come together, grieving as one and united in the belief that this was an evil act, so we’ve come a long way.

 

Now maybe there’s some magic law that will keep us from having more of these. I mean basically the only way to guarantee that we will dramatically reduce acts of violence involving guns is to basically remove guns from society, and until somebody gets enough “oomph” to repeal the Second Amendment, that’s not going to happen.

Edited June 21, 2015 by Jim1cor13

[chess]

THE BEST THING:   MANDATE THAT EVERYONE (OF AGE) MUST CARRY A GUN,

 

AFTER TAKING A MANDATED WEAPONS COURSE.

 

.....AND BEING OF SOUND MIND, OF COURSE.

[Hearts]

I yield to ronscarpa on this but what about a change of hearts to Christ. That is the only answer.

[divemaster5734]

 

 agenda

 

 

 has roots in keeping people divided, and it works

 

 but it has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment.

 

The problem is always violent people, many who are

on psych drugs, which cause additional problems as side effects that are ignored.

 

Yup, it's called Agenda 21

 

That's what politics are for, dividing people, because religion wasn't splintering everyone like it was supposed to.

 

That's the key, the 2nd has NEVER been about shooting Bambi.

 

Now there's black people openly calling for a race war with "whitey". There's an interview I didn't bother to bring over a lady is blaming every trouble on white privilege. I'm sure she is a loyal democrat.

 

Everyone is frustrated with the way things are, but the media and president are giving one group of people a target group to focus their frustration on.

The mental health issue has been the elephant in the room for a long time.

I understand they are giving pharmaceutical speed to anyone diagnosed with ADHD. 

Doesn't that make people taking it paranoid, delusional, and hallucinate?

Just add a few gratuitous anti-white op-eds and the nut cases are going ballistic. 

THE BEST THING:   MANDATE THAT EVERYONE (OF AGE) MUST CARRY A GUN,

 

AFTER TAKING A MANDATED WEAPONS COURSE.

 

.....AND BEING OF SOUND MIND, OF COURSE.

 

Like Israel and Sweden, every adult MUST serve 2 years in the military, and they keep their automatic rifle after discharge, must keep it in working order, and are subject to activation in a national emergency.

[Jim1cor13]

THE BEST THING:   MANDATE THAT EVERYONE (OF AGE) MUST CARRY A GUN,

 

AFTER TAKING A MANDATED WEAPONS COURSE.

 

.....AND BEING OF SOUND MIND, OF COURSE.

 

That is very reasonable chess and something one would think would have been

implemented long ago. Of course, "being of sound mind" would be the challenge! 

 

Thanks chess

[Jim1cor13]

Everyone is frustrated with the way things are, but the media and president are giving one group of people a target group to focus their frustration on.

 

Indeed, but most have not yet realized that their favorite media outlet is PART of the problem.

 

 

The mental health issue has been the elephant in the room for a long time.

I understand they are giving pharmaceutical speed to anyone diagnosed with ADHD. 

Doesn't that make people taking it paranoid, delusional, and hallucinate?

Just add a few gratuitous anti-white op-eds and the nut cases are going ballistic. 

 

This is critical to what has been happening since the psych drugs etc., came into

being. I cannot get into it now, but I have access to files from one of the BIG pharma's

and they have KNOWN about the dangers from day one. It is damning evidence, yet

they are heavily protected, and so far have escaped the scrutiny of most.

 

As far as I can tell, ALL mass shootings, schools, etc., there have been anti-depressant use involved

and the media will rarely report it why? Because they pay their bills via drug company commercials

and will not threaten that. Yes it is THAT shallow and it IS criminal. What the pharma's are doing

is beyond imagination, and they get away with it because they have bought out Washington. That

is a fact and most think it is "ok".

 

I can only say what I have learned and what I have seen as evidence is sick. I have some personal

experience with this, and I have seen what the psych drugs do and how people often change shortly after

starting the routine. These drugs are NOT the answer, they are part of the problem...a large part. 

[dantach]

THE BEST THING:   MANDATE THAT EVERYONE (OF AGE) MUST CARRY A GUN,

 

AFTER TAKING A MANDATED WEAPONS COURSE.

 

.....AND BEING OF SOUND MIND, OF COURSE.

Sound mind? Why do you eliminate the demorats?

[yota691]

Add this from the Link above...Eff Rove and the horse he rode in on !!!

MOLON LABE
.

Guns & a Solution

No matter how you feel about guns, you should find this most interesting.

This may explain why there has never been an attempt on Obama.

In 1865 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States 
.

In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States , who later died from the wound.

In 1963 a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of 
the United States .

In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the 
United States .

In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the 
United States .

In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a 
McDonalds restaurant.

In 1986 Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an 
Oklahoma post office.

In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC 
office.

In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a 
Luby's cafeteria in Killeen , TX.

In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers 
in a Texas laboratory.

In 1999 Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church 
service.

In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed 
attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US .

In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a 
Lockheed Martin plant.

In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in 
Virginia Tech.

In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep.Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.

In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and 
shot and killed 12 people.

In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in 
Minneapolis .

In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a 
school in Newtown , CT.

As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship 
yard.

Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.

Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was involved in any 
of these shootings and murders.

SOLUTION: 
It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.

[MyLadiesDaddy]

I yield to ronscarpa on this but what about a change of hearts to Christ. That is the only answer.

First, Amen. Only God can save this nation.

Second, if Karl Marxist Rove wants any weapons I may or may not

have he is more than welcomed to bring his fat lying Democrat Azz

to Ks and try to take them.

I might put down my Bible long enough to do the world a huge

favor.

And herein is the difference between godless liberals and true

Christians. Rove would have to come to me and attempt to

violate my Constitutional rite. Whereas Godless liberals

hunt you down thinking themselves to be something their not.

As Master Yota so clearly pointed out in his most excellent

post. Tip-hat

[umbertino]

Quote

It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.

End Quote

Ok.....But ( correct me if I'm wrong) the biggest  domestic mass murder in the US in the last 30/ 40 years, Oklahoma City, was perpetrated by Mr. McVeigh ( sure that was  a bomb and not guns) and I don't think he was exactly a Democrat....Peace out.

 

Edited June 22, 2015 by umbertino

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///

 

When guns are banned, only democrats will have guns.

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///

 

We MUST point out that ROVE said appealing the 2nd Amendment would never happen.

 

He does NOT believe that is the answer.

 

The left took this and ran with it and interpreted it to mean he said we SHOULD.

[Jim1cor13]

Thanks Gals, the whole point of mentioning 'removing guns from society'

to me is still not an answer or solution. Responsible gun owners should not be 

thought of as threats, so for any of these posers to say the only solution is to

remove or repeal is playing the game in my opinion. Addressing the purposeful push

to see people fighting each other would be a start, but it appears guns are always blamed

when it is in fact a people problem, along with often unstable characters...let alone the

unstable politicians who think they have the right to manage everyone's lives.

 

Never give consent to allow any of them to run others lives, but unfortunately it is all

too common.

[Whatshername]

Quote

It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.

End Quote

Ok.....But ( correct me if I'm wrong) the biggest  domestic mass murder in the US in the last 30/ 40 years, Oklahoma City, was perpetrated by Mr. McVeigh ( sure that was  a bomb and not guns) and I don't think he was exactly a Democrat....Peace out.

You're correct... Timothy McVeigh was not a democrat. He was an extreme, anti-government, domestic terrorist wing nut! And that should scare the crap outa everyone because when when one of them takes a leap off the deep end... they go big!

If the Second Amendment were to ever be repealed... (and Rove was not advocating that, BTW http://therightscoop.com/no-karl-rove-did-not-call-for-the-repeal-of-the-2nd-amendment-this-morning/ ), it would surely spark an anti-government revolution that would drive some (otherwise) sane people to... Go Big. Unlike the cowards who shoot at innocents in "gun-free zones" like churches, schools and movie theaters, the wing nut will focus his rage on the biggest threat to freedom... tyrannical government (and he won't be on psychotropic drugs!).

My advice... don't work for the government, depend on the government or defend the government when/if the SHTF. "You can have my gun when you pry it from my cold, dead hand" is not empty rhetoric to those who cherish their God-given right to protect themselves. It's a warning that tyranny will not go unanswered. Do not underestimate the lovers of freedom... and especially the wing nuts!

[Moejoe]

Thank You Master Yoda, You are the man. 

[bigwave]

You're correct... Timothy McVeigh was not a democrat. He was an extreme, anti-government, domestic terrorist wing nut! And that should scare the crap outa everyone because when when one of them takes a leap off the deep end... they go big!

If the Second Amendment were to ever be repealed... (and Rove was not advocating that, BTW http://therightscoop.com/no-karl-rove-did-not-call-for-the-repeal-of-the-2nd-amendment-this-morning/ ), it would surely spark an anti-government revolution that would drive some (otherwise) sane people to... Go Big. Unlike the cowards who shoot at innocents in "gun-free zones" like churches, schools and movie theaters, the wing nut will focus his rage on the biggest threat to freedom... tyrannical government (and he won't be on psychotropic drugs!).

My advice... don't work for the government, depend on the government or defend the government when/if the SHTF. "You can have my gun when you pry it from my cold, dead hand" is not empty rhetoric to those who cherish their God-given right to protect themselves. It's a warning that tyranny will not go unanswered. Do not underestimate the lovers of freedom... and especially the wing nuts! (

"and Rove was not advocating that"

 

Thank you whatshername.

 

I jsut heard exactly what he said and a follow up discussion. 

 

It just goes to show you to do just a bit of extra research prior to posting something.

[8th ID]

Thanks Yota, that was spot on.

 

They will not come and take all of the guns in this nation at one time, not that they wouldn't try. It would almost be impossible. They will go after the ammunition first as they already have. Look at the amounts that the government has ordered. Look at what the ATF tried to do with the M855 5.56 ammo recently. Look at the bans on foreign ammo now in the most popular calibers. This isn't over folks. They will keep banning ammo types, possession and manufacture. They will tell you that you can keep your guns, you just can't have the ammo. Look at the "ammo shortage" now. We were told it was because of military production for the Iraqi war. Well I am sorry folks, I don't buy all of that, not now. We are talking about one of the greatest industrial nations in the world. Why are there still shortages and limits on some calibers of ammo? As they say, "Follow the Money". Look at the groups that are buying the weapons and ammo manufactures right now. They lead back to one person, George Soros.

 

That is why when people ask me what caliber weapon they should get, I tell them to get something that the gov't uses. The way I look at it is if the SHTF and the gov't does something really stupid, then I should be able to keep my weapons fed. Commons calibers are 9mm and .40 cal for pistol and 5.56 for rifle. You may find 7.62 (.308), since it is still used.