yota691 Posted May 29, 2015 Report Share Posted May 29, 2015 Paul Bremer: what is going on in Iraq caused by the withdrawal of US troops Obama 08:48: 05/29/2015 Khandan - announced by Paul Bremer, the former US envoy to Iraq, said that what is currently witnessed in Iraq is a result of the withdrawal of US President Barack Obama for US forces in 2011. Bremer said in an interview with CNN, the US "From my point of view there are three things we must do in Iraq First we have to expand the air campaign is far more than it is at the present time, there are currently about 14 air strike in the day, three-quarters back without bombing targets, and second thing we need to elements on the ground to guide air strikes, and the third thing is we have to start sending weapons the tribes of the Sunni and the Kurds. " He added: "We have to work to achieve the goals set by the US president a defeat al Daash, and must be defeated in front of the world, because America's credibility is on the line, and the important question now is how we can achieve Obama's goals?" In response to the criticism that guided him during the period of his service in Iraq, such as the dismantling of the army, Bremer said: "Al-Qaeda in Iraq, was defeated at the hands of the Iraqi army, which was trained by US forces, and by the end of 2009, Al-Qaeda in Iraq ended, and this is what the President Obama admitted when he took term presidential, where he said he received the Iraq file a stable and democratically. " "The main problem we face today is the president's decision to the end of 2011 to withdraw all US troops from Iraq, and this is the main reason for our vision of the new-born al-Qaida in Iraq, which calls itself now organized Daash. . From my point of view instability in Iraq is because of Obama's withdrawal of US troops and this is a big mistake. " 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eburt Posted May 29, 2015 Report Share Posted May 29, 2015 What a mess - I disagree with his statement - Plain and simple Iraq needs to stand own it's own 2 feet - Stop making excuses and man-up!!!! 5 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ocdude Posted May 29, 2015 Report Share Posted May 29, 2015 (edited) The troops were withdrawn because of the agreement signed by W. Without the Iraqis agreement, it could not be changed. The U.S.–Iraq Status of Forces Agreement (official name: Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq On the Withdrawal of United States Forces from Iraq and the Organization of Their Activities during Their Temporary Presence in Iraq) was a status of forces agreement (SOFA) between Iraq and the United States, signed by President George W. Bush in 2008. It established that U.S. combat forces would withdraw from Iraqi cities by June 30, 2009, and all U.S. combat forces will be completely out of Iraq by December 31, 2011.[1] Edited May 29, 2015 by ocdude 6 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boozer Posted May 29, 2015 Report Share Posted May 29, 2015 Ostupid Could have stayed there longer. Just another one of his Blunders... 4 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrinityeXchange Posted May 29, 2015 Report Share Posted May 29, 2015 why they keep propagating that lie is beyond me as if we cant research for ourselves. maliki, under pressure from iran, did not want to give amnesty to united states troops and there is no way in the world we should have remained there without it. additionally, what is happening in iraq with isil is being conducted in sunni communities by a sunni lead group who up until today is more desirable to sunni citizens than the shia internal security who were violating them. a unified iraq will not happen through civil war, bombs and bullets. it can only be achieved by reconciliation, unity and harmony amongst tribes. until that happens, sadaam's old guard will continue leading isil forces to control sunni territories within iraq. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ocdude Posted May 30, 2015 Report Share Posted May 30, 2015 Ostupid Could have stayed there longer. Just another one of his Blunders... No, he couldn't have. Stop blaming him for W's blunder. The ONLY way he could have had Iraq agree to us staying would be to agree that the troops would not have immunity....and THAT would have been a blunder. 3 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandfly Posted May 30, 2015 Report Share Posted May 30, 2015 THANKS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted May 30, 2015 Author Report Share Posted May 30, 2015 05/30/2015 16:41 US credibility is at stake if Daash unbeaten in Iraq The main problem we face today is the decision of the president by the end of 2011 to withdraw all US troops from Iraq. BAGHDAD / Obelisk: Take former US envoy to Iraq, Paul Bremer, that what is currently witnessing Iraq, came as a result of the withdrawal of President Barack Obama for US forces in 2011. Bremer said in an interview to CNN that "from my point of view there are three things we have done in Iraq, first we expand the air campaign is far more than it is at the moment," noting that "there are currently about 14 air strike in the day, three quarters of them come back without the bombing of its objectives. " Bremer said that "the second thing is the need of the elements on the ground to guide air strikes," he said. "The third thing is we have to start sending weapons to the Sunni tribes and Kurds." "I must work to achieve the goals set by the US president a defeat Daash, and must defeat in front of the world, because America's credibility is on the line." In response to the criticism directed at him during the period of his service in Iraq, such as the dismantling of the army, said Bremer that "al-Qaida in Iraq, was defeated at the hands of the Iraqi army, which was trained by US forces," explaining that "by the end of 2009, Al-Qaeda in Iraq ended, and this What the President Obama admitted when he took his presidency, where he said he received the Iraq file a stable and democratically. " He said the "main problem we face today is the ruling of the President by the end of 2011 to withdraw all US troops from Iraq, and this is the main reason for our vision of the new-born al-Qaida in Iraq, which calls itself now organized Daash," adding that "the instability of Iraq came because of Obama's troop withdrawal US and this is a big mistake. " The US forces completed a formal withdrawal from Iraq in December 31, 2011, and focus axis of its work after the training of Iraqi forces, while the US ambassador in Baghdad at the time, James Jeffrey, said that his country will work with Iraq to no end, calling on withdrawal as a "Day New in the history of the Iraqi and American peoples. " 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ocdude Posted May 30, 2015 Report Share Posted May 30, 2015 AGAIN....The U.S.–Iraq Status of Forces Agreement (official name: Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq On the Withdrawal of United States Forces from Iraq and the Organization of Their Activities during Their Temporary Presence in Iraq) was a status of forces agreement (SOFA) between Iraq and the United States, signed by President George W. Bush in 2008. It established that U.S. combat forces would withdraw from Iraqi cities by June 30, 2009, and all U.S. combat forces will be completely out of Iraq by December 31, 2011.[1 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted May 30, 2015 Report Share Posted May 30, 2015 (edited) a unified iraq will not happen through civil war, bombs and bullets. it can only be achieved by reconciliation, unity and harmony amongst tribes Read more: http://dinarvets.com/forums/index.php?/topic/203360-paul-bremer-what-is-going-on-in-iraq-caused-by-the-withdrawal-of-us-troops-obama/#ixzz3bdJuD7g6 Good luck wit dat. No, he couldn't have. Stop blaming him for W's blunder. The ONLY way he could have had Iraq agree to us staying would be to agree that the troops would not have immunity....and THAT would have been a blunder. Ostupid Could have stayed there longer. Just another one of his Blunders... Sorry to say, but it was his plan all along. He's been supplying ISIS through Benghazi and now through, " accidental air drops", ever since he had them trained in Jordan. Nothing here is what it seems, and simpletons will choose sides. As if there really were sides. That illusion is only to control the masses at large. What is really happening is the beginning of population control. Edited May 30, 2015 by ladyGrace'sDaddy 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ocdude Posted May 30, 2015 Report Share Posted May 30, 2015 (edited) Haha...knew it wouldn't be long til you had to try. BUSH signed the agreement. Facts are a strange thing aren't they? Edited May 30, 2015 by ocdude 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tedro Posted May 30, 2015 Report Share Posted May 30, 2015 Facts can be strange......it helps those with narrow minded skills. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ocdude Posted May 30, 2015 Report Share Posted May 30, 2015 Facts can be strange......it helps those with narrow minded skills. Facts don't change...no matter how much people try to bend them to their opinion. 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artitech Posted May 30, 2015 Report Share Posted May 30, 2015 The little "o" is so SORRY! This(RV) would be overnow, if low information voters hadn't voted for the subversive in the first place! Our great country is in a mess! I sure would like to be the one to arrest him and his very SORRY old lady! They would never get to spend a dime of the money they have stolen. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts