Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Media Black Out 200,000 Marching For Pro Life Americans


Djorgie
 Share

Recommended Posts

Media black out 200,000 marching Americans News outlets slammed for ignoring massive pro-life event
 

 

march_for_life_2015.jpg

An estimated 200,000 people joined in a March for Life in Washington, D.C., bringing to the streets in front of Congress their plea for protection of the unborn.

 

It was double the number of people that go to even the biggest football games or indoor concerts.

Yet the establishment media was virtually absent.

WND Editor and CEO Joseph Farah has joined with Media Research Center and more than 20 pro-life groups in denouncing the establishment TV networks for failing to cover this year’s March for Life, held last week.

According to MRC, CBS was the only major broadcast network that covered the march – and the coverage was limited to 15 seconds during a discussion of moderate Republican opposition to the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act.

In the meantime, NBC, ABC and Spanish-language networks Univision and Telemundo did not mention the march at all.

“It’s not surprising when the big media ignore large gatherings in Washington – year after year – of hundreds of thousands of pro-life activists, but it is unprofessional and betrays their absolute bias,” Farah said.

Other organizations that have joined MRC in condemning the establishment media include the Catholic League, Liberty Council, the Hispanic Leadership Fund, Concerned Women for America and Human Life International.

Troy Newman, co-author of “Abortion Free: Your Manual for Building a Pro-Life America One Community at a Time,” said he thinks the media are trying to protect a certain narrative about abortion.

“The March for Life is the largest annual civil rights march in the world,” Newman told WND. “For the national media to acknowledge this fact would contradict their premise that 1) abortion is a good thing; 2) the country is firmly pro-abortion; and 3) the pro-lifers are a small, insignificant group of religious extremists.”

Newman is president of Operation Rescue and a member of the MRC coalition, continued.

“In my humble opinion, the media is an extension of the far left – it reports only the approved propaganda and ignores the obvious truths. George Orwell’s ’1984′ has come to life in 2015 – the national media is the ‘Ministry of Truth.’”

Farah agreed that the media are becoming Orwellian.

“As a journalist, senior newspaper executive and media entrepreneur for more than 35 years, I’m genuinely ashamed at what my industry has become,” Farah said. “Not only do they avoid debate and discussion of the sanctity of life, they seek to distort the issue by hiding gatherings with the vigor one would expect only in a totalitarian, closed society with a government-controlled media.”

MRC President Brent Bozell did not hold back, blasting the media for their lack of coverage.

“If these were a few dozen hipsters protesting corporate profits while taking selfies with iPhones, the networks would have wall-to-wall coverage,” Bozell said. “The media cannot be bothered to cover 200,000 pro-lifers who came to Washington in the middle of winter to march for the unborn.

“It’s shameful. If you’re throwing Molotov cocktails at police officers, the media will provide sympathetic coverage to your cause,” he said. “If you’re standing up for the most vulnerable in our society, the media turn a deaf ear. With each passing day, the media continue to hemorrhage their credibility.”

Instead of covering the march, the major TV networks devoted time to the New England Patriots’ “Deflategate” controversy, sidecar dogs in America and Prince Andrew’s sex scandal, according to MRC.

David Kupelian, WND’s managing editor and the driving force behind the monthly news magazine “Whistleblower,” said: “The big media have been shunning pro-lifers for decades. I remember reporting back in 1989 how the Washington Post devoted a dozen stories to a major pro-choice demonstration in D.C., even providing a map and directions to the upcoming rally. But a year later, the gargantuan ‘Rally for Life ’90,’ which attracted approximately 350,000 according to aerial photos, was graced with one 13-inch story and one photo on page B3.”

At the time, Richard Harwood, the Post’s ombudsman, wrote about the non-coverage this way:

[The pro-life event] stirred no juices at the Post. Many editors were unaware it was taking place … Journalists here, [managing editor Leonard] Downie thinks, not only are not part of the anti-abortion movement, but don’t know anyone who is. The movement is seen as one of those “fundamentalist,” “fringe” things somewhere out there in Middle America or Dixie. Those are not the circles in which we travel or from which we draw intellectual nourishment. As one of last weekend’s editors put it: ‘I didn’t even know this was anything important.

9

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While stationed in the D.C. area in the late 80's, myself, wife and baby in tow headed downtown for a day of Smithsonian Museums.  As we came up the escalator from the Metro Rail on the National Mall, there were literally 100K LGBT's getting their pride march on.  We proceded right back to the down escalator and headed home.  Not one word of that rally was advertised on t.v.  What were the networks thinking by skirting (no pun intended) such an event?

 

GO RV, and NO BV 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While stationed in the D.C. area in the late 80's, myself, wife and baby in tow headed downtown for a day of Smithsonian Museums.  As we came up the escalator from the Metro Rail on the National Mall, there were literally 100K LGBT's getting their pride march on.  We proceded right back to the down escalator and headed home.  Not one word of that rally was advertised on t.v.  What were the networks thinking by skirting (no pun intended) such an event?

 

GO RV, and NO BV 

 

 

That depends on what the media bias and political agenda was at the time.

 

10801925_878137745541809_881254098533555

Edited by rightsonword
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still up to your slanted humor. :peace:  How can you compare the sanctity of life to gays.  They (gays) were given life, a chance at life.  :shrug: Babies are being murder.  Babies Shabs.  <_<

 

The media is filled with the works of evil. 

 

No humor whatsoever, patty.  Just stating a fact about the media and their various agendas as far as what they deem news worthy.  When it comes to abortion, I'll never face the dilemma of choice, for I'm not a woman.   :mellow: 

 

GO RV, and NO BV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NOTHING TO SEE HERE...

 

march_for_life_facebook.jpg

 

If these were a few dozen hipsters protesting corporate profits while taking selfies with iPhones, the networks would have wall-to-wall coverage. The media cannot be bothered to cover 200,000 pro-lifers who came to Washington in the middle of winter to march for the unborn. 

It’s shameful. If you’re throwing Molotov cocktails at police officers, the media will provide sympathetic coverage to your cause. If you’re standing up for the most vulnerable in our society, the media turn a deaf ear. With each passing day, the media continue to hemorrhage their credibility.

marchforlifefrominstagrammade16x9.png?itThe statements of various pro-life movement leaders are included below:

"If 200,000 people showed up in Washington to protest in favor of almost any other cause, it would be considered national news by nearly every newspaper or network. The decision to ignore America's biggest march yet again shows that U.S. mainstream media, including the Big Three networks, has no interest in reporting on anything that might harm its agenda -- and nothing undercuts that agenda more than hundreds of thousands of mostly young people coming to D.C. to support life." 

John-Henry Westen
Editor-in-Chief Co-Founder, LifeSiteNews.com

 

“The media blackout of this gigantic march shows how proud these journalists are to wear their politics on their sleeve. They do a disservice to the public, which accounts for why they are held in such low regard.”

Bill Donahue
President, The Catholic League

 

"Most Americans could be forgiven if they had no idea that 200,000 people took to the streets of the nation's capital every year to mark the anniversary of Roe v. Wade. After all, how would they know? Protests, like Occupy Wall Street, get major news coverage only when they advance the agenda of the mainstream media." 

Brian Burch
President, CatholicVote.org

 

“We don’t March for Life in the hope of media coverage, but it defies logic that the largest, longest-active and still-growing civil rights movement can be overlooked or judged not newsworthy.” 

Fr. Frank Pavone 
President, Priests for Life

 

"The intentional refusal to report on nearly half a million people dominated by youth standing for life in our Nation's Capital is irresponsible. While the media turned a blind eye, the tidal wave of life will one day wash away the blood shed of our children."

Mat Staver
Founder and Chairman, Liberty Council

 

"The mainstream media has proven, yet again, its main interest is to misinform the public. Every year they gladly cover '*** pride' parades with misrepresentative imagery while choosing to misrepresent America's pro-life majority by deliberately ignoring that we exist." 

Ryan Bomberger
Chief Creative Officer, The Radiance Foundation

 

“When more than a quarter of a million people come to one city on one day for one cause – how can any real journalist not consider it to be worth covering?  Yet that’s exactly what happened when the 42nd annual March for Life was held in Washington on January 22.  I’ll bet that every other cause or protest-related rally drawing over 100,000 people to the nation’s capital in the last year was covered and covered excessively, while the March for Life was treated as if it never even happened.” 

Colin Hana
President, Let Freedom Ring

 

"It’s not surprising when the big media ignore large gatherings in Washington – year after year – of hundreds of thousands of pro-life activists, but it is unprofessional and betrays their absolute bias. As a journalist, senior newspaper executive and media entrepreneur for more than 35 years, I’m genuinely ashamed at what my industry has become. Not only do they avoid debate and discussion of the sanctity of life, they seek to distort the issue by hiding gatherings with the vigor one would expect only in a totalitarian, closed society with a government-controlled media.”

Joseph Farah
Editor and Chief Executive Officer, WND.com, WND Books, WND Films

 

"When a massive group of 200,000 Americans of every ethnic, racial, religious, age and economic status peacefully unite for a cause that speaks to perhaps the most fundamental pillar of our society, it is news.  Trying to pretend otherwise is irrational, irresponsible, and unprofessional."

Mario Lopez
President, Hispanic Leadership Fund

 

"The mainstream media either ignores the annual March for Life or they lie about it. They lie about it by not showing the hundreds of thousands of pro-life marchers instead focusing exclusively on a handful of pro-aborts as if that is the story. No matter. We are winning without them. We are winning in spite of them. All the better for when we finally win.”  

Austin Ruse
President, C-FAM (Center for Family and Human Rights)

 

"The left-wing media’s pro-abortion bias is obvious in its reporting priorities.  Zero mention of the hundreds of thousands of Americans who participated in this year’s March for Life, but plenty of ‘news’ about deflated footballs instead.  Pathetic.”

Gary Bauer
President, American Values

 

“The hundreds of thousands that marched peacefully last Tuesday did so to give voice to the voiceless. The network press doesn't report on the March for Life because they are cowards who don't want to risk offending those who already have voices.” 

David Bozell
President, ForAmerica

 

"It is truly inexcusable for the media to ignore the March for Life, one of the nation's largest annual human rights demonstrations.  Despite media censorship, the pro-life movement grows every year, attracting more and more women and young people who understand the fundamental truth that all human beings, irrespective of age or ability, have equal value and ought to be protected in law."

Penny Nance
President, Concerned Women for America

 

"It amazes me that the media can ignore a half of a million people peacefully raising their voices in protest but act like sharks in a feeding frenzy over the Ferguson and New York protests.  Perhaps if we walked with our arms up and chanted 'hands up, don't abort' or 'I can't breathe,' they would have covered it. Just as black lives matter, all lives matter.  Their silence shows their bias and their fear of showing the world that this is the pro-life generation." 

Bryan Kemper
President, Stand True Pro-Life Outreach

 

"Americans are continuing to move increasingly pro-life, and the hundreds of thousands of people at this year's March for Life bear witness to that fact.  Though the media ignores the mass crowds year after year, the grassroots continues to have its intended effect, spreading the truth that every life, born or unborn, is precious and priceless."

Brian Fisher
Co-Founder and President, Online for Life

 

“The major media networks and papers cannot deal with their narrative being contradicted by the joyful witness of hundreds of thousands. That is why they can’t bring themselves to look at it honestly. If this was a huge annual anti-war rally Anderson Cooper would be doing wall to wall coverage with a desk on the mall. Negating coverage of the annual March for Life – which brings thousands upon thousands to testify to the sanctity of all life – should call all pro-lifers to increased pro-life action.” 

Krista Thomas
Communications Manager, Human Life International

 

“The mainstream media continues to show its extreme bias on issues like marriage and life with their lack of coverage of the 2015 March for Life, which brought hundreds of thousands of protesters to the nation’s capital. Even as network media continue to ignore critical issues of importance to average American families, preferring to highlight meaningless though titillating and trending topics in the culture, they wonder why fewer and fewer Americans turn to them for news and information. They are on a march to irrelevancy.” 

Brian Brown
President, National Organization for Marriage

 

Other signers include:

Terry Schilling
Executive Director, Americans Principles in Action

Troy Newman
President, Operation Rescue 

 

Update: The following signatories joined this statement post-publication:

"The mainstream media can seemingly crank out endless stories about deflated footballs or large amounts of snow in certain portions of the country. But when well over half a million people come to the nation’s capital to speak out on the human rights issue of our time, they seem inconvenienced in having to report anything – if they report anything at all. With polls showing a majority of Americans oppose abortions, and a majority of young Americans as well, it’s well past time for the media to wake up and acknowledge that."

Steven Ertelt
Editor, LifeNews.com

 

“Every year, hundreds of thousands of Americans come to Washington in the dead of winter to rally on behalf of the unborn. And every year, the media ignores or downplays the significance of the pro-life movement. The egregious bias proves that cronyism extends beyond simply handing out checks, it extends into our culture. Fortunately, most Americans see through the spin and continue to fight for the most vulnerable among us.”

Mike Needham
CEO, Heritage Action for America

 

"The continued media blackout on abortion disregards the primary obligation of journalism: to accurately report, investigate, and tell truth without bias. While mainstream media perpetuate a silence on the March for Life, the unjust killing of 3,000 preborn children in the womb by abortion continues each and every day. We must speak for society's littlest and weakest members, and give voice to those who are the victims of the greatest human rights abuse of our day."

Lila Rose
President, Live Action

- See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb-staff/2015/01/26/nineteen-pro-life-groups-join-mrcs-brent-bozell-denouncing-media-blackout#sthash.kMHTezDj.dpuf
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.