The Balfour Declaration

[flatdawg]

The Balfour Declaration (it its entirety)

Foreign Office

November 2nd, 1917

Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely,

Arthur James Balfour

Flatdawg says: Notice it's addressed to lord rothschild? See why I call it rothschildistan?

By siding with rothschildistan, you have sided with the most destructive enemy of humanity, those that have made you a slave though debt.

Mark Twain said "It's easier to fool a man than to convince him he's been fooled."

[chess]

Going back to the old Testament, this is obviously what God would approve.

 

Palestinians were just roving bands and tribes of squatters on His Majesty's territory.

 

Allah's boys are NOT friends to the USA.  God's chosen people.........ARE!!  

[flatdawg]

The Palestinians are the true natives to this land.

[Maggie123]

The Balfour Declaration (it its entirety)

 

Foreign Office

November 2nd, 1917

Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country."

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.

Yours sincerely,

Arthur James Balfour

Flatdawg says: Notice it's addressed to lord rothschild? See why I call it rothschildistan?

By siding with rothschildistan, you have sided with the most destructive enemy of humanity, those that have made you a slave though debt.

Mark Twain said "It's easier to fool a man than to convince him he's been fooled."

 

Thank You Flatdawg... I've never seen this before.

 

You can't help but notice how Arthur James Balfour says... "the establishment in Palestine"....

History re-written according zionists of course denies that Palestine ever existed. They Lie...

 

Also... how about this part???

"it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine"

 

History is so revealing to the truth... pretty hard to run back and cover THAT up.

 

Good Points About Who It Is Addressed To... And WHAT they have created for us here in the good ol' USA.

 

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER:

(please note: Zionism has absolutely nothing to do with race nor religion )

Anti-Semitic = hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group

Zionist = American/Israeli government/banksters/military/media that work together for the same agenda that ONLY benefits Israel. Anyone who looks at a map (bank) can see "Who Benefits"... It Isn't Us.

 

I Am For AMERICA FIRST.

Edited September 2, 2014 by Maggie123

[RVWITHME]

And to think all this time I thought the Balfour Declaration was just something that the current whitehouse resident was yelling on the back 9 to alert the group playing ahead.

 

/sarc

[Thaiexpat]

Going back to the old Testament, this is obviously what God would approve.

 

Palestinians were just roving bands and tribes of squatters on His Majesty's territory.

 

Allah's boys are NOT friends to the USA.  God's chosen people.........ARE!!  

Yep! Just go ask the survivors of the USS Liberty. they LOVE Israhell. DNA testing shows that Palestinians are closer genetically to the original semitic people than the current so-called Israelis. But, as I have said before, not all Zionist are Jews. Mental illness knows no religion-present company excluded, of COURSE! Dunno, just a Jew saying.........

[chess]

OK...just curious, though, as to the comparative DNA testing method of the ORIGINAL semitic people?..........

[flatdawg]

Thank You Flatdawg... I've never seen this before.

 

You can't help but notice how Arthur James Balfour says... "the establishment in Palestine"....

History re-written according zionists of course denies that Palestine ever existed. They Lie...

 

Also... how about this part???

"it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine"

 

History is so revealing to the truth... pretty hard to run back and cover THAT up.

 

Good Points About Who It Is Addressed To... And WHAT they have created for us here in the good ol' USA.

 

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER:

(please note: Zionism has absolutely nothing to do with race nor religion )

Anti-Semitic = hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group

Zionist = American/Israeli government/banksters/military/media that work together for the same agenda that ONLY benefits Israel. Anyone who looks at a map (bank) can see "Who Benefits"... It Isn't Us.

 

I Am For AMERICA FIRST.

This ties in with my thread of the William Casey quote, does it not?

OK...just curious, though, as to the comparative DNA testing method of the ORIGINAL semitic people?..........

Arabs and Palestinians are the ORIGINAL Semitic people.

[waterman13]

This ties in with my thread of the William Casey quote, does it not?

Arabs and Palestinians are the ORIGINAL Semitic people.

WRONG!

Please read the book by Stephen Jones

"Struggle for the Birthright"

Wm13

[dog53]

The History and Meaning of "Palestine" and "Palestinians"

 

Yep and now for the rest of the story

 

 

 

 

 

"

There is no such thing as a Palestinian Arab nation . . . Palestine is a name the Romans gave to Eretz Yisrael with the express purpose of infuriating the Jews . . . . Why should we use the spiteful name meant to humiliate us?

The British chose to call the land they mandated Palestine, and the Arabs picked it up as their nation's supposed ancient name, though they couldn't even pronounce it correctly and turned it into Falastin a fictional entity.

" — Golda Meir quoted by Sarah Honig, 

Jerusalem Post

, 25 November 1995

Palestine has never existed . . . as an autonomous entity. There is no language known as Palestinian. There is no distinct Palestinian culture. There has never been a land known as Palestine governed by Palestinians. Palestinians are Arabs, indistinguishable from Jordanians (another recent invention), Syrians, Lebanese, Iraqis, etc.

Keep in mind that the Arabs control 99.9 percent of the Middle East lands. Israel represents one-tenth of one percent of the landmass. But that's too much for the Arabs. They want it all. And that is ultimately what the fighting in Israel is about today . . . No matter how many land concessions the Israelis make, it will never be enough.

 — from "Myths of the Middle East", Joseph Farah, Arab-American editor and journalist, 

WorldNetDaily

, 11 October 2000

From the end of the Jewish state in antiquity to the beginning of British rule, the area now designated by the name Palestine was not a country and had no frontiers, only administrative boundaries . . . .

 — Professor Bernard Lewis, 

Commentary Magazine

, January 1975

Talk and writing about Israel and the Middle East feature the nouns "Palestine" and Palestinian", and the phrases "Palestinian territory" and even "Israeli-occupied Palestinian territory". All too often, these terms are used with regard to their historical or geographical meaning, so that the usage creates illusions rather than clarifies reality.

What Does "Palestine" Mean?

It has never been the name of a nation or state. It is a geographical term, used to designate the region at those times in history when there is no nation or state there.

The Philistines were not Arabs, they were not Semites. They had no connection ... with Arabia or Arabs.

The word itself derives from "Peleshet", a name that appears frequently in the Bible and has come into English as "Philistine". The name began to be used in the Thirteenth Century BCE, for a wave of migrant "Sea Peoples" who came from the area of the Aegean Sea and the Greek Islands and settled on the southern coast of the land of Canaan. There they established five independent city-states (including Gaza) on a narrow strip of land known as Philistia. The Greeks and Romans called it "Palastina".

The Philistines were not Arabs, they were not Semites. They had no connection, ethnic, linguistic or historical with Arabia or Arabs. The name "Falastin" that Arabs today use for "Palestine" is not an Arabic name. It is the Arab pronunciation of the Greco-Roman "Palastina" derived from the Peleshet.

How Did the Land of Israel Become "Palestine"?

In the First Century CE, the Romans crushed the independent kingdom of Judea. After the failed rebellion of Bar Kokhba in the Second Century CE, the Roman Emperor Hadrian determined to wipe out the identity of Israel-Judah-Judea. Therefore, he took the name Palastina and imposed it on all the Land of Israel. At the same time, he changed the name of Jerusalem to Aelia Capitolina.

The Romans killed many Jews and sold many more in slavery. Some of those who survived still alive and free left the devastated country, but there was never a complete abandonment of the Land. There was never a time when there were not Jews and Jewish communities, though the size and conditions of those communities fluctuated greatly.

The History of Palestine

Thousands of years before the Romans invented "Palastina" the land had been known as "Canaan". The Canaanites had many tiny city-states, each one at times independent and at times a vassal of an Egyptian or Hittite king. The Canaanites never united into a state.

After the Exodus from Egypt — probably in the Thirteenth Century BCE but perhaps earlier — the Children of Israel settled in the land of Canaan. There they formed first a tribal confederation, and then the Biblical kingdoms of Israel and Judah, and the post-Biblical kingdom of Judea.

Israel-Judah-Judea has the only united, independent, sovereign nation-state that ever existed in "Palestine" west of the Jordan River.

From the beginning of history to this day, Israel-Judah-Judea has the only united, independent, sovereign nation-state that ever existed in "Palestine" west of the Jordan River. (In Biblical times, Ammon, Moab and Edom as well as Israel had land east of the Jordan, but they disappeared in antiquity and no other nation took their place until the British invented Trans-Jordan in the 1920s.)

After the Roman conquest of Judea, "Palastina" became a province of the pagan Roman Empire and then of the Christian Byzantine Empire, and very briefly of the Zoroastrian Persian Empire. In 638 CE, an Arab-Muslim Caliph took Palastina away from the Byzantine Empire and made it part of an Arab-Muslim Empire. The Arabs, who had no name of their own for this region, adopted the Greco-Roman name Palastina, that they pronounced "Falastin".

In that period, much of the mixed population of Palastina converted to Islam and adopted the Arabic language. They were subjects of a distant Caliph who ruled them from his capital, that was first in Damascus and later in Baghdad. They did not become a nation or an independent state, or develop a distinct society or culture.

In 1099, Christian Crusaders from Europe conquered Palestina-Falastin. After 1099, it was never again under Arab rule. The Christian Crusader kingdom was politically independent, but never developed a national identity. It remained a military outpost of Christian Europe, and lasted less than 100 years. Thereafter, Palestine was joined to Syria as a subject province first of the Mameluks, ethnically mixed slave-warriors whose center was in Egypt, and then of the Ottoman Turks, whose capital was in Istanbul.

During the First World War, the British took Palestine from the Ottoman Turks. At the end of the war, the Ottoman Empire collapsed and among its subject provinces "Palestine" was assigned to the British, to govern temporarily as a mandate from the League of Nations.

The Jewish National Home

Travellers to Palestine from the Western world left records of what they saw there. The theme throughout their reports is dismal: The land was empty, neglected, abandoned, desolate, fallen into ruins

Nothing there [Jerusalem] to be seen but a little of the old walls which is yet remaining and all the rest is grass, moss and weeds.

 — English pilgrim in 1590

The country is in a considerable degree empty of inhabitants and therefore its greatest need is of a body of population

 — British consul in 1857

There is not a solitary village throughout its whole extent [valley of Jezreel] — not for 30 miles in either direction. . . . One may ride 10 miles hereabouts and not see 10 human beings.

For the sort of solitude to make one dreary, come to Galilee . . . Nazareth is forlorn . . . Jericho lies a moldering ruin . . . Bethlehem and Bethany, in their poverty and humiliation . . . untenanted by any living creature . . . .

A desolate country whose soil is rich enough, but is given over wholly to weeds . . a silent, mournful expanse . . . a desolation . . . . We never saw a human being on the whole route . . . . Hardly a tree or shrub anywhere. Even the olive tree and the cactus, those fast friends of a worthless soil, had almost deserted the country . . . .

Palestine sits in sackcloth and ashes . . . desolate and unlovely . . . .

 — Mark Twain, 

The Innocents Abroad

, 1867

Their [the Jews] labors created newer and better conditions and opportunities

The restoration of the "desolate and unlovely" land began in the latter half of the Nineteenth Century with the first Jewish pioneers. Their labors created newer and better conditions and opportunities, which in turn attracted migrants from many parts of the Middle East, both Arabs and others.

The Balfour Declaration of 1917, confirmed by the League of Nations Mandate, commited the British Government to the principle that "His Majesty's government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a Jewish National Home, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object. . . . " It was specified both that this area be open to "close Jewish settlement" and that the rights of all inhabitants already in the country be preserved and protected.

Mandate Palestine originally included all of what is now Jordan, as well as all of what is now Israel, and the territories between them. However, when Great Britain's protégé Emir Abdullah was forced to leave the ancestral Hashemite domain in Arabia, the British created a realm for him that included all of Manfate Palestine east of the Jordan River. There was no traditional or historic Arab name for this land, so it was called after the river: first Trans-Jordan and later Jordan.

By this political act, that violated the conditions of the Balfour Declaration and the Mandate, the British cut more than 75 percent out of the Jewish National Home. No Jew has ever been permitted to reside in Trans-Jordan/Jordan.

Less than 25 percent then remained of Mandate Palestine, and even in this remnant, the British violated the Balfour and Mandate requirements for a "Jewish National Home" and for "close Jewish settlement". They progressively restricted where Jews could buy land, where they could live, build, farm or work.

After the Six-Day War in 1967, Israel was finally able to settle some small part of those lands from which the Jews had been debarred by the British. Successive British governments regularly condemn their settlement as "illegal". In truth, it was the British who had acted illegally in banning Jews from these parts of the Jewish National Home.

Who Is A Palestinian?

During the period of the Mandate, it was the Jewish population that was known as "Palestinians" including those who served in the British Army in World War II.

Jews who might have developed the empty lands of 'Palestine' ... instead died in the gas chambers of Europe

British policy was to curtail their numbers and progressively limit Jewish immigration. By 1939, the White Paper virtually put an end to admission of Jews to Palestine. This policy was imposed the most stringently at the very time this Home was most desperately needed — after the rise of Nazi power in Europe. Jews who might have developed the empty lands of Palestine and left progeny there, instead died in the gas chambers of Europe or in the seas they were trying to cross to the Promised Land.

At the same time that the British slammed the gates on Jews, they permitted or ignored massive illegal immigration into Western Palestine from Arab countries Jordan, Syria, Egypt, North Africa. In 1939, Winston Churchill noted that "So far from being persecuted, the Arabs have crowded into the country and multiplied . . . ." Exact population statistics may be problematic, but it seems that by 1947 the number of Arabs west of the Jordan River was approximately triple of what it had been in 1900.

The current myth is that these Arabs were long established in Palestine, until the Jews came and "displaced" them. The fact is, that recent Arab immigration into Palestine "displaced" the Jews. That the massive increase in Arab population was very recent is attested by the ruling of the United Nations: That any Arab who had lived in Palestine for two years and then left in 1948 qualifies as a "Palestinian refugees".

Casual use of population statistics for Jews and Arabs in Palestine rarely consider how the proportions came to be. One factor was the British policy of keeping out Jews while bringing in Arabs. Another factor was the violence used to kill or drive out Jews even where they had been long established.

For one example: The Jewish connection with Hebron goes back to Abraham, and there has been an Israelite/Jewish community there since Joshua long before it was King David's first capital. In 1929, Arab rioters with the passive consent of the British — killed or drove out virtually the entire Jewish community.

It is now often proposed as a principle of international law and morality that all places that the British and the Arabs rendered Judenrein must forever remain so.

For another example: In 1948, Trans-Jordan seized much of Judea and Samaria (which they called The West Bank) and East Jerusalem and the Old City. They killed or drove out every Jew.

It is now often proposed as a principle of international law and morality that all places that the British and the Arabs rendered Judenrein must forever remain so. In contrast, Israel eventually allotted 17 percent of Mandate Palestine has a large and growing population of Arab citizens.

From Palestine To Israel

What was to become of "Palestine" after the Mandate? This question was taken up by various British and international commissions and other bodies, culminating with the United Nations in 1947. During the various deliberations, Arab officials, spokesmen and writers expressed their views on "Palestine".

"

There is no such country as Palestine. 'Palestine' is a term the Zionists invented. . . . Our country was for centuries part of Syria. 'Palestine' is alien to us. It is the Zionists who introduced it.

" — Local Arab leader to British Peel Commission, 1937

"

There is no such thing as Palestine in history, absolutely not

" — Professor Philip Hitti, Arab historian to Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry, 1946

"

It is common knowledge that Palestine is nothing but southern Syria.

" — Ahmed Shukairy, United Nations Security Council, 1956

By 1948, the Arabs had still not yet discovered their ancient nation of Falastin. When they were offered half of Palestine west of the Jordan River for a state, the offer was violently rejected. Six Arab states launched a war of annihilation against the nascent State of Israel. Their purpose was not to establish an independent Falastin. Their aim was to partition western Palestine amongst themselves.

They did not succeed in killing Israel, but Trans-Jordan succeeded in taking Judea and Samaria (West Bank) and East Jerusalem, killing or driving out all the Jews who had lived in those places, and banning Jews of all nations from Jewish holy places. Egypt succeeded in taking the Gaza Strip. These two Arab states held these lands until 1967. Then they launched another war of annihilation against Israel, and in consequence lost the lands they had taken by war in 1948.

During those 19 years, 1948-1967, Jordan and Egypt never offered to surrendar those lands to make up an independent state of Falastin. The "Palestinians" never sought it. Nobody in the world ever suggested it, much less demanded it.

Finally, in 1964, the Palestine Liberation Movement was founded. Ahmed Shukairy, who less than 10 years earlier had denied the existence of Palestine, was its first chairman. Its charter proclaimed its sole purpose to be the destruction of Israel. To that end it helped to precipitate the Arab attack on Israel in 1967.

The outcome of that attack then inspired an alteration in public rhetoric. As propaganda, it sounds better to speak of the liberation of Falastin than of the destruction of Israel. Much of the world, governments and media and public opinion, accept virtually without question of serious analysis the new-sprung myth of an Arab nation of Falastin, whose territory is unlawfully occupied by the Jews.

Since the end of World War I, the Arabs of the Middle East and North Africa have been given independent states in 99.5 percent of the land they claimed. Lord Balfour once expressed his hope that when the Arabs had been given so much, they would "not begrudge" the Jews the "little notch" promised to them.

[Note: Some of the material cited above is drawn from the book From Time Immemorial by Joan Peters.]

Edited September 2, 2014 by dog53

[chess]

IS IT NOT NICE TO HEAR THE TRUTH?!........thanks

[rothsdad]

Dog, you really twisted the Balfour Declaration.  First off, you might want to say that the Declaration happened in the midst of WWI and not at the end as some sort of treaty for the homeland of the jews.  It was a deal that the wealthy Rothschilds, who basically stole the Bank of England through trickery in Napoleon's War, would ruin England if Balfour did not promise Palestine which was not even held by England at the time.  Balfour had no choice but to take the Zionists deal.  After WWI they couldn't get enough Jews to move to the shitty desert.  The Jews were happy in beautiful Europe.  The Zionists needed a racial war.  So what do they do?  Germany was left holding the bag after WWI, they were put in economic disaster and allowed Hitler to come out of the ashes.  The jews became the scapegoat.  They prevented jews from moving to any other European countries.  Even the U.S. would not accept them.  The Germans created camps to hold the jews in Eastern Europe until the end of the war and the migration to Israel skyrocketed.  Even the jewish star on the flag of Israel is a made up design by the Rothschilds.   

[dog53]

Dog, you really twisted the Balfour Declaration.  First off, you might want to say that the Declaration happened in the midst of WWI and not at the end as some sort of treaty for the homeland of the jews.  It was a deal that the wealthy Rothschilds, who basically stole the Bank of England through trickery in Napoleon's War, would ruin England if Balfour did not promise Palestine which was not even held by England at the time.  Balfour had no choice but to take the Zionists deal.  After WWI they couldn't get enough Jews to move to the shitty desert.  The Jews were happy in beautiful Europe.  The Zionists needed a racial war.  So what do they do?  Germany was left holding the bag after WWI, they were put in economic disaster and allowed Hitler to come out of the ashes.  The jews became the scapegoat.  They prevented jews from moving to any other European countries.  Even the U.S. would not accept them.  The Germans created camps to hold the jews in Eastern Europe until the end of the war and the migration to Israel skyrocketed.  Even the jewish star on the flag of Israel is a made up design by the Rothschilds.   

 

Hey R-dad  I didnt twist it.

The history books did.

All I did was copy and paste 

 

You should get a hold of all those historical authors and let them know they got it all wrong.  

[rothsdad]

We have all been fooled in this game to bring war upon one another.  The only way for the foolishness to end to not believe ANYTHING you read in the history books or see on TV.  

[dog53]

We have all been fooled in this game to bring war upon one another.  The only way for the foolishness to end to not believe ANYTHING you read in the history books or see on TV.  

 

Believe me when I say Roth I believe no one I trust no one.

I am a native american who lives in a town where there is this big statue of George armstrong custer 

and he is celebrated as a hero. My grandchildren are taught that this was man is to be respected.

I teach them that this is a man who decorated his saddle horn with the private parts   of indian squase  

that he murdered.  I know that you and flat both have a problem with the zionist. Who`s right and who`s wrong I coulnt tell you.

But Im betting you or flat  really cant either.  But its sure as hell a good read aint it   

Edited September 3, 2014 by dog53

[Catalina]

Believe me when I say Roth I believe no one I trust no one.

I am a native american who lives in a town where there is this big statue of George armstrong custer 

and he is celebrated as a hero. My grandchildren are taught that this was man is to be respected.

I teach them that this is a man who decorated his saddle horn with the private parts   of indian squase  

that he murdered.  I know that you and flat both have a problem with the zionist. Who`s right and who`s wrong I coulnt tell you.

But Im betting you or flat  really cant either.  But its sure as hell a good read aint it   

Eloquent as always !

[Thaiexpat]

OK...just curious, though, as to the comparative DNA testing method of the ORIGINAL semitic people?..........

Sorry, I was a bit vague in my original reply. To my understanding (and please forgive me, as I am going by memory from an article I read about 1-2 years ago) is that they tested the DNA of various groups of people who had been living there their whole lives (both jews and arabs and could prove their heritage back a bit) and compared it to the folks who were "Israeli" and claiming Jewish ancestry. What the researchers found is that the "real local" folks had better matching DNA (therefore, were of similar background) then those who claimed to be of Jewish ancestry. In fact, the vast majority of them had backgrounds of Russian, central European descent. So the claim is that the current PALS are closer to the original folks then those claiming some right to the area. I think I fall into the latter category myself. Possible convert to Judaism in my family happened in the 1700(??) as far as my brother can ascertain (and hell, he works for the CIA, so whom better to get info about anyone/thing) as we have no further proof of a lineage prior to that. Therefore, if I was to become an Israeli citizen (God FORBID), would I have a "right" to steal land from the original people there? I, for one, don't think I have a RIGHT to their land unless I buy it properly. Stealing is stealing. At least, as taught by my JEWISH parents.

Again, I am sorry I don't have the specifics of the study. It was from an English research group a year or 2 back. Dunno, just saying.......

Believe me when I say Roth I believe no one I trust no one.

I am a native american who lives in a town where there is this big statue of George armstrong custer 

and he is celebrated as a hero. My grandchildren are taught that this was man is to be respected.

I teach them that this is a man who decorated his saddle horn with the private parts   of indian squase  

that he murdered.  I know that you and flat both have a problem with the zionist. Who`s right and who`s wrong I coulnt tell you.

But Im betting you or flat  really cant either.  But its sure as hell a good read aint it   

I thought he was a GENERAL. Why would he be carrying PRIVATE parts??? Trying to relate to the enlisted guys, was he? Dunno, just asking........and I have a problem with Zionist too....

[dog53]

Sorry, I was a bit vague in my original reply. To my understanding (and please forgive me, as I am going by memory from an article I read about 1-2 years ago) is that they tested the DNA of various groups of people who had been living there their whole lives (both jews and arabs and could prove their heritage back a bit) and compared it to the folks who were "Israeli" and claiming Jewish ancestry. What the researchers found is that the "real local" folks had better matching DNA (therefore, were of similar background) then those who claimed to be of Jewish ancestry. In fact, the vast majority of them had backgrounds of Russian, central European descent. So the claim is that the current PALS are closer to the original folks then those claiming some right to the area. I think I fall into the latter category myself. Possible convert to Judaism in my family happened in the 1700(??) as far as my brother can ascertain (and hell, he works for the CIA, so whom better to get info about anyone/thing) as we have no further proof of a lineage prior to that. Therefore, if I was to become an Israeli citizen (God FORBID), would I have a "right" to steal land from the original people there? I, for one, don't think I have a RIGHT to their land unless I buy it properly. Stealing is stealing. At least, as taught by my JEWISH parents.

Again, I am sorry I don't have the specifics of the study. It was from an English research group a year or 2 back. Dunno, just saying.......

I thought he was a GENERAL. Why would he be carrying PRIVATE parts??? Trying to relate to the enlisted guys, was he? Dunno, just asking........and I have a problem with Zionist too....

 

Well I guess thats your problem doc not mine. Yes your right he need all the private parts he could find since he did not have any of his own.   

[Maggie123]

This ties in with my thread of the William Casey quote, does it not?

 

 

It Sure Does...

 

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."

 

~ William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)

[umbertino]

Dog, you really twisted the Balfour Declaration.  First off, you might want to say that the Declaration happened in the midst of WWI and not at the end as some sort of treaty for the homeland of the jews.  It was a deal that the wealthy Rothschilds, who basically stole the Bank of England through trickery in Napoleon's War, would ruin England if Balfour did not promise Palestine which was not even held by England at the time.  Balfour had no choice but to take the Zionists deal.  After WWI they couldn't get enough Jews to move to the shitty desert.  The Jews were happy in beautiful Europe.  The Zionists needed a racial war.  So what do they do?  Germany was left holding the bag after WWI, they were put in economic disaster and allowed Hitler to come out of the ashes.  The jews became the scapegoat.  They prevented jews from moving to any other European countries.  Even the U.S. would not accept them.  The Germans created camps to hold the jews in Eastern Europe until the end of the war and the migration to Israel skyrocketed.  Even the jewish star on the flag of Israel is a made up design by the Rothschilds.   

Rothsdad...I really appreciate that. Grazie. Knowledge is indeed Power.

Among many other things...Zionists did invite King Hussein of Jordan's Grandfather to go talk to them...He did go....and they killed him. Dirty game in the least

Also... Israel is one of the very few  or  maybe the only country in the world with no Constitution and no definite, clear, exact borders.

Edited September 3, 2014 by umbertino

[rothsdad]

Thank you Umbertino.   You are right about the lack of borders in Israel because the plan is to make Israel much larger.  If they set borders then they are boxed in and set.  

I find it very honorable for people like Thaiexpat to speak honest about the situation in Israel.  You never see on the news the jews who are actually protesting the actions of the Israeli government.  There were thousands protesting in Tel Aviv a few days ago.  Very honorable people.  

http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Politics-And-Diplomacy/Left-wing-protesters-to-stage-Tel-Aviv-rally-say-wont-be-intimidated-by-far-rightists-371259

Edited September 3, 2014 by rothsdad

[flatdawg]

One of the reasons I brought this here was to show that the zionist, from the beginning, have never lived up to their end of the bargain.

This week bibi refused to send a delegation to negotiate a plan for peace that the cease fired called for. bibi, and the zionist, don't want peace. Never did. They want an even greater(land wise) israel.

Meanwhile, his poll numbers are dropping rapidly with israelis, and Hamas' numbers are rising with Palestinians. This sure hasn't gone the way bibi wanted it to.

[flatdawg]

I reckon this is as good a place for as any other.

Q. Who do you call a person that doesn't hate jews buts critiques israeli policy?

A. A Jew hater.

[dog53]

I reckon this is as good a place for as any other.

Q. Who do you call a person that doesn't hate jews buts critiques israeli policy?

A. A Jew hater.

 

 

There was only one answer ?   

If your gonna make it a multiple answer question 

Ya gotta have more then one answer 

[flatdawg]

You silly dog, Q=question, A=answer.

Course, B=flatdawg.

Better?